| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE KING LEAR": |
|
|
"Henry IV" and "King Lear" ( William Shakespeare ), 1999.
Examines and compares how two tragic kings are portrayed by the author and treated by the other characters.
2,475 words (approx. 9.9 pages), 8 sources, $ 87.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The purpose of this research is to examine how the two kings are treated in 1 Henry IV and King Lear and why they are treated as they are. The plan of the research will be to set forth the dramatic and historical context in which each play deals with the issue of monarchy and its proper treatment, and then to discuss lines of action in each play that demonstrate the source of the treatment that Henry and Lear receive.
In the film My Fair Lady, after the Cockney flower girl Miss Eliza Doolittle has been trained to speak and behave in a genteel English manner, she says to the mother of her trainer, Professor Higgins, that the difference between a flower girl and a lady is not how she acts but how she is treated: "I shall always be a lady to Colonel Pickering [Higgins's partner in the training] because he always treats me as a lady and always will. I shall ..."
| |
|
Shakespeare's "King Lear", 2006.
A look at the theme in William Shakespeare's play, "King Lear" about the lessons learned from death and aging.
1,586 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 51.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes the theme of death and old age in William Shakespeare's play "King Lear", explaining that it is an important theme because it educates us about life and serves as a catalyst for King Lear's transformation. The paper further explains that King Lear would not have become the man he was at his death had he not experienced the turmoil, pain and suffering that old age and death had introduced into his life.
From the Paper
"This passage reveals something significant in King Lear's character--a complete turnaround. What he once thought was important, including the trappings of royalty, is not. What we see in this scene is a man resigned to happily spend the rest of his days in prison as long as he has the love of his daughter. Their reconciliation proves that peace can be discovered in the worst of circumstances. Because of their experiences, King Lear and Cordelia are changed throughout the course of the play. Of course, this is more prevalent with King Lear, who seems to find utter contentment in catastrophe."
| |
|
Shakespeare's "King Lear", 2005.
This paper analyzes extensively the character of King Lear in Shakespeare's tragedy, "King Lear".
4,240 words (approx. 17.0 pages), 5 sources, $ 112.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper argues that King Lear is driven by a desire to validate himself independently from his noble status and that his natural combativeness brings about his own downfall. The author asks why, in the first place, does King Lear give up the throne and answers that he is beginning to realize his office is a separate entity from himself and that he is having a sort of belated mid-life crisis. The paper relates that Lear changes because, throughout the play, he finds the validation for which he has been searching and can now accept the love that Cordelia offers freely, the same love that he attempts to extort from her at the beginning of the play.
From the Paper
"As early as the first scene, Lear can be seen struggling with his roles as king and father, and how his failings as one overlap with the other. As the play opens, Lear is secure, if not necessarily successful, in his position as king, but he has decided to abdicate the throne to his daughters and their husbands. He does so by staging a ?love test?, wherein he asks his daughters which one of them loves him most and awards them a portion of the kingdom in relation to their answers. Cordelia?s refusal to flatter him causes him to explode, banishing her and his trusted advisor Kent, and setting the play in motion. This scene introduces many important ideas that will recur throughout the play, and is the most important for understanding Lear?s character."
| |
|
Shakespeare's "King Lear", 2002.
This paper discusses the use of animal imagery in William Shakespeare's "King Lear".
1,850 words (approx. 7.4 pages), 0 sources, $ 59.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the references to animals within Shakespeare's "King Lear" and attempts to understand the choice of animal motifs and the role they are intended to play in conveying the playwright?s message.
From the Paper
"In his discourse with the king, the Fool refers to an animal again in the lines, ?Fools had ne'er less wit in a year/ For wise men are grown foppish/ They know not how their wits to wear/ Their manners are so apish? (1.4.152-155). Here, too, the fool is making fun of the king?s paying heed to wrong advise and people by comparing his behaviour with that of an ape?s propensity to imitate. In other words, the Fool is implying that the king is imitating other foolish people instead of retaining his own counsel.
The Fool, as is already evident, is very fond of drawing comparisons to animals to make his point. And so, again we hear him say, ?For, you trow, nuncle/ The hedge-sparrow fed the cuckoo so long? (1.4.207-208). The fool uses the analogy of the hedge-sparrow feeding the cuckoo too long to King Lear?s decision to carve up his kingdom between his daughters, implying that the King was doing more for his children than he should."
| |
|
Kent in Shakespeare?s ?King Lear?, 2002.
This paper explores the role of Kent in Shakespeare?s ?King Lear? as a foreshadow of Lear?s growth from an unfeeling man, to a man who places love above all else.
780 words (approx. 3.1 pages), 1 source, $ 27.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This author believes that Kent is perhaps one of the most loyal subjects ever written by Shakespeare. He states that Kent is a complex person, who is loyal to his king, even when he must disagree with him. By doing this, the paper says that Kent causes the reader to look for signs of redemption in King Lear.
