| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "WRITE RESEARCH": |
|
|
Writing a Research Paper, 2004.
An examination of the process of writing a research paper.
911 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 32.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents guidelines for writing a research paper. The paper contends that writing a research paper involves five simple yet important steps: focusing the topic, conducting thorough research, writing a first draft, revising the draft into a well-written composition, and creating a properly formatted final composition. The paper elaborates on each of these five steps.
From the Paper
"Research papers will haunt all students during the course of their educational careers and beyond, depending on their career. Although writing a research paper is never easy, and demands hard work, time, and patience, the task need not be daunting. The process of writing a research paper entails five major steps. First, start with a narrow and focused topic in the area of interest. One of the main mistakes made by beginning writers is attempting to tackle a topic that is too broad. The best research papers have a clear focus and a thesis statement that summarizes it. Second, do all the requisite footwork such as locating bibliographic materials and conducting searches using the Internet and electronic databases. Ideally, all reference materials for the paper should be reputable if not peer-reviewed, from scholastic sources. Blogs might be good starting points for finding initial topics but do not constitute reliable source material. The third stage in the research paper writing process involves the composition of a primary draft. Getting thoughts down on paper without worrying about sounding erudite removes self-censorship and helps the writer overcome mental blocks."
| |
|
Writing a Research Report, 2008.
This paper explores the steps involved in writing a successful research report.
6,473 words (approx. 25.9 pages), 16 sources, MLA, $ 149.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses how writing a research report begins with the selection of a topic and the research of information. The paper relates that writers often outline what they are going to do and then make changes later on. The paper also points out that there are different levels and types of writing and the form of the report, the wording and the tone may depend on what type of report is being written. Additionally, the paper refers to various sources that offer advice on writing and language styles.
Outline:
Introduction
Organizing the Topic
Research
The Writing Process
Other Elements to be Considered
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Writing a report can be achieved in several different ways, but there are certain steps every writer should consider and that may help the writer focus on a topic, develop the evidence needed, and shape the written report to follow. In general terms, the writing process begins with the selection of a subject about which to write. Sometimes the subject is assigned, while at other times it must be selected from something that interests the writer or that he or she thinks they can explain in an interesting way. This is more than just the beginning of the process--it is one of the most important parts of the process because it decides much of what will be done next. If the writer chooses a subject that is too hard to understand, he or she will not be able to explain it to someone else."
| |
|
Research Writing and Writing for a Non-Scholarly Audience, 2008.
A comparison between research writing and writing aimed at non-scholarly audiences, through a close examination of articles by Carol S. Dweck and John O'Sullivan.
1,070 words (approx. 4.3 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the differences between research writing and writing for a non-scholarly audience. The paper points out that the most obvious difference is that the former can be very difficult to read, but the latter is almost always relatively easy to read. However, there are many subtler stylistic differences as well. This essay examines the differences between the two styles of writing, by comparing Carol S. Dweck's research article entitled "The Role of Expectations and Attributions in the Alleviation of Learned Helplessness" with her popular article "Caution - Praise Can Be Dangerous", and with John O'Sullivan's popular article "Put Gay Marriage to 'Covenant' Test". To conclude, the paper examines the reliability of academic versus popular articles. The paper maintains that the former are peer-reviewed, making them likely to be more trustworthy, while popular articles are not necessarily trustworthy.
From the Paper
"One sometimes comes across articles written by the same authors, but written in different styles in order to suit the kind of article being written. Thus, a researcher may write a research article for a scholarly publication, and also write articles for popular audiences. In this way, the researcher is enabled to communicate with a much broader audience. Thus, a researcher who believes her information is very important may make use of the popular media to communicate what she knows. Dweck is an example of such a researcher/author - she is able to write very competently for both audiences. This shows that she clearly has a finely nuanced comprehension of the different stylistic devices employed in the two different kinds of publications. It also affords the opportunity of comparing her writing style in the two different styles of writing."
| |
|
Evaluation of Research Writing, 2005.
