An examination of the British healthcare system, from it's inception to its current challenges.
Research Paper # 92328 |
1,570 words (
approx. 6.3 pages ) |
5 sources |
MLA | 2007
|
$ 30.95
More information
|
New! Look inside the paper
|
Add to cart
Abstract
The paper discusses the NHS, and describes how, in spite of inadequate budgets, both infant mortality and life expectancy rates are comparable to other modern Western countries. The paper explores how, at the same time that costs are soaring, the number of people needing services is rising, but those contributing to the social security funds are shrinking. The paper concludes that, while the NHS solved a medical emergency in 1948 when it was founded, it will have to continue to grow and evolve, and continue to find creative solutions to the problems it will face in the future, if it is to remain a viable health care solution for Great Britain.
From the Paper
"Great Britain also struggles with emergency care. In a hospital study conducted in 2003, NHS evaluators evaluated a hospital in the town of Hackney to see whether it met the government's target of a maximum of a four-hour wait for emergency care before either being admitted or released. The hospital performed quite well. However, the hospital knew the evaluation was coming. It pulled medical staff from other departments. The director of the hospital acknowledged that the hospital could not sustain that pace over time and that they had taken extraordinary lengths to keep the emergency room better staffed than it was typically."
Tags:restructured, control, costs, redistribution, long-term, planning, government, bureaucracy
An analytical comparison of the health care systems in the US, UK, and Canada and a discussion of nationalized health care in general.
Comparison Essay # 128526 |
3,802 words (
approx. 15.2 pages ) |
9 sources |
MLA | 2010
|
$ 62.95
More information
|
New! Look inside the paper
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper provides a detailed overview of the health care systems in the United Kingdom (UK), Canada, and the United States (US), including the perceptions of the citizen who experience the highest degree of illness. In response to the question of whether nationalized health care can be a public good, the paper states that when dealing with the concept of universal or nationalized health care, where a government has decided that all or nearly all citizens have a right to access care and it is funded through some form of government compensation program, health care then becomes a non-excludable public good that can be consumed by multiple consumers. The author also shares personal experience of health care in the US, and suggests how the situation would have been handled differently in the UK or Canada. The paper concludes that the true test will be if the plan can find a balance between the high rates of patient satisfaction found in nationalized plans, without sacrificing the choice and arguable benefits of a relatively open market system.
Outline:
Introduction
Purpose of Paper
A Framework for Comparison
Literature Review
Canada
Overview of the Canadian System
Health System View Among Sicker Adults
Great Britain
Overview of the United Kingdom's National Health Service
Health System View Among Sicker Adults
United States
Overview of the System
Health System View Among Sicker Adults
Can Nationalized Health Care Be A Public Good?
Personal Experience
Summary
Works Cited
From the Paper
"As the number of uninsured citizens grows increasingly closer to 50 million, which is approximately 15% of the population, improved health care coverage has dominated the American political debate, (Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 2006). Understanding the benefits and disadvantages of nationalizing certain aspects of the American health care and health insurance markets is a topic that should interest many Americans, as it could impact on how we seek health care for many years to come. Several of the perceived advantages to expanding coverage through some form of government plan are; access to health care that is currently unavailable to the uninsured; a perceived reduction in costs to the consumer, and a higher satisfaction with the level of health care delivered. All of these seem to be desirable objectives. However, the quest for these improvements may lead to several substantial negative side effects. Increasing health care coverage for US citizens through some form of an interlinked state or federal plan could lead to a reduction in efficiency of the current largely private health insurance market by reducing competition. Therefore, these changes may simply alter how health care is rationed in the US by moving from monetary to time rationing."
Tags:rationing, cost, time, debate, socialized, medicine
A thorough overview of the National Health System in Britain, looking at the history, the present state, and the future.
Research Paper # 47376 |
9,231 words (
approx. 36.9 pages ) |
18 sources |
MLA | 2004
|
$ 114.95
More information
|
New! Look inside the paper
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper begins by providing an in-depth history of Britain's NHS. It identifies problem areas that have emerged in relation to NHS, with an attempt made to address the manner in which such problems have historically influenced reform efforts. It then moves to the present day and examines a summary of the 2000 NHS Plan. It explains the economic and social implications of this plan. It then looks at some of the differences that may exist in health care systems. It reviews the major types of health insurance systems utilized currently within Japan, Sweden, and Canada, and then provides a brief comparison between these systems and the NHS in the UK. It finally looks at where the World Health Organization and health care funding systems fit into the NHS.
Outline
Historical Perspective
Summary of 2000 NHS Plan
Review of Healthcare Systems in OECD Countries
World Health Organization and Health Care Funding
Conclusion
From the Paper
"With the passage and associated provisions of the NHS Act of 1946, NHS was implemented in the UK in 1948. The NHS Act of 1946 served as the means by which a pattern of health service finance and provision was established in the UK following World War II (Baggot, 1998). According to Baggot, on the basis of the Act, the principle of collective responsibility by the state for the establishment of a comprehensive health service system was introduced, allowing for the planned use of services by the entire population at no cost. It was also intended that equality of access to services would be incorporated within NHS as a consequence of the availability of health services at no charge."
