Abstract
An examination of the life of Mohandas Gandhi, his philosophy of non-violence, his religious views, his achievements and his legacy as one of the greatest leaders of the twentieth century. The author discusses Gandhi's vital role in the Indian independence movement, provides a brief historical, religious, and political overview of India, examines factors relating to British imperialism in India, and examines political developments and challenges in India since independence was won from Great Britain in 1947.

Abstract
This paper describes Mohandas Gandhi's background that exposed him to the Jain influences and encouraged his vegetarianism and practice of fasting. The paper also shows how his upbringing in the business caste environment taught him to solve issues without using violence. The paper relates that besides making an impact on human rights in politics, Gandhi has also become a literary source for all to turn to and concludes that his never ending quest for truth, equality and respect has left a legacy for us all.

From the Paper
"To say that Mohandas Gandhi has made an impact on the human rights movement across the world, is an understatement. He has made an impact on an international basis by being a political leader, a human rights leader (sometimes interminably described as a civil rights leader), and a literary contributor. He is best known for this human rights contribution while being a nonviolent political leader. His nonviolent, peaceful legacy is something we can learn from."

Tags:India, human, rights, peace, politics

Abstract
This paper compares and contrasts the philosophies of Mohandas Gandhi and Victor Frankl, including happiness, suffering, freedom and meaning. Support for the analysis is provided from the authors' respective. "Essential Writings" and "Man's Search for Happiness" are examined in detail.

From the Paper
"The respective philosophies of Indian leader Mohandas Gandhi and Nazi concentration camp survivor Victor Frankl share a number of similarities despite their distinctions. Gandhi's principles of freedom through duty, sacrifice and satyagra, his or truth force as leading to freedom are comparable to Frankl's belief that finding meaning in suffering and a purpose larger than one's self produces a state of happiness. However in many aspects of their theories from God and spirituality to happiness and meaning the philosophies of Gandhi and Frankl are distinct..."

Tags:truth force, satyagrahi, India, Nazis, pain, duty, responsibility, god, law, morality, spirituality, sacrifice

Abstract
This paper gives a brief history of the lives of Mohandas Gandhi and Martin Luther King and then notes the differences and similarities in how they conducted their nonviolent resistance movements.

From the Paper
"King became one of the founders of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) in 1957 and also became its President. SCLC was an organization of black churches and ministers that opposed racial segregation. The SCLC supported the NAACP's legal efforts to put an end to segregation through the courts with nonviolent direct action to protest racial discrimination. These activities included marches, demonstrations, and boycotts. The direct action provoked violent responses from whites community that forced the federal government to address the issues of racial injustice and racial discrimination in the South."

Tags:segregation, racial, discrimination, satyagraha, voting, rights, act, civil, rights, movements

Abstract
"As outlined in Chapter 16, "The Struggles for Asia, 1920-1945" Mohandas Gandhi appears to be an unparalleled leader and inspirer of human political motivation. The book implies that Gandhi was responsible for the transformation of the demand for independence into a nationwide mass movement that mobilized every class of society against the imperialist forces of Britain.

From the Paper
"As outlined in Chapter 16, "The Struggles for Asia, 1920-1945" Mohandas Gandhi appears to be an unparalleled leader and inspirer of human political motivation. The book implies that Gandhi was responsible for the transformation of the demand for independence into a nationwide mass movement that mobilized every class of society against the imperialist forces of Britain. As is often the case, the free India that came into being, divided and committed to a program of modernization and industrialization, was not the India of his dreams.

The highlights of his life show a man of action. Born Oct. 2, 1869, in Porbandar, India, in 1893 he went to South Africa to battle for the rights of Indians, an event which would influence his initial struggle in 1915 for India's independence. A..."

Abstract
This paper examines the Bush Administration's invasion and occupation of Iraq from the perspectives of Bill Clinton and Mohandas Gandhi indicating that neither of them would have initiated a preemptive war under such unjustified circumstances. The paper further discusses that Gandhi's advocacy of non-violence would have precluded him from even considering military action, while President Clinton's energetic advocacy of diplomacy and negotiation in the Middle East confirmed that he considered the use of military force to be a last resort, justified only by an immediate threat to American national security.

Tags:clinton, and, gandhi

Abstract
The first of these two essays examines why Mohandas Gandhi, despite having neither an army nor a formal title, was able to turn a small independence movement into a massive campaign that eventually forced the British to agree to India's Independence. The author discusses Gandhi's personal qualities and presents examples of why Gandhi succeeded. The second essay, discusses why Gandhi's non-violence, non-cooperation campaign was a key to India's ultimate success in gaining Independence from the British without a costly war, and explains why this type of civil disobedience tactic is still effective today.

Tags:gandhi, and, non-violence

Abstract
The paper opens by contrasting Nietzsche's view that strength bestows morality with Gandhi's view that self-denial and forbearance are the foundations of morality. The author examines texts written by Gandhi and Nietzsche to reveal further differences between them. These differences include: truth, absolute truth and ascetic ideals. The author concludes that the reality may lie somewhere between the two.

From the Paper
"The issue of the ascetic ideal is addressed by both in these two works, though--as might be expected--in vastly different ways. Nietzsche addresses this very human phenomenon, which can be seen as a natural outgrowth of the so-called "slave morality" that Nietzsche asserts so dominates modern man's life, much more explicitly than does Gandhi, addressing the last of the three essays in Of the Genealogy of Morals specifically to determining the meaning of ascetic ideals. He uses Richard Wagner as an entrance to this topic; specifically, Nietzsche is intrigued by the composers late-life chastity, and muses on its possible causes and/or meanings. After an involved discussion first of the non-existence of some of the oppositions we take for granted, such as that between chastity and sensuality, he goes on to say that even if such opposition did exist that choosing only one side of things (especially chastity) would be boring--it is the opposition that makes life interesting (Nietzsche, sec. 2).
"For Nietzsche, then, ascetic ideals is essentially meaningless: "in the case of an artist, ... [they mean] absolutely nothing!...Or they means so many things, that they amount to nothing at all!" (Nietzsche, sec. 5). His major problem with the logic of the ascetic ideal seems to be that it rejects everything outside the body as unimportant, but then places a major emphasis on refraining from these unimportant things. Nietzsche sees ascetic ideals as a way for the power structure to continue to control people and to have the people think that it is good without even realizing that they are being controlled. Furthermore, he suggests that ascetic ideals are also nihilistic (Nietzsche, sec. 26). Though his rhetoric is often as emotional as it is logical--and sometimes more so--Nietzsche finds a way to dismantle any concept of ascetics as moral."

Tags:morality, passive resistance, ascetics truth

Abstract
This paper examines the influence and spiritual moving actions of Indian leader, Mohandas Gandhi. Through the power of his own spirit, Gandhi was able to make India follow him in the path to independence.

From the Paper
"No Indian since Buddha has so fully captured the imagination, or taught the world as much, as Mohandas Gandhi. As one of the most complex personalities of the 20th century (Rushdie 129), his actions affected the lives of millions of people. His leadership of the movement to end British rule brought about India's independence and introduced a revolutionary new political method.

Few historical figures seemed as unlikely a candidate for memorable greatness as Gandhi. He was a soft-spoken, frail-looking man who would confer with his British adversaries dressed in the traditional Indian dhoti and sandals. Committed to a life of poverty, he occupied no elected office, held no academic distinction and made no scientific discoveries. And yet, upon hearing of his death in 1948, no less a figure than Albert Einstein.."