| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "WEAPONS MASS DESTRUCTION": |
|
|
Weapons of Mass Destruction, 2007.
This paper documents the creation and use of weapons of mass destruction throughout the history of human civilization.
2,273 words (approx. 9.1 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 70.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper provides a brief overview of the range and types of weapons of mass destruction that were used in human history before the advent of the nuclear bomb. The paper shows how the earlier forms of these weapons were limited by the technologies of the time and their destructive capabilities were generally comparatively mild compared to the large and super-destructive weapons created by modern technology. Yet, the paper concludes that it is not necessarily technology that makes weapons of mass destruction so dangerous, rather it is the aims and intentions of human beings who use these weapons.
Outline:
Introduction
A Brief History of Weapons of Mass Destruction
Conclusion
From the Paper
"The term 'weapons of mass destruction' was allegedly first used in a report by the London Times in 1937. The report was a description of a German air force attack on the town of Guernica in Spain which "... destroyed 70 percent of the town and killed a third of its population." (Origin of the Phrase Weapons of Mass Destruction) The phrase that was used in the report of the London Times on December 28, 1937, is as follows: " Who can think without horror of what another widespread war would mean, waged as it would be with all the new weapons of mass destruction?". ( Who coined the term "weapons of mass destruction"? ) After the Second World War the term was later used describe to threat of atomic weapons during the Cold War. In more recent times the term weapons of mass destruction has evoked images of the hydrogen bomb and refers to biological, chemical, and radiological weapons. ( Who coined the term "weapons of mass destruction"? )"
| |
|
Iraq and Weapons of Mass Destruction, 2002.
A review of the book "The Greatest Threat: Iraq, Weapons of Mass Destruction and the Crisis of Global Security? by Richard Butler.
1,168 words (approx. 4.7 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 40.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines Richard Butler?s; "The Greatest Threat: Iraq, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and the Crisis of Global Security? in which he describes how Iraq and its threat to the world through the use of weapons of mass destruction is one of the most pressing problems America currently faces. It looks at the book?s content and measures it against the current U.S. foreign policies. It also examines how Richard Butler served as the chairman of UNSCOM, the committee that was charged with inspecting Iraq following the first Gulf War in 1991 and which was charged with checking Iraq for evidence of the manufacturing of weapons of mass destruction.
From the Paper
"Butler tells of the work he tried to complete with the committee and the fact that the inspection team was eventually thrown out of Iraq. In an almost Late Great Planet Earth type eeriness his predictions of the future are coming to pass and his insistence on the importance of continued diligence with regard to Saddam Hussein has become the national cry of the majority of Americans. As Butler explains the purpose of the United Nations Special Commission and its members it begins to sound like a recital of the United States current foreign nation policy. It is extremely interesting that the events triggering the book happened a decade before the current Iraq situation and resolution by America to go in with or without the world?s support and by doing so the nation believed it was strengthening global security."
| |
|
Weapons of Mass Destruction, 2007.
This paper discusses weapons of mass destruction, which pose a legitimate threat to world safety today.
2,068 words (approx. 8.3 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 65.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article the writer looks at several different types of weapons of mass destruction, which, when in the wrong hands, can do a great amount of damage. The type of weapons of mass destruction mentioned include biological weapons, chemical weapons, nuclear weapons, and radiological weapons. Throughout this paper the writer discusses the various types of weapons of mass destruction and looks at what the individual weapons are called. The writer then examines what these weapons can do and mentions the symptoms of these weapons. Further, the writer explores how they are used and the precautions that can be taken to protect society from them.
From the Paper
"Although anthrax may be the most well known biological weapon, there are several other biological agents which can be used as weapons that are worth noting. These include the Ebola virus, Bubonic plague, Yellow Fever, Smallpox, Ricin, Botulism toxin, Saxitoxin, Rocky Mountain spotted Fever, Typhus, Q fever, and others."
"Biological weapons are not used strictly to attack humans; instead they may be used to attack crops and animals as well to disrupt an area's agricultural supply. Additionally, by attacking the agricultural supply, this may be a way of transmitting the biological weapons to human beings."
"One way to prevent succumbing to some forms of biological weapons is through good hygiene, in much the same way one can prevent the spread of everyday bacteria and viruses."
| |
|
Weapons of Mass Destruction, 2003.
