| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "U S WWII": |
|
|
U.S. Immigration Policy for Jews In WWII, 1994.
This paper discusses the immigration policy of the United States prior to and during the Second World War with regard to Jewish persons living in Europe: Background, anti-Semitism in U.S., economic fears, attitudes of Roosevelt administration and refusa
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 13 sources, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"This paper will discuss the immigration policy of the United States prior to and during the Second World War with regard to Jewish persons living in Europe. The thesis of this paper is that the U.S. government refused to liberalize immigration laws in response to the Nazi policies in Europe because of a combination of traditional anti-semitism, economic fears stemming from the Depression, and government responses to public opinion, both actual and perceived. The first part of the paper will provide a brief background to U.S. immigration policy during the Twentieth Century and show how this policy remained the same throughout the Second World War. The second part of the paper will examine anti-semitism in the U.S. during this period and discuss how it affected immigration policy. The third part of the ... "
| |
|
U.S. Economy Since World War II, 2005.
A look at the U.S. economy since WWII and how it favors the wealthy.
1,083 words (approx. 4.3 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay gives an overview of the post-World War II U.S. economy and outlines the ways in which various U.S. administrations have enacted policies favoring the corporate sector and the wealthy.
From the Paper
"The 18th century British economist Adam Smith advocated the benefits of a Laissez faire economy in his The Wealth of Nations (1776) by proclaiming that a "free economy" in which every individual pursues his own good, works for the benefit of everyone. These principles of a capitalist economy were adopted by almost all Western countries including the United States following the Industrial Revolution. The 19th century United States thus saw the rise of the "robber barons"-an era in which industrial workers were ruthlessly exploited by a handful of capitalists who also exercised great influence over the government. The result of the "free" economy without regulation and the unchecked pursuit of profits was one of the main reasons behind the Great Economic Depression of the 1930s in which millions of Americans were rendered destitute. This, in turn, prompted the "New Deal" Reforms of Franklin Roosevelt which led to increased government regulation of the economy and far-reaching reforms such as minimum wages and social safety nets for the poor. As a result, the US economy turned around and was put on the path of prosperity."
| |
|
U.S.-U.S.S.R. Relations during the Cold War, 2005.
A look at the rise in the Soviet Union's power and the deterioration in U.S.-U.S.S.R. relations after WWII.
819 words (approx. 3.3 pages), 2 sources, APA, $ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses and analyzes three important events before and during the Cold War period that chronicle the eventual erosion of the ?Grand Alliance? between U.S. and U.S.S.R. These three events are enumerated as follows: (1) the breakdown of U.S.-U.S.S.R. ties after WWII due to socio-political differences and incompatibilities; (2) integration of the Marxist-Leninist ideology into Russian society after WWII; and (3) U.S. President Harry Truman?s declaration of his containment policy against Communist countries, with a special focus on U.S.S.R.
From the Paper
"The Cold War, a long-term conflict between the Communist states in the Eastern region and the United States, began after WWII, wherein the rise in the popularity and increasing influence of Socialist (Communist) ideology was happening. While the rise of Communism became popular in USSR, China, and other countries like Vietnam and Korea, United States centered its attention in curbing Communism through the Soviet Union, since the nation is the prime mover in embracing and applying Marx?s ideology of a socialist society."
| |
|
U.S. Economy and World War II, 2002.
A comparative analysis of the U.S. economy before and after World War II.
786 words (approx. 3.1 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 28.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes the reasons why the U.S. economy flourished successfully after the WWII compared to the pre-war periods. It examines how pre-war, the stock market crashed due to the overwhelming amounts of speculative trading and investment and how the market and America?s economy went down. It looks at how along with the country?s downfall economically were the severe food shortage, high rates of inflation and nationwide unemployment which gave the name the Great Depression to the time. In contrast, it discusses how post-war America flourished because of increased military spending which paved the way for large-scale manufacturing to develop and how the economy strengthened due to support from international financiers.
From the Paper
"There are several reasons why the Depression in America took place prior to the war, and not at the end of the war, as what might be logically predicted. Take not that in the 1920s, America had also participated in the First World War, and after WWI, a sudden influx of economic and financial resource helped the society recover from the effects of the war. Because of the ?booming? economy of the nations, spending increased, and speculation in the market had also increased due to abundant economic resources. As a result, when the stock market had crashed due to the overwhelming amounts of speculative trading and investment, the market and America?s economy went down."
| |
|
WWII and U.S. Foreign Policy, 1999.
Argues that WWII had more impact on shaping the U.S. policy in the 20th Century than WWI, the Cold War or the Vietnam War.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 2 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
"This study will argue that, in terms of shaping United States foreign policy in the twentieth century, World War II was more influential than World War I, the Cold War, or the Vietnam War.
From the Paper
"This study will argue that, in terms of shaping United States foreign policy in the twentieth century, World War II was more influential than World War I, the Cold War, or the Vietnam War. The involvement of the United States in World War I was certainly a significant event in the history of the United States, but World War I simply did not have the lasting effect which World War II had in terms of uniting the destinies of the United States and Europe. The United States essentially adopted an isolationist attitude after World War I, and this isolationism intensified during the 1930s and the Depression years.
