| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "U S INVOLVEMENT BOSNIA 1990S": |
|
|
U.S. Involvement in Bosnia during the 1990s, 2002.
An overview of America's foreign policy towards Bosnia during the turbulent war years of the 1990s.
3,658 words (approx. 14.6 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 101.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This research paper traces the evolution of American involvement in and international strategy toward Bosnia during the period beginning with the outbreak of war among indigenous forces there in early 1992 and continuing to the present time. It begins by discussing the war in Bosnia and U.S. international strategy after the end of the Cold War. It then discusses Bush's strategy vis-a-vis Bosnia and Clinton administration non-strategy. The writer then addresses the reassertion of American leadership in 1994-95 and concludes the implementation of the Dayton Accords.
From the Paper
"The international strategy of any nation contains three elements: its foreign policy (ends or goals) and the means used to achieve those goals (foreign policy means, including the use of diplomacy, the threat of or use of military power, and economic tools, such as foreign aid, trade, etc.), as permitted or constrained by foreign policy resources (including the sinews of national economic and military capacity and strength, and intangible sources of national power, such as international prestige and reputation, national will and public support). International strategy consists of three basic elements or components: global strategy, regional strategy and strategy toward a particular nation or state. The primary thesis of this paper is that the United States failed for at least four years to develop and, therefore, implement through appropriate use of diplomacy and military force an effective international strategy for dealing with the Bosnian war because it suffered from confusion as to its basic objectives there and a lack of conviction that its vital interests were involved. Even today, four years after the signing of the Dayton Accords, legitimate questions can be raised as to whether American policy makers, the Congress or the American public sufficiently appreciate the long-term nature of the commitments they have undertaken in Bosnia and whether they are prepared to stay the course long enough to complete them."
| |
|
U.S. Involvement in Bosnia in the 1990s, 2000.
An examination of the evolution of American diplomatic, political and military action, strategies, alliances and role of Presidents.
2,925 words (approx. 11.7 pages), 10 sources, $ 103.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This research paper traces the evolution of American involvement in and international strategy toward Bosnia during the period beginning with the outbreak of war among indigenous forces there in early 1992 and continuing to the present time
From the Paper
"U.S. Involvement in Bosnia During the 1990s
This research paper traces the evolution of American involvement in and international strategy toward Bosnia during the period beginning with the outbreak of war among indigenous forces there in early 1992 and continuing to the present time.
Outline
1. 1991-1992. The United States failed to develop an effective international strategy for coping with the disintegration of Yugoslavia and the war in Bosnia in large part because after the Cold War, its senior policy makers during the Bush administration did not view the United States as having any vital national interests involved in that conflict and, was therefore, determined to leave the diplomatic initiative for its..."
| |
|
U.S. Involvement In Bosnia, 2002.
A research and explanation of the current U.S. involvement in Bosnia.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 5 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
An analysis of US foreign Policy and security stance in the Bosnia situation and the effects its had on the world order and the domestic policy within the US. It assesses the role of the US and the origins of intervention.
| |
|
U.S. Foreign Policy Decisions, 2004.
An examination of whether U.S. foreign policy decisions are more beneficial to the United States itself or to the world it is aiming to 'protect'.
2,451 words (approx. 9.8 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 74.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the question, "Is the U.S. seeking to protect its own national security or simply to secure its own national interests throughout the world by having a unilateral approach to foreign policy decisions?" The paper uses two main sources as the basis for the analysis of this question: "Logic of American Foreign Policy" by Patrick Callahan, published in 2004; and the fifth edition of "American Foreign Policy" by Glenn Hastedt, published in 2003/4. These two main sources are introduced, in depth, and the frameworks that arise from these books are then used to frame an analysis of the question posed in this paper; supplementary examples are taken from recent political involvements of the U.S. in Bosnia, Iraq, Kosovo, and China. The final section of the paper, therefore, looks at the question from the viewpoint of the book reviews, with supplementary information where necessary.
From the Paper
"Essentially, Callahan?s book looks, in depth, at six facets (or ?logics?) of the role the United States plays on the world stage: hegemonism, liberalism, realism, isolationism, liberal internationalism, and anti-imperialism. The book looks at each of these logics, and essentially traces the development of these logics through the study of the relevant policy documents and historical responses to these policies; a critical summary is then given for each logic. Three case studies are then presented at the end of the main body of the text: the debate following US intervention in Kosovo; the debate surrounding the 1990 Chinese trade debate, and the events following the events of September 11th 2001. These issues will be discussed, when relevant, in the present paper."
| |
|
U.S. Involvement in the Persian Gulf Conflict, 2000.