From the Paper
"Kent is blunt and does not know how to soften his words. This gets him into trouble, but Kent?s way of communicating also stands in contrast to those around the King who merely say what he wants to hear. Kent?s outspoken nature serves to emphasize the cause of King Lear?s difficulties: he has lost track of who to believe."
| |
|
Violations of Nature in Shakespeare's "King Lear", 2004.
An exposition of Shakespeare's characters in his "King Lear."
904 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper provides an exposition of the symbolic use of unnatural actions and motivations of Shakespeare's characters in his tragedy "King Lear." The paper examines the Elizabethan view of determinism, including filial relationships in the play and the Elizabethan ideal.
From the Paper
"Shakespeare presents numerous violations against nature in the tragedy "King Lear." Throughout the play he exploits the Elizabethan views of determinism in nature and physical order within the universe. Shakespeare explores the effects of committing violations against established natural laws through his characters' inappropriate dealings within their relationships against the natural order and against their own bodies and minds. His portrayal of unnatural relationships carried a profound significance for Elizabethan audiences."
| |
|
Shakespeare's "King Lear", 1978.
This paper examines the interpersonal relations in William Shakespeare's "King Lear" between Lear and his three daughters.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 1 source, $ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The purpose of this research is to examine the interpersonal relations in William Shakespeare's "King Lear" between Lear and his three daughters. Since the character of Lear himself is the catalyst for the relations not only between him and his daughters but also those relations between sister and sister. This research will first discuss the title character. This discussion will be followed by an examination of the various scenes of the play that best illuminate all of these relationships, how they are presented, how they change and how they reflect on the nature of familial, parental relationships in general. The research will conclude with some overall observations on the play itself, other relationships that enrich and reflect on those main ones among Lear and his daughters.
Lear is at his worst in the very first scene in which we see... "
| |
|
Shakespeare's "King Lear" in Film, 1995.
This paper examines two film versions of Shakespeare's "King Lear", the 1987 version directed by Jean-Luc Godard and the 1984 television version starring Laurence Olivier: Style, critical reception, characters, narrative and adherence to Shakespeare.
2,475 words (approx. 9.9 pages), 12 sources, $ 87.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The purpose of this research is to examine two film versions of Shakespeare's King Lear. The plan of the research will be to set forth the context for and fundamental premises of the two works, and then to discuss the style, tone, language, and treatment of the protagonist in each.
The television production of King Lear adapted by and starring Laurence Olivier is accurately described as straightforward in its style of treatment of the text. The production as a whole is set in pre-Christian Britain, which is consistent with the fact that, according to Rowse, the Lear story was familiar to Elizabethans from Holinshed's account of ancient British history and legend. The use of Stonehengelike pillars and rustic wood as structural elements, together with wilderness exterior settings, is consistent not only with ... "
| |
|
Betrayal in Shakespeare?s "King Lear", 2002.
This paper looks at two characters from William Shakespeare's "King Lear" who, according to the writer, react very differently when betrayed by those closest to them.
960 words (approx. 3.8 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 34.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The writer discusses the characters of Lear and Gloucester. These two characters are faced with the same basic problem: their close acquaintances are betraying them. According to the writer, Lear reacts by exiling or cutting off anyone that he suspects of betrayal, while Gloucester gives his trust to those he thinks remain loyal.
From the Paper
"He begins by exiling Kent, a member of his counsel. Next he cuts off Cordelia, his youngest daughter, for going against his wishes. Finally, he offends the King of France. This not only sets him up for disaster later, but also provokes serious responses from the aggrieved parties. Lear has responded quickly and decisively to betrayal, but he has not necessarily helped himself with his actions."
| |
|
Shakespeare: Hamlet & King Lear, 1988.
Working from Aristotle's definition of the tragic hero, this figure is explored in Shakespeare's HAMLET, & KING LEAR.
2,025 words (approx. 8.1 pages), 8 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The tragic hero derives from the Greek drama, as elucidated by the criticism of Aristotle in particular, criticism that was revived in the Renaissance period and that came to be used as a prescription for drama rather than a description of it as Aristotle intended. The hero often knows his fate but still does not see it coming, as it were. F.L. Lucas writes about the characters of tragedy as Aristotle has delineated them and notes that they must be "good" but not perfect, appropriate or true to type, and consistent or true to themselves. Lucas says that "good" in the context in which Aristotle uses it means noble or fine, and thus the characters appropriate to tragedy are elevated characters, because "tragedy in Aristotle's theory represented men as finer than they are" (Lucas 125). Lucas notes that (...)"
| |
|
Shakespeare's "KIng Lear", 1972.
This paper discusses deception in Shakespeare's "King Lear".
