Abstract
The following paper will look at NCAA rules violations in Division One and explore two things: the extraordinary difficulty which accompanies trying to remove a coach found in violation of NCAA rules - and the extraordinary pressure placed upon those coaches to win, pressure which can lead them towards taking action they would not take otherwise. Over the next few pages, a brief overview will be undertaken of the Jim O'Brien controversy at Ohio State and the later controversy at Indiana involving Kelvin Sampson. At the same time, the paper will look at just how wide-spread NCAA violations are - as perceived by college coaches in a seminal poll taken at the end of the 1980s - and the paper will conclude by looking at the pressures placed upon coaches to win. These pressures, suffice it to say, will often lead them to look the other way when a student is struggling academically, just as they will compel them to engage in recruitment exercises that are, officially, beyond the pale. In the end, until the commercialization of college athletics is diminished (or at least something is done to relieve some of the pressure on coaches), these problems will continue.

From the Paper
NCAA Rules Violations in Division One The following paper will look at NCAA rules violations in Division One and explore two things: the extraordinary difficulty which accompanies trying to remove a coach found in violation of NCAA rules - and the extraordinary pressure placed upon those coaches to win, pressure which can lead them towards taking action they would not take otherwise. Over the next few pages, a brief overview will be undertaken of the Jim O'Brien controversy at Ohio State and the later controversy at Indiana involving Kelvin Sampson. At the same time, the paper will look at just how wide-spread NCAA violations are - as perceived by college coaches in a seminal poll

Tags:ncaa, rules, violations

Abstract
The firing in 2004 of Ohio State Buckeye basketball coach Jim O'Brien provides an example of the all too common practice in NCAA Division 1 sports of violating recruiting rules by providing financial assistance during the recruiting process. According to the Illinois Business Law Journal (2006) Ohio State University officials announced in 2004 "that they were firing then-coach Jim O'Brien because of NCAA violations that allegedly breached O'Brien's contract with Ohio State. O'Brien was the head coach for the men's basketball team, and was fired for loaning out $6,000 to a foreign player who the University was trying to recruit."

From the Paper
NCAA Division 1 Rules Violations The firing in 2004 of Ohio State Buckeye basketball coach Jim O'Brien provides an example of the all too common practice in NCAA Division 1 sports of violating recruiting rules by providing financial assistance during the recruiting process. According to the Illinois Business Law Journal (2006) Ohio State University officials announced in 2004 "that they were firing then-coach Jim O'Brien because of NCAA violations that allegedly breached O'Brien's contract with Ohio State. O'Brien was the head coach for the

Tags:ncaa, rules, violations

Abstract
This paper provides two essays on compliance with NCAA regulations and bylaws. The first essay describes the issue of drug abuse at Baylor University and discusses the NCAA penalties imposed as a result. The second essay studies the University of Nebraska's violation of NCAA gambling regulations and bylaws.

Tags:honesty, ethics, unethical conduct, institutional control, sanctions, penalties, infractions committee, college athletics, wrestling, football, benefits, marijuana

Abstract
This essay discusses the process by which the Bowl Championship Series (BCS) in NCAA Division-I football chooses which teams play in which games. The article argues that though the BCS already uses a complex process by which to determine a playoff system, the process is biased and needs further change. It discusses the complaints of current bodies that are urging the BCS to change its method, as well as the various arguments why the change in the playoff system is necessary.

From the Paper
"The BCS system is heavily weighted to schools in the big conferences. This represents a detriment to the other schools, and can result in athletes leaving those schools early to join the professional ranks. Hawai'i lost two of its receivers following its bowl game success, as they felt that the program would not be as good the following year and would therefore hurt their draft status. Neither of these players, Davone Bess and Ryan Grice-Mullen left college early because the BCS system essentially told them their draft status had peaked. The result is that neither player finished their degree. Bess has found work with the Miami Dolphins, but Grice-Mullen was cut by Chicago. A more equitable system may have encouraged such players to stay, but under the current system anything a non-BCS school like Hawai'i needs to have an exceptional year for its players to be noticed. College football players are becoming physically mature, but may not be emotionally mature. When the prospect of an NFL draft selection is dangled in front of a player who is unlikely to appear in a BCS bowl game, it represents a powerful temptation."

Tags:media, college football, playoff system

Abstract
Jeremy Bloom, a football player at the University of Colorado, was ruled ineligible to play for the team because he had accepted paid endorsements for professional skiing. The NCAA was the one that made the ruling, and they determined that anyone who is paid for endorsements is not allowed to play in college sports. This paper explains that there is some discussion and dissent as to whether this should be the ruling in cases like Bloom's, since the sport that he received paid endorsements for was distinctly and clearly separate from the sport that he played at the University of Colorado. It shows that there has been much discussion into this issue because there are those that are very serious about whether this ruling was accurate, and there are two sides to the argument, both of which are dealt with in this research.