Critique of the research methods reported in a journal article authored by Kim M. Henderson and James R. Evans.
1,968 words (approx. 7.9 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents a thorough analysis and critique of research information reported in an article entitled "Successful Implementation of Six-Sigma: Benchmarking General Electric Company" (Henderson and Evans, 2000). The critique covers areas important to research facilitation including, but not limited to, methodology used, formulation of an appropriate research question, significance of reported substantive literature, research design selection, appropriateness of sample data gathering techniques and data analysis, and importance of conclusions drawn.
From the Paper
"Research endeavors must at all times adhere to the rigors of effective or best-fit research practice. Without stringent controls placed on the area of investigation no research endeavor will advance any body of knowledge. To this end all research must be finely tuned and described as to intent or purpose, phenomenon to be assessed and reported upon, and relevance and efficacy of conclusions drawn."
|
| Term Paper # 8176 |
temporarily unavailable
|
|
|
|
How to Write an Essay, 2002.
A step-by step guide of how to write a good research or term paper.
2,720 words (approx. 10.9 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 81.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper considers how to write an essay. It discusses good preparation and content as well structure and general research rules. It reviews each topic in turn from how to write an introduction to how to wrote a bibliography.
From the Paper
"A paragraph should like the complete essay be clear, cohesive and organized each must have a central theme that is always stated in the first sentence of the paragraph. Body paragraph sentences are used to provide different formats of data each is in its own way beneficial to the systemic way of stringing paragraphs together to form essays, clear examples of this would be in the provision of reasons for a particular view point, solid details, major examples, facts, or incidents and anecdotes. By using any of the above examples either collectively or individually the student will be able to provide suitable paragraphs that will support either the topic or thesis statement."
| |
|
Power Writing, 2008.
A research paper that examines whether writing instruction is enhanced with the use of power writing beginning at the kindergarten level.
2,884 words (approx. 11.5 pages), 18 sources, APA, $ 85.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper explores whether the use of power writing improves the literacy development of kindergartners. The paper explains that power writing describes a three-step process that can be applied to all forms of expository, persuasive or personal narrative writing. The paper examines the elements of writing and the essentials for a strong writing program. The paper stresses that literacy goals must begin in the kindergarten classroom and not wait until the children can read and spell correctly.
Outline:
Chapter 1: Introduction
Problem to be Investigated
Purpose of the Study
Importance of the Study
Research Question
Definition of Terms
Chapter 2: Literature Review
What is Writing?
Essentials for a Strong Writing Program
Power Writing
Writing in Kindergarten
Conclusion
From the Paper
"In Ontario, student achievement in writing is assessed by the writing portion of the Grade 3 Assessment of Writing by the Education Quality and Accountability Office (EQAO). The results of these standardized tests are broken down into categories. Students consistently score lowest in the category of "organization of ideas" for the reading and writing segment. Realizing the need for improvement, the school boards, the schools, and the administrators are able to establish and implement a set of strategies and interventions to achieve progress. It is their responsibility to ensure that primary students have the best possible opportunity to become effective writers. Educators know that children's reading and writing achievement at the end of Grade 3 will depend in large part on the reading and writing instruction they receive in Kindergarten, Grade 1 and Grade 2 and so they work collaboratively to ensure seamless progression (Ministry of Education, 2003)."
| |
|
Reporting Research, 2004.
This paper discusses criteria for evaluating research reporting and applies these to a nursing research article.
1,250 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 3 sources, APA, $ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, when performing a critical analysis of another?s research reporting, the reviewer must adhere to the basic principle of evaluation, namely, the structure of the research upon which scientific conclusion is drawn. The author points out that the function of a research report or article is to inform readers about the problem being investigated, the methods used to solve the problem, the results of the investigation, and the conclusions inferred from the results. The paper relates that the writing in research reports must be succinct, objective, and crystalline so that the research can be replicated by those who read it.
