| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "WORLD ORDER": |
|
|
"New World Order", 2005.
This paper explores the current meaning of the phrase "new world order".
930 words (approx. 3.7 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 33.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that the term "new world order" was first used by then-President George H.W. Bush and his peers in the early 1990s to describe new alignments of power after Communism's initial collapse in 1991. The author suggests that today, the "new world order" is one in which (1) trans-global corporate power is, in and of itself, a "power player" like never before and (2) the U.S., France, Russia and Britain are fighting terrorism primarily from Islamic religious followers. The paper expresses concern that, since 9/11, changing social values include an increased willingness on the part of many American citizens as well as many British, Spanish and other ones who now feel directly threatened by the specter of terrorism, to give up voluntarily many basic rights and freedom such as the use of video public surveillance.
From the Paper
"In essence, then, today's post-911 "New World Order" has become a more scared one - far more scared today, in fact, than when the post-World War II Communist threat was taken seriously. Increasingly, moreover, just as, when in the four or five decades following World War II, the Eastern and Western worlds were polarized against one another (e.g., the United States and its allies against the Soviet Union and its allies, and China and its allies), the non-Islamic and Islamic worlds are now similarly polarized. Meanwhile, as America focuses on Iraq, where no nuclear danger exists, North Korea has developed nuclear arms; Iran is well on the way to doing so, and China remains as formidable as ever."
| |
|
World Order, 2002.
Examines the emerging world order since September 11th.
3,713 words (approx. 14.9 pages), 14 sources, MLA, $ 102.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper argues that peace and stability throughout the world does not seem to be achievable in the world today with the escalation of military operations by Super powers. It argues that these actions are apparently not carried out in order to defeat terrorism but to simply dominate more countries. This paper presents a literature review which outlines the international order in America and Europe in the formation of New World Order.
Table of Contents:
Statement of the Problem
Introduction
Hypothesis
Rationale
Literature Review
Methodology
Analysis
Summary/conclusion/recommendations/
Bibliography
Appendix
From the Paper
"Ironic as it may sound, though the term ?terrorism? is widely known as one that describes the actions of perpetrators, on the other hand it describes the actions of ?freedom fighters? against oppressors. The ?Jehadis? (freedom fighters) say that they do not have an army to counter the injustice that is taking place in Palestine, Kashmir, Bosnia, Myanmar, Eritrea, etc., so they have organized themselves in groups all over the world. In this way, they can attack U S setups as and when they get the opportunities, and their ultimate aim is to weaken America by doing so (Esposito, 1999)."
| |
|
The World Order: 1945-1970, 2007.
This paper discuses the world order, especially the U.S., from 1945 after the end of WWII to 1970 and Vietnam.
2,370 words (approx. 9.5 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 72.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that the years from 1945 to 1970 witnessed the transformation of the world order, which had been characterized by the emergence of the nation-states of the 19th century and their imperialistic colonization of countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America. The author points out that, after WWII, with the power of England, France and Germany destroyed, the U.S. was the only major power unscathed in its territory. The paper relates that, when the Soviet Union tested its first atomic bomb and imposed its constricting net over Eastern Europe, the two super powers aggressively opposed each other on either side of the Cold War. The author concludes that the state of the world in 1970 found a radically altered American society where, for the first time in its history, its Vietnam War policy was politicized and polarized.
From the Paper
"It is possible and perhaps necessary to view this strategic impasse less as a function of monolithic state policy than as actions motivated and implemented by government sectors, interest groups, or ministries. The arms race, with its high stakes in profits, needed a protagonist and an adversary; certain elements within the burgeoning military-industrial context also benefited quite well from the ostensibly anti-U.S. policy of Charles de Gaulle who "suspended military assistance to Israel" leaving the U.S. to become Israel's main arms supplier."
| |
|
New World Order, 2002.
A look at the world's attempt to make a new world order.
2,400 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 10 sources, $ 89.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the new world order, i.e. the steady efforts by the nations of the world to forge a world system that can secure for humanity the possibility of peace, justice and prosperity.
| |
|
Islamic Societies and World Order, 1999.
