| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "UNITED STATES NATIONAL HEALTHCARE INSURANCE": |
|
|
The United States and National Healthcare Insurance, 2005.
Examines whether a government-sponsored healthcare insurance is a winning proposition for the American people.
1,857 words (approx. 7.4 pages), 7 sources, APA, $ 59.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In the early 1990s, under the Clinton administration, a system of national healthcare was proposed for the United States. Although the plan failed, many Americans still believe that they would be better off if the government paid for the costs of healthcare. This paper examines both sides of the argument - those who are pro-national healthcare and those who believe that the physician-patient relationship is not the proper province of government. The paper examines Europe's policy of state sponsored healthcare to compare with the United States.
From the Paper
"So, no matter how many facts and figures each side brings to the table, the basic argument remains -- is the field of Healthcare appropriate for federal intervention? Regardless of the scope of European successes, regardless of the contribution to the general welfare, and regardless of its equalizing propensities, the use of federal dollars to pay for Healthcare in the United States will remain controversial. It is not that one side does not wish to help the other, the well-off to help the unfortunate, but rather that there is a difference of opinion on the ultimate extent of personal responsibility. For so long Americans have made so much of the concept of "self-reliance" that the mere mention of the creation of a new government program conjures up images of an uncontrollable and meddlesome monster."
| |
|
Health Insurance in the United States, 2002.
A look at the uninsured in the United States and problems facing them.
2,400 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 10 sources, $ 89.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper outlines the problem of the large number of uninsured Americans, suggests that a major cause of the reason that so many Americans are uninsured has to do with the fact that most people receive HMO-based health coverage through their employers, and makes recommendations as to how the situation might be improved.
| |
|
Healthcare Insurance, 2005.
This paper looks at the healthcare insurance industry in the United States.
2,025 words (approx. 8.1 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the healthcare insurance industry in the United States, looking at how many people have coverage, what it costs, how it is paid for, and how many people are uninsured. The paper also looks at economic factors which are causing people to drop coverage and the effects that has on their health and the healthcare providers.
From the Paper
"Health care spending in the United States rose at five times the rate of inflation - the fastest rate in US history. NCHC-Costs in health care premiums rose at a rate five times faster than the inflation rate, which was the largest one-year increase in premiums in more than a decade..."
| |
|
A National Healthcare System, 2005.
This paper discusses the ethics of a national healthcare system in the U.S..
6,360 words (approx. 25.4 pages), 37 sources, APA, $ 147.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper asserts that the U.S., being such a rich nation with so many
uninsured individuals, makes national healthcare and national health insurance a major ethical issue: National health insurance is a political idea which must be resolved. The author points out that the proponents of national healthcare tend to emphasize, in different shades of reasoning according to the cost proposed, the argument that the right to free or affordable healthcare is inalienable; whereas, people in opposition state that the current healthcare system barely works; moreover, it worked better before the current move toward affordable healthcare systems such as Medicaid, Medicare and HMOs became widespread. The paper suggests that the present managed care system will most likely be expanded, but there still will be application-based and ethical imperatives about government controlled healthcare programs as supplementary services and their position in a dynamic healthcare economy, which is becoming increasingly privatized.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Pros and Cons of National Healthcare
Socio-Economic and Ethical Issues
Recommendations
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Another way of simplifying the current system which confuses so many with its complexities is to look at the ways in which we as a society define health. Health may be conceptualized either as a state of being free from disease or as a constant striving for physiological, psychological, and spiritual wellness. The former approach is a relatively
narrow one and has as its counterpart in ontology, whereby disease is a specific thing external to the individual which must be warded off. There are approaches that are more holistic in addressing the needs of the whole person. Among other things, rather than seeing disease as the negation of health, this simplified point of view envisions the possibility of living a healthy lifestyle even with a chronic condition like diabetes, high blood pressure, or HIV."
| |
|
Healthcare Insurance, 2008.
An analysis of the problem of the large uninsured population in the United States healthcare system.
1,107 words (approx. 4.4 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 38.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the unresolved issue of healthcare insurance in the United States. It analyzes whether and how to insure those who have no insurance now and the effects of the large uninsured population on the rest of the population. It describes past debates on the issue and the recommendations that were made then. The paper concludes that anything short of full coverage leaves a portion of the population outside the system and yet burdens the system in the long run.
From the Paper
"Insuring everyone may not solve these problems if the insurance plan itself includes requirements for more paperwork, showing that full insurance in and of itself is not the sole answer to the health care problem. However, it is a vital start and gives the public what it sorely needs, that being a better health care system and better health as well. So long as there is a huge uninsured population, health care costs cannot be contained because the insured population is absorbing the costs of the uninsured, whether they know it or not. It is true that a full insurance program for everyone would spread the costs as well, but it could do so in a more efficient and controlled manner and would thus provide better information to those seeking to reduce health car costs across the board."
| |
|
The United States Health Care System, 2008.
