| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "THINKING LANGUAGE": |
|
|
Critical Thinking and Language, 2008.
This paper discusses the role language diversity plays in the critical thinking process.
752 words (approx. 3.0 pages), 3 sources, APA, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper explains how language diversity is a necessity in the critical thinking process, in expressing thoughts and in implementing the power of persuasion. The paper discusses how language barriers are not as much of a problem as they may appear to be. The paper concludes that it is necessary and important for people to be able to efficiently communicate with one another.
From the Paper
"Critical thinking is defined as the process of solving complex real world problems, and generating multiple (or creative) solutions to the problem (Brighton). When gathering information to form the best possible solution, a number of people might be involved through the process. It is important that the gap be bridged together during this time. When a very foreign accent is presented, most would assume the individual has difficulty in understanding, hearing, or writing the English language (Thiederman). Thiederman's advice is to be optimistic, slow down, and avoid using slang. In these situations most foreigners are able to understand English very well, but have a hard time pronouncing the English language. With this being said, the critical thinking process must not be swayed by the language barrier. Critical thinking can definitely be affected by language, but according to Thiederman is not always as much of a problem as people assume. Language diversity is definitely affected in the critical thinking process, even if it could be eliminated. Not only does language diversity play a role in the critical thinking process, it affects the way in which diverse people express their thoughts."
| |
|
Critical Thinking vs. Creative Thinking, 2002.
This paper explains and compares these two modes of thinking.
630 words (approx. 2.5 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 22.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper differentiates between critical thinking and creative thinking, explaining the features and uses of each of these modes of thinking. The importance of both creativity and critical thinking is highlighted with the use of examples and famous quotes. It concludes by clarifying the place of creative thinking as an essential supplement to critical thinking, as opposed to a replacement for it.
From the Paper
"Creative and critical thinking are often used simultaneously, but they have different meanings. Creative thinking can be described as creating ideas or thoughts. Creative is described as creating or power of creating resulting from originality of thought or imaginative. Critical thinking is evaluating the idea or thought. Both are different, but are important in the lives of people."
| |
|
Human Language, 2007.
This paper discusses theories relating to human language.
2,580 words (approx. 10.3 pages), 7 sources, APA, $ 77.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, despite the ubiquity of human linguistic ability, pinning down exactly how language helps people and how people use it is not at all a straightforward task. The author points out that Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget and Russian psychologist Lev Vygotsky examined how children acquire language and the relationship of thinking and language learning. The paper relates that the comparisons of bilingual and monolingual children, as well as comparisons of bilingual children of varying levels of development, indicate that bilingualism can lead to superior performance on a variety of intellectual skills.
From the Paper
"It is clear that normal children acquire a language that reflects their particular linguistic environment. A child brought up in Japan acquires a version of Japanese. The same child brought up in Brazil acquires a version of Portuguese. So, these languages must in some sense reflect some of the same underlying innate principles. Languages are basically the same in structure, up to certain parameters, for example, whether the head of a phrase goes at the beginning of a phrase or at the end. Children do not have to learn the basic principles; they only need to set the parameters."
| |
|
Critical Thinking, 2007.
An analysis of the process and advantages of critical thinking over regular thinking.
1,566 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 51.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper compares and contrasts the various definitions of critical thinking. The paper discusses the significance of encouraging and facilitating the process of critical thinking in students within a high school setting. It describes the process of critical thinking and discusses the advantages of critical thinking over regular thinking for all individuals.
From the Paper
"Studies have proved that cognitive skills lead to critical thinking. Research has shown increased forms of critical thinking among the students who have greater requirement for cognition and enhanced active learning. In the case of students whose cognitive capacities have been advanced by means of course exercises and assessment methods are able to promote the idea of critical thinking. The cognitive development, involving interpretation skills, analysis, assessment, as well as inference would tend to include the student's reading of a message as well as forming judgment regarding its effects. This is a function which is considered to be most typical with regard to the assessment of deduction in that of critical thinking. Further with regard to tapping of the student's capability in relation to deduction, the assessment of cognitive skills analyzes their understanding and acceptance of the varied fallacies, inclusive of those including slippery slopes, over-generalization, as well as wrong links. The assessment could also understand and tap knowledge of students with regard to socio-political values, which is important for finding about the incredibility relating to an argument. (Cheung; Kwan; Yue, 2002)"
| |
|
Critical Thinking, 2005.
