Papers on "Controversy on Religious Belief" and similar term paper topics

Paper #025481 :: Controversy on Religious Belief
Buy and instantly download this paper now

A comparison of William Kingdon Clifford's essay "The Ethics of Belief" and William James' essay "The Will to Believe".

Written in 2002; 5,217 words; 8 sources; MLA; $ 129.95

Paper Summary:

A look at differing outlooks on religion as seen through the eyes of Clifford (mathematician and philosopher) and James (philosopher and psychologist). The paper asks if James' treatment of Clifford in "The Will to Believe" was fair? Were his arguments against Clifford consistent? Did he take into account all that Clifford wrote in "The Ethics of Belief"? The writer claims that the answer to all three questions is "No". The writer gives a brief exposition of both James' and Clifford's essays and then focuses on James' attack on Clifford.The paper refers to some passages in Clifford's "The Ethics of Religion" and also to James's "The Sentiment of Rationality."

From the Paper:

"The topic of Clifford's paper is revealed in its title. It is about ethics and belief-and that only. It is not about deciding to act, guessing or gambling, nor about hypotheses. According to Clifford, "it is wrong, always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence" (DDR, 181). Put otherwise, whenever we have insufficient evidence, we have a moral duty to suspend judgment and to go on inquiring. Clifford introduces his thesis through two stories. I will give the highlights of only the first one since the second story, though different, adds only reinforcement to the points already demonstrated in the first. A ship owner faces a dilemma; he has doubts as to the seaworthiness of his vessel. He stifles those doubts by working on them, by trying to convince himself that his fears have no ground. He lets the ship sail. It sinks. But our ship owner's culpability goes undiscovered; not a witness survives to tell the tale. And the insurance company pays up. Clifford judges, as the majority of us I am sure would, that the ship owner did wrong. Suppose, he adds, that the belief, nourished and fostered by attention only to favorable evidence (unfavorable evidence not being conducive to establishing the wanted belief), has taken a genuine hold. The verdict, he thinks, still stands. And he is right again. "

Tags: sentiment rationality

More papers on "Controversy on Religious Belief"

1. Paper #094744 :: Textbook Controversy ( 1,228 words; 8 sources; MLA )
2. Paper #074841 :: Religious Pluralism in American Society ( 1,602 words; 3 sources; MLA )
3. Paper #022139 :: The Abortion Controversy ( 2,025 words; 12 sources; )
4. Paper #023182 :: Religious Pluralism ( 567 words; )
5. Paper #065540 :: Religious Intolerance in Germany ( 2,875 words; 10 sources; MLA )

About AcaDemon

We have thousands of high-quality term papers, research papers, essays, book reports and dissertations on every topic. At AcaDemon, you can download those term papers to help you write yours! You can be sure that the term paper, essay, book report or research paper, you download are top-quality, competitively priced and high-level work.

Look for more research papers, essays and book reports on Controversy on Religious Belief

This Free Term Paper Abstract is a part of our Term Paper Library. Here you can purchase research papers, examples of essays, academic dissertations, articles, notes, analytical papers, book reports, stories and poems. We have thousands of persuasive, point-of-view, narrative, critical, compare and contrast and other types of essays in our Library. You can also find here Term papers on "Controversy on Religious Belief", Essays on "Controversy on Religious Belief", Research papers on "Controversy on Religious Belief", Student papers on "Controversy on Religious Belief", Book reports on "Controversy on Religious Belief", Dissertation on "Controversy on Religious Belief", Thesis on "Controversy on Religious Belief", Summary of paper on "Controversy on Religious Belief", Articles written on "Controversy on Religious Belief".