Abstract
This paper looks at the Newtonian Universe, laws of gravity, the development of calculus, the laws of motion and the idea of the clockwork universe.

From the Paper
"Sir Isaac Newton was considered by many the most important figure in the development of modern science, and his accomplishments covered a broad scope, from fundamental contributions to physics and astronomy, to the invention in parallel with Liebnitz of the mathematical field of calculus and Newtonian mechanics which came to be regarded as the ultimate explanatory science. Sir Isaac Newton changed the understanding of the universe with his three laws of motion."

Tags:gravity, clockwork universe, calculus, laws of motion

Abstract
This paper explores the metaphysics of Newtonian space-time, with the aim to discover the true meaning of Newton's three laws of motion. The common misconception is that the "universal" laws pertain to a universal and objective reality, whereas they pertain to nothing more than a certain method of setting up experiments, and this the paper aims to establish. It also shows how this throws light on the interpretation of quantum mechanics, and then draws significant parallels between classical physics and the modern philosophy of existentialism.

From the Paper
"Newton's laws of motion have a subtext that always escapes scrutiny at the first instance. This is Newtonian space-time, the metaphysical framework that underpins the laws. This framework consists of three spatial dimensions, chalked out as perpendicular to each other and emerging from a unique origin of coordinates. This is Cartesian space. If we add to this the extra dimension of linear time we obtain Newtonian space-time. The laws of motion make sense only when we assume them to be taking place in Newtonian space-time. And when we add the epithet "universal" to the three laws of motion then we have underhandedly made Newtonian space-time infinite in all 6 dimensional directions and have mapped this framework to reality."

Tags:quantum, mechanics, laws, of, motion, universal, existentialism

Abstract
This paper helps to explain and justify the creation of calculus. Isaac Newton helped to solve some of the most perplexing problems the world has imagined, and the method he used in doing so is still used for the same purpose today. Newton's creation of calculus and ideas of using it to prove the universal laws of nature made human reason the most powerful method of thought and most definite route to seeking the truth.

From the Paper
"In mathematics, a certain surprising thing happens again and again. Someone poses a simple question, a question so simple that it seems no useful result can come from answering it. And yet it turns out that the answer opens the door to all kinds of interesting developments, and gives great power to the person who understands it." (Saywer 3) This quote from a prestigious professor of mathematics parallels the story of Isaac Newton and his development of calculus. Isaac Newton helped to solve some of the most perplexing problems the world has imagined, and the method he used in doing so is still used for the same purpose today. There is a popular myth that Newton was sitting under a tree when an apple fell from it, and he asked himself what force could pull the apple to the Earth. Whether this story is true or not is uncertain, but the image is clear of Newton getting hit on the head with the apple of epiphany. He used calculus to prove that gravity pulled objects to Earth and held the planets together, and also to prove his world-renowned three laws of motion. By forming this revolutionary method of problem solving, Newton not only paved the way for new roads in mathematics but also changed the way that people thought and sought out answers. Newton's creation of calculus and ideas of using it to prove the universal laws of nature made human reason the most powerful method of thought and most definite route to seeking the truth.

Tags:calculus, impact, Newton, physics, social, mathematics, Isaac, apple, problem, solving

Abstract
Aristotle was a brilliant philosopher, but many of his scientific beliefs have been proven to be incorrect. One example is the fact that Aristotle believed that the earth was the center of the universe. Regarding Aristotle's views on the idea of motion, he was in conflict with another Greek thinker named Zeno who had attempted to analyze the motion of an object as a series of "still frames." Aristotle did not believe that motion could occur this way. This paper delves into Newtonian science and quantum physics and tries to understand Aristotle as a philosopher.

Abstract
The purpose of the universe has been seen from many angles in human history. The scientific view of the purpose of the universe has fluctuated together with various epochs and the philosophies connected with these epochs. Various philosophies of the purpose of the universe, and whether indeed the universe does have a purpose, are discussed.

From the Paper
"Cosmology, or the study of the universe, originated in Mesopotamia. The philosophy of the time was that the earth was the center of the universe. Main philosophers of the time were Aristotle and Ptolemy. Because of Aristotle's power, this view of the world remained relatively uncontested until 1543. This philosophy also made the idea of the purpose of the universe fairly simple. The universe existed for human beings, who were created at the center of it. The understanding of the world, being simple, was therefore unproblematic. It therefore might be not only Aristotle's power but also the basic human need to feel that there is a purpose to things that perpetuated this view."

Tags:cosmology, science, aristotle

Abstract
This paper explores the fate of the universe. The writer looks back to the origins of the universe to see how it all started and what has been happening since then. In this article the writer explores some of the predictions for the future, the main one of which is that the universe will go on expanding forever.

From the Paper
"Before one can speculate on the fate of the universe, one must first look back to how it began. The modern version of the 'Big Bang' theory is that a massive explosion created all the mass and energy in the universe and also the fabric of time-space, which inflated rapidly after the big bang but then slowed down and the universe cooled down. The temperature dropped within minutes and free-roaming quarks formed protons and neutrons, some of which coalesced into the nuclei of simple elements."

