Abstract
The paper looks at the issues behind the use of Napster and similar file-swapping services. This allowed users to download and share copyrighted music without paying. The paper examines the legal and moral issues behind this and discusses the arguments presented. It also offers an explanation of what has now become a common term; being "Napsterized".

From the Paper
"In analyzing the implications of being "napsterized", it is evident that many prospective users of Napster's file sharing system or similar website systems did not want to think about the fundamental ownership and copyright issues involved. They were much more interested in downloading the music files available through Napster and its online imitators. For many of these people, vastly expanding their personal music libraries without the inconvenience of paying the artists and music companies who created their favorite tunes was the only operative factor. Unfortunately, there are more issues involved in this process than wanting music, downloading it, and listening to it. The implications of the peer to peer file sharing movement that Napster pioneered are vast and troubling..."

Tags:napster, and, copyright

Abstract
This paper makes recommendations regarding Napster's business model. The author discusses the Issue of copyright laws. The paper examines the sharing music as MP3 files.

From the Paper
"Napster is an online music service that was originally a file sharing service. Napster made a major impact on the Internet in calendar year when it reached the height of its popularity. The company has a remarkable history. In early ..., Shawn Fanning began to develop an idea of sharing music formatted as MP3 files. He thought of the idea of using a search engine dedicated to finding MP3 files combined with the tools needed to trade files called file sharing. The trick was to share ..."

Tags:Napster, file sharing, peer to peer, online, internet, RIAA, legal case

Abstract
This paper traces the history of the controversial music sharing internet provider, Napster. The bulk of the paper is an actual timeline that literally moves from month to month covering the major developments in the case. A conclusion is offered along with short biographies.

From the Paper
"Napster was established in May of 1999 by 19-year-old Shawn Fanning, 20-year- old Sean Parker, and 23-year-old Jordan Ritter. The program was designed by Fanning so that users could share MP3 music files online, using free software that the user downloads from the Napster website. Napster users share MP3 files online and store downloaded files on their computers for playback at their convenience. This is called peer-to-peer sharing. Napster allows users to search the hard drives of other users for files that they wish to download. The program provides technical support for the indexing and searching of MP3 files, and also provides chat rooms where users can talk to one another while searching for their files."

Tags:case, history, napster, study

Abstract
This paper explains in detail the consumer benefits of trading music files over the Internet on the Napster web site. It provides a historical overview of the growth of the company and its enormous popularity. It touches upon the copywriting controversy being fought in court.

From the Paper
"The Napster is one of the most controversial and popular systems produced by the Internet. Unlike the many dot.com companies that have fallen by the wayside in droves, the controversy surrounding the Napster rages on and its popularity continues to grow. Still, the question remains, is it a form of artistic piracy? Or is it the greatest way for consumers to explore the wide range of musical forms and musical talent in the world and on the web?
The history of the Napster began in January 1999, making it fairly old in terms of Internet chronology. Shawn Fanning created it while he was a nineteen-year- old student at Northeastern University. At present, Shawn Fanning lives in San Mateo, California, just a few minutes from the Napster offices. He rooms with Sean Parker, the twenty-year-old co-founder of Napster Inc. (Rollingstone.com) Their invention allows students to download songs for free from the Internet without buying the band's album, without paying any royalties to either the music company or the musicians who produced the music. At the end of 1999, 20 million Internet surfers had made use of the technology. By 2000, the number increased to nearly 70 million. (CNET News.com)"

Tags:napster, music, industry, copyright, royalties, internet, shawn, fanning, sean, parker, artistic, piracy

Abstract
This paper takes a look at the Napster company which was launched in 1999 by freshman Shawn Fanning. Napster was later shut down in 2001 due to violations of copyright laws. The author gives a brief description of the creation of Napster and explains why, revolutionary at that point of time, Napster changed the face of the entertainment industry forever. The paper also discusses the controversy of whether or not file sharing programs such as Napster are fully violating copyright laws and cause the decline of sales in the entertainment industry.

From the Paper
"In their own defense, Napster claimed that it did not make or sell illegal copies of music, but allowed people to communicate with one another and share information. But the loss of Napster did not stop the music sharing idea; however, it opened the door to a new world of new music sharing programs and methods. Many programmers, such as the ones who developed KazaA and Morpheus, learned from Napster's mistakes and still run the piracy hub on the internet. As a result, a controversy occurred of whether or not Napster and other music sharing programs are the prime reason why music sales have decline in recent years and are fully violating copyright laws. While these events have occurred, it is inaccurate to state that Napster and other piracy programs are solely responsible."

