| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "THINKING PROBLEM RESOLUTION": |
|
|
Critical Thinking: Problem Resolution, 2007.
An analysis of a particular example of critical thinking using the critical thinking problem solving model by R. Hansten and M. Washburn.
846 words (approx. 3.4 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines critical thinking (otherwise referred to as reflective thinking). The author reflects on a situation she experienced while holding a position in a hospital's accounting department and looks at how it was necessary to apply critical thinking to the problems that existed in the department. The paper presents the writer's opinion of the worth of the critical thinking problem solving model by R. Hansten and M. Washburn.
From the Paper
"Implementing the change would require some cross training from those who were skilled and knowledgeable of various insurance company nuances. Incorporating insurance company specific protocols into an online or hardcopy binder, with company listed alphabetically, would provide a reliable reference tool from which to adequately handle insurance company protocols. It is also suggested that a day be devoted to cross training presentations; for example, in the morning the manager could conduct a presentation on how to effectively deal with insurance companies and in the afternoon conduct a presentation on how to effectively deal with private patients, both with ample time for team discussion."
| |
|
Critical Thinking and Conflict Resolution, 2002.
Explains how the theories of critical thinking could be taught to and used by adults in conflict resolution situations.
1,247 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains how conflict is part of everyday life, yet many adults fail to achieve successful conflict revolution. It examines the theory of critical thinking, which is one approach that shows promise, and what is needed is adult education to teach peace as the key to personal and social change. It discusses how critical thinking emerges form the theories of Mezirow and Brookfield and enables the individual to think differently about conflict. Critical thinking leads to conflict resolution, and the theoretical assumptions and alternatives are noted by the author as he shows different strategies for conflict resolution leading to suggestions for practical techniques to teach critical thinking and relate it to conflict resolution.
From the Paper
"The individual and his or her work situation are affected by how they handle such issues as conflict resolution, stress management, interpersonal communication, and non-verbal communication. These dimensions of everyday life have to be addressed by everyone, and how well they manage to do this determines their own sense of well-being and self-esteem on the one hand, and how they are viewed by observers on the other. There is a considerable body of literature indicating how important these dimensions are to the person and to the person's social standing as well as offering advice and guidance on how best to achieve control of these dimensions. O. Randall Braman indicates the importance of the issue and calls on educators to fulfill their function of preparing the young for their adult roles in life by "teaching peace to adults" through the application of critical thinking to conflict situations."
| |
|
B.F. Skinner and the Resolution of Society's Problems, 2002.
Examines the validity of B.F. Skinner's behaviorist principles.
956 words (approx. 3.8 pages), 1 source, $ 33.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Behaviorism, as described by philosopher B.F. Skinner in his work "Walden Two", is a scientific manner of understanding human actions as based on a certain set of principles. The paper examines Skinner's view that all actions are the result of a series of determined factors in "competition" with each other. Whichever factor proves to be dominant will determine the final action. The paper argues that while these factors can be "charted" to determine the probable end results of human action, it should be noted that these factors are not always totally predictable. It shows that Skinner, though, would simply argue that this lack of predictability was merely a technical problem that would eventually be resolved.
From the Paper
"Finally there exists the problem of ultimate control. His whole concept of society is to be based on regulated planning to produce favourable situations, but who or what would be responsible for this centralized control. Skinner proposes that the "charlatans" who now have control over certain segmented areas will be replaced when all is "united", but he does not suggest who it is that will replace them. Obviously someone or something must be in overall command of this series of controls, but on what basis will this be decided."
| |
|
Critical Thinking vs. Creative Thinking, 2002.
This paper explains and compares these two modes of thinking.
630 words (approx. 2.5 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 22.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper differentiates between critical thinking and creative thinking, explaining the features and uses of each of these modes of thinking. The importance of both creativity and critical thinking is highlighted with the use of examples and famous quotes. It concludes by clarifying the place of creative thinking as an essential supplement to critical thinking, as opposed to a replacement for it.
From the Paper
"Creative and critical thinking are often used simultaneously, but they have different meanings. Creative thinking can be described as creating ideas or thoughts. Creative is described as creating or power of creating resulting from originality of thought or imaginative. Critical thinking is evaluating the idea or thought. Both are different, but are important in the lives of people."
| |
|
Critical Thinking, 2007.
An analysis of the process and advantages of critical thinking over regular thinking.