Argues for universal health care in the United States.
2,195 words (approx. 8.8 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 68.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper states that the United States is virtually the only industrialized country in the world that does not automatically give citizens the benefit of free health care, but notes that there are, however, several other types of health care options in the U.S.. The paper then describes problems with these health care options such as that they require the individual to independently pay for private health insurance or Medicare. Next, the paper relates that, in other countries such as Canada and Britain, the universal health care concept is viewed as very successful. The paper contends that when the United States government realizes that universal health care is the best option, all citizens of the U.S. will begin to live a healthier life.
From the Paper
"The quality of health care in the United States can be considered opinionated to a certain extent but the amount of money the U.S. spends in comparison to other countries is inarguably absurd. There cannot be any denial of the inflation rate of uninsured citizens. The number of Americans without health insurance is now up to 45,000,000. That is a huge increase considering that in 1990 there were 35,000,000 uninsured citizens. Being uninsured increases your chance of fatality. If a universal health care system were to come into existence, we would see far less deaths in the U.S."
| |
|
Managed Care in the United States, 2006.
A look at the origins and history of managed care in the United States.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 6 sources, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Managed care in the United States consists of Health Management Organizations (HMOs), Preferred Provider Organizations (PPOs), and Medicaid and Medicare. These organizations arose as the growing population of the United States began to demand forms of health insurance that would not only provide services to workers but also their families. This paper discusses managed care health organizations in the US, looking at the reasons these organizations came into being, their origins and their original purpose.
| |
|
The Evolution to Economic Maturity for the United States, 2001.
This paper examines the significant economic advances that were made in the United States between 1782-1815.
1,526 words (approx. 6.1 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 50.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper starts by briefly outlining the basis of the American economy in the colonial period, and then contrasting it with the period of rapid economic development from 1782 to 1815. The rest of the paper examines this period carefully. Key issues outlined include the influence of mercantilism, the development of the American Banking System, the evolution of the insurance industry, as well as agricultural advances such as the flour mill.
From the Paper
"From 1782-1815, there was an extraordinary amount of change that took place in America, particularly on the economic front. Extremely significant shifts in agriculture, manufacturing, banking, and many other areas of the American Economy transpired, and the foundation for the most successful economy in the world today was laid. When the economic history of the United States is examined, it is clear that the time period between 1782 and 1815 was in fact "a period of evolution to economic maturity for the infant United States.""
| |
|
Health Care and Nursing in the United States, 2004.
Examines how health care reforms in the past years have affected America's uninsured and the nursing industry.
2,111 words (approx. 8.4 pages), 11 sources, MLA, $ 66.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how the health care reforms instituted under the past two presidencies have failed to address the problems of uninsured Americans in the United States. The first part of this paper examines the long road to health care reforms. It pays special attention to the thorny issue of universal insurance and the trends towards the privatization of health care. The next part of the paper then focuses specifically on the field of nursing. It looks at how health care reforms have changed the nature of a nurse?s job, increasing both the level and difficulty of a nurse?s workload. These changes also have significant implications for the quality of patient care in health care facilities and the rise in the number of self-care practitioners in the United States.
From the Paper
"Many nurses also report a rise in patient acuity. The privatization of healthcare has resulted in a new mindset in the medical workplace, one that requires hospitals to limit admissions to only ?the sickest patients for the shortest possible stays? (Sochalski and Aiken 1999:1). In addition to the increase in the number of patients, nurses are also managing an increased number of patients who are much more ill and who require more attention. As a result, the level and difficulty of a nurse?s workload has significantly increased."
| |
|
Universal Health Care in United States, 2002.
Examining the health care crisis in the States, reasons for the crisis and possible solutions.
3,589 words (approx. 14.4 pages), 13 sources, MLA, $ 100.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The first part of this paper examines the scope of the current healthcare crisis, with a special focus on New Jersey. It looks at the number of uninsured people in America, the rising costs of health insurance and other reasons why more and more people cannot afford adequate health care. The paper then studies why the current healthcare system fails to address their health needs. After looking at the failed health reform plan of former President Clinton and the various grassroots efforts towards providing low- or no-cost health insurance, the paper discusses the need for a single payer system of national health insurance.
From the Paper
"The United States has arguably the most scientifically advanced healthcare system in the world. Its physicians and scientists make significant strides in complex medical procedures such as organ transplants and treating cancer. People from around the world travel to the United States to consult with health experts and to seek medical help. It is therefore a sad irony that an estimated 44 million Americans could not afford adequate medical care. A growing number of Americans do not have health insurance and live in fear of an unexpected illness and financial ruin."
| |
|
Healthcare Insurance, 2007.
