| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "UNITED STATES PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS 1824": |
|
|
United States Presidential Elections of 1824 and 1848, 2002.
The paper compares the elections of 1824 and 1848 in the United States and discusses the rise of mass Jacksonian Politics.
1,598 words (approx. 6.4 pages), 14 sources, APA, $ 52.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper shows that a distinct political revolution occurred between the Presidential Elections of 1824 and 1848. This change is often referred to as the Jacksonian Revolution or the rise of mass politics. It discusses how the beginnings of these changes are seen in 1824, but would not be institutionalized as a part of every election campaign until 1848. The paper shows that the most notable differences between the Presidential Elections of 1824 and 1848 were the use of party identifications or the partisan nature of the papers, the way that editors and people who wrote editorials to the papers argued their points and the development of early forms of polling and political endorsements.
From the Paper
"During the 1824 Presidential Election there are few, if any, forms of polling, political endorsements, or advertisements, but they are all over the papers by the 1848 Presidential Election. Several unscientific polls are reported to the New York Herald regarding the 1848 Presidential Election during the six months leading up to the elections. ?Another Vote for Taylor ? On a late trip of the steamboat Herald, down the Illinois river, the vote for President was taken and stood as follows:- In the ladies? cabin, for Taylor 14; for Cass, 3. Gentlemen?s cabin, for Taylor, 43; Cass, 23.? "
| |
|
U.S. Presidential Elections, 2002.
A review of the 1984 presidential election compared to that of 2000.
3,395 words (approx. 13.6 pages), 13 sources, MLA, $ 96.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews and compares the 1984 and 2000 presidential elections in the U.S.A. Beginning with a brief history of the electoral/political system in America, the paper than offers a look at a number of issues, comparing the outcome in 1984 to that in 2000. The first issue is that of the candidates themselves, followed by the role of the media during both campaigns, an analysis of the victories, the gender gap, third party impacts and finally a conclusion which looks at the overall picture of the 2 elections.
From the Paper
"What distinguishes the 2000 campaign from the 1984 campaign is that neither is an incumbent for the office they are running for. Both are members of the Baby Boom Generation, the first time in history this has happened, since both of President Clinton's opponents were from the G.I. Generation. Vice President Al Gore is running to extend the eight-year Democratic control of the White House. The son of the late Senator Albert Gore Sr., the Vice President has 24 years' experience in government as a Congressman, Senator and Vice-President."
| |
|
Presidential Elections - Then and Now, 2002.
Compares and contrasts the Presidential elections of 1968 and 1992.
1,544 words (approx. 6.2 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 50.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
An essay focusing on the long and arduous process of getting elected President. Compares the elections of 1968 and 1992, both of which featured a strong third-party candidate who threatened to steal the presidency.
From the Paper
"Being a citizen of the United States affords one with many opportunities that are sometimes taken for granted. As American citizens, we have the opportunity to vote for many offices at the national, state, and local levels. However, the election of the president of the United States every four years is undeniably the most important part of the American political process."
| |
|
TV and Presidential Elections, 1991.
This paper examines the relationship between the mass media, specifically television, and presidential elections: Predicting winners, debates, commercials and pros and cons.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 13 sources, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The aim of this paper is to look at the relationship between the mass media, specifically television, and presidential elections. This paper will focus on the function of television in presidential elections through three main areas: exit polls, presidential debates, and spots. The focus is on television for three reasons. First, television reaches more voters than any other medium. Second, television attracts the greatest part of presidential campaign budgets. Third, television provides the candidates a good opportunity to contact the people directly. A second main theme of this paper is the role of television in presidential elections in terms of representative democracy in the United States.
Researchers tend to hold one of three views about ... "
| |
|
The Impact of Television on Presidential Elections, 1991.
This paper discusses the relationship between the mass media, specifically television, and presidential elections: Function and impact of exit polls, debates and spot commercials on voters.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 13 sources, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The aim of this paper is to look at the relationship between the mass media, specifically television, and presidential elections. This paper will focus on the function of television in presidential elections through three main areas: exit polls, presidential debates, and spots. The focus is on television for three reasons. First, television reaches more voters than any other medium. Second, television attracts the greatest part of presidential campaign budgets. Third, television provides the candidates a good opportunity to contact the people directly. A second main theme of this paper is the role of television in presidential elections in terms of representative democracy in the United States."
| |
|
Four Close U.S. Presidential Elections, 2001.
Discusses 12th Amendment to the Constitution (the Electoral College) & elections of 1824, 1876, 1888 & 2000.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 3 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The Electoral College has served its purpose under the Constitution for more than 150 years. It has operated quietly, smoothly and effectively, so much so that the general public is hardly aware of its existence except when there is a close election (Hoffman, 935).
