| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "U S JAPANESE MANAGEMENT STYLES": |
|
|
U.S. and Japanese Management Styles, 2005.
This paper compares U. S. and Japanese management styles.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 5 sources, APA, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that there are major differences between U.S. and Japanese management styles. The author points out these differing concepts of correct management practices. The paper describes the vast cultural influence on management style in especially in negotiations.
From the Paper
"According to Tolich Kenney and Biggart, American sand Japanese conceive of management very differently and have strikingly different conceptions of themselves as managers and of correct management practice. The impact of cultural influence on management styles cannot be underestimated in today's global business environment and an increasing number of multinational operations in the U .S. owned by the Japanese. This analysis will compare and contrast differences in U. S. and Japanese management styles. There are a number of cultural factors."
| |
|
U.S. and Japanese Management, 2002.
A comparison of the U.S. and Japanese management philosophies.
2,458 words (approx. 9.8 pages), 9 sources, MLA, $ 74.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how the Japanese management philosophy has changed drastically in recent years due to a declining economy and rapidly changing technological advances. It looks at how ideals such as lifetime employment and seniority based pay systems have all but disappeared in Japan. It demonstrates how the new management philosophies are modeled somewhat after U.S. human resource principles such as pay based on performance. It also examines how the U.S. in turn, has also re-structured some of it?s management practices to reflect Japanese ideals of total quality management and efficiency.
Outline
Introduction
State of the Economy
Lifetime Employment in Japan
Seniority Based Promotions
Union Memberships
Japan vs. U.S.
Quality Control
Productivity and Efficiency
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Many theorists have claimed that the changes occurring in the Japanese management system are making the management more Western in nature, more reminiscent of U.S. styles of management. In some respects this idea is true. Human resource policies in Japan encouraging performance based pay structure are very similar to ideals adopted by many U.S. business entities (Ornatowski, 106). The major changes occurring in Japan are related more to seniority based pay and wages, as well as consensus management decision making than lifelong employment philosophies. It is true that thousands of ?lifelong? employees have been displaced due to harsh economic times. It is important to remember however, that not all employees in Japan are lifelong employees, and only key or ?core? employees."
| |
|
Japanese Culture and Management Style, 1991.
This paper discusses the cultural basis for Japan's economic superiority despite small size & dearth of resources: Socio-historical and philosophical foundations for successful management emphasizing common goals and manager-worker cooperation.
3,150 words (approx. 12.6 pages), 18 sources, $ 111.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"As a modern, industrial country, Japan has been able to significantly and steadily improve its productivity and enhance the quality of its manufacturing processes to the point where it is providing world leadership in the art and science of management, especially production management. Although the West has expressed considerable interest in Japanese management techniques over the last few decades, there has been only limited interest in adopting particular aspects of Japanese management into the American corporate environment. This is due, in part, to the overriding belief that Japanese management is inexorably tied to Japanese culture, and hence is not transferable. In fact, although there are numerous examples of culture and management being intertwined, particular variables and techniques from Japanese management "are transferable to the West, although ... "
| |
|
Japanese Management Style, 1997.
Examines theory & practice, cultural factors, corp. loyalty, motivation, power & control, failure, decision making, flexiblity; compared to American style.
2,025 words (approx. 8.1 pages), 9 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"JAPANESE MANAGEMENT STYLE
This research reviews the Japanese style of manufacturing management. Management problem solving approaches, leadership styles, worker attitudes and thinking processes, and inventory and production management techniques are addressed. The approach in this review to the development of an understanding of the Japanese style of management is to compare Japanese managerial practices with American managerial practices.
Japanese managers take the theories they find and put them to use (Chen, 1995, pp. 180-196). A theory of work as meaningful living prepares employees for socialization into groups, as does the belief that the company has a legitimate social mission. Powerful managers who demand that employees participate and do not worry about little mistakes motivate the development a strong.."
| |
|
Japanese Management in the U.S., 1992.
A description and application of Japanese techniques, compared to the U.S. approach, implementation, examples, successes and failures.
2,700 words (approx. 10.8 pages), 26 sources, $ 95.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"APPLYING JAPANESE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES IN THE UNITED STATES
Introduction
This research examines the application of Japanese management techniques in the United States. A specific interest in this examination is a consideration of why some Japanese management techniques may not always produce satisfactory results when they are applied in American organizations.
Japanese Management and Japanese Culture
Contemporary Japanese management practices, and, indeed, the contemporary success of Japanese enterprise may be traced to the Meiji Restoration. The Meiji Constitution was implemented in 1889, and, subsequent to its introduction, Japan entered into a period of rapid development (Toland, 1970, p. 62). The Tokugawa governments had opposed the opening of Japan to ..."
| |
|
Japanese Management Practices, 1992.