This paper discusses the use, storage, proliferation, and control of weapons of mass destruction.
3,050 words (approx. 12.2 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 89.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that there have been many efforts to stop the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, with many of leaders of countries signing several different treaties, but nothing can stop the production of such destructive weapons. The author points out that the majority of the nations and organizations, such as our allies, rogue nations, and terrorist groups, have some sort of a weapon of mass destruction. The paper stresses that, as destructive as chemical weapons are, far bigger threats to international security are biological weapons, which, if not decreased, can cause more causalities than chemical weapons.
From the Paper
"The variations of the different types of chemical weapons hurt a nation?s chances of a defense or readiness against a chemical weapon because chemical weapons are hard to stop spreading. As mentioned by the government document, chemical weapons have been used before when ?Chlorine gas and mustard gas were widely used during World War I.? Many countries can produce chemical weapons on a mass scale and have the resources that are necessary to produce the chemical weapons. A nation?s only defense would be retaliation, which could mean an all out nuclear war which will meet any human?s fear or global destruction. With this risk of global chaos existent, many of the world?s leaders should be put at blame. If world leaders such as the United States established treaties to decrease or even eliminate chemical weapons, this problem would cease to exist because other nations would follow along."
| |
|
Bush, Iraq and Weapons of Mass Destruction, 2008.
Looks at the entrance of President Bush into the Iraq War based on the possible existence of weapons of mass destruction.
1,700 words (approx. 6.8 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper argues that the allegation that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, which were never discovered, was a deliberate deception by the Bush administration to justify their aggression in terms of containing terrorism by maintaining the international balance of power. The paper further asserts that Bush ignored the truth that he heard from his advisers and deliberately misled the American people to make an excuse to go to war with Iraq. The paper contends that Bush wanted to secure America's position of dominance, power and access to oil resources in the Middle East and tricked the American people into thinking that going to war with Iraq was a way of waging war on terrorism.
From the Paper
"The primary thrust of Bush's argument for the invasion of Iraq was that Iraq was a serious threat to the rest of the world because it was building WMD. This is an interesting allegation, given that the only country that really has a large supply of WMD is the USA. However, it must be borne in mind that those countries who seek to justify owning WMD - such as the USA - seek to do so in terms of deterrence theory. The idea is that if rational countries such as the USA and Russia possess nuclear weapons, their mutual knowledge that the other country has WMD will deter either country from ever deploying the WMD."
| |
|
Weapons of Mass Destruction, 2007.
A discussion on the consequences of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction throughout the world.
3,454 words (approx. 13.8 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 97.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate an understanding of the national security decision-making process and U.S security issues related to weapons of mass destruction proliferation and to demonstrate an understanding of the national security decision-making process and U.S. security issues. It further evaluates the U.S. security policies and their effectiveness in supporting the U.S. national security strategy.
Outline:
Objective
Introduction
Chapter One
U.S. Strategy for Nonproliferation
Three Key Treaties for Stemming Proliferation of WMD
Chapter Two
Limitations of the Three Treaties
Countries that are not a Party to the Treaties
Four Multilateral Export Control Arrangements
Two U.S. Agencies Administer the Export Control System
Time and Resources of the U.S. in Elimination of WMD
Chapter Three
United States Policy Since Reassessment in 2001
Summary and Conclusion
From the Paper
"The amount of funding that has been required in the efforts of the United States to assist other newly independent countries in the elimination of weapons of mass destruction and the material that are used to produce these weapons is astronomical and even with all of this being spent the efforts have not been a full success. While many nations throughout the world are parties to the various treaties, concerning nuclear weapons there are still significant countries that are not members to these treaties and that present a problem for U.S. security and create security threat and risks to other countries on a worldwide basis."
| |
|
Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq, 2006.
Argues that the US was right to invade Iraq in 2003 because Iraq possessed and intended to use weapons of mass destruction.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 5 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This political study argues that the American cause for the invasion of Iraq was valid due to the availability of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq before 2003. American military forces invaded Iraq in 2003 due to the fact that Saddam Hussein had created, stored, and was going to attack his neighbors with various missiles and chemical based weapons. In this manner, the evidence supporting the fact that Syria had helped Saddam Hussein move the weapons before the American invasion of 2003 is presented in this study. Although the United Nations had previously thought that there was an absence for cause for the American invasion of 2003 of Iraq, the evidence is growing against these claims.
| |
|
Weapons of Mass Destruction and Terrorism, 2005.