The most complicated bit of governmental machinery which the modern world has to exhibit is that which is employed in the selection of the chief executive officer...for the United States...It is almost marvelous that any people should have preserved political unity for a century under such a loose and decentralized system of election of its chief..."
| |
|
The Iraq War and the Presidential Election, 2004.
An examination of how issues of safety affected the outcome of the 2004 presidential election in the United States.
1,450 words (approx. 5.8 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The months leading up to the 2004 presidential election between John Kerry and George W. Bush were filled with commentaries and speculations as to what issues most concerned voters. This paper shows that, from a vast array of topics such as health care, employment, social security, taxes, abortion and gay rights, voters at the polls on November 2 proved that what they were most concerned about was safety, thus homeland security and the Iraq war took center stage over all the other societal issues.
From the Paper
"In an October 30, 2004 article for Newsday, Ken Fireman said that during the last days of the campaign, Bush returned to the theme that has sustained him throughout the year: "that he will be more resolute and aggressive than Kerry in battling the terrorists who struck the country on September 11, 2001" and was aided in pressing this theme home by the sudden reappearance of Osama bin Laden on tape outlining his reasons for ordering the September 11th attacks (Fireman 2004). In contrast, Kerry talked about refocusing his campaign on domestic issues such as jobs and health care, yet never quite managed to do so, and has continually been drawn back into exchanges about Bush's handling of Iraq and the war on terror (Fireman 2004)."
| |
|
2000 Presidential Election, 2004.
Looks at the legal consequences of the U.S. Supreme Court decision regarding the Presidential elections in 2000.
1,389 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 46.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains how the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court regarding the 2000 Presidential elections blurred the lines between the three branches of government and made expediency of more importance than rule of law. The paper also points out that, at the time the decision was made, the majority of the justices of the Supreme Court had been appointed by Republican presidents, either Reagan or Bush Sr. The paper also talks about the importance of precedence in Supreme Court rulings and how the decision made by the Supreme Court on the 2000 elections will have a ?trickle down? effect not only on subsequent sitting Supreme Court decisions, but on the character of decisions made generally in the courts of the United States.
From the Paper
"The dissenting opinions make it clear that the dissenters were acting on the principles set out in the Constitution, and according to the proper Constitutional structure and field of action of each branch of government. Justice Souter, agreeing with Justices Stevens, Ginsburg and Breyer, noted that the three issues before them were ?straightforward.? Among those issues were whether the Florida Supreme Court?s interpretation of the election results violated a state law; whether the Florida Supreme Court had exceeded its powers in allowing a recount, and that those powers should have resided in the state?s legislature, and; whether the variety of standards for interpreting the hard-to-read ballots constituted violation of equal protection or due process. Souter dismissed that third claim out of hand."
| |
|
The 2004 U.S. Presidential Election, 2005.
This paper discusses the 2004 U.S. Presidential election, including background, election results and an assessment of what each campaign did right and wrong.
1,700 words (approx. 6.8 pages), 5 sources, APA, $ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, although the 2004 Presidential elections were not as contentious as the 2000 election and may not go down in history as one of the worst election in history, it certainly changed the way many politicians look at elections and the way the Democratic Party will attack elections in the future. The author points out that the campaign issues were quite clear and quite emotional on both sides: President Bush ran on a conservative ticket, opposing moral issues such as gay-marriage, abortion and gun control: whereas, Senator Kerry's focused on the positive and was far more liberal on just about every issue, from gay marriage to foreign policy. The paper states that Senator Kerry's campaign could not rouse the American people as much as President Bush's could and it seems that many of Kerry's supporters and political advisors did not know how to advise Kerry; therefore, he seemed to "flip-flop" on many of his positions.
From the Paper
"Election week was a flurry of campaigning, political ads, and polls. In the Showdown States, many voters complained of numerous phone calls and in-person visits from both parties, along with many special interest groups who were employing every measure they could in a last ditch effort to elect their specific candidate. The polls showed the election was extremely close (nearly 50-50), and so, the campaigning was much more intense than many people remembered in previous years. The battle for electoral votes seemed all in Kerry's favor early in the election results, when many East Coast polls closed. Kerry won in many East Coast states, including New York and Massachusetts, but Bush carried the states in the Midwest, such as Missouri, Illinois, Iowa, Nebraska, and of course, Ohio. These states tend to be more conservative in their outlook, and are traditionally Republican strongholds, and this was the case in 2004."
| |
|
Presidential Election and TV, 2006.