1,566 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 51.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper compares and contrasts the various definitions of critical thinking. The paper discusses the significance of encouraging and facilitating the process of critical thinking in students within a high school setting. It describes the process of critical thinking and discusses the advantages of critical thinking over regular thinking for all individuals.
From the Paper
"Studies have proved that cognitive skills lead to critical thinking. Research has shown increased forms of critical thinking among the students who have greater requirement for cognition and enhanced active learning. In the case of students whose cognitive capacities have been advanced by means of course exercises and assessment methods are able to promote the idea of critical thinking. The cognitive development, involving interpretation skills, analysis, assessment, as well as inference would tend to include the student's reading of a message as well as forming judgment regarding its effects. This is a function which is considered to be most typical with regard to the assessment of deduction in that of critical thinking. Further with regard to tapping of the student's capability in relation to deduction, the assessment of cognitive skills analyzes their understanding and acceptance of the varied fallacies, inclusive of those including slippery slopes, over-generalization, as well as wrong links. The assessment could also understand and tap knowledge of students with regard to socio-political values, which is important for finding about the incredibility relating to an argument. (Cheung; Kwan; Yue, 2002)"
| |
|
Thinking and Decision Making, 2008.
This paper analyzes three types of thinking styles: logical, persuasive and systematic thinking.
1,200 words (approx. 4.8 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that critical thinking and critical decision-making are partners in managing beneficially any business or organization; therefore, managers need the proper skills to make good sound decisions. The author explores logical thinking by looking at the deductive thinking process, which includes categorical, hypothetical and disjunctive syllogisms. The paper points out that a successful persuader usually has knowledge of the subject, is objective, follows ethical guidelines and can appeal to the other person's needs and values The author relates that persuasive thinking is a form of creative thinking, which takes quite a bit of involvement, ingenuity and thought. The paper describes the process of systematic thinking as (1) recognizing and investigating the problem, (2) devising multiple alternatives, (3) characterizing and instituting a selection criterion and (4) making a concluding verdict.
From the Paper
"A good example of systematic thinking occurs when an employee is in need of a raise or promotion. The employee would first establish a plan. The employee would analyze his or her individual position within the company as well as analyze the situation. What does the employee need to do now to achieve the raise or promotion? What will their next step be in order to bring them closer to his or her raise or promotion? This allows the employee to think coherently by developing a timeline and acting accordingly."
| |
|
Thinking and Decision Making, 2008.
This paper compares three different thinking processes to discover how each affects the critical thinking process.
1,200 words (approx. 4.8 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes three different thinking styles: logical, persuasive and systematic thinking. The author uses workplace examples to show how the critical thinking-process moves into the decision making-process. The paper explains that one component of logical thinking is the deductive thinking process, which then is broken down into three types of syllogism-- categorical, hypothetical and disjunctive. The author relates that a successful persuader usually has knowledge of the subject, is objective, and honest, and can appeal to the other person's needs, wants, and values. The paper utilizes the example of an employee asking for a raise to demonstrate systematic thinking.
From the Paper
"Persuasive thinking can be positive when following moral and ethical guidelines. In doing so one must be aware of his or her biases and control them. It's necessary to be objective and see things from different perspectives and to know the audience's values and needs.
Thinking systematically, or methodically, is probably the most popular and most organized style of thinking. Systematic Thinking involves the thinker to follow four simple steps, they are: (1) recognize and investigate the problem, (2) devise multiple alternatives, (3) characterize and institute a selection criteria, and (4) make a concluding verdict."
| |
|
Rain Man: An Illustrative Thinking, 2001.
A discussion on the three thinking processes: deductive reasoning, creative thinking or reasoning, and problem solving.
1,455 words (approx. 5.8 pages), 0 sources, $ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper uses the movie "Rain Man" to illustrate the concepts of three thinking processes. The writer underscores the mechanics of deductive reasoning, creative thinking or reasoning and problem solving while citing examples from the movie as well as discussions on cognitive psychology.
From the Paper
"The human thinking process is extremely complex. We have many ways of problem solving that we are not aware of but simply use. The movie Rain Man is an excellent illustration of what can happen if the processes are not complete or they are confused in our brains. Deductive reasoning, creative reasoning and problem solving are all intertwined and the movie about an autistic man provides a clear picture of the differences."
| |
|
The Logic of Critical Thinking, 2008.
An examination of the logic of critical thinking.