This paper discusses the topics of weapons of mass destruction and terrorism both before and after 9/11.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 8 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores two broad themes concurrently. Firstly, the writer examines the efforts of the U.S. government to successfully pin a WMD buildup on Iraq. The writer secondly discusses the efforts of U.S. officials to link Osama Bin Laden with Saddam Hussein. The writer then points out that what should become apparent is that, while there is or was some circumstantial evidence to link the Iraqis with Bin Laden and with WMD buildups, the whole story remains elusive.
From the Paper
"The phrase "Weapons of Mass Destruction" has long-since entered the American lexicon. With the Bush Administration's stubborn insistence in recent years that there was a long-time link between Al-Qaeda and Iraq, the importance of determining how many "weapons of mass destruction" Iraq had - if it had any at all - and where those alleged weapons were stored was undeniable. For an American people still recovering from the shock and horror of 11 September, 2001, the notion that one of America's most inveterate foes had harbored, perhaps even supplied, a terrorist mass-murderer was discomfiting, to say the least - and remains unsettling to this very day. This paper will explore the WMD issue as it pertains to Iraq and also explore Iraq's relationship - such as it was - with Al Qaeda."
| |
|
Weapons of Mass Destruction, 2002.
An examination of the creation, effects and possible usage of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons.
3,846 words (approx. 15.4 pages), 9 sources, APA, $ 105.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
A nuclear, biological, or chemical attack can be devastating for all those involved and the world as a whole. This paper discusses how any weapon of mass destruction would create a devastating reaction both psychologically and economically. It looks at the history and different types of these weapons from their conception and their development throughout the world and evaluates how although world powers such as the United States and Russia are cutting back on WMD (Weapons of mass destruction), nations like Pakistan and Israel are developing large arsenals.
From the Paper
"India is believed to have enough plutonium to make anywhere from 100 to 150 warheads, and Pakistan is believed to have 35 to 40 warheads. The United States currently possesses about 2,000 nuclear warheads and more then 1,000 tactical nukes. Russia, as well as the United States, is cutting back on nuclear warheads and currently possess around 2,000 and 8,000 tactical nukes. Israel is the only country in the Middle East to have a nuclear arsenal. It has 100 to 200 nuclear weapons that can be delivered by plane or by missile. It is believed that Iraq is developing nuclear weapons; however, there is no confirmed evidence of nuclear development since weapons inspections have not taken place since 1998."
| |
|
Weapons of Mass Destruction, 2002.
An examination of the new arms race which followed the WWII atom bombings in Japan.
1,387 words (approx. 5.5 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 46.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes the weapons of mass destruction arm race. It examines the different forms of weapons of mass destruction and looks at the major players in this field. It also discusses attempts at various treaties by the nations of the world to slow down or stop this extremely potentially dangerous weapons war.
From the Paper
"On July 16, 1945 the first weapon of mass destruction was detonated. Gadget, as the original atomic bomb was known, was tested for eventual use in the second World War. In August of 1945, the world entered a new age of weaponry with the dropping of atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan. The use of these weapons of mass destruction brought an abrupt halt to World War Two, but also initiated a new type of arms race: a race for weapons of mass destruction.
For nearly sixty years the nations of the world have sought weapons of mass destruction. These weapons take many forms, they range from nuclear bombs and missiles to chemical and biological weapons. Though there are many types of arms, the staple of most nations with the technology to develop weapons of mass destruction are those weapons which have a basis in nuclear fission. The following pages will explore and define this particularly popular manifestation of weapons of mass destruction."
| |
|
Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) & Terrorism, 2001.
Analysis of incidents in U.S. & Japan. Descriptions of WMD & crisis management operations & procedures. State & Federal plans to combat WMD attacks. Need for integrated, cenralizd approach.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 16 sources, $ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Prior to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack on America, there were three other terrorist attacks using weapons of mass destruction (WMD): the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center by Muslim extremists, the 1995 sarin nerve gassing by the Aum Shinnkyo sect on Tokyo subway commuters and the 1995 bombing of a federal building in Oklahoma City by a domestic radical right group. In response, government at all levels significantly increased preparations for future such attacks. In January 1997, then Secretary of Defense (SecDef) William Cohen described terrorist-inspired WMD attacks "the greatest threat any of us will face in coming years" (USAWC, 2000, September, p. 99). According to Stanton (2001, February), the federal..."
| |
|
Weapons Proliferation, 2004.