An analysis of the effect of television on voting outcomes during a presidential election.
4,394 words (approx. 17.6 pages), 20 sources, APA, $ 115.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes the effect that television has on the voting public at the time of a presidential election. It focuses on how much viewers are influenced by what they see and hear on the television. The paper examines the question of whether or not voters make their decisions based on an understanding of the issues, or if issues no longer count in the presidential race, but rather votes are bought by professional image makers, pollsters and spin doctors.
From the Paper
"Since it first began, communication research has gone through a number of different phases. Early work sought to uncover evidence of a strong, direct media influence that led to changes in individuals' behavior. When voting studies in the 1940s and 1950s found that the findings were mixed on the effect of this persuasive influence, mass communications researchers focused on understanding more about the nature effects and the more subtle aspects of the mass media's influence."
| |
|
Two U.S. Presidential Elections, 2002.
An analysis of the 1984 and 2000 elections.
2,925 words (approx. 11.7 pages), 14 sources, $ 103.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Analysis of the 1984 and 2000 elections. Background of the two-party system. Significance of the 2000 election as the first time in 124 years that the candidate who won the national popular vote lost the electoral vote. Compares the candidates of 1984 and 2000. Role of the media in Presidential elections.
From the Paper
"Analysis of the U.S. Presidential Elections of 1984 and 2000
Introduction - The Birth of the Two Party System
Prior to the election of 1840, America did not have a two-party political system. Federalists and Democratic-Republicans contested elections in the early republic, but they were more representations of class and regional power than political parties. From 1812 to 1824, during the "era of good feelings," there was only one political party, and Presidents James Madison and James Monroe ran virtually unopposed (Shulman, M1).
After a 4-year interregnum in which Andrew Jackson - the man who won the most electoral votes in the election of 1824 - was denied his victory in the House of Representatives in favor of John Quincy Adams, Jacksonian Democracy - a further development of..."
| |
|
The Presidential Election of 1992, 2005.
This paper discusses the close 1992 presidential election between challenger Bill Clinton and incumbent President George Bush (I), which was complicated by the third candidate Ross Perot.
1,280 words (approx. 5.1 pages), 9 sources, APA, $ 43.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, in light of his post-war approval rating, a win for Bush should have been an easy victory; however, William Clinton, the Democratic challenger, brought to the campaign a straightforward economic campaign, which appealed to the voters because, following the Iraq war, the United States was in a deep recession. The author points out that Bush's campaign of focusing on his experience and trust used by incumbents throughout history; furthermore, Bush brought Clinton's credibility into question, in terms of his lack of military service and other issues. The paper relates that Bush refused to believe that an economic recovery was not occurring, despite higher unemployment and the lowest interest rates since the Kennedy presidency; the result was one of the closest elections: Clinton was elected president.
From the Paper
"It is important to first understand the incumbent's reliance on his popularity in the era of a victory in Iraq, and in the post-cold war atmosphere. In 1992, the American population found themselves in a changed world, where the Berlin Wall and intercontinental missiles no longer existed. The Soviet Union was no longer united, Germany had become united, and the threat of nuclear conflict, so long a staple of the American psyche, had disappeared. Bush had recently completed a successful military attack in Iraq, showing the power and force of the American military."
| |
|
The Gender Gap in Presidential Elections, 2002.
Study of how men and women differ in their views of candidates and issues and the significance of this difference.
2,150 words (approx. 8.6 pages), 7 sources, $ 80.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
One of the buzzwords in recent presidential elections has been "gender gap." Poll after poll, particularly in the past four presidential campaigns, have shown that men and women view candidates differently on the issues and vote accordingly. The gender gap, however, has been around for at least five decades, and we will study it here and learn how men and women tend to cast their ballots.
| |
|
The Presidential Election and the Supreme Court, 2002.
A look at the Supreme Courts involvement in the 2000 Presidential elections.
1,900 words (approx. 7.6 pages), 4 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses whether the Supreme Court was an issue in the 2000 presidential campaign, what kinds of justices the candidates would be likely to appoint, what the current status of the Court is, what influence the makeup of the Senate has on the process, and whether Supreme Court appointments are likely to have the outcome that the candidate intended.
| |
|
The Presidential Elections of 1876 and 2000, 2001.
830 words (approx. 3.3 pages), 6 sources, $ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents the similarities between aspects of the presidential election in 1876 between Republican Rutherford B. Hayes, and Democrat Samuel Tilden, and in 2000, between Republican George Bush and Democrat Al Gore.
|
|
|