1,280 words (approx. 5.1 pages), 3 sources, APA, $ 43.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses critical thinking, a constructive thinking mode based on reason and evidence, that facilitates the process of making decisions, determining an appropriate course of action or simply deducing the likely outcome of one's behavior. The paper relates that critical thinking is an important part of developing a suitable learning strategy that will help the individual to integrate and apply information and, ultimately, to navigate the challenges of everyday life with a versatile compass. The paper further suggests that by utilizing thinking techniques founded upon logic, and thus directed to extract knowledge from circumstance in a constructive and focused manner, an individual improves the likelihood of making intelligent and informed decisions. The paper concludes with a personal account of the author's experience with critical thinking. The author relates how, by changing his mode of thinking about himself as poor student, he was able to assess himself more objectively and improve his situation.
From the Paper
"Sometimes, critical thinking may require one to reject his own beliefs and biases in favor of a shift in perspective. Critical thinking means that one is prepared to accept the possibility that a preconceived notion which he has held is incorrect, or at least that it is subject to change. With the case of my academic difficulties, it became apparent that my unquestioning assumption of certainty with regard to the cause of my poor test performance was a significant obstacle to comprehending the range of unconsidered possibilities. I had determined with a perceived certainty that my study methods were the primary cause of my low scores. It seemed, given the inaccessibility of the required knowledge with each test-taking experience, that I was not properly assimilating information. However, after a multitude of study-habit alterations seemed to make no positive impact on my test-day performance, I started to experience the self-fulfilling prophecy of a mental block. Certain that my incapacity to retain information was damaging my ability to learn, I would enter each test with an anxiety that was exponentially more palpable than on the previous exam. This anxiety would in turn levy a distracting stress on me as I would attempt to focus, thus disrupting my ability to perform to the best of my abilities. The determination which I had made to regard only a single possible cause for my predicament would prove faulty. Only when I developed a willingness to step outside of my assumptions was I able to recognize the need for a logically founded process in attributing causality. The critical thinking process demands that we scrutinize our own assumptions for logical shortcomings. When I applied this process to my own academic difficulties, I found a greater clarity in building a case for test performance anxiety, rather than a learning disability, as the cause of my academic difficulties."
| |
|
Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) and Lawyers Ethics, 2002.
Examines the ethical responsibility of lawyers to offer their clients alternate dispute resolution to resolve conflicts.
6,466 words (approx. 25.9 pages), 22 sources, APA, $ 149.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In today?s society, lawyers are encouraged to present the option of pursuing alternate dispute resolution to clients as a matter of good practice and lawyers who fail to do so may be subject to malpractice liability. This paper explores the growing popularity of alternate dispute resolution (ADR) due to the high costs, both financially and to relationships, of traditional litigation.
Subtitles in the Paper: Alternate Dispute Resolution; Ethics and Dispute Resolution; The Costs of Conflict; Ethical Issues in Choosing Whether and How to Mediate; Client Satisfaction; Methods of Dispute Resolution in Businesses; The Role of Counsel; Results of Alternate Dispute Resolution; A Lawyer?s Duty to Advise About ADR; Ethical Rules of ADR; Lawyer as Client Representative or Advocate; Lawyers as Neutrals; Conflict of Interest; Malpractice and Negligence; History of ADR; Everyday Disputes; Determining the Role of a Mediator; Conclusion.
From the Paper
"Alternate dispute resolution is a practical business and personal solution, as there are significant costs associated with different ways of resolving disputes, which often outweigh the conflict itself .
The direct costs associated with disputes include the fees of lawyers and other professionals. In 1994, nearly 18 million cases were filed in U.S. courts at a cost of $300 billion.
Productivity costs involve the value of lost time, or the cost of what those involved would otherwise be producing. Continuity cost is the eventual end of relationships that would have continued without the conflict. Emotional cost reflects the pain of focusing on emotions and the problems this can cause psychologically."
| |
|
Critical Thinking, 2004.
A brief explanation of the importance of critical thinking in decision making.
757 words (approx. 3.0 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains what critical thinking is and how vital it is, both within the workplace and in everyday life. The writer defines critical thinking as a rational way of thinking that attempts to understand and interpret information to find real meaning. The paper then shows how decision making is a large part of critical thinking and refers to the conclusion of the critical thinking.
From the Paper
"It is interesting to note that while critical thinking must involve decision making, decision making does not have to involve critical thinking. For example, I can make any decision without thinking rationally about it. I can choose to leave my job and move to Rome without critically assessing whether this is an appropriate decision. I can choose to accept that Pepsi must be a great drink because Britney Spears drinks it and decide never to drink anything else. These are decisions but without being considered decisions, they are not critical thinking."
| |
|
Mediation and Conflict Resolution, 2004.