Tags:file sharing, music, entertainment industry, copyright laws

Abstract
This paper examines the famous case of Napster being sued by the RIAA over copyright infringement by their technology that allowed individual users to share personal recordings across the Internet. It looks at the arguments from both sides against restraint, the legal position of both sides and the ethics of the whole episode. It evaluates how Napster's enterprise deprived artists of their rightful profit from their work even though it probably was not the intent upon Napster's entry into the marketplace and whether Napster were really at fault since they posted the copyright rules on their web site.

From the Paper
"The RIAA claimed that Napster did not have any non-infringing uses that were commercially significant. The RIAA also claimed that copying off a television program is different than copying and distributing off a cd. Napster's position was that they were comparable to Sony because they are providing the directory that enables users to use it for non-infringing purposes. In this phase of the argument, both parties made reference to the Universal City Studios v. Sony case. Which determined that it was OK to videotape television shows for personal use. In Sony, why isn't it acceptable to copy music from the Internet for personal use?"

Tags:internet, music, files

Abstract
This six-page undergraduate paper discusses the Napster controversy in terms of analyzing the court briefs prepared by Napster attorneys. Based upon these briefs, and citing the Sony precedent, a legal argument is presented asserting that Napster is not responsible for any possible copyright infringement indulged in by third parties.

Abstract
This paper studies the legal case against Napster, an Internet company that provided a service which allowed users to download and share copyrighted music. The plaintiffs in the case accused Napster of violating copyright laws, and Napster argued that preventing them from offering their service was an infringement of their basic rights. This paper highlights the arguments and issues on both sides of the debate and then discusses the Court's decision on the case, why it made such a decision, and the implications of that decision.

From the Paper
"Music lovers in the US and around the world mourned the death of a cultural phenomenon when the US Court ruled against Napster a year or so ago thereby intermitting the Internet trend of music file swaps. The company had become tremendously popular with 13.6 million US users in 2001 (Ahrens 2002). Napster, a company which developed a service tool that allowed users to swap copyrighted music files through the Internet, created havoc in the music industry for quite sometime until it was sued by music companies who blamed the company for their decreasing CD sales volume."

Tags:sharing, software, tool, record, companies, musicians, exchange, information, data, freely, associate

Abstract
This paper outlines the Napster lawsuit while providing a brief summary of copyright protection laws and legislation. It explores the concept of file sharing technology in general and how this related to Napster Inc. in particular. It takes a look at the Napster court case and all the details surrounding this legal issue. It concludes with an examination of the RIAA's (Recording Industry Association of America) response to copyright infringement.

From the Paper
"In today's information based world, one confrontational issue is the idea of copyright protection and how it is applied to the Internet. With the invention of the Internet and the World Wide Web, sharing files and intellectual properties amongst thousands if not millions of people became much easier. However, one problem that has been associated with this mass distribution of copyright material is the question of who holds the sole ownership of these intellectual properties. Recently, file sharing utilities such as Imesh, Scour, and most notably Napster have come under fire for infringing on copyright laws and regulations. One important ethical and legal question that has been raised is, who holds the rights to these properties. On the plaintiffs side they argue that the original creator of these intellectual properties holds the copyright and is the only one that can determine how and where these properties will be used. On the defendants side they argue that they are nothing more than a file sharing utility. Napster states that they provide a service to people to share files. Napster's argument is that they cannot be held responsible if their users engage in illegal copyright infringement and that Napster should not be held liable. However the Recording industry of America feels that Napster is nothing more than a tool, which makes the lucrative industry of copyright infringement easier."

Tags:compression, copy, mp3, riaa, utility

Abstract
This paper discusses Napster, first started by college student Shawn Fanning in 1999, that facilitated the sharing of recorded songs over the Internet. It shows the way Napster operated until its shut down in September of 2002, due to multiple charges that the website violated copyright infringement. The paper then looks at the void left in the market by Napster and shows how other entrepreneurs are looking for legal ways to enter the market for digitized music files.

From the Paper
"Anticipating the void left by Napster, various other individuals began working on alternatives that would still allow the swapping of music files without violating the law. Ian Clarke, a programmer in England, designed a program to facilitate untraceable files. His program would allow anything to be traded, including pornography. He said that those who made their money on copyrights should just find another way to make their living (Levy, 2000). He did not explain how anyone could profit from writing songs without copyright protection. In addition, what is untraceable now may well be traceable in the future, and it is unlikely that all nations of the world will do away with copyright law."

Tags:MP3, recording, industry