From the Paper
"Further, the research investigator failed to mention in the written analysis whether or not the parents were fully informed as to the purpose of the study or its benefits. Again, the investigator fell short of adhering to the principles of ethical research etiquette. In the final analysis, this reviewer is forced to grade the Schultz research with a D grade. Based on the lack of a stated research problem, stated testable hypothesis, appropriate sampling and statistical analysis, and lack of sustainable topical inference the investigation falls short of credible informational importance."
| |
|
The National Writing Project, 2008.
A study proposal to look at the history of the National Writing Project and its implications for today's classrooms.
6,010 words (approx. 24.0 pages), 38 sources, MLA, $ 142.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper traces the early history of the National Writing Project (pre 1974-1984) within a historical framework of educational reform and theory articulated by participants in the Project's first years. It investigates how a small group of innovative educators spanning all levels of education came together across curriculum barriers, across theoretical stances, and individual practices to focus on a new approach to classroom writing and teaching. It also explores the historical education background that led to this innovation, eventually named the National Writing Project, that started as a local (The Bay Area of California) response to problems in the American educational system.
Outline
Statement of the Problem
Purpose of the Study
Research Questions
Research Study Methods
Qualitative/Quantitative Mixed Approach
Participants
Literature Review
Significance of the Research
Proposed Chapters
Bibliography
Appendix A: Informed Consent Letter
Appendix B: Interview Questions
Appendix C: Questionnaire
From the Paper
"Gray and his colleagues felt a need for change due to dismal testing scores for entering students at the college level. They turned from the existing theoretical educational background of Piaget and Skinner through a collaborative effort to offer, "teachers a program unlike any other they had experienced. The BAWP [Bay Area Writing Project] vision, conceived by a small group of classroom teachers, faculty and administrators at UC Berkeley, moved to improve writing in the schools by creating a new model for continuing education, one that recognized the expertise, knowledge and leadership potential of classroom teachers" (Gray and Sterling 1). They were prodded to action by the failure of the profession to understand that writing is fundamental to learning. New teachers were trained to teach reading but not writing. No teacher training courses offered a course in the teaching of writing in any university in the country. "
| |
|
Research Papers, 2005.
An examination of research methods and designs used for a specific article on inhibitors of proteasome dipetidyl boronic acids.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 1 source, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper pays particular attention to substantive qualities (research problem and purpose, research question and accompanying hypothesis/hypotheses, variable identification, supportive literature, conceptual framework), research methodology, research ethics, data interpretation, writing and presentation style and quality of presentation and writing. The paper specifically discusses these issues with regards to an article by Adams, Julian, et al.
From the Paper
"Fairly commenting on an investigator's research endeavor is a task that must be taken seriously. Although it is quite easy to have an opinion of another's research, it is something quite different to be able to evaluate the research activity in terms of topic specificity and soundness, intent or purpose, data analysis, and informational importance. When embarking upon a critical analysis of another's work the reviewer must, at all times, adhere to the basic principle of prudent evaluation; namely, evaluating the structure of the research upon which scientific conclusion are drawn."
| |
|
Web Research, 2005.
A discussion of the positive and negative aspects of internet research.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 10 sources, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the concept of Internet research for writing. The paper delves into the positive aspects of Internet research, such as web sites that are effective in aiding the researcher, and the options available on the World Wide Web. The paper further explores the negative elements of Internet research to include Internet addiction, reputable sites, and plagiarism. The paper provides evidence of the research, and draws conclusions based on factual material.
| |
|
Developing Writing Skills, 2002.
This paper is an essay that can make writing a more pleasant task by developing these writing skills.
1,335 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 0 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents skills that all writers can develop to make writing easier. The author suggests that to overcome writer's block use these techniques: Free writing, taking a break from writing and using outside sources for information. The author proposes that difficulties with organizing and structuring material can be solved by creating an outline, brainstorming and using a specific format. The paper recommends that to polish a paper write a draft and then edit, re-edit and re-edit. An outline is included.