Describes the benefits of conflict resolution through mediation as opposed to traditional means of conflict resolution.
990 words (approx. 4.0 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains the process of mediation and the different types of mediation, as well as how it differs from traditional methods of conflict resolution, which tend to be antagonistic and create a win-lose atmosphere between parties. The paper also describes the many advantages of pursuing a mediated agreement in comparison to pursuing the adversarial approach in litigation.
From the Paper
"ADR methods may be used either as a result of a legal mandate (sometimes referred to as "imposed" ADR) or voluntarily as a result of an agreement between the parties ("contractual" ADR). Since the right to trial by jury in most cases is constitutionally protected, legally imposed ADR is rarely binding on the parties. Typically, mediation and binding arbitration are the result of a voluntary contractual agreement between the parties. Courts and legislatures generally recognize that individuals may elect to resolve their disputes by some method other than litigation and may, in the case of arbitration, waive their right to a jury trial. As a general rule, courts will enforce agreements to use ADR techniques as long as the agreement is properly and fairly made."
| |
|
Conflict Resolution, 2004.
This paper discusses conflict resolution, a method beginning in the early grades to teach children the systematic way to handle differences with others.
2,185 words (approx. 8.7 pages), 8 sources, APA, $ 68.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that educators recognize that the management of classroom behavior problems is one of the most important skills a teacher can have; however, many teachers feel it is the area where they are the less prepared. The author relates that the goal of conflict resolution is to teach students to identify conflicts and to learn to find ways to solve the differences in what is called a ?win/win? way, where both people walk away feeling the resolution was fair and just. The paper suggests a research project to test the efficacy of conflict management in the classroom by using a checklist of disruptive behavioral problems to compare behaviors in classrooms that either use or do not use conflict management.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Statement of Problem
Review of the Literature
Hypothesis
How to Proceed
From the Paper
"Bryant-Edwards, et. al. (2002) found students who had been suspended for behavior problems during one and one-half year period and put them into a program called ?Alternative to Suspension for Violent Behavior? (ASVB), which was based on conflict resolution. The researchers looked for four desired outcome -- a reduced rate of later suspensions for participants for physical violence; reduced suspensions not related to violence; reduced rate of suspension overall for students completing the program; and a lower rate of other disciplinary interventions. However, assignment to groups was not random, and other factors seemed to be relevant."
| |
|
Systems Thinking, 2006.
A discussion on systems thinking within the corporate world.
1,595 words (approx. 6.4 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 52.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper begins with a definition of systems thinking. It continues to discusses its implementation into a company. It concludes with an exploration of the system's advantages and disadvantages to a business. The paper also offers an annotated bibliography.
Table of Contents:
What is Systems Thinking?
How Systems Thinking Might be Implemented
Metrics and Strategies
Strengths and Weaknesses of Systems Thinking
Conclusion
Annotated Bibliography
From the Paper
"These efforts to analyze procedures must be supported by other analyses. Statistical analysis can play an important role in data evaluation, if done well and kept in perspective. Statistical analysis has to be done by someone skilled in the use of statistics, and the research design must be carefully planned (Beckford, 2002). The computer saying "GIGO" - Garbage In, Garbage Out - applies to statistics as well. In addition, because statistics are so narrowly focused, their trend is somewhat contrary to Systems Thinking. Because of their narrow focus, decisions should not be made based on statistical results alone (Beckford, 2002)."
| |
|
Critical Thinking, 2002.
This paper looks at the importance of critical thinking.
890 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes and examines the multitude of issues related to the importance of critical thinking. The author discusses the importance of critical thinking, the essential elements of critical thinking, and reviews tactics individuals use to guide their thinking process. Finally, this paper concludes with recommendations for improving how individuals utilize critical thinking.
From the Paper
"Individuals and researchers should never underestimate the importance of critical thinking. Critical thinking affects each and every individual?s life, as well as society in general, both in the short-term and long run. Examples of decisions involving critical thinking include economic choices, educational decisions, occupational choices, political decisions, religious choices, social choices, etc. What makes critical thinking so invaluable is that decisions made with little or no critical thinking frequently backfire, creating greater difficulties. In order to avoid potential difficulties and unexpected surprises, individuals and organizations must continually engage in critical thinking, adapting their ways as time and other factors dictate."
|
|
|