2,025 words (approx. 8.1 pages), 1 source, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"A character who uses deception to gain his ends is generally considered villainous, dishonest, and untrustworthy. These negative qualities are associated with one who deceives because he usually wants something of value possessed by another, and he takes it without being truthful. In King Lear various deceptive devices ranging from forgery to flattery are used to make the intended person believe that is not true. The two brothers, Edmund and Edgar, both deceive their father, Gloucester, yet both do not attempt to trap him out of treachery. In other words, all those who intentionally mislead others cannot be categorized as evil. To see a clear distinction between types of deception, the character's motives for deceiving must be examined.
The key to examining Edmund's motives might best be seen by carefully analyzing a quote from his father. In Act I, Edmund ... "
| |
|
Shakespeare's "King Lear", 2000.
An examination of the themes of parental love and filial obligations in "King Lear".
2,482 words (approx. 9.9 pages), 1 source, $ 75.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the unrealistic expectation of parents re: filial duty, love, obligation of parents and children to each other in Shakespeare's play, "King Lear".
From the Paper
"It can be argued that the parents King Lear and the Earl of Gloucester damage their children?s lives because of their unrealistic and confused expectations about filial love, duty, and the obligations of parents and children to each other. An examination of the characters in "The Tragedy of King Lear" supports this thesis. "
| |
|
William Shakespeare's "King Lear", 2002.
Analyzes the characters' use of disguises in the play "King Lear".
1,237 words (approx. 4.9 pages), 0 sources, MLA, $ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper attempts to answer why the characters in "King Lear" use disguises and what this need for disguises says about the world in which they live. The paper discusses the disguise of each of the main characters in the play and then explains the purpose each of those disguises.
From the Paper
"William Shakespeare, in his tragedy ?King Lear? describes the story of King Lear who intends to divide his kingdom among his three daughters in accordance with the love that they could profess for him. It was also his intent to retain all the powers of the king while absolving himself of the duties and functions, which has to be performed by a ruling king. But as the fate had decided King Lear divides the whole kingdom into almost two equal portions and gives them to his two cunning elder daughters. The youngest innocent and gentle daughter, whom he loved most and about whom it was expected that she would get the biggest share from the kingdom, is denied her legal rights and nothing is given to her. As soon as the two elder daughters take full command of the situation, they start mistreating their father and the King takes refuge in a jungle."
| |
|
Vision and Blindness in Shakespeare's "King Lear", 2000.
1,510 words (approx. 6.0 pages), 3 sources, $ 49.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay takes a look at how a Structuralist would view the main characters weaving through the plot of "King Lear". Structuralists believe that there is a structure (that can be located) in every piece of literature that makes the plot happen; without structure there would be no story. The first line of this paper is: ?The continuous reiteration of references, both explicit and implicit, to vision and blindness in King Lear renders its resultant symbolism an obviously necessary part of the play?s construction.? The paper goes on to prove that if Lear hadn?t lost his physical eyesight and gained a spiritual kind of sight, there would be no story. That is the structure of the play.
From the Paper
"The continuous reiteration of references, both explicit and implicit, to vision and blindness in King Lear renders its resultant symbolism an obviously necessary part of the play?s construction. This language pattern plays a structural role in defining Lear?s fall from self-assumed grace to what he belatedly recognizes as an enlightened perspective; he fails to ?see? truth until he has lost his visions of grandeur along with his eyesight. Therefore, without King Lear?s intellectual and spiritual blindness, there would be no meaning assigned to his eventual clarity concerning morality. His lack of vision in the beginning is what allocates meaning to his eventual clarity. Each recurring allusion to eyesight in the play is like a verbal organ that composes the framework for a whole body of paradoxical meanings relating to a larger picture of the human condition. ?To have eyes, and to see not, is to be at the mercy of evil?? (Heilman 51)."
| |
|
"Hippolytus" ( Euripides ), "King Lear" ( Shakespeare ) and " 'tis Pity She's A Whore" ( John Ford ), 1999.
Compares the treatment of the themes of illegitimacy and incest in three plays, focusing on "Hippolytus".
2,925 words (approx. 11.7 pages), 3 sources, $ 103.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This study will explore the themes ofillegitimacy/legitimacy and incest in three plays, Euripides's Hippolytus, Shakespeare's King Lear, and John Ford's 'Tis Pity She's a Whore.
From the Paper
"This study will explore the themes ofillegitimacy/legitimacy and incest in three plays, Euripides's Hippolytus, Shakespeare's King Lear, and John Ford's 'Tis Pity She's a Whore. The study will focus on Hippolytus and the several illegitimate children in that play, followed by comparisons of that play with the latter two. The argument of the study will be that the issues of illegitimacy and incest have more to do with love rather than sex, or even with morality, and, therefore, investigation of those issues will focus on the roles which illegitimacy and incest play in the expression of love and in the obstacles to love.
Hippolytus is the illegitimate son of Theseus, but an obsessively virtuous man who incurs the wrath of Aphrodite because of his rejection of her and his alliance with Artemis, a ..."
|
|
|