A discussion of the development and application of critical thinking skills.
690 words (approx. 2.8 pages), 2 sources, APA, $ 23.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper asks and addresses three questions pertaining to critical thinking: 1) What role does language and language diversity play in the critical thinking process? 2) How does language empower or limit the expression of our thoughts? and 3) What is the role of critical thinking in persuasion?
| |
|
Critical Thinking: Problem Resolution, 2007.
An analysis of a particular example of critical thinking using the critical thinking problem solving model by R. Hansten and M. Washburn.
846 words (approx. 3.4 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines critical thinking (otherwise referred to as reflective thinking). The author reflects on a situation she experienced while holding a position in a hospital's accounting department and looks at how it was necessary to apply critical thinking to the problems that existed in the department. The paper presents the writer's opinion of the worth of the critical thinking problem solving model by R. Hansten and M. Washburn.
From the Paper
"Implementing the change would require some cross training from those who were skilled and knowledgeable of various insurance company nuances. Incorporating insurance company specific protocols into an online or hardcopy binder, with company listed alphabetically, would provide a reliable reference tool from which to adequately handle insurance company protocols. It is also suggested that a day be devoted to cross training presentations; for example, in the morning the manager could conduct a presentation on how to effectively deal with insurance companies and in the afternoon conduct a presentation on how to effectively deal with private patients, both with ample time for team discussion."
| |
|
Thinking and Decision Making, 2008.
This paper analyzes three types of thinking styles: logical, persuasive and systematic thinking.
1,200 words (approx. 4.8 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that critical thinking and critical decision-making are partners in managing beneficially any business or organization; therefore, managers need the proper skills to make good sound decisions. The author explores logical thinking by looking at the deductive thinking process, which includes categorical, hypothetical and disjunctive syllogisms. The paper points out that a successful persuader usually has knowledge of the subject, is objective, follows ethical guidelines and can appeal to the other person's needs and values The author relates that persuasive thinking is a form of creative thinking, which takes quite a bit of involvement, ingenuity and thought. The paper describes the process of systematic thinking as (1) recognizing and investigating the problem, (2) devising multiple alternatives, (3) characterizing and instituting a selection criterion and (4) making a concluding verdict.
From the Paper
"A good example of systematic thinking occurs when an employee is in need of a raise or promotion. The employee would first establish a plan. The employee would analyze his or her individual position within the company as well as analyze the situation. What does the employee need to do now to achieve the raise or promotion? What will their next step be in order to bring them closer to his or her raise or promotion? This allows the employee to think coherently by developing a timeline and acting accordingly."
| |
|
Thinking and Decision Making, 2008.
This paper compares three different thinking processes to discover how each affects the critical thinking process.
1,200 words (approx. 4.8 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes three different thinking styles: logical, persuasive and systematic thinking. The author uses workplace examples to show how the critical thinking-process moves into the decision making-process. The paper explains that one component of logical thinking is the deductive thinking process, which then is broken down into three types of syllogism-- categorical, hypothetical and disjunctive. The author relates that a successful persuader usually has knowledge of the subject, is objective, and honest, and can appeal to the other person's needs, wants, and values. The paper utilizes the example of an employee asking for a raise to demonstrate systematic thinking.
From the Paper
"Persuasive thinking can be positive when following moral and ethical guidelines. In doing so one must be aware of his or her biases and control them. It's necessary to be objective and see things from different perspectives and to know the audience's values and needs.
