| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "U S PATENT LAW": |
|
|
U.S. Patent Law, 1994.
This paper examines the contemporary controversies related to the United States patent system: Impact of technological innovations, economics, competition, public goods, intellectual property, cost and legal barriers and compared to Japanese patent law.
3,375 words (approx. 13.5 pages), 13 sources, $ 119.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"This research examines the contemporary controversies related to the United States patent system. The most significant of these controversies are those related to restrictions that patent holders are allowed to placed on the use of legally protected intellectual property, the economic harm suffered by patent holders as a result of infringements on patents, and the legal life of patents.
... contends that emerging technological innovation (in fields such as biotechnology and information systems) is being hampered by requirements of the existing American patent system. This problem ... "
| |
|
Patent Law, 2002.
A discussion of the imporatnce of patent law in businesses in the U.S.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 4 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
An overview of the importance of the patent law in the business field in the U.S.
| |
|
International Patent Law, 2007.
An examination and comparison of articles relating to international patent law.
8,276 words (approx. 33.1 pages), 8 sources, APA, $ 176.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper illustrates, analyzes and compares articles regarding the existing obligations or provisions regarding international patent law. It examines those provisions that fall under the Paris Convention, the Patent Cooperation Treaty, the Berne Convention and the Rome Convention. It also looks at the Treaty on Intellectual Property in Respect of Integrated Circuits and the European patent Convention, the Treaty on Intellectual Property in Respect of Integrated Circuits and the European patent Convention.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
Implementation Of The Trips Agreement
National And Most-Favored-Nation Treatment
Patent Right Exhaustion: Doha Declaration (Analysis Of Article 6)
TRIPS And Article 7 (Technological Promotion And Public Protection) Health Analysis
General Enforcement Obligations: Analysis Of Article 41
Fair And Equitable Procedures Article 42
Evidence (Article 43)
Article 45: Damages - Comparison and Analysis Related to IP Where Applicable
From the Paper
"The guides existing to allow action that is effective in prevention of infringement state the "the requirement procedures permit 'effective action' speaks to all possible remedies, including civil, administrative and criminal procedures, as well as border measures, customs, tax and communication procedures." Copyright law in countries of optical media product export has proved ineffective in terms of media licensing and "countries have adopted optical media licensing regimes." TRIPS has as an obligation the provision of "effective actions" of infringement upon rights under this Article. It is held that Article 41 when combined with 61 (assumed to be understood as subsumed within the requirements of Article 41" make it a further requirement o countries to make the provision of any remedies "available" and not limited to those that are only within the law. Article 61 obliges countries to make the provision of criminal procedures and penalties "at least in cases of willful trademark counterfeiting or copyright privacy.""
| |
|
Patent Law & Genetic Medicine, 2006.
A discussion on how legal issues in patent law shape ethical decisions in human stem cell research.
4,186 words (approx. 16.7 pages), 20 sources, MLA, $ 111.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This work examines the issue of human stem cell research from the view of the medical profession with an eye on funding, the public perspective and legislation affecting research of the human genome. Specifically this work explores the patenting process, whether patenting the human genome is plausible, and what consequences might exist in these patents. The paper notes the veritable quietness of the legal community at large in relation to this medical research issue.
Outline:
Abstract
Objective
Terms & Definitions of Study
Introduction
I. Implications of Diamond v. Chakrabarty (1980)
II. Implications of Later Cases
III. Free Market System Impacts
IV. What Ways Do Patents Objectify Human Dignity?
V. Is there a 'just' way of thinking about intellectual property law?
VI. Rights - Technological
VII. Ethics of Patenting the Technique for Human Stem Cell Lines
Summary & Conclusion
Bibliography
From the Paper
"In review of the patent laws in the United States, the U.S. Patent laws provides that the patent begin on the date that the patent is issued and ends 20 years later on the same date however, in special circumstances that date might be different and patents are considered for extensions as well. In order for issuance of a patent the invention must be a process that is both 'new' and 'useful' and must be a 'process, machine, manufacture or composition of matter' furthermore the invention must bee the standards of 'utility, novelty and non-obviousness' and must be something that is not in use publicly, not in written form or known to others in the same field of study."
| |
|
China's Patent Law, 2001.
Focus on international policy; Qualcom's CDMA patents, impact of 1992 revisions to law, intellectual property rights.
2,250 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 12 sources, $ 79.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Until 1984, when the first Patent Law of the People?s Republic of China was passed, the government of China afforded no patent protection to foreigners (Moser and Ho 453). Along with legislation involving trademark, copyright, and intellectual property rights, China?s patent laws have signaled the Republic?s desire to open its doors to new technology transfer (Shan 1). Though, in its original form, China?s Patent Law fell short of international standards, amendments passed in 1992 have brought the law in line with the international community (Global Sources).
Cultural hurdles faced by the government in enforcing the patent protection it affords have been aggressively pursued. The characteristically Chinese concept of technology as a ..."
| |
|
German Patent Law, 2003.
Discusses the protection of intellectual property.
2,250 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 9 sources, $ 79.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Describes the historic position of granting a patent only if the invention was truly new and representative of a technical step forward. Discusses restrictions of the law and modifications made with passage of the 1986 German Utility Model Act.
From the Paper
"German Patent Law reflects a long history in Germany, one whose laws on patents and other forms of protection have been adopted by other countries like Japan. Up until the adoption of the German Utility Model ..."
| |
|
Labour Law in the U.K. and Canada, 2003.