Examines ways Islamic countries can add to the security and peace of the world. Discusses obstacles, religious divisions, economics, politics, spirituality, war, fundamentalism, public vs. private sectors, banking and differences with the West.
8,100 words (approx. 32.4 pages), 31 sources, $ 135.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This research addresses the issue of how Islamic societies in the Middle East can contribute to a better world order. There are two major facets to this issue. The first facet of the issue concerns the character of any contribution that the Islamic societies of the Middle East can make to a better world order. The second facet of the issue revolves around the obstacles that the Islamic societies in the Middle East must overcome before they can make a contribution to a better world order.
From the Paper
"HOW ISLAMIC SOCIETIES IN THE MIDDLE EAST CAN CONTRIBUTE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A BETTER WORLD ORDER
Introduction
This research addresses the issue of how Islamic societies in the Middle East can contribute to a better world order. There are two major facets to this issue. The first facet of the issue concerns the character of any contribution that the Islamic societies of the Middle East can make to a better world order. The second facet of the issue revolves around the obstacles that the Islamic societies in the Middle East must overcome before they can make a contribution to a better world order. The findings of this research are presented within a framework of these two major facets of the overall issue of how Islamic societies in the Middle East can contribute to a better ..."
| |
|
New World Order, 2002.
A look ahead to a world of peace, justice and prosperity.
3,650 words (approx. 14.6 pages), 10 sources, $ 133.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the new world order, i.e. the steady efforts by the nations of the world to forge a world system that can secure for humanity the possibility of peace, justice and prosperity.
| |
|
Technology and the Government: The Mark of the New World Order, 2003.
Examines how advancements in technology will ultimately enable the government to monitor our every move.
3,339 words (approx. 13.4 pages), 9 sources, MLA, $ 95.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
For some people, especially Christians, the government?s role of utilizing advanced technology to create a more secure and efficient information superhighway infrastructure is more than just a loss of privacy and freedom; it is the ?Mark of the Beast? and a sign of the ?End of Times? based on the Biblical prophesies. The paper shows that, to others, such as privacy advocate groups, these new innovations are the ?Mark of the New World Order,? a new era in which the government will have totalitarian control of all people throughout the world through the use of advanced technology. The paper traces the history of all prior technological events that led to our current information superhighway and ?identity? crisis, starting from the emergence of computers in the 1960s, which enabled the government to identify each person with a unique number, such as the social security number that was created in the 1930s. The paper discusses the role of the IRS, bar codes, credit cards, the Internet, and Global Positioning Systems.
From the Paper
"Nonetheless, in order for all these great electronic innovations to work efficiently and gather data in one central location, every person will need to carry a national identification card. After several attempts for everyone to receive a national identification card for medical purposes by the Clinton administration, the United States government still has been unsuccessful in standardizing a national identification card. However, many people have already started using a similar card in the banking, telecommunication, transportation, and access areas called the Smart Card. Smart Cards are more intelligent and efficient than the traditional magnetic cards that are widely used today by most consumers. The new Smart Cards are embedded with a computer chip that has the capacity to store an enormous amount of data and is more secure since they require a pin number. Eventually, the government?s goal will be accomplished?the requirement of a national id card, similar to the smart card, which will contain all personal information about you. The technology is there folks. It?s only a matter of time before we open up our mailboxes and find our new Smart Cards that will replace our expired and old magnetic bank cards?that is if you don?t already have one. "
| |
|
The World Bank, 2002.
Discusses the original purpose of the World Bank and its significance today in the 'New World Order'.
2,150 words (approx. 8.6 pages), 14 sources, $ 80.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Both the World Bank and the United Nations' "New World Order" credo came about just after World War Two ended. Birthed by different corporate agencies, to further different (albeit consistent) purposes, both the World Bank and the New World Order have become entirely different from what they had been at their inception. In both cases, wealthy business interests took over and effectively redefined intent at inception. A handful of elite secret societies, most notably the Bilderberg Group, combine the economic and political power of the world's wealthiest in well-documented ways that effectively subvert and overrule the entire world's national and international governance.
| |
|
International Order, 2006.
