Abstract
This reaction paper is about Michael Collins, the leader of the Irish Republican Brotherhood, his tactics, model, and his influence on later revolutionaries/terrorists. It looks at Collins' model of political violence.

From the Paper
"Terrorism Having viewed the film Michael Collins and examined a limited sample of scholarly literature on the life of the Irish radical activist himself the purpose of this report is to discuss who and what Michael Collins was ..."

Tags:Michael Collins, revolutionary, Irish, terrorists

Abstract
In this essay, the writer maintains that the legend and reality of the life of Michael Collins is matter of much debate and also a certain amount of mystery. The writer notes that the subject of Collins' motivations and character are dealt with in the film "Michael Collins" directed by Neil Jordan. The writer points out that there is a certain amount of ambiguity with which the film attempts to deal, in that Collins is the instigator of a brutal form of guerrilla warfare used as a reaction against the occupying British forces. The central aim of these actions was to oust the British from Ireland and to achieve an independent Irish Republic. There are two central aspects that this paper attempts to address in light of the view that the film puts forward about Collins. Firstly, the writer notes the view of Collins as an Irish patriot and secondly the writer assesses Collins' methods of retaliation against the British forces in Ireland.

From the Paper
"The film itself leaves little doubt that the tactics that Collins employed against the British, while ethically questionable, were the only tactics that he felt were left to him in the face of the overwhelming force of British domination. At one point in the films he states that he hates the British not because of their nationality, colonial dominance or even their brutality, but because they have left him no choice but to employ harsh tactics that would increase violence and hatred. This reasoning is similar to the rationale behind many other guerilla or terrorist groups and tactics throughout the world. There is also suggestion in the film and the literature that the way that Collins used guerrilla tactics against the British was emulated by other leaders and groups such as Argentinean Marxist revolutionary, Che Guevara."
"This reason for the use of guerilla or terrorist tactics is often given as being inevitable, when a smaller force is faced by an intimidating and overwhelming or numerically superior oppressor that cannot be fought in a conventional manner."

Tags:Ireland, British, forces, patriot, terrorist, group

Abstract
The paper shows how, like most controversial political figures, Collins was both admired and despised. The paper explains that loyal supporters of Collins saw him as a fighter for Irish freedom and independence, while the British and some in Ireland saw him as a violent radical. The paper discusses the film "Michael Collins" by Neil Jordan that illustrates Collin's tactics of guerrilla warfare and shows how violence inevitably has tragic consequences.

From the Paper
"Like most controversial political figures, Michael Collins was both admired and despised. The adage that one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter definitely applies to Collins, for he was idolized across much of Ireland as a patriot, but was condemned by the British as a villain. Loyal supporters of Collins saw him as a fighter for Irish freedom and independence, while the British and some in Ireland saw him as a violent radical."
"In his film "Michael Collins" Director Neil Jordan (1996) portrays the violent final hours of the Easter Rising, during which British troops suppressed the rebellion and executed the Irish leaders by firing squad. Jordan's portrayal of the guerilla tactics of Michael Collins reveals why the British considered him a terrorist, for he targeted the British leadership in Ireland for assassination in order to create chaos and compel the British to grant the Irish independence."

Tags:violence, radical, freedom, fighter, IRA, pro-Treaty, anti-Treaty

Abstract
In this article, the writer discusses the controversial political figure, Michael Collins. The writer points out that Collins was both loved and hated, as in many parts of Ireland he was viewed as a hero while he was considered as an outlaw by the British. The writer maintains that he was seen as a Irish freedom fighter by devoted followers and viewed as a fanatical extremist by others. The writer looks at tactics related to this colorful figure.

From the Paper
"Like most controversial political figures, Michael Collins was both admired and despised. The adage that one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter definitely applies to Collins, for he was idolized across much of Ireland as a patriot, but was condemned by the British as a villain. Loyal supporters of Collins saw him as a fighter for Irish freedom and independence, while the British and some in Ireland saw him as a violent radical."

Tags:issues

Abstract
This paper traces the life of Michael Collins, who, through his courageous involvement in the Irish revolution for independence, as well as his political activity, can be considered one of the greatest Irish heroes of all time. It examines how he was both a visionary and a realist, seeing not only that there was room for change in Ireland, but also that compromise can equal justice. It shows how he was well-respected by the people of Ireland, not only for his bravery and courage, but also for his ability to lead others with confidence and a clear sense of equality. He was a revolutionary leader who, through determination and will, led his country to independence from Britain.