On the other hand, the Cold War and the Vietnam War were among the direct and indirect results of World War II. Both the Cold War and the Vietnam War would not have even come into existence had not World War II taken place and created the ..."
| |
|
Pre-WWII U.S. Neutrality, 1994.
A historical background from 1899, including pros and cons, peace pacts, public opinion and government policy toward Japan and Germany, the Lend-Lease Act and economic and political considerations.
4,950 words (approx. 19.8 pages), 26 sources, $ 135.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The Pre-Second World War Neutrality Controversy in the United States
Introduction
This research examines the pre-Second World War neutrality controversy in the United States. The most vocal opponents of changes to the nation's position of neutrality were the isolationists; however, German-American and Irish-American groups strongly opposed changes they feared would ally the United States more closely with the United Kingdom, and commercial and industrial interests opposed changes that would impinge on their freedom to trade with willing buyers. The most visible proponents of changes to the nation's neutrality laws were those individuals and groups who denounced what they perceived to be the inherent evilness of the sitting governments in Germany, Italy, and Japan. The most..."
| |
|
"Modern America: The U.S. From WWII to the Present" by Allan M Winkler, 1994.
A review of the work on the major social and political events and changes from Truman to Reagan.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 1 source, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Allan M. Winkler in his book Modern America: The United States from World War II to the Present relates the history of what came to be called the Cold War period up to 1985, several years before the Cold War effectively ended with the dissolution of the Soviet Empire. The author begins with World War II because he feels "that the war had a profound impact in shaping the nature of postwar society" (xi). He notes that the war developed differently in the United States than it did anywhere else--the U.S. came to the war later, fought overseas, experienced no devastation at home, and gained a confidence that would last beyond the war. The author emphasizes the diplomacy of the war period and the nature of the various alliances that were formed at that time. During and after the war, various conferences were held among the Allies, conferences that would..."
| |
|
The S.S., 2002.
An overview of Hitler's notorious military group, the S.S.
1,057 words (approx. 4.2 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In 1925, Adolf Hitler formed his own personal bodyguard unit and called it the Schutzstaffel (S.S.). Four years later Heinrich Himmler was appointed its leader. This paper looks at the history of one of the world's most feared military units during WWII. It also looks at the structure of the group, its three branches and their roles within the organization. Finally, the paper looks at the downfall of the S.S. with the fall of the Third Reich.
From the Paper
"Despite the almost mythical reputation of the S.S., (at least in the eyes of Germans), when the Third Reich fell, the S.S. fell with it. By mid-1943, more than 100,000 Waffen S.S. recruits died in during battle in Russia. ??We weren?t outfought?, wrote Kurt Meyer, ?but we were outnumbered, overwhelmed, pushed to the wall by sheer weight.?? (Constable, 172) Yet, the Waffen S.S. units continued to fight to ?stave off the end of nazism?. The attack of Kharkov was Germany?s last won battle. ?Hitler was ecstatic because his faith in the S.S. panzer corps had been validated?Himmler, too, brimmed with pride.? (Constable, 174)"
| |
|
The U.S. and the U.N. Rights of the Child Convention, 2002.
This paper discusses why the U.S. hasn't signed the treaty on the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child.
5,060 words (approx. 20.2 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 127.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents a detailed examination, written from a legal standpoint, of the treaty on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Children. The paper concludes the U. S. is willing to intervene in other international problems, such as oil; and therefore, it should make a public statement to protect the world?s most precious commodity, children, by supporting the treaty.
Table of Contents
Introduction
What Is It
What It Protects
What about the Legal Standpoint
Why Is Treaty Needed
Why Won't the U.S. Sign?
Reasons for Signing the Treaty
From the Paper
"While there are many political reasons that the US may refuse to sign the treaty, one of the chief causes for concern might be the establishment of an International Criminal Court. Many UN delegates support the idea of an International Criminal Court but the United States has been steadfast in its refusal to agree. An international criminal court might begin the slippery slope of descent to the power of individual nations when it comes to many issues including the treaty.If the international criminal court gains favor and power in the future it is feasible that the court could be used to enforce the treaty."
| |
|
Multiculturalism in the U.S. and U.K., 2005.
This paper presents an analysis regarding the doctrine of multiculturalism.
904 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer discusses the doctrine of multiculturalism. The writer offers an analysis of why such a doctrine is problematic. In order to examine the issue of multiculturalism, the writer uses examples from the public education systems in the U.S. and Great Britain to show the difficulties in treating all cultures as equal.
From the Paper
"Multiculturalism is defined by the Ayn Rand institute as the view that all cultures are equal. While this doctrine is often adopted in spirit if not in principle in the U.S. and Great Britain, multiculturalism is problematic as a term. For if all cultures are equal we cannot say that there is one superior way of being, one superior set of values or one superior method of educating individuals. However societies like America and Great Britain often adopt such methods values ... "
| |
|
The World Order: 1945-1970, 2007.