A discussion on the modifications needed for successful healthcare provision.
1,368 words (approx. 5.5 pages), 20 sources, MLA, $ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper researches the provision of healthcare services by the not-for-profit organization. It also offers a thorough review of related literature. The paper claims that in today's world it is clear that structural changes must take place if the not-for-profit organization is to have any effect on successful healthcare provision to those who are under- and uninsured.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
Threat of Risk Due to Under and Uninsured Growth Rates
SWOT - Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats
Five Key Initiatives for Building Organizational Strength
The 'Macmillan Matrix' States Factor in the Structural Changes that Must Occur in the Not-for-Profit Organization
Summary and Conclusion
Bibliography
From the Paper
"The strengths that exist were identified in the work: CFAR Briefing Papers (1996) specifically those of uncomplicated integration in financial management, management of human resources, culture, strategic planning, and resource allocation. The primary weakness of the organization is in their lack of ability of meeting the demands for healthcare provision of an ever-growing under- and uninsured group of individuals. Other weaknesses are in the areas identified in the CFAR Briefing Papers (1996) as being the hardest for the organization to integrate which are the areas of: Physician, support services, information systems, clinical integration, marketing, and quality assurance."
| |
|
Health Care Reform In the United States, 2002.
This paper discusses Clinton's 1993 "State of the Union Address" and his health care promises.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 6 sources, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This short paper discusses Clinton's 1993 "State of the Union Address" and promise that during his presidency all Americans would find themselves covered by some form of medical insurance. Seven years later, in the twilight of his presidency he continues to promise health care reform. This paper also looks at why nurses support health care reform. The focus of the paper will be on the benefits of health care reform.
| |
|
Nationalization of Healthcare, 2002.
An analysis of the Healthcare system, including the pros and cons of nationalization.
1,900 words (approx. 7.6 pages), 7 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
A paper on the topic of nationalization of Healthcare. The paper presents a review of both President Clinton President Bush's thoughts on the issue. The paper also provides an analysis of the pros and cons of the issue.
| |
|
The League of Nations and the United Nations, 2005.
This paper discusses the participation of the U.S. in the League of Nations and the United Nations as an element of the American national interest.
1,730 words (approx. 6.9 pages), 15 sources, APA, $ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, although the U. S. failed to support the League of Nations, America supported the United Nations because the supreme national interest of America was to obtain a world atmosphere in which the United States could grow its inner social values devoid of undue commotion or danger from the outside. The author points out that collective action via the United Nations instead of unilateral action was considered politically viable on key political issues. The paper concludes that the League of Nations and the United Nations disappointed hopes the following the two world wars because, in no way, can they be an autonomous political power; at best, the U.N. is a mirror image of the opposing interest of autonomous states.
Table of Contents
Introduction
America's Rejection to Support the League of Nations
The Historical Background
The Fundamental Principals that Lead to the Rejection of the League of Nations
America's Support for the United Nations
Using United Nations to Achieve the Goals of American Foreign Policy
The Fundamental Goal of Military Security
The Fundamental Goal of Political Security:
The Fundamental Goal of Stability and Welfare
The Fundamental Goal of World Order
Conclusion
From the Paper
"In the United States of America the major disagreement on both the groundwork venture and the refined Covenant of the League of Nations had been on the base that the League would function as an intrusion with the sovereignty of America and with the Monroe principle, that it concerned desertion of the traditional American policy, which had not been in favor of entrapped coalitions, and that the government did not have the power, within its Constitution, to insert such an agreement . Independence has revealed to be just so much freedom of action on the behalf of countries as is coherent with their responsibility, within international law and principles, to authorize the application of uniform independence or freedom of action by their sister countries. The League agreement had assured all States in their application of this sovereignty free from coercion by other Countries, and he who desires more is actually in search of the authorization thoughtlessly to ignore these commitments -- to refuse, for instance, the fair rulings of a properly established tribunal -- which is the German perception of independence."
| |
|
League of Nations and the United Nations, 2005.
This paper compares and contrasts the League of Nations and the United Nations.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 4 sources, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer compares and contrasts the League of Nations and the United Nations as international organizations formed to maintain peace and international cooperation. The writer discusses the League's role in reducing international tensions and its limited effectiveness. Further, the writer discusses the complexity of the United Nations as an organization.
From the Paper
Inis L. Claude stated that 'One World' is in some respects an idea land an aspiration born of modern interpretations of ancient moral thoughts and of rational estimates of the requirements for human survival. Both the League of Nations and its successor the United Nations were created as international organizations with a vested interest in maintaining the peace, preventing war, creating a mechanism or set of mechanisms for international cooperation and diplomacy and otherwise serving as trustees of ... "
|
|
|