A discussion about the balance of trade regarding weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and the threat towards America.
945 words (approx. 3.8 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 33.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper briefly discusses the threat that WMD pose to America because of the trading of nuclear weapons. It discusses the treaty signed by most countries in the world and how UN control of the trade of these weapons is essential in preventing a disastrous nuclear war.
From the Paper
"Weapons proliferation, simply defined, is the rapid increase or spread of weapons in the context of global security. If we are to measure the weapons capabilities of the world, the United States retains the lion?s share: in 2002 the Economist estimated that American military spending would exceed 379 billion in 2003 (Economist, 6/18/2002.) For comparison?s sake, Russia, the world?s second largest nuclear power, had a total GDP of merely 346.6 billion in 2002 (Economist, 7/22/2003.) However, the ?balance of terror? that underscored the cold war era was in many ways much safer than the current situation. Whereas ?weapons proliferation? once referred to the number of weapons in existence, it has taken on a new meaning; it now is usually meant to reflect the number of political entities capable of using weapons of mass destruction. The number of such countries has increased beyond UN Security Council permanent members to include India, Pakistan, Israel and perhaps most notably North Korea."
| |
|
Mass Media, Mass Communication and Globalization, 2006.
An essay that defines the concept of globalization and what it means to all aspects of modern life.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 1 source, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper defines globalization as a process that is leading the world towards economic integration that goes beyond states and local economies. The paper discusses how globalization refers to the growing sense of interconnectedness throughout the world and not in just an economic sense. The people asserts that, on the contrary, globalization is evident in all the key arenas of modern life.
| |
|
Mass Transit and the needs of the Masses, 2002.
Examines public transportation service in downtown East Side Vancouver.
2,150 words (approx. 8.6 pages), 11 sources, $ 80.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper will consider the relation between the British Columbia public transit service's new "Stop Request" program, in relation to the transportation needs of Vancouver's Downtown East Side residents. This paper will examine these issues with Beauregard's (1989) modernist/postmodernist perspective; and the usefulness of Young's (YEAR) discussion of the five faces of oppression, as a way to more specifically characterize the people of East Side Vancouver in relation to their marginal location in the city and in the society and their relation with issues of "safety".
| |
|
Science Education, 2005.
This paper discusses the science education in many countries as related to the development of weapons of mass destruction (WMD).
18,750 words (approx. 75.0 pages), 88 sources, APA, $ 249.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that scientific and educational advances in the countries which occupy permanent positions on the UN Security Council, have created tremendous growth in the areas of chemical and nuclear weapons research and of chemical and nuclear weapons production as a function of their science education programs. The author focuses on the scientific education infrastructure of individual countries, which is designed to produce scientific minds capable of creating WMD, as a result of science being taught without significant emphasis on philosophy, history and ethics. The paper relates that, since the fall of Soviet communism, Russia remains the largest of the former Soviet Bloc states and retains the vast majority of WMD capability; but these changes have resulted in a significantly weakened national science education program and a reduction in its ability to produce scientists and ultimately produce more WMD. Many charts and tables.
Table of Contents
Introduction
The United Nations
A Brief History of Weapons of Mass Destruction
Scientific Education in the UN General Assembly
Scientific Education in Countries of Interest
Scientific Education in Permanent Members of the Security Council
Global Education Trends
UNESCO
Education Reform in Islamic Countries
Education Advancement in the Sciences
Global Proliferation Trends
Rogue Nations
Consequences of Scientific Education
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Within the United Nations are several councils, agencies, organizations and groups that carry out responsibilities and provide leadership for the UN as a whole. Among the smaller groups within the UN are disarmament groups such as the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) and the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO PrepCom). These bodies are responsible for preventing the use of WMD and for working to prevent the proliferation of such weapons. In addition to disarmament, groups are relevant education groups within the UN that are essential to consider when discussing the growth and potential use of WMD. Such groups are the United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR) and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization."
|
|
|