An analysis of the reasons behind U.S. involvement in the 1991 Persian Gulf conflict.
1,775 words (approx. 7.1 pages), 7 sources, $ 57.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
An analysis of the developments that lead the U.S. to become involved in the Persian Gulf conflict. The author discusses aspects such as image, economics, priorities and interests of the U.S. that lead her to become involved.
From the Paper
"On August 8, 1990, President George Bush announced that he had sent American troops to Saudi Arabia to protect it during Iraq?s invasion of Kuwait. This was the beginning of U.S. military involvement in the Persian Gulf Conflict, which had started with Saddam Hussein?s decision to invade only a week earlier. What made Bush decide to get involved so quickly? What did he stand to lose, and what did he expect to gain? Given a thorough understanding of the United States? priorities and relationships with other countries in the Middle East, the answers to these questions are easy to find."
| |
|
Debate Over U.S. Involvement in Vietnam, 2002.
An overview of the debate between the "Hawks" and the "Doves" over U.S. involvement in Vietnam.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 4 sources, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is an examination of the debate during the Vietnam War between the "Hawks", who were pro-war, and the "Doves", who were against the war. The paper looks at the origins of the controversy and looks at the opinions of several people from each side regarding the issue.
| |
|
U.S. Involvement, 2003.
A discussion on America's international involvement in Asia and China.
690 words (approx. 2.8 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 23.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the Open Door policy. The author expands on the American entry into Asia, and its interests in China.
From the Paper
"Today the U S is an international super power. Built at the outset of the Twentieth Century the internal growth of America finally got politicians and diplomats to look outside the country. As a Christian nation America ..."
| |
|
U.S. Involvement in World War I, 2007.
This paper discusses how World War I changed the economic position of the United States in a permanent and positive way.
1,580 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 51.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses the reasons for the United States' involvement in the First World War. The paper then explains how the war impacted the US economy in terms of exports, employment and taxes. The paper illustrates how the war effort had a favorable impact on the U.S. economy and how the power as financial world leader shifted from London to New York. The paper shows how the devastating human and resource losses were offset by favorable economic factors.
From the Paper
"World War I, like all wars tend to, had a devastating effect on all the parties involved. The War in question began in Europe, resulting from a dispute between just two countries. The rest of Europe became involved through various alliances, loyalties, and enmity, respectively. The involvement of the United States lasted only months, from 1917 to the end of the War. The country's initial declaration of neutrality for the majority of the War ended when the country's economy was seriously threatened by Germany's warfare practices (Feldmeth)."
| |
|
U.S. Involvement in Nicaragua, 2003.
This is a source-based essay exploring the United States' interference in the independent political process of Nicaragua late last century.
1,455 words (approx. 5.8 pages), 11 sources, MLA, $ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the question: Why did the United States interfere in the internal politics of Nicaragua in the 1970?s and 80?s?. It features a recount of the political situation pre US involvement; a break down of the reasons for U.S. interference and a description of the effects of this process.
From the Paper
"The US interference in the affairs of Nicaragua during the Carter and Reagan administrations and its subsequent exposure to the international community remains as an example of international terrorism disguised as a form of US foreign policy. Before the answering question as to why the US government felt it necessary to blatantly ignore both international and American law in order to destabilize the Nicaraguan political scene, a brief outline of the events concerned must be offered."
| |
|
U.S. Involvement in the Persian Gulf War, 2000.
An analysis of foreign policy decisions, diplomacy and military events leading up to, during and after the 1990-91 war between the Western allies and Iraq.
2,025 words (approx. 8.1 pages), 10 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"This research paper summarizes and analyzes the United States foreign policy decisions and military events which led to, perpetuated and ended American involvement in the Persian Gulf War, including the military strategy employed by Iraq and the United States during that war.
The Persian Gulf War was precipitated by the invasion of Kuwait by Iraq in August 1990 and the determination by the United States that its vital interests were thereby threatened. American foreign policy, because it sought to maintain a balance between Iraqi and Iranian power in the region, sent Iraq mixed signals which failed to deter the invasion, but many other factors lay behind Saddam Hussein's decision to invade. Thereafter, the United States effectively built up its forces in..."
| |
|
The U.S. and the U.N. Rights of the Child Convention, 2002.
This paper discusses why the U.S. hasn't signed the treaty on the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child.
5,060 words (approx. 20.2 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 127.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents a detailed examination, written from a legal standpoint, of the treaty on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Children. The paper concludes the U. S. is willing to intervene in other international problems, such as oil; and therefore, it should make a public statement to protect the world?s most precious commodity, children, by supporting the treaty.