A comparative analysis of labour law in the U.K. and Canada.
2,530 words (approx. 10.1 pages), 23 sources, MLA, $ 87.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews labour laws in the United Kingdom and Canada in relation to wrongful dismissal and unfair dismissal. It assesses relevant cases to compare and contrast the situation in the two countries. It also discusses remedies available.
From the Paper
"This research compares and contrasts remedies for wrongful and unfair dismissal that are available to employees in the United Kingdom ..."
| |
|
Reasons for Consumer Protection Laws in the U.S., 2001.
A look at the history and reasons for Consumer Protection Laws in the U.S., beginning from the 1960s.
410 words (approx. 1.6 pages), 1 source, $ 17.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Consumers want to be treated fairly and honestly in the marketplace. Consumers may be harmed by abuses such as unfairly high prices, unreliable and unsafe products, excessive or deceptive advertising claims, and the promotion of some products known to be harmful to health."
| |
|
Immigration Laws in the U.S., 2004.
This paper contends that immigration laws in the United States must be revised.
2,475 words (approx. 9.9 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 87.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper argues that immigration laws in the United States must be revised to reflect the fact that Mexican immigrants comprise a crucial component of the American economy, particularly in the the essential services sector. The paper explains that the current policy is duplicitious, openly praising the virtues economic integration while simultaneoulsy preventing the integration of the labor market.
From the Paper
"The United States of America in dutifully and aggressively protecting its own interests has at times assumed a duplicitous role with its neighbors. Nowhere has this been truer than in regard to Mexico specifically pertaining to US immigration policy."
| |
|
U.S. Patent Holders in Japan, 1991.
A look at the problems and suggested solutions for Americans with patents doing business with Japan.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 10 sources, $ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Problems Faced in Japan by American Patent Holders
Fusion Systems (United States) charges Mitsubishi (Japan) with patent infringement.. Motorola (United States) sued by Hitachi (Japan) for patent infringement.. These two cases, in which both an American and a Japanese firm sue a Japanese and an American firm for patent infringement illustrate the complicated character of the patent protection issue involving the United States and Japan. At the heart of the matter are significantly different approaches to the conduct of industrial business in the two countries, which, in turn, has resulted in patent laws in the two countries which are not compatible in most instances.. Thus, an American patent holder anticipating American-style intellectual property protection in Japan is usually in for a disillusioning surprise, while Japanese firms become..."
| |
|
Intellectual Property Laws in U.S. & China, 1999.
Compares nations' legal protections (patents, copyrights), impact on trade & investment, agreements and enforcement.
2,700 words (approx. 10.8 pages), 37 sources, $ 95.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWS IN THE UNITED STATES AND THE PRC
This research paper summarizes the intellectual property laws of the United States and the People's Republic of China (PRC) and compares and contrasts the protection available to American intellectual property in the two nations.
Legal Protection of Intellectual Property in the United States
Intellectual property is extensively protected under the American legal system. That protection falls into four principal categories: (1) Patents; (2) Trademarks and Tradenames; (3) Trade Secrets; and (4) Copyrights. Special statutory protection is afforded certain high technology products and services as noted below.
Constitutional basis for protection. Art. I, Sec. 8, Cl. 8 of the U.S. Constitution provides that Congress shall have the.."
| |
|
Law Enforcement in the U.S., 2003.
Discusses military and civilian police forces.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 6 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Provides a history of each force. Examines the roots of law enforcement in British Common law, the development of a police force to provide social control, and the origin of military police by George Washington during the Revolutionary War.
From the Paper
"Law enforcement in the United States has a rich and varied history. Although most people are familiar with the "boys in blue" who patrol the nation's neighborhoods, many are utterly ignorant of the role military police play in enforcing the laws of our ..."
| |
|
Trademark Law in Canada and the U.S., 1993.
A look at the history, defintion, function and provisions with an emphasis on infringement cases.
2,475 words (approx. 9.9 pages), 41 sources, $ 87.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Trademark Law in Canada and the United States
This paper will examine trademark law in Canada and the United States, paying particular attention to infringement upon registered marks. The first part of the paper will briefly examine the history of trademark protection in the two countries; the second part will deal with infringement problems in the United States; the third part will look at infringement problems in Canada.
Historical Background
The protection of marks and names which identified the maker of certain goods dates back to the early years of English common law. It was not uncommon for unscrupulous competitors to copy the identifying mark of a well-respected manufacturer or merchant in order to "pass-off" their goods as those of the more famous..."
| |
|
Trademark Laws in U.S. & Canada, 1993.
Involving unfair advertising & competition, piracy & other infringements. Examples, recommendations and global aspects.
3,375 words (approx. 13.5 pages), 7 sources, $ 119.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
" This study is concerned with trademark laws in the United States and Canada and how they relate to unfair advertising or competition, as well as how effective they are in stopping piracy and other trademark infringements. It will be argued that, while recent legislation within these two countries has made trademark infringements more difficult, trademark law still needs further definition in the international sphere.
Since the 1870s, trademark rights in the United States have arisen out of the marks in commerce, the basic premise being "no trade, no trademark." The federal trademark statute enacted in 1946 required U.S. trademark owners to submit proof of prior use when applying to register their marks in the Patent and Trademark Office. In 1989 changes in trademark legislation within the United States gave domestic firms an edge in competing against.."
|
| Term Paper # 94463 |
temporarily unavailable
|
|
|
|