An argument that in order to achieve some degree of Japan's success, and due to the extent of Japanese investment in America, US managers are attempting to emulate Japanese management styles to the greatest possible degree.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 9 sources, $ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Introduction
The Japanese industrial expansion since World War II has been considerable and has been noted by other industrialized nations around the world. Japan began from a position far behind the West, with her infrastructure devastated, and since has achieved a position of economic preeminence, challenging the United States and other industrialized nations for world leadership in innovation and industrial production, especially in high-tech industries of great import on the international scene today and into the future. The U.S. has recently started giving Japan greater attention in order to discern the management styles used in Japan and to emulate them to the greatest degree possible, and..."
| |
|
Management Styles, 2002.
This paper discusses an American business manager's style and Canadian business manager's style, in a similar field.
2,900 words (approx. 11.6 pages), 8 sources, $ 106.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper compares and contrasts the American and Canadian management styles in the areas: Planning, organizing, communication, directing and controlling. The paper explains the strengths and weaknesses of both styles. The paper relates the effect of the management styles on the economy of the different countries.
| |
|
Management Styles, 2007.
This paper examines the different management styles of chaos management, entrepreneurship management, marionette management and partnership management.
2,005 words (approx. 8.0 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer discusses that in the business world today, the old cliche, that change is the only constant, is more dynamically true than ever before. Indeed, the writer notes that change has become so prevalent and multifaceted that specific management theories have been developed to focus on this phenomenon alone. Further, the writer points out that in order to most effectively survive in the changing business world today, it is perhaps best to focus on not one single, but on a multiplicity of management styles. In this essay the writer presents a description of the theories and philosophies behind four management styles and looks at how they integrate with the new modern business paradigm: chaos management; entrepreneurship management; marionette management; and partnership management.
Outline:
Chaos Management
Entrepreneurship Management
Marionette Management
Partnership Management
Conclusion
From the Paper
"The basic reason for the necessary shift in business paradigm is the shift in actual business from the physical in the workplace to the mental. Whereas labor in the past was mostly manual, this has been replaced by technology, leaving workers free to make more use of the mental paradigm in the workplace. The rapid advance of Information Technology has made this all the more complex and difficult to manage. Information, unlike physical labor, is a not a physical phenomenon that can be seen and quantified easily. This is why chaos so easily results. The traditional methods, while still valid, need to be supplemented to ensure that they can be adequately applied to the new business paradigm."
"To develop additional strategies for chaos management, Wojick suggests a clear distinction between attention and thought: attention being the aspect of the cognitive industry that can be managed, while thought is mysterious, creative, often chaotic, and hence impossible to manage."
| |
|
Japanese Management, 1996.
Critical comparison of 1973 & 1983 books on British & Japanese management philosophies & practices. "British Factory-Japanese Factory" by Robert Dore & "Under Japanese Management" by M. White & M. Trevor.
2,700 words (approx. 10.8 pages), 2 sources, $ 95.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Much has been written during the 1980s about Japanese management and how the techniques employed by the Japanese have ramifications and applications to management throughout the world. Just-in-time (JIT) inventory management and Total Quality Management (TQM) have both gained popularity in the United States and United Kingdom, as well as other regions, and their roots can be traced to Japan. However, management analysts have been interested in Japanese management techniques for a number of years prior to the recent wave of attention focused on Japanese management, and some researchers were conducting studies on factories in Japan and comparing their management styles to factories in the United Kingdom. This research examines two such works, written ten years apart, which studied Japanese factories and used the findings to..."
| |
|
Japannese and American Management Styles, 1991.
This paper compares and contrasts the Japanese and American management styles.
2,250 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 6 sources, $ 79.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The organization of the future and the leadership style of the future will be more firmly supportive of one another than has been the case in the recent past. In the United States especially, managers have been looking for a new way to structure the organization and a new way to manage it in order to regain the sort of competitive power that once was the hallmark of the American system. There is a perception of decline that has affected all considerations of the future, and managers seem more and more to view themselves as having to catch up to Japan in particular. Much of the concern with Japanese business and manufacturing now centers on questions of how to adopt Japanese techniques to the formation of the new organizational structure and how to manage that structure in the American environment. It has been found that simply importing Japanese techniques is not ... "
| |
|
Management Styles, 2005.
This paper explores the concept of management style by examining past antiquated styles, the definition of management and a variety of current adaptations.
2,580 words (approx. 10.3 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 77.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that an antiquated management style, once typical of the the old "Rust Belt Industries", is the "Top-Down Autocratic Style", in which there is a rigid, established hierarchy, ruling with an iron fist and giving little concern to middle-management who carried out the orders of the Baron types owners. The author points out that a manager must posses the skills of leadership along with the intelligence, fortitude and willingness to apply this leadership to accomplish a task no matter how the task is defined. The paper relates, after reviewing many contemporary management styles, such as "Management by Objectives" and "Management by Walking Around", that, because today businesses are rapidly expanding globalization and are subject to constant technological changes, management styles must be flexible.