This paper discuses the world order, especially the U.S., from 1945 after the end of WWII to 1970 and Vietnam.
2,370 words (approx. 9.5 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 72.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that the years from 1945 to 1970 witnessed the transformation of the world order, which had been characterized by the emergence of the nation-states of the 19th century and their imperialistic colonization of countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America. The author points out that, after WWII, with the power of England, France and Germany destroyed, the U.S. was the only major power unscathed in its territory. The paper relates that, when the Soviet Union tested its first atomic bomb and imposed its constricting net over Eastern Europe, the two super powers aggressively opposed each other on either side of the Cold War. The author concludes that the state of the world in 1970 found a radically altered American society where, for the first time in its history, its Vietnam War policy was politicized and polarized.
From the Paper
"It is possible and perhaps necessary to view this strategic impasse less as a function of monolithic state policy than as actions motivated and implemented by government sectors, interest groups, or ministries. The arms race, with its high stakes in profits, needed a protagonist and an adversary; certain elements within the burgeoning military-industrial context also benefited quite well from the ostensibly anti-U.S. policy of Charles de Gaulle who "suspended military assistance to Israel" leaving the U.S. to become Israel's main arms supplier."
| |
|
U.S.-Soviet Relations from WWII to 1948, 1996.
Evolution from start of alliance against Nazi Germany to Teheran Conference (1943), Yalta Conference (1945), major issues (Japan, U.N., atomic bomb), beginning of Cold War, Soviet hegemony over Eastern Europe & Berlin Airlift.
5,850 words (approx. 23.4 pages), 17 sources, $ 135.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"This paper will discuss the evolution of relations between the United States and the Soviet Union between the end of World War II and the beginning of the Cold War in 1948. It will trace the deterioration in these relations, starting with friction between the two countries in the alliance against Nazi Germany at the end of the Second World War, through the advent of American nuclear power, to the imposition of Soviet hegemony over Eastern Europe in the late 1940s. The paper will end with the Berlin Airlift, which marked the final dissolution of the Second World War Alliance.
Prelude: The Second World War.
The evolution of U.S.-Soviet relations up to the Cold War cannot be understood without a brief background on the effect of the ..."
| |
|
Internment of U.S.Japanese Residents in WWII, 2001.
Military rationale. Issues of discrimination, civil liberties. Presidential proclamations & Supreme Court rulings.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 6 sources, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"During World War II, the United States interned Japanese residents of the Western states in internment camps such as that at Manzanar in California. The reason was indicated in Executive Order 9066, signed in 1942 by President Roosevelt to give authority to the War Department to define military areas in the western states and to exclude anyone who might be seen as threatening the war effort (Houston and Houston xi-xii). Japanese living in the Western states were seen as potential subversives and were summarily removed to camps to prevent this. The camps operated until after the surrender of Japan, though the U.S. Supreme Court ruled at the end of 1944 that loyal citizens could not be held in detention camps against their will (Houston and Houston, 1973, xii). The United States was wrong to place any Japanese who had not committed any offense into..."
| |
|
U.S. Internment Of The Japanese In WWII, 1995.
Argues that the policy was unjust, unjustified, illegal, hysterical, racist and inhumane.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 5 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"During World War II, the United States interned Japanese residents of the Western states in internment camps such as that at Manzanar in California. The reason was indicated in Executive Order 9066, signed in 1942 by President Roosevelt to give authority to the War Department to define military areas in the western states and to exclude anyone who might be seen as threatening the war effort (Houston and Houston xi-xii). Japanese living in the Western states were seen as potential subversives and were summarily removed to camps to prevent this. The camps operated until after the surrender of Japan, though the U.S. Supreme Court ruled at the end of 1944 that loyal citizens could not be held in detention camps against their will (Houston and Houston xii). The United States was wrong to place any Japanese who had not committed any offense into these camps ..."
| |
|
U.S. Foreign Policy After WWII, 2008.
A discussion of the impact of the end of the Second World War on US foreign policy and its international conduct.
1,309 words (approx. 5.2 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper shows how the effects of the war determined consequences for the United States that would mark its history for the next fifty years. The paper discusses how the end of the war represented an identification of the two enemies: the capitalist and the communist systems of government. The paper further discusses the creation of the United Nations and the American acceptance of the role of the leader of the free world. The paper also looks at America's engagement in the European affairs and in the nuclear race for the next half a century.
From the Paper
"After the end of the war and once the establishment of the communist rule across the Eastern part of Europe and large parts of the world in general, it came apparent that an eventual clash of doctrines and political system would emerge (Kissinger, 1995). From this point of view, it can be said that the start of the Cold War determined the way in which foreign relations and internal structures would be shaped. More precisely, once the Yalta discussions had taken place it was rather obvious for the US Administration as well as for the rest of the Western bloc that Stalin would try to impose the communist rule over most of the European continent in a quest for supremacy."
|
|
|
