| Papers [1-15] of 49 :: [Page 1 of 4] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 —> | Search results on "VERSAILLES": |
|
|
Absolutism Through Versailles, 2002.
This essay examines how King Louis XIV used visual arts within the palace of Versailles to establish the primacy of the French monarch.
1,400 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 10 sources, $ 46.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at how King Louis XIV of France used the remodeling of his magnificent palace at Versailles, and the visual art in the palace, as a propaganda tool. The author discusses Louis' constant campaign for absolute power as a divine ruler. The paper pays close attention to the architecture at Versailles.
From the Paper:
"King Louis XIV used visual arts within the palace of Versailles to establish the primacy of the French monarch. Louis XIV wanted to legitimatize his form of strict absolutism through art. The pinnacle of this propaganda campaign was the remodeling of the ch?teau of Versailles into a palace. He and his artists made specific choices to flaunt his wealth and give the king credibility. The gardens, grand staircase, hall of mirrors and salons parade with grandeur and thick allegorical comparisons between the Gods and Louis. The propaganda was effective in targeting its three intended audiences to the degree that later monarchs and artists mimicked it. "
| |
|
The Treaty of Versailles and the Congress of Vienna, 2006.
This paper offers a comparative analysis of The Treaty of Versailles and the Congress of Vienna.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 4 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this essay, the writer compares two major diplomatic events. The writer looks at the Treaty of Versailles and the Congress of Vienna which show similarities in the fact that they both acted as the conclusion of European wars. The writer explains that the Congress of Vienna took place in 1814 following the Napoleonic Wars, in an attempt to ensure a lasting peace and restore political stability. The writer also examines the Treaty of Versailles which occurred in 1919 at the end of the First World War with the same intentions and aims as the Congress of Vienna.
From the Paper
"The Treaty of Versailles and the Congress of Vienna are comparable in that they were both major diplomatic events that formally ended destructive European wars. The Congress of Vienna was convened at the end of the Napoleonic Wars in 1814 and was attended by European heads of state and leading diplomats, who sought to restore political stability and establish a just and lasting peace. The Treaty of Versailles was convened after the First World War in 1919, was also attended by heads of state and leading diplomats, who also sought to restore political stability and establish a just and lasting peace."
| |
|
The Treaty of Versailles - Doomed From the Start, 2002.
This paper is a basic analysis of the Treaty of Versailles of 1919 which saw the end of WWI. Particular attention is paid to the reasons that it failed in terms of both its provision and execution.
807 words (approx. 3.2 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 28.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper argues that the Treaty of Versailles - signed in 1919 between Germany and the Allies to officially end WWI - was bound to fail from its inception. The paper explores the necessary conditions that need to be met for any treaty to succeed and, based on this information, provides the reasons for the demise of the Treaty of Versailles.
From the Paper
"The Treaty of Versailles was a monumental document presented to the Germans carrying the signatures of Great Britain, France, and the United States? leaders respectively, with particular attention paid to Great Britain and France because they were Germany?s primary opponents during World War I. The irony is that the Germans, at whom the bulk of the treaty was aimed, were not allowed to participate in the Paris Peace Conference where the Treaty of Versailles was ironed out and finalized. In reality the Treaty was more of a list of demands made on the Germans due to their involvement and subsequent ?lose? in World War I, a list including German land ownership rights, military size and scope, and war reparations. Especially due to the coercive nature of the treaty, the Allied Forces were under tremendous pressure to take certain measures involved with peacekeeping and treaty making in order to maintain the peace that any treaty attempts to maintain (and which in this particular case were failed to be met, evident by the rise of Hitler based largely on the promises of undermining the Treaty of Versailles)."
| |
|
The Treaty of Versailles, 1999.
A discussion of whether the Treaty of Versailles created more problems than it solved.
1,383 words (approx. 5.5 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 46.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes the Treaty of Versailles, which was signed after the end of World War I and questions its nature in relation to the problems it caused 20th Century Europe. It looks at how the treaty, which the allies forced upon the Germans in 1919, has been one of the most controversial political acts of the twentieth century and how on almost every aspect can be seen as a failure, although it did provide Europe with twenty years of peace from 1919 to 1939. It examines such issues as reparations forced on the Germans who could not pay and the territorial changes that were made in Europe. It evaluates how the treaty was too harsh upon the Germans and how it caused resentment amongst them, which Hitler skilfully brought to the surface.