From the Paper
"The old Soviet Union under Communist Rule is another classic example of the failure of the autocratic top down approach to management style. In this case, all incentives were removed from middle management and in there place was a quota system thereby producing their iron-fisted control of workers which in turn produced a total collapse of their economic system in spite of appearing to compete favorable with other nations of the world. This also produced many unsavory characters willing to take about any chances to cheat the system and this not to mention the damage this management style did to the population as a whole from a sociological point of view."
| |
|
Management Styles, 2008.
This paper analyzes the fundamental differences between management styles in western and eastern cultures.
2,830 words (approx. 11.3 pages), 11 sources, APA, $ 84.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper highlights three major differences between eastern and western cultures that affect management styles. The author reports that the philosophical underpinning of the west is based on rationality and maximizing self interest; whereas, eastern cultures focus on changing behaviors and circumstances for different behaviors. The paper states that western culture is focused on individuality and on proactive decision-making; however, eastern management styles are based on a strict manager-subordinate chain with more of a group oriented focus on the successful completion of tasks. The author points out that the eastern management style is more directive with workers expecting assigned tasks and clear directions; whereas, in western culture, the idea of initiative is praised and workers are expected to question assumptions, take risks and undertake tasks that were not necessarily assigned. The paper includes a graph and a table.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
Management Styles in Western and Eastern Cultures
The Role of Culture in Business Management: Western versus Eastern Philosophies
Motivation and Performance Measures in Western and Eastern and Eastern Cultures
Western and Eastern Workers: Interactions with the Organization
Cultural Differences and Communication
Conclusion
From the Paper
"On a practical note, Korn/Ferry International conducted a survey in collaboration with the Economist Intelligence Unit and found that a vast amount of respondents (72%), saw the East as a major influence in the macro business environment, and were considered major players within the overall globalization process, as different geographic spheres became more integrated. However, the Eastern leaders were not considered particularly able to excel in the global market place (this excludes Japan); as only 20% of the respondents thought Eastern cultures were adaptive to the global business environment and practices."
| |
|
Conflict Management Styles, 2007.
An analysis of the appropriate use of different conflict management styles within a work environment.
991 words (approx. 4.0 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses five conflict management styles - collaborating, competing, compromising, avoiding and accommodating. It discusses when different conflict styles should be used, depending on the situation one finds oneself in. The paper then provides a personal discussion of how these conflict styles are used in a certain agency environment.
Table of Contents:
Abstract
Introduction
Defining Conflict Management Styles
Agency Conflict Management Style Approach
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Defining Conflict Management Styles
When faced with conflict, individuals have a specific conflict management style he or she likes to use. The definition of conflict management as defined by Wikipedia refers, "to the long-term management of intractable conflicts. It is the label for the variety of ways by which people handle grievances, standing up for what they consider to be right and against what they consider being wrong." (Wikipedia, 2007). The key to effectively managing conflicts is the ability to choose which management style is best appropriate for certain situations. (Ohio Commission on Dispute Resolution & Conflict Management, unknown). There are five main types of conflict management style types such as collaborating, competing, compromising, avoiding, and accommodating."
| |
|
Management Styles, 2005.
This paper is a research proposal to study the evolution of management styles in the Middle East
885 words (approx. 3.5 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that the thesis will evaluate Middle East organizations and identify modern management styles being adopted by them. The author stresses that management styles implemented in a regional-specific organization should take into account the culture, values and the type of industry. This study will identify the strengths and the weaknesses of the different management styles of the past century and identify their appropriateness for the Middle East. The paper relates that the research methodology will include an extensive secondary exploration and a survey using questionnaires and a focus group to collect primary data.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Aims and Objectives of this Thesis
Significance of this Study
Literature Review
Research Methods
Expected Outcome for this Thesis
From the Paper
"The effects of corporate culture and the attitude of the management towards the worker are also as important as the culture and the value of the worker. Abraham H. Maslow and Douglas M. McGregor both believed that in order for people to work to their full potential, they're basic needs have to be satisfied. Herzberg stated that there are various factors that affect motivation: working conditions, salary, job-security and company policies to name a few. Douglas McGregor also put forth the concept that people's management-behavior is dependent upon their view of human beings and work."
| |
|
Comparing Management Styles and Concepts, 2001.
This paper compares William Ouchi?s and Frank Gilbreth?s management styles and strategies in the realm of electronics management.
965 words (approx. 3.9 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 34.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The following paper discusses management's different styles and concepts, each of which are legitimate from their own vantage point. The writer examines how different theories seem to borrow from one another the basic structure of good management. It also explains how they can also stand alone, based on the theory's uniqueness. There are many different management theories available for comparison. The following comparison represents only a fraction of the different theories and strategies in the realm of electronics management.
From the Paper
"There are many different management philosophies existing in the electronics industry today. Conforming to one particular style of management can be an investment that returns attributes such as team cohesiveness and cost effectiveness many folds. Of course before selecting a favorite style, a critical comparison of several will take place. Here, is present a comparison of William Ouchi?s and Frank Gilbreth?s management styles."
|
|
|