Tags:OECD, WHO, budget, economics
A look at an alternative to the current tort-based system in England and Wales.
Research Paper # 29441 |
18,238 words (
approx. 73 pages ) |
37 sources |
MLA | 2002
|
$ 195.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper discusses the issue of the economic effectiveness of tort law in the common law legal system of England and Wales, as applied to medical and clinical negligence and malpractice cases. It looks at how in response to economic concerns and a continual rise in cases, an examination of the consideration of a proposed no-fault alternative to the current system is underway. It explores the basis of the current system, the impetus for change and the characteristics of no-fault reform as experienced by other countries and its pros and cons. The principal aim of tort reform is to limit the legal or financial exposure of the NHS (National Health System) to liability for damages and to streamline the process of compensation for plaintiffs.
Outline
The United Kingdom
Introduction
Statistics Regarding Claims
The National Health System
Obstacles to Due Process
The Case for Reform
The Regulatory Environment
The Rising Cost of Litigation
Lord Woolf's Reforms
More Cost Controls
The United States
Introduction
The St. Paul's Pullout
The Insurance Industry
Tort Reform In America
Fleeing Physicians
Statistics for Error, Injury and Death
The Call for Reform in 2003: A Familiar Refrain
The United States Situation, in Summary
New Zealand Case Studies
The Swedish Scheme
A Comparison: Which System is Better?
First: Underlying Differences
Talking Tort: American Peculiarities
Americans Consider No-Fault
Britain Considers No-Fault
Conclusion
Works Cited
Appendix A
From the Paper
"When St. Paul's, the largest writer of medical malpractice policies, ceased to offer the coverage in 2001-2002, it was the a consequence of the attention that had been focused on the administration of this type of coverage. A 1989 investigation of St. Paul's and one other insurer initiated by Michael Hatch, then Commerce Commissioner of Minnesota, revealed that over a six-year period premiums had increased 300 percent while claims had not. Hatch was quoted as saying the reason for the increase was: "Because they had the opportunity to do it. There was a limited market. People need coverage. The companies knew they had a corner on it, and they raised their rates accordingly." In response, a group of surgeons from Charleston jointly sued St. Paul for "grossly poor management". St. Paul's consequently dropped that type of coverage as part of its portfolio."
Tags:america, britain, medical, clinical, negligence, malpractice
A discussion on the proposal to facilitate new drug approval in Great Britain's National Health Service (NHS).
Term Paper # 149479 |
1,059 words (
approx. 4.2 pages ) |
2 sources |
MLA | 2011
|
$ 22.95
More information
|
New! Look inside the paper
|
Add to cart
Abstract
The paper discusses how the nature of the British healthcare system is to discourage rather than encourage healthcare usage, and this system has created a very cost-efficient model for the UK. The paper explains, however, that this frugality means that bypass surgery, dialysis, and medications in general are much more rarely prescribed in the UK than in the US. The paper relates that to address the problems of under-medication, there has been a proposal to allow drug companies in the UK with "innovative" medicines to bypass the current screening process for cost-effectiveness. The paper points out that this new policy could result in fewer NHS funds for more necessary procedures and drugs that could help more people, but also notes the economic and medical arguments for approving this proposal.
From the Paper
"Private insurance and expanded and expedited care is possible because unlike Canada, Britain allows citizens to hold supplementary insurance. As well as NHS care, patients can opt for care for which either they or their private insurer (or a combination of both) must pay. 11% have some form of employer-provided or private insurance, and "many jobs offer it as a perk" (Klein 2009). "To accommodate this, doctors can have both private and public practices, meaning they can treat patients under public rules complete with queues for non-pressing procedures while, at the same time, be performing the same procedures with quick turnaround for those with supplementary private insurance" (Klein 2005). Unsurprisingly, this has caused a great deal of discontent about such apparent inequality in a system which, at least in spirit, is supposed to be based upon the principle of equal care for all. The tension because of the disparity of quality that exists between public and private care has only been exacerbated in recent years, as expensive and rare drugs and treatments that the NHS will not cover continue to proliferate. Thus, there has been a call for expanded access and coverage to such expensive and innovative care under the NHS--even while funding has been cut."
Tags:medications, pharmacy, healthcare
A review of the inequalities and the injustice present in the U.S. health system.
Research Paper # 94181 |
1,058 words (
approx. 4.2 pages ) |
2 sources |
APA | 2006
|
$ 22.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper takes a look at the U.S. health policies and institutions, intended to treat the sick, take care of the people with disabilities and support the senior citizens. According to the paper, access to the health system is sometimes guaranteed for all citizens, and other times it depends on the contribution made to the health funds. The paper discusses how the quality of health services differ from person to person, depending on their socio-economic status and their personal features (such as race or sex).