From the Paper
"He returned home to Ireland in December 1916. In 1917, he was elected to the Sinn Fein (Barrett, 1997). The Sinn Fein was, and still is, an establishment which attempts to form a new Ireland based on sustainable social and economic development; genuine democracy, participation, and equality and justice. Collins was elected Member of Parliament as a Sinn Fern candidate in the British General election held in 1918. The party formed a separate Government in Dublin known as Dail Eireann (Loftus, 2003). The British were quick to react and the new government was barred and forced to go underground (Bowden, 1973)."

Tags:sinn, fein, parliament, easter, rising, independence, britain

Abstract
This paper looks at both the movie and book of "Michael Collins", a comparison and contrast of the two are addressed. As well the credibility of both are addressed.

Abstract
This paper is a historical film review that analyzes "Michael Collins" starring Liam Neeson and discusses the movie's historical accuracy. The author includes specific details of the Irish patriot's life, his major role in politics, his military strength, and the attacks he carried out as a member of Sinn Fein.

From the Paper
"The movie Michael Collins is the story of an Irish revolutionary and political leader. He was a leader within the Irish Republican Brotherhood, a leader in the Sinn Fein Movement and a member of its cabinet, a guerrilla leader, and eventually became the Commander in Chief of the Irish Free State Army. The film details the events of his political career, his love life, and ultimately, his death. Collins' goal of course was to take Ireland back from the British after 700 years to form an independent republic for the Irish people."

Tags:britain, churchill, film, ira, ireland, neeson, rebel, revolution

Abstract
"Michael Collins" is an engaging film that looks at the early 20th century Irish patriot. This paper looks at the historical accuracy of the film by comparing and contrasting the events and people in the film with the actual events. It looks at the characters, the events, the political agenda and the implications made throughout the film.

From the Paper
"One of the most dynamic figures in 20th century Ireland was Michael Collins. For centuries heroic leaders tried to free Ireland from Great Britain. Their rebellions plans were spectacular in idea and more spectacular in their failure. While previous revolutionaries were bold yet unrealistic, Collins was able to take on the British and drive them out of Ireland. He was a dynamic leader with a complex personality. While he helped orchestrate a guerilla campaign against the British authorities, Collins hated violence. Collins could be ruthless and compassionate at the same time. He was always ready with a quick joke. This made his personality even tougher to capture. Even with these complexities, Neill Jordan's political goals force him to take too many liberties in depicting key people and events Collins's life."

Tags:20th, century, film, history, ireland, leader, revolution, national, patriot

Abstract
The main points of the essay are outlined as follows: 1. The division of Northern Ireland and the Republic based on Protestants (Unionists) vs. Roman Catholics (Irish Nationalists); 2. Conflict of the numerous attempts to pass the Home Rule Bill; 3. Formation of the IRB and the Easter Rebellion of 1916; 4. The rise of de Valera and Michael Collins to power; 5. de Valera's acceptance of negotiations, leading to further splits, forcing Michael Collins to appear as the bad guy forming the Free State; 6. Civil War. The events leading up to the Irish Civil War make it a very complex and intricate issue. Ireland was divided in numerous ways, three of which were mentioned here: Catholics versus Protestants; for Home Rule versus against Home Rule; and for the Free State and against the Free State. The dream of the republicans was not in vain; the Irish Free State became the Republic of Ireland in 1949. The divisions of Ireland can still be seen today. Northern Ireland is still under the rule of Britain.

From the Paper
"When people think of the division between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, they often think of Protestants versus Roman Catholics. However, this is not true. This is only one of the intricate divisions that has played a role in the separation of Northern Ireland and the Republic. Their own fight for freedom against the British Empire finally drove them to two extreme poles at the negotiation tables, inevitably splitting the country in half. The focus of this paper is how events led into the Civil War and the inescapable division."

Tags:1916, catholics, collins, easter, ira, irb, irish, michael, northern, protestants, valera

Abstract
This paper explains that, despite unlikely odds, devastating difficulty and political misfortune, the Irish Republican Army has and continues to fight both violently and non-violently in an attempt to gain Northern Ireland's independence from Britain and to form a united Ireland. Next, the paper relates the history of the IRA, which was established by Michael Collins following the failure of the Easter Rebellion of 1916. The paper underscores that the IRA, in their attempt through terrorism to eventual achievement full political, social, economic and cultural freedom for all of Ireland, continues to this day as a reminder of an endless bloody fight that has taken so many lives. Sources are listed as end notes and not in a bibliography.

From the Paper
"Eventually, the civil war died out, though the split amongst countrymen never left Ireland. In 1969 and 1970, the IRA split over strategy disagreements, and the provisional IRA was formed. True to the radicals that preceded them, they continued to seek effect through bombings and shootings. One of the most sad and memorable days in Irish history was January 30, 1972. In Derry, protesters were met by British forces who were aiming to stop the protest."

Tags:independence split, conspiracy claims, sinn fein, oppositional action