Table of Contents
Introduction
What Is It
What It Protects
What about the Legal Standpoint
Why Is Treaty Needed
Why Won't the U.S. Sign?
Reasons for Signing the Treaty
From the Paper
"While there are many political reasons that the US may refuse to sign the treaty, one of the chief causes for concern might be the establishment of an International Criminal Court. Many UN delegates support the idea of an International Criminal Court but the United States has been steadfast in its refusal to agree. An international criminal court might begin the slippery slope of descent to the power of individual nations when it comes to many issues including the treaty.If the international criminal court gains favor and power in the future it is feasible that the court could be used to enforce the treaty."
| |
|
Multiculturalism in the U.S. and U.K., 2005.
This paper presents an analysis regarding the doctrine of multiculturalism.
904 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer discusses the doctrine of multiculturalism. The writer offers an analysis of why such a doctrine is problematic. In order to examine the issue of multiculturalism, the writer uses examples from the public education systems in the U.S. and Great Britain to show the difficulties in treating all cultures as equal.
From the Paper
"Multiculturalism is defined by the Ayn Rand institute as the view that all cultures are equal. While this doctrine is often adopted in spirit if not in principle in the U.S. and Great Britain, multiculturalism is problematic as a term. For if all cultures are equal we cannot say that there is one superior way of being, one superior set of values or one superior method of educating individuals. However societies like America and Great Britain often adopt such methods values ... "
| |
|
Discrimination in the U.S. 1950s -1990s, 1994.
This paper discusses discrimination in the U.S. from the 1950's to the 1990's: Racism and sexism in business and society, politics, integration, harrassment and instutionalized biases.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 7 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Business today has to take a broad view of ethical issues, not in terms of letting certain actions slide as was done in the past, but in terms of seeing more and more of its choices as ethical dilemmas with pitfalls for the company as well as for society. We live today in a litigious society and to a degree in a more judgmental one, and ethical lapses are closely followed by a public that is both eager to hear details of every error in judgment and unwilling to look the other way when it believes an individual or a company has done something unethical. Race and sex discrimination in their various forms are clearly ethical issues for business, issues which impact on society and which are viewed as fundamental issues of right and wrong. Society at large no longer takes the attitude that such discrimination is acceptable. Indeed, an examination of what Americans have always ... "
| |
|
U.S. Foreign Policy in the 1990s, 2002.
Examines the United States' foreign policy in the 1990's, mainly under President Clinton, as the only remaining superpower.
1,054 words (approx. 4.2 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains how, with the cold-war over, the U.S. found itself re-examining its foreign policies and deciding how to establish itself as the only remaining superpower. This paper looks at three of the principles that shaped foreign policy in the 1990s -- namely a much lessened interest in security, an emphasis on trade and an extraordinary focus on humanitarian activities.
From the Paper
"Much of the United States foreign policy in the 1990s reflected the country?s ongoing adjustment to its new role as, in Richard Haas? terms, a ?reluctant sheriff.? With the zero-sum struggles of the Cold War out of the way, the United States suddenly found itself the only remaining superpower. As Haas observed, ?We no longer live in a world in which a rival possesses missiles aimed at us with the capacity to destroy us in an instant. Nor is the United States engaged any longer in a global struggle for influence or advantage? (The Reluctant Sheriff, 56)."
| |
|
Food Rights and U.S. Policy in the 1990s, 2000.
A position paper arguing that the Clinton Administration's refusal to recognize a 'right to food' is entirely inconsistent with its recognition of economic and social rights.
1,410 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 6 sources, $ 46.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Among various scholars? enumerations of particular human rights, the fundamental rights listed may be classified as either political and civil rights or economic and social rights. Political and civil rights are negative rights, which are typically satisfied by the mere absence of constraint or harm. In contrast, economic and social rights are positive rights, which constitute an affirmative claim to certain goods and services in society. Human rights have traditionally been considered, by definition, those rights that are universal in nature. Justifying economic and social rights has been problematic because not all goods are attainable. The provision of many economic and social goods is dependent upon a society?s production possibilities, which in many nations are too inadequate to provide for basic needs, and therefore deny the universal possibility of fulfilling such rights. However, consideration of the duties and obligations of actors in a global economy reveal that economic and social rights are, in fact, justified. Mr. Bush and Mr. Reagan?s terming of such rights as mere ?goals? or ?objectives? should not be restored; the Clinton Administration?s termination, by policy, of the distinction between economic and social rights and political and civil rights represents a moral movement forward. However, the Clinton Administration?s refusal to recognize a ?right to food? is entirely inconsistent with its recognition of economic and social rights. "
|
|
|