From the Paper
"Still, it is more than attitude involved here. The situations can be extremely varied, depending on many factors, from one place to another. In third world countries (and if we only think about the genital mutilation practices still existing in some African countries), or in places where the role of women is of little importance, or where the education is scarce, or where the resources are limited - to discuss about inequalities in health here would be almost redundant, since inequality is part of every aspect of life. Nonetheless, the health system is filled with injustices even in the developed countries, where, for example, the life expectancy is shortened by socioeconomic disadvantages. "
Tags:social, agenda, political, age, economic, disease, socioeconomic, disadvantages
Investigates the marketing of the United States Military Health System (MHS) .
Case Study # 118189 |
1,655 words (
approx. 6.6 pages ) |
8 sources |
MLA | 2009
|
$ 32.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper analyzes the U.S. Military Health System (MHS) and explains that its mission is to deliver the highest quality medical care, anywhere, anytime, that is enacted through an effective strategic plan. The paper specifically analyzes this health organization's effective use the five Ps of marketing. The paper concludes that this marketing mix of the MHS is highly effective in the development of a product that combines value and utility and that it is universal and exclusive to the Department of Defense (DoD) service members, retirees and their families..
Table of Contents:
Introduction
The Strategic Plan of the MHS
The 5 P's
Product
Place
Promotion
Price
Positioning
Conclusion
From the Paper
"The Community Based Health Care Organization (CBHCO), as mentioned above in the products section, is an Army program that enables a soldier to acquire services from medical facilities in the area of their home while remaining on active duty. Prior to the CBHCO program, the place of treatment for the soldier was at an active Army installation, away from their families. The former setup resulted in over-crowding and challenges due the soldiers being away from their families and communities."
Tags:mission, strategy, retirees, umbrella, programs
A look at the history of Nigeria's health care system and the success it has had building a modern one.
Analytical Essay # 33 |
1,430 words (
approx. 5.7 pages ) |
5 sources |
2000
|
$ 28.95
More information
|
Add to cart
From the Paper
"Nigeria's situation is rather typical of contemporary African nations, developed by a strong tribal tradition in a curious mix with the Western culture imparted by colonialism. Public health reflects this curious malady. Medicine in Nigeria was once primarily the job of tribal "medicine men" (Motherland Nigeria 1). Recently, though, Nigeria has developed a modern, Westernized, health care system for the purpose of improving health outcomes of its citizens."
Tags:international
This paper assesses the effectiveness of HMOs (Health Maintenance Organizations) in the delivery of health care to poor and low-income communities.
Research Paper # 26090 |
8,018 words (
approx. 32.1 pages ) |
42 sources |
APA | 2002
|
$ 103.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper presents an extensive review of the effects of HMOs to medical care in the U.S. and England. This paper concludes that HMOs demonstrated that they can be effective in the delivery of health care to any population group, including poor communities and low-income persons and households who live outside of poor communities. The author states that HMOs and other managed care organizations have in the past, are now and likely will continue in the future to sacrifice the care required by any population group that threatens to impinge on the bottom-line of these organizations.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Statement of the Problem
Research Questions
HMOs as Health Care Providers
Access to Care through HMOs
Effects of HMOs and Managed Care on Hospitals and Low-Income Patients
Capitation
Purchaser-Oriented Management and Practice Guidelines
Case Management
Performance Analysis
Medicaid and HMOs: A Direct Impact on Poor Communities and On Low-Income Persons and Households
HMOs and Care Quality
Health Care Delivery in the United States Compared With the United Kingdom
National Health Care System in the UK
Similarities & Differences between the National Health Care Systems in the United Kingdom and the United States
The Case for Universality
Conclusions
From the Paper
"Over the past 50 years, managed care programs have existed such as the Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program (California) and the Health Insurance Plan of New York City. These programs only affected a minority of patients and physicians, until the past six or seven years during which managed care has grown significantly. Rising costs of health care, particularly in industry, and the fact that approximately 15 percent of the United States population lacks health insurance, have provided stimulus for this growth. Health care expenditures account for over 14 percent of the gross domestic product in the United States. Management of medical services is attempted through managed care. It is estimated that around 100 million individuals are now covered by a managed care plan and that 77 percent of employers offer a managed care program."
Tags:managed, care, cost, kaiser, england
A review of the free health services provided in Kuwait.
Essay # 30247 |
2,570 words (
approx. 10.3 pages ) |
17 sources |
MLA | 2002
|
$ 46.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper explores the health system provided by the government of Kuwait. The paper explains how the Kuwaiti government offers free health care to all of its citizens, at any age and in any circumstance. This generous system also extends to the animals and livestock owned by Kuwaiti's. The paper includes an analysis of the medical education system and training for doctors as well as the financing and implementation of it all. The paper also makes some brief comparisons to other countries' health systems.
From the Paper
"The doctors and nurses and medical technicians that implement hands-on health care in the clinics and hospitals are trained in the following facilities: the Faculty of Medicine University (established in 1973); the College of Medical Science and Allied Health (built in 1982); and the College of Pharmacy and College of Dentistry (established in February, 1996). These facilities are the result of an ordinance issued by the Amir in July, 1973; or, in other words, a decree."
Tags:doctor, medical, nurse, livestock, arab, muslim, government, amir, decree