From the Paper
"The other key feature of Versailles was the reparations which the allies believed that the Germans had to pay. These ranged from the modest to the ridiculous. The French believed 200 million German Marks would be the minimum that the Germans would have to pay. Both Britain and France wanted reparations, by France desperately needed them, as the war had left the French economy in ruins. Therefore the French aims with Versailles was to hamstring the German economy in such a way that the Germans would have paid for France?s war and left themselves bankrupt. To the French this was the ideal situation, as a bankrupt Germany would pose no threat to the safety of France. However the French could not see that by hamstringing the German economy, the whole of the European economy would be wrecked."
| |
|
The Treaty of Versailles, 2002.
Discusses the provisions of the Treaty of Versailles and the consequences these provisions had upon chances for future peace.
2,650 words (approx. 10.6 pages), 5 sources, $ 97.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the Treaty of Versailles which ended the First World War in terms of the Allies' desire for vengeance, the treaty's punishing territorial provisions, the unrealistic war reparations payments demanded of Germany, and the dire consequences these had upon chances for future peace.
| |
|
Treaty of Versailles, 2002.
An analysis of why the Treaty of Versailles failed the Weimar Republic.
1,938 words (approx. 7.8 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 61.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper focuses on the reasons for Hitler's rise to power over the Weimar Republic. In particular, it discusses how the failure of the Weimar Republic was due in part to the Treaty of Versailles and how it caused social unrest, economic upheaval and lastly, political tension within the Republic itself. It attempts to show how all of these factors led to the eventual downfall of the Weimar Republic and the rise of Adolf Hitler.
From the Paper
"Because Berlin was still rife with revolutionary tension, the meeting for the drafting of the new Constitution for the new Republic was held at Thuringian town, Weimar. The National Assembly passed the Constitution on July 31, 1919. It was accepted by "265 to 75 votes". Power was derived from the people and the state (Reich) was a democratic Republic. The German Parliament (Reichstag) was where sovereignty resided and it was elected every four years. The vote was extended to men and to women over 21 years of age. Each party was allowed one representative for every 60 000 votes cast in its favour. The former states were renamed into provinces, Lander. The former federal council was replaced with the Reichsrat. The executive power, formally vested in the Kaiser, was shared between the Rech President and the Reich government. "
| |
|
The Treaty of Versailles, 2002.
A summary and analysis of the impact of the Treaty of Versailles of 1919 on European history 1919-1939.
3,189 words (approx. 12.8 pages), 12 sources, MLA, $ 92.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the effect of the Treaty of Versailles of 1919 on European history during the interwar period. It looks at how the territorial, financial and security framework and arrangements created by and under the treaty ultimately (by the late 1930s) failed to keep the peace in Europe. It evaluates how the terms of the treaty and the manner it was imposed on Germany contributed to the continuing instability of Central and Eastern Europe and to revanchist sentiment in Germany.
Outline
Basic Facts
Treaty Terms: Motivations and Consequences
Impact of the Treaty's Economic Provisions
Overall Assessment of the Treaty's Impact
Conclusion
From the Paper
"The reparations clause of the Treaty helped to undermine the political and economic stability of Germany and other nations in Central and Eastern Europe. The original amount of reparations demanded by the Allies ($200 billion by France) and ($120 billion by Britain) far exceeded postwar Germany's capacity to pay (Bailey 245). The combined burden of the initial reparations payments exacted from Germany in the early 1920s ($5 billion in gold), the dislocation to the German economy caused by the revolutionary situation at home and the adverse effects of the French occupation of the Ruhr led to a devastating devaluation of the German mark and hyperinflation."
| |
|
Versailles, 2001.
This paper is a detailed look at the history of the palace at Versailles.
3,590 words (approx. 14.4 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 100.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the art and architectural history of Louis XIV's opulent palace at Versailles. The author examines the palace itself and its gardens both from an architectural point of view and as a political statement. The paper describes how the decorative styles of the grounds and castle reflected the power and demanding nature of its main inhabitant, the self-proclaimed "Sun King".
From the Paper
"While the explicit purpose of Versailles was to glorify king and country, it also glorifies at least implicitly the architect who translated the king?s vision. By 1674, when Monsart was commissioned to rebuild the ch?teau of Clagny for Louis XIV's mistress Madame de Montespan, he was already launched on a brilliant career. In 1675 Mansart became official architect to the king and from 1678 on was occupied with redesigning and enlarging the palace of Versailles, for which he directed a legion of collaborators, prot?g?s, and artisans. Mansart began his own work by using the plans of architect Louis Le Vau, and to these plans built the new Hall of Mirrors, the Orangerie, the Grand Trianon, and the north and south wings and at the time of his death he was working on the chape. Each element was designed to magnify the sense of Louis?s own power and the wealth and sophistication of France."
| |
|
The Treaty of Versailles, 2006.