A look at international or world order.
4,027 words (approx. 16.1 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 108.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper takes a look at the concept of international order. According to the paper, the idea of international order or world order is nothing new; however technological innovations have created a world that is increasingly more global. In light of this globalization the type of international order that will emerge is in question. This paper examines the emerging international order to determine if it is increasingly liberal.
Outline:
Introduction
International Order from a Historical Perspective
The Current System of International Order
The Role of an Imperial Threat
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Overall this aspect the research seems to indicate that in the eyes of many America has already formed an imperial structure or way of being as it relates to foreign policy and the international community. Whether this kind of informal imperialism was intentional is unclear. However, it seems more likes that America's dominance in the world is a result of the positions that the United States took following the world war. During much of this time America worked multilaterally with other nations to bring about peace and stability in the world. America was able to influence countries because it had both economic and political strength that was unparallel. Although there were conflicts after the Cold War that involved American troops, America seemed more apt to solve problems using diplomatic means. However, after the attacks of 9/11 the approach to global conflict changed and the nation believed that it had to act unilaterally to ensure the security of its citizens. Because this unilateral approach as it relates specifically to the invasion of Iraq-- has lessened the sovereignty of nation states, America is viewed as a nation that desires imperial rule. "
| |
|
"A World of Strangers", 2002.
A book review of "A World of Strangers: Order and Action in Urban Public Space," by Lyn H. Lofland.
1,370 words (approx. 5.5 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This is a critical report of Lyn Lofland's "A World of Strangers: Order and Action in Urban Public Space,"an interesting study of urban neighborhoods, and what makes them the way they are today. The paper shows how Lofland contends that neighborhoods are far different today because of the growth of cities. We live in a neighborhood of strangers, and our interactions with them cause little or no discourse or meaning. It shows how the author of the book makes it clear from the beginning that her premise is about the people who inhabit the cities of her topic, and not so much the cities themselves.
From the Paper
"Lofland also discusses the threat we feel from strangers, and how we react to this implied threat. In today's society, strangers are often a threat, and so we tend to avoid them at all costs, especially in public situations. The person standing across from us on the subway platform could be the man of our dreams, or an axe murderer looking for his next victim. We are afraid of strangers because of the autoimmunity of our society, and our cities. There are many different types of avoidance behaviors people exhibit when strangers surround them, such as in terminal waiting for a bus or a plane, or at a social engagement where they know none of the others in attendance. People go to fairly elaborate measures to ignore strangers in these situations, such as reading books, sitting in one spot and ignoring everyone around them, and moving from place to place investigating everything in the room so they are never in one place long enough to make contact with anyone else. These avoidance mechanisms say a lot about our society, and how we are all strangers to one another."
| |
|
Globalization, 2005.
This paper discusses economic globalization and its relation to the ideas of the New World Order and a One World government.
1,400 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 7 sources, APA, $ 46.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that several conspiracy and the 'New World Order' theories, on the surface, may be considered as harmless, but, when evaluated in the light of their messages, may become quite menacing. The author states that, in its simplest definition, globalization is a social change, which brings about increased connectivity among societies; but, citizens, especially in lesser-developed parts of the world, see big businesses demolishing labor rights, environmental concerns and feminism and destroying entire cultures of indigenous people and decimating bio-diversity and cultural diversity.
Table of Contents
Introduction
New World Order, One World Governments, Conspiracy Theories, and Secret Societies
Economic Globalization
Analysis
From the Paper
"The term 'New World Order' was first used, not as a political nomenclature, but by Baha'u'llah, the Prophet-Founder of the Baha'i Faith, in his Most Holy Book. Woodrow Wilson first widely used the phrase following World War I and during the formation of the League of Nations." Since then, numerous politicians have used the term as a generic term referring to a worldwide conspiracy, by a select and powerful group of the world's highest echelons of society. This group of the world's wealthiest people, top political leaders, and top corporate elite, has one goal, to strip societies of all nationalistic and regional boundaries and create a One World Government, which they solely control. It is a belief among apocalyptic religious and a variety of political groups that a conspiracy exists for world domination.
| |
|
Samuel Huntington's "The Clash of Civilizations", 2008.