Thinking systematically, or methodically, is probably the most popular and most organized style of thinking. Systematic Thinking involves the thinker to follow four simple steps, they are: (1) recognize and investigate the problem, (2) devise multiple alternatives, (3) characterize and institute a selection criteria, and (4) make a concluding verdict."
| |
|
The Logic of Critical Thinking, 2008.
An examination of the logic of critical thinking.
1,280 words (approx. 5.1 pages), 3 sources, APA, $ 43.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses critical thinking, a constructive thinking mode based on reason and evidence, that facilitates the process of making decisions, determining an appropriate course of action or simply deducing the likely outcome of one's behavior. The paper relates that critical thinking is an important part of developing a suitable learning strategy that will help the individual to integrate and apply information and, ultimately, to navigate the challenges of everyday life with a versatile compass. The paper further suggests that by utilizing thinking techniques founded upon logic, and thus directed to extract knowledge from circumstance in a constructive and focused manner, an individual improves the likelihood of making intelligent and informed decisions. The paper concludes with a personal account of the author's experience with critical thinking. The author relates how, by changing his mode of thinking about himself as poor student, he was able to assess himself more objectively and improve his situation.
From the Paper
"Sometimes, critical thinking may require one to reject his own beliefs and biases in favor of a shift in perspective. Critical thinking means that one is prepared to accept the possibility that a preconceived notion which he has held is incorrect, or at least that it is subject to change. With the case of my academic difficulties, it became apparent that my unquestioning assumption of certainty with regard to the cause of my poor test performance was a significant obstacle to comprehending the range of unconsidered possibilities. I had determined with a perceived certainty that my study methods were the primary cause of my low scores. It seemed, given the inaccessibility of the required knowledge with each test-taking experience, that I was not properly assimilating information. However, after a multitude of study-habit alterations seemed to make no positive impact on my test-day performance, I started to experience the self-fulfilling prophecy of a mental block. Certain that my incapacity to retain information was damaging my ability to learn, I would enter each test with an anxiety that was exponentially more palpable than on the previous exam. This anxiety would in turn levy a distracting stress on me as I would attempt to focus, thus disrupting my ability to perform to the best of my abilities. The determination which I had made to regard only a single possible cause for my predicament would prove faulty. Only when I developed a willingness to step outside of my assumptions was I able to recognize the need for a logically founded process in attributing causality. The critical thinking process demands that we scrutinize our own assumptions for logical shortcomings. When I applied this process to my own academic difficulties, I found a greater clarity in building a case for test performance anxiety, rather than a learning disability, as the cause of my academic difficulties."
| |
|
Rain Man: An Illustrative Thinking, 2001.
A discussion on the three thinking processes: deductive reasoning, creative thinking or reasoning, and problem solving.
1,455 words (approx. 5.8 pages), 0 sources, $ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper uses the movie "Rain Man" to illustrate the concepts of three thinking processes. The writer underscores the mechanics of deductive reasoning, creative thinking or reasoning and problem solving while citing examples from the movie as well as discussions on cognitive psychology.
From the Paper
"The human thinking process is extremely complex. We have many ways of problem solving that we are not aware of but simply use. The movie Rain Man is an excellent illustration of what can happen if the processes are not complete or they are confused in our brains. Deductive reasoning, creative reasoning and problem solving are all intertwined and the movie about an autistic man provides a clear picture of the differences."
| |
|
Critical Thinking, 2004.
A brief explanation of the importance of critical thinking in decision making.
757 words (approx. 3.0 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains what critical thinking is and how vital it is, both within the workplace and in everyday life. The writer defines critical thinking as a rational way of thinking that attempts to understand and interpret information to find real meaning. The paper then shows how decision making is a large part of critical thinking and refers to the conclusion of the critical thinking.
From the Paper
"It is interesting to note that while critical thinking must involve decision making, decision making does not have to involve critical thinking. For example, I can make any decision without thinking rationally about it. I can choose to leave my job and move to Rome without critically assessing whether this is an appropriate decision. I can choose to accept that Pepsi must be a great drink because Britney Spears drinks it and decide never to drink anything else. These are decisions but without being considered decisions, they are not critical thinking."
| |
|
Critical Thinking, 2002.