This paper discusses the diplomatic history of the Treaty of Versailles.
3,800 words (approx. 15.2 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 104.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, even though the Treaty of Versailles ultimately failed, it changed diplomatic history. The author not only examines Woodrow Wilson's impossible plan for the treaty and the League of Nations but also addresses the motivations of France, Great Britain, Italy and Japan and what they hoped to gain. The paper relates that the German people also felt that they were being treated unfairly and were betrayed by their government; therefore, the problems, which they had with the government and with the allied forces, distressed the German people.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
Woodrow Wilson
The Long and Devastating War
The Spoils of War
Political Pressure and the Punishment of Germany
France
Desires Going into the War
Hardships That the Country Faced
Personal Goals of the Treaty
How the Country's Diplomat Changed Wilson's Plan for the Treaty
Great Britain
Desires Going into the War
Hardships That the Country Faced
Personal Goals of the Treaty
How the Country's Diplomat Changed Wilson's Plan for the Treaty
Italy
Desires Going into the War
Hardships That the Country Faced
Personal Goals of the Treaty
How the Country's Diplomat Changed Wilson's Plan for the Treaty
Japan
Desires Going into the War
Hardships That the Country Faced
Personal Goals of the Treaty
How the Country's Diplomat Changed Wilson's Plan for the Treaty
United States Politics
German Response to the Treaty
Conclusion
From the Paper
"This idea that Congress had regarding whether it would be more difficult to declare war was very important, as it also related to the spoils of war. The Treaty, had it been ratified, would have helped out many nations, but would have also made it more difficult for countries that did war with one another to collect items and take them home to their country. Because of this, the spoils of war that were generally collected would no longer be available, and many of the larger nations did not agree with this idea."
| |
|
The Treaty of Versailles, 2005.
An analysis of the global implications of the Treaty of Versailles and the extent to which it could be considered a failure.
8,251 words (approx. 33.0 pages), 38 sources, MLA, $ 176.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In order to answer to what extent the Treaty of Versailles was a failure, this paper reveals the German grievances with the Treaty and also shows how, on a more international level, nations were dissatisfied. It also examines the League of Nations, the institution that was created to uphold its laws and police its implementation, concluding that it also failed in this endeavour. The paper mainly focuses upon the Treaty's failures, but makes reference to some of its successes, while also stating certain unforeseeable detrimental factors to world security such as the economic depression - factors that any system of peace would struggle to deal with. Ultimately, the paper concludes that the Treaty did in part contribute to, and allow for war and that, hence, WWII was the ultimate failure of the Treaty.
Outline:
Introduction
Part One: Implications for Germany
Loss of Territory and Population
Imposed Disarmament
War Guilt and the Trial of the Kaiser
Reparations and Economic Decline
Conclusion
Part Two: Global Implications
The Principle Victors
The Aggressors of World War Two (Excluding Germany)
The New Nation-States
Conclusion
Part Three: League Of Nations
Introduction
Institutional Weaknesses
Territorial Successes
Territorial Failures
Conclusion
From the Paper
"In the early 1920's it soon became clear that Germany was too weak to pay reparations as envisaged. The German economy failed to stabilise after the war leading to the hyperinflation crisis of 1923. By May 1923 the rate of increase of the amount of marks in circulation throughout Germany was over 250 billion per week.35 "The world has never witnessed a more extraordinary inflation of currency than that in Germany since the war."36 Hyperinflation dealt a staggering blow to German national pride. It was realized that the current plan for reparation payments was too much of a burden for such a weak economy. To counter the inflation in 1924 a committee that was established by the Allied powers presented the Dawes Plan. This plan provided that: firstly a new Reichsbank and currency would be established with the aid of an external gold loan; and secondly the fixation of annuities from the US for the amounts, which Germany was liable to the Allied Powers (reparations). "
| |
|
Antecedents Of Failure In The Treaty Of Versailles, 1995.
An analysis of the Treaty of Versailles, which ended the First World War. Discuses how the French fear of Germany led to harsh terms and German bristling at the harsh terms led to the Second World War.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 1 source, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The Treaty of Versailles officially ended World War I , yet virtually none of the parties which signed this document were satisfied with the terms. The two bitterest enemies of the Great War, Germany and France, had suffered devastating losses as a result of four years of intense fighting across their shared borders. Their opposing viewpoints regarding how peace in Europe should be maintained were described in the book, Sources of the Western Tradition, Volume II: From the Renaissance to the Present, edited by Marvin Perry, Joseph R. Peden, and Theodore H. Von Laue (1995).