Outline
Introduction
Statement of the Problem
Significance of the Problem
Review of Related Literature
Discussion of Source Materials
Body of the Report
Summary and Conclusion

From the Paper
"Naturally, this is very important to Jeremy Bloom but there are bigger considerations as well. The ruling that the NCAA has regarding this type of paid endorsement and all of the other rulings that the NCAA has regarding college athletes affect not only Bloom but thousands of individuals that attend college across the United States and play sports as well. Most of these individuals are not affected by this particular ruling because they are not competent in another sport to the point where they are being offered endorsement money for professional things."

Tags:professional, athlete, sport

Abstract
This paper studies sports law and its relationship to the NCAA. The paper focuses on anti-trust legislation and the monopolization of the NCAA choosing basketball teams to attend postseason tournaments. The paper cites a recent case (which was settled out of court) in which the NCAA was sued for monopolistic practices by a consortium of five New York colleges known as the NIT.

From the Paper
"The issue at hand in this analysis of sports law is anti-trust legislation and business monopolies. Rule of Law Antitrust lawsuits are brought against companies that are thought to maintain a monopoly in an industry because the company has..."

Tags:athletics, unfair competition, ESPN, universities

Abstract
This paper describes the role of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) in making sure that the purpose of colleges is not corrupted by the high-dollar sports industry. The paper also describes some of the problems that arise from the NCAA's effort to fulfill that role.

From the Paper
"It is important to understand the particulars of the crimes committed before one can properly begin assigning culpability. The University of Alabama has been involved with so many incidents of this nature in the past decade that it would be impractical to visit each one. Alabama is a good model to show the effects of greedy boosters and coaches, because they have an infraction for each category of misconduct under scrutiny. Logan Young of Memphis and two other boosters were involved in several acts of recruiting misconduct involving several Memphis area high school players. (Birmingham1) Young was a wealthy Memphis area booster who prided himself on being a "recruiting junkie", and was in the business of providing the University of Alabama football program with "blue chip" high school athletes. (NCAA)"

Tags:extracurricular, activity, amateur, sports, professional, ranks, leagues, lucrative, industry

Abstract
This paper will seek to understand the sociological implications in the NCAA Intercollegiate Sports violations and probation for Southern Methodist University. By understanding the literature that has been created from this scandal, we will explore the various problems of this violation in the sociological spectrum. Also, and explanation of actual modus operandi, which was brought forth by the NCAA, will be investigated, as to why this event occurred. The basis for this study will be to over the reasons for an event like to happen, and to clarify its actions in the realm of sociological research.

Abstract
This paper reviews the debate between the NCAA (National Collegiate Athletics' Association) and black leaders over the discriminatory effect of NCAA Proposition 16. The author points out that the basic conflict is between black coaches and civil-rights leaders vs. college presidents and officials of the NCAA . The paper concludes that the problem lies with the structure and relationship between college and professional level athletics.

From the Paper
"The debate over the National Collegiate Athletics' Association's NCAA Proposition raged largely between black coaches and civil-rights leaders versus college presidents and officials of the NCAA. These two groups had faced off before over ..."

Tags:NCAA, proposition 16, proposition 48, racial discrimination, college sports, athletics

Abstract
This paper examines the issue of performance enhancing drugs in the form of over the counter nutritional supplements. In particular it talks about ephedra, androstenedione (andro) and creatine within the context of the sports world today. It discusses the pharmacology of all three, their health risks and why the NCAA have chosen to legalize or illegalize these three drugs. They are all legal to purchase without a prescription, but ephedra and androstenedione have been banned by a majority of sports governing bodies and creatine has caused more problems than any nutritional aid has ever caused a sport governing body.

From the Paper
"Androstenedione is also known as Andro or the Mark McGuire drug. Shortly after breaking the homerun record, "Big Mac" came out and said that he used the supplement to gain a competitive advantage. Andro gives an athlete this "competitive edge" by working in a way similar to anabolic steroids. It is what is called a pro-hormone. It is part of the final product, testosterone. The supplement is supposed to increase the amount of testosterone in men much the same way as anabolics, but with out going to the extremes of pure anabolic steroids. A person could think of it as light steroids, except for the fact that it doesn't work. It has been proven however to increase the levels of estrogen in the male system. This can cause many steroid like side effects, but without steroid like strength gains (Sports, 2001). "

Tags:ncaa, prescription, hormone, drugs, competitive, advantage