This paper looks at the importance of critical thinking.
890 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes and examines the multitude of issues related to the importance of critical thinking. The author discusses the importance of critical thinking, the essential elements of critical thinking, and reviews tactics individuals use to guide their thinking process. Finally, this paper concludes with recommendations for improving how individuals utilize critical thinking.
From the Paper
"Individuals and researchers should never underestimate the importance of critical thinking. Critical thinking affects each and every individual?s life, as well as society in general, both in the short-term and long run. Examples of decisions involving critical thinking include economic choices, educational decisions, occupational choices, political decisions, religious choices, social choices, etc. What makes critical thinking so invaluable is that decisions made with little or no critical thinking frequently backfire, creating greater difficulties. In order to avoid potential difficulties and unexpected surprises, individuals and organizations must continually engage in critical thinking, adapting their ways as time and other factors dictate."
| |
|
Systems Thinking, 2006.
A discussion on systems thinking within the corporate world.
1,595 words (approx. 6.4 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 52.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper begins with a definition of systems thinking. It continues to discusses its implementation into a company. It concludes with an exploration of the system's advantages and disadvantages to a business. The paper also offers an annotated bibliography.
Table of Contents:
What is Systems Thinking?
How Systems Thinking Might be Implemented
Metrics and Strategies
Strengths and Weaknesses of Systems Thinking
Conclusion
Annotated Bibliography
From the Paper
"These efforts to analyze procedures must be supported by other analyses. Statistical analysis can play an important role in data evaluation, if done well and kept in perspective. Statistical analysis has to be done by someone skilled in the use of statistics, and the research design must be carefully planned (Beckford, 2002). The computer saying "GIGO" - Garbage In, Garbage Out - applies to statistics as well. In addition, because statistics are so narrowly focused, their trend is somewhat contrary to Systems Thinking. Because of their narrow focus, decisions should not be made based on statistical results alone (Beckford, 2002)."
| |
|
Critical Thinking, 2002.
This paper discusses the utilisation of critical thinking in everyday life.
1,140 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the role of critical thinking in everyday life. Issues discussed include factors used in the decision-making process, barriers to critical thinking, and how critical thinking can be improved. The use of language, memory, and creativity in the critical-thinking process is also addressed. The paper concludes with a brief summary of its main points.
From the Paper
"Like it or not, there is not a single aspect of our lives that is not governed by the thinking process. As employees, students, family members, and participants in various social groups, every day we have to think about things in order to make decisions about them. Those decisions may not always be deep and significant, but they are decisions that need to be thought about and made nonetheless."
| |
|
Critical Thinking Styles and Forces of Influence, 2004.
This paper discusses that critical thinking styles and forces of influence play major roles in the decision making process.
885 words (approx. 3.5 pages), 7 sources, APA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper states that there are no guarantees that a particular decision will be the ?right? choice; however, through critical thinking skills, the chances are better that the decision will be more ?right? than ?wrong.? The author points out that, similar to scientific and logical thinking styles, the systematic thinking style looks first at the ?real? problem; managers must use their critical thinking skills to discount irrelevant information and find the actual problem before proceeding through the systematic problem solving steps. The paper relates that, by ?trying on? the various ?hats?, managers can get different perspectives on a particular problem.
From the Paper
"Intuition is another critical thinking style. Many of the decisions made using intuition are trial and error. Intuition usually contributes to decisions where risk and uncertainty are prevalent. Some people, like Edward de Bono, author of several books on the creative process, ?see intuition as a set of mental tools separate from logic and judgment that an individual can develop through practice and training?. Intuition is often referred to as a ?gut instinct? or ?sixth sense.? Intuition skills can be learned. It does involve staying close to the problem, listening to what is being said or not said, going with a hunch and following it through to the end. Intuition skills are becoming important abilities in today?s decision-making world."
|
|
|