This paper analyzes political scientist Samuel Huntington's "The Clash of Civilizations and the Making of the World Order" by comparing it with Edward Said's book "Orientalism".
1,265 words (approx. 5.1 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, in "The Clash of Civilizations and the Making of the World Order", Harvard political scientist Samuel Huntington believes that a clash of civilizations may arise in the not too far distant future because of the instability of the present international system, which he believes features a number of civilizations with incompatible political, social, cultural and religious values. The author points out that Huntington is especially critical of Islam, which he views as a civilization convinced of its cultural superiority yet obsessed with the inferiority of their power. The paper argues that, despite Edward Said's charges in his book "Orientalism", neither Huntington nor the theories in his book is orientalist. The author underscores argues that ill-conceived books, such as Said's , perpetuate myths about Zionism and Western misdeeds.
From the Paper
"In contrast to Huntington, who is very critical of Islam, Said is very critical of Zionism. Consequently, it is not surprising that he would consider Huntington an Orientalist. For example, in terms of Zionism and related perceived ideologies, Said insists upon blaming the West or Zionists for the poor image of Arab societies among so many people outside of the Middle East. He seems particularly intent upon attacking Jewish scholars and media organizations, and objects to any mention in the West of Arab treatment of groups such as the Kurds, the Christians, the Bahais, or Arab women who undergo genital mutilation in the name of "modesty"."
| |
|
The Taliban, 2004.
An analysis of the Taliban movement through a review of Peter Marsden's book, "The Taliban: War, Religion and the New World Order in Afghanistan".
1,412 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper contends that Peter Marsden successfully brings several muddled issues into focus in his book, "The Taliban: War, Religion and the New World Order in Afghanistan". The paper claims that the author neither demonizes nor glorifies the Taliban in his constructive and scholarly overview of the movement. The paper discusses the book and considers it a useful starting point for a fruitful investigation of the Taliban, in particular, and radical Islam in general. The theme and tone of Marsden's book are diplomatic, and thus the book also allows students of international relations to grasp the objective and unbiased perspectives necessary to approach complex global issues. The Taliban, in fact, provide a prime example of the difficulties in forging dialogue between divergent cultures.
From the Paper
"One of the main strengths of Marsden's book is his dedication to framing the Taliban within a broader historical, cultural, and religious framework. In addition to offering the background historical information in the early chapters of the book, describing how the Taliban eventually were able to take power in Kabul, the author also includes an outline of early and convergent Islamic movements in Chapter Six. Marsden compares and contrasts these movements, taking care to respect the specific ethnic and cultural traditions that support them. While Marsden does not treat Islam as a homogenous religious force, he does note the inevitable similarities between Islamic movements, especially as they draw upon religious scripture as the source for political policy. Indeed, one of the main difficulties in forming dialogue with radical Islamic movements is that those movements are informed directly by religion, whereas in European and North American secular societies, religion and politics inhabit separate spheres. Great difficulties arise when the religiously-grounded politics of the Taliban conflict with the secular morals and ethics of other cultures around the world."
| |
|
Huntington's Clash of Civilizations, 2006.
A review of "The Clash of Civilizations and the Making of the World Order" by Samuel Huntington.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 2 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how in "The Clash of Civilizations and the Making of the World Order", Harvard political scientist Samuel Huntington argues that the modern world should be viewed not as bipolar, or as a collection of nation-states, but as a set of seven or eight cultural civilizations. The paper further discusses how, according to Huntington, these cultural entities are distinct and large enough to be called civilizations, and are fated to interact in terms of their respective civilizational identities, which may lead to a clash of civilizations.
| |
|
"The Shape of the Future", 2002.
Discusses the argument in "The Shape of the Future" that the end of the Cold War brought about a new era and a new world order.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 1 source, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay discusses Donald Snow's "The Shape of the Future". The author argues that the end of the Cold War has brought the world into a new era. Since most of the communist world has disappeared, a world composed of two different "tiers" has emerged. The question is which tier the former communist nations will fall into.
|
|
|