Tags:Big Bang, Big Splat, Big Rip, cosmological constant, neutrinos, gravity

Abstract
This paper discusses how the creation of the universe has been a controversial topic since its inception and how scientists now accept the 'big bang theory' as the most likely origin of the universe. It also looks at how there are other theories, such as the steady state theory,
that also endeavor to explain our existence. The paper attempts to show that although both theories share certain bases such as the violation of the first law of thermodynamics, the big bang theory is the more probable theory as to how the universe formed.

From the Paper
"The Big Bang is believed to have happened 13.7 billion years ago, marking the beginning of space and time. It suggested that the universe violently exploded into existence, and it continued to expand and cool, condensing and growing in both size and temperature, eventually forming the universe we know today. To this day, the universe continues to expand. The Big Bang theory has quite a bit of evidence backing it up, such as Hubble's Law- suggesting that the universe is constantly expanding and compacting through time. Or the discovery of Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson, both radio-astronomers, that 2.735 Kelvin CMB radiation can be found in the universe, a leftover of the Big Bang. Also, the sheer amount of large 'light elements' such as hydrogen and helium in combination to form deuterium, which is believed to be created at the Big Bang. This evidence led scientists to accept the Big Bang theory as the most probable origin of the universe.
"

Tags:perfect cosmological principle First Law of Thermodynamics energy spectrum

Abstract
This paper discusses the origins of the universe using the theory of the inflationary model. It discusses the concept of the fine tuning of the universe and defines and explains the anthropic principle. It discusses how the anthropic principle does provide a useful explanation of the universe, despite the fact that it appears to be a weak concept initially.

From the Paper
"So many strong coincidences on the universal level can hardly be explained by random chance. For example, it may be possible for a player to get a royal flush once, but when it happens repeatedly, it becomes clear that there are unaccounted factors, such as cheating. Similarly, to call the perfection of these various quantities coincidence is quite a stretch. It can only be convincingly explained as a tailoring towards life. On the more terrestrial level, it is the exact opposite; there is virtually no evident fine-tuning for life as far as we know. Together, these result in an overall moderate tailoring of the universe towards life. This fine-tuning logically leads to the weak anthropic principle, which offers an explanation for the basic, "first principles" of the universe, providing us with the answer to "why" instead of "how," purpose rather than method."

Tags:random, coincidence, expansion

Abstract
This paper explains that philosophers debate, based on Newtonian Determinism, from two views with opposite implications for human life and moral judgment, whether humans genuinely have free will. The author points out that, according to the Hard Determinism point of view, since every individual event is a necessary result of prior causes, the eventual outcome of every single event, which occurs in the universe, is predetermined. The paper relates that Soft Determinism accepts the overall premise that all events in the universe are indeed completely necessary and unchangeable results of events and conditions that precede them, but the distinction between Hard and Soft Determinism is that the latter postulates that free will and the genuine ability to make decisions and to shape our own lives in an ongoing manner are nevertheless possible.

Table of Contents
Introduction
Hard Determinism
Implications of Hard Determinism
Soft Determinism
Implications of Soft Determinism
Conclusion

From the Paper
"The argument is that only inanimate objects and events (such as the tides, earthquakes, and the solar orbits of the planets) are completely determined by preceding natural conditions and events in the manner that the course of Osmo's life was charted before he lived it. On the other hand, under soft determinism, internal living processes (especially human thoughts) are still subject to free will and mental choices by which sentient beings may determine what happens in their lives, despite the fact that the rest of the (inanimate) universe strictly obeys the principles of hard determinism.

Tags:osmo, quantum, dilemma, hawking, free-will

Abstract
This paper explains that organizations are becoming aware of the serious need to cope with and quickly adapt to change; therefore, they increasingly are turning to chaos theory in order to understand and manage change in a dynamic business environment. The author points out that chaos theory, also known as non-linear systems theory, is based on the premise that the world is made up of complex systems that are non-linear, dynamic, unstable and unpredictable, contrasting sharp with Newtonian science, which believed that the universe functioned in an ordered, stable, linear and predictable manner. The paper relates that chaos theory has led to organizations being viewed as organic or living systems that will find orderly solutions if they are allowed to do so; however, organizational management needs to be more sensitized to environmental changes, leading to flexibility, responsiveness, dynamism and a reduced reliance on precise planning.

From the Paper
"True, that discerning the underlying structure of the complex systems that bring about change is often difficult because there are a number of myriad factors involved. However, chaos theory is nevertheless useful in understanding and managing what was previously considered to be uncontrollable, chaotic events and behavior. This is achieved by defining chaos as "the range of behaviors that deterministic processes can adopt." One such deterministic process is deemed as the organizational culture and structure itself. Indeed, this is precisely the reason why modern organizations are moving towards decentralized, leaner, flatter structures that allow for employee empowerment, self-organization and emergence."

Tags:nonlinear, systems, unpredictable, organic, flexibility