As victors, the French demanded extreme measures of punishment against the Germans both for reasons of revenge and as a means of securing their territory from future threats of German invasion. The French were in large part motivated by the fact that the major ..."
| |
|
Germany and the Treaty of Versailles, 2006.
This paper examines Germany's rearmament under Hitler after the Treaty of Versailles and relates this to the subsequent increased international aggression.
1,368 words (approx. 5.5 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This report traces Germany's re-armaments under Hitler and links them towards his expanded aggressive foreign policy. The writer shows how Hitler achieved his international victories, first by acting subtly and cleverly concealing his real motives and then his stepping up of illegal military buildup in a more open and brazen fashion. The author shows how the policies of Britain and France to appease Hitler helped him even as he became openly aggressive.
From the Paper
"This paper looks at the formation of German's rearmament while the country, under the Treaty of Versailles, was under military restrictions. Specifically this report examines issues of the relationship between Germany's increasing international aggression under Hitler and its relationship to the rearmament. At the end of the first World War, the Treaty of Versailles was signed to limit the size of Germany's navy and army and prohibit the country from developing an air force. Hitler viewed the treaty as an affront to Germany and was determined to not only ignore the treaty and rearm Germany in secret, but also to eventually show this open rearmament and pursue aggressive preemptive warfare against regions which the country had lost in the treaty. This report traces Germany's rearmaments under Hitler and links them towards this expanded aggressive foreign policy. Other factors must also be considered however in the light of these issues, such as the inability and sometimes even unwillingness of Britain and France to do anything about Germany's rearmament during the years of Nazi power in Germany. "
| |
|
Treaty of Versailles, 1990.
Analysis of the Treaty of Versailles, its provisions and its impact on all the signatories. Examines the contention that if the treaty had been less punitive, the Germans would have been less likely to respond as strongly in favor of Hitler.
4,275 words (approx. 17.1 pages), 5 sources, $ 135.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
The Treaty of Versailles
Introduction:
"The intent in the following pages is to examine the origins of the Treaty of Versailles, its provisions, and its impact on all the signatories. A number of theorists consider the Treaty of Versailles and its harshness against Germany as the foundation of the German depression, the rise of Hitler, and the inception of World War II. If the Treaty of Versailles had been less punitive, they contend, Germany would not have experienced such deep humiliation and suffering, and would not have been as likely to respond to Hitler.
The Treaty of Versailles itself was developed from the pre.Armistice agreement between the Allies which was established on November 3, 1918."
| |
|
Treaty of Versailles, 1995.
This paper discusses six interpretations of the Treaty of Versailles, signed in 1919, officially ending the First World War: Negotiations, aims, motivations, rhetoric, politics, international and domestic concerns, leadership and reparations.
2,025 words (approx. 8.1 pages), 6 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"This paper will discuss six interpretations of the Treaty of Versailles, which was signed in 1919, officially ending the First World War. These six interpretations will be drawn from six different books by six different authors. These works focus upon different aspects of the Treaty and these differing focuses can often account for the variation in interpretations.
Most of the interpretations of the treaty attempt to explain why the negotiators acted in the ways they did in formulating the Treaty. One interpretation of the Versailles Peace Treaty argues that the Allied negotiators in Paris feared Bolshevism more than a resurgent Germany. The high tone of the rhetoric which issued forth from the negotiations was founded less upon genuine feelings of world justice, than upon uneasiness at the prospect of proletarian revolut ... "
| |
|
Treaty of Versailles, 1993.
A look at its aims, provisions, the impact on Germany and the rise of Adolf Hitler, economics and politics.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 6 sources, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Introduction
The First World War, known then as the Great War, was also supposed to be the war to end all wars. Clearly, it did not achieve this lofty goal. The defeat of Germany led to the signing of the Treaty of Versailles, and that document was intended to lead to a new and more peaceful world. To achieve this, though, the victors believed they had to bind Germany so that the German military would never again be able to threaten the rest of Europe. There was more than a slight element of punishment in the provisions placed upon Germany by the victors, though the victors did not fully agree among themselves as to the proper course to take.
The Treaty of Versailles was the result of the Paris Peace Conference, organized by the victors to settle the issues raised..."
|
|
|