From the Paper
"Writing has often been said to be some of the hardest work in the world that does not directly involve heavy lifting. While the tone of this comment is clearly humorous, it certainly helps to underscore the serious difficulty that writing poses to a wide variety of individuals. Writing can be a truly time-consuming, laborious and unpleasant experience for many people. As such, a large number of intelligent, accomplished and highly competent individuals have serious difficulties with producing a final draft, organization and writer?s block. Writing does not come naturally to a great number of people, and they face an uphill challenge when trying to produce written materials."
| |
|
School Writing Exercises, 2006.
The author of this paper argues that the required writing exercises of diagramming sentences and writing journal entries in school are a useful and helpful method of teaching writing skills.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 2 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper revisits two unhappy memories of exercises done while in grade school and/or high school: the diagramming of sentences and the writing of journal entries. The paper then attempts to persuade the reader that these two activities, while not seen as fun or helpful at the time, were in fact very useful in the writer's development and learning. It is then argued that these same two activities are valid and useful with today's students.
From the Paper
"There are two exercises that I was asked, no forced, to do when I was in grade school and high school that seemed so ridiculous and tawdry at the time that I can still remember my distaste and displeasure whenever they were assigned. I am sure these two activities bring back such unpleasant memories to many people of my age. They are sentence-diagramming and journal-writing. Yet, despite how much I loathed doing either of these while I was a burgeoning student and writer, despite how awful I thought they were, I have come to realize that each activity was quite useful in my development and learning. This essay will argue that sentence-diagramming and journal-writing were both sound steps in this writer's development and could also benefit students of today. The first of these two activities is still mentioned with scorn and even terror from most ex-students' lips even today."
| |
|
Writing Centers, 2007.
An argument in favor of using university writing centers to improve the writing skills of students.
1,526 words (approx. 6.1 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 50.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the pros and cons of using writing centers that are provided by universities in order to improve the writing skills of students. It addresses the misconceptions that students have about university writing centers, particularly focusing on the writing center at Kennesaw State University. The author argues in favor of university writing centers, based on her personal experience and observations.
From the Paper
"Writing Centers were created to assist students in improving their writing skills, gain the knowledge to increase the quality of students' literary work, and to promote collaboration and communication, not only between tutor and student, but also between peers. Writing Centers can be found at nearly every University and offer students an incredible opportunity to improve their writing. The Writing Center, at KSU, provides an invaluable experience, using peer tutoring to enrich the student's skills as a writer and provides students with a free outlet to improve their writing experience. Whether a student is an English major or a Science major, these Centers are open to all different kinds of students who desire to receive knowledge and the assistance of their peers. Although The Writing Center is free to those who want the aid of the faculty and tutors, there are a several factors that seem to keep students away from receiving the full advantage of this convenience."
| |
|
Six Traits Writing System, 2007.
This paper looks at the assessment method used for assessing the writing skills of children in elementary school, known as the six traits writing system.
1,088 words (approx. 4.4 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses the six traits writing system which identifies six common traits of good writing in order to provide an assessment of elementary writing. The paper looks at some commonly agreed upon definitions of the six traits. The paper points out that not all six traits are used by all teachers or across all grade levels, as some traits develop later than others. The paper relates that this system has improved the teaching of writing, because it identifies and defines a more objective manner of assessment.
From the Paper
"The Six Traits Writing System was developed during the 1980s to cope with a situation where assessment of elementary writing was neither standardized nor reliable. The teachers across the country cooperated and devised a system which identified six common traits of good writing. These include: ideas, organization, voice, word choice, sentence fluency, conventions, and presentation (in the 6+1 model). (NW Regional Education Laboratory 2006) The model uses these traits to assess the different characteristics of good writing. The definitions of these traits of good writing are shared and modified as needed, but by using a shared definition of each trait, an easily understandable method of assessment can convey exactly what the assessment means for each child, and enable better teaching of writing skills. The number of traits assessed may vary from four to seven, depending upon the type of writing, the context and the children being assessed."
|
|
|
