| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "TERRORISM POLICY": |
|
|
Terrorism Policy, 2008.
This paper looks at definitions of terrorism and their effects on terrorism policies.
944 words (approx. 3.8 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 33.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses how a terrorism policy is contingent upon the definition of terrorism prevalent at a given time and looks at the terrorism policies of the past. The paper discusses the serious implications for how we define the word terrorism. The paper also explains that, used too broadly, the definition can limit the ability of legitimate guerrilla organizations to fight oppressive regimes, but used too restrictively, it can make a nation vulnerable to unforeseen attacks.
From the Paper
"The issue of global terrorism has become a major public concern in the past decade or so and particularly since the attacks of September 11, 2001. It is a natural response to terrorist attacks and activity that governments and lawmakers will attempt to formulate policies to deal with the problem. It seems logical to conclude that without clear and consistent sets of policies and procedures to deal with such a multi-faceted and complex problem, it will not be possible to effectively combat it or fight it on almost any coherent level."
| |
|
Counter-terrorism Policy Changes, 2006.
Examines the effectiveness of the changes in the U.S. government's policy on terrorism after 9/11.
857 words (approx. 3.4 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
After the September 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the United States went on the offensive against Afghanistan, its Taliban leadership and Al Qaeda. Since then, the "war on terror" has expanded to include Iraq, despite the lack of evidence of weapons of mass destruction on their part or of a link between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein. The paper shows that, although as an American it is easy to see why the government would want to combat terrorism, the policies and actions taken by the United States have not been the best for reducing the threat of counter-terrorism
From the Paper
"The most obvious place for improvement in the United States counterterrorism policy is in the dominant position that the United States insists on taking in such situations. Such an attitude limits the ability of government officials to understand the underlying causes of acts of terrorism against the United States. While it would not necessarily improve the state of affairs to negotiate face to face with terrorist groups, it would certainly be useful to carefully consider the background and experiences of those groups that choose to terrorize the United States."
| |
|
Terrorism and US Policy, 2006.
An understanding of the cause and effect of terrorism in American domestic and foreign policy.
2,025 words (approx. 8.1 pages), 5 sources, $ 80.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this paper one could find how America has become a preemptive and unilateral military force in the world due to the Bush Administration's foreign policy. The paper discusses how the cause and effect of terrorism has been brought on by the CIA and American corporate interest, which has resulted in a foreign policy debacle of major proportions. The illogic of attacking a country with no ties to Bin Laden nor its having weapons of mass destruction makes for dangerous foreign policy.
From the Paper
"The aim of this political study will be to examine the cause and effect of American foreign policy throughout the world. Although the main focus of this study will be to understand how terrorism has become a major part of domestic policy, the foreign policy of the American government is a very important part of why terrorism is such a major phenomenon from 1995-2005. By understanding the anger and resentment that Arabs in the Middle East have felt toward American imperialism in their region, the rise of terrorism is a causal response to countries without armies powerful enough to face an American attack. The effect of this imperialist policy has been the constant and unmitigated attacks by such terrorists as Bin Laden and others that seek to bring down U.S. hegemony in the Middle East. "
| |
|
Anti-terrorism Policies, 2005.
Discusses the effect that anti-terrorism policies have on the U.S.A. and the rest of the world.
2,435 words (approx. 9.7 pages), 12 sources, MLA, $ 74.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This research discusses anti-terrorism policies and the manner in which they influence the nation and the world. Anti-terrorism is defined as defensive procedures used to decrease the susceptibility of citizens and property to terrorist attacks. In the aftermath of September 11, 2001, the U.S.A. was forced to deal with the threat of terrorism in a completely new light. For this reason, lawmakers devised a set of laws know as the Patriot Act. The research in this paper suggests that the Patriot Act is the main bill that deals with the issue of anti-terrorism in the United States. Though an anti-terrorism bill is necessary, the research indicates that the details of the Patriot Act are problematic. The issues that are problematic and even unconstitutional include: The government's ability to detain those that are believed to be terrorists without any due process, the right of the government to eavesdrop using roving wiretaps, reductions in judicial oversight and the role of congress. The paper argues that all of these issues are pertinent to American citizens and may prove to undermine the administration's efforts to mount a defense against acts of terrorism.
Abstract
Introduction
Review of Literature
Findings
Conclusion
From the Paper
"According to an article entitled "The War Power and Its Limits", several aspects of the current antiterrorism policies are questionable. Kassop (2003) explains that in addition to abandoning the aforementioned judicial oversight, the antiterrorism policies of the Bush Administration also "created a blurring of distinctions between military action and law enforcement, along with a resultant uncertainty as to which set of standards applies in certain circumstances (Kassop 2003)." In addition, Kassop (2003) asserts that the antiterrorism policies have a disregard for congress. The author contends that the antiterrorism policies also give law enforcement agencies a tremendous amount of authority to monitor all types of activities that were once considered an invasion of privacy(Kassop 2003)."
| |
|
Western Foreign Policy & Global Terror, 2004.
This paper discusses the possible link between Western foreign policy and global terror.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 23.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This article offers a brief review linking Western foreign policy, to the rise and extension of global terror. The writer suggests that there is a connection between Western foreign policy, especially American and spreading global terrorism. The writer examines the unbalanced American policy for the Arab-Israeli conflict. The writer raises the subject of the anger felt by Islamic populations.
From the Paper
"American policy in the Arab-Israeli conflict has been neither restrained nor balanced. Rather American policy toward the conflict has provided for an intensive American involvement with a solid preference for Israel. In the early days, Israel was a small struggling country. Survival was an issue and American foreign policy in the Middle East was to achieve peace in order to assure that survival. Contemporary Israel, however has one of the most powerful military forces in the world, together with ... "
| |
|
U.S. Foreign Policy?s Influence on Terrorism, 2002.
The paper discusses the influence that United States foreign policy has had on creating terrorism throughout the world.
4,405 words (approx. 17.6 pages), 24 sources, MLA, $ 115.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper argues that U.S. foreign policy within the last thirty years has had a significant influence in the rise of terrorism throughout the world. The writer cites U.S. involvement in domestic politics in many countries, military interventions, and pursing national interests in other countries regardless of the consequences of pursing those interests, as influential in enabling terrorist organizations. The paper claims that in order to stop the wave of terrorism throughout the world, the United States must stay clear from interfering with domestic political problems in many regions around the world and must stay away from pursuing military operations that are not in the national interests of United States.
Table of Contents:
U.S. Foreign Policy?s Influence with Terrorism
Defense against Terrorism
The Roots of Terrorism
State Support of Terrorism
War on Terrorism
Solutions to Terrorism
From the Paper
"As Ahid Aslam concentrated on the foreign policy priorities of the Bush Administration in his article, Robert Cutter from the institute for foreign policy in focus wrote an article titled ?The Anti-Terrorist Coalition: A New World Order Redux.? This article focuses on the possibility that the anti-terrorist coalition may incite terrorist groups to ruse up and take action against the coalition in order to break it up. The author concentrates on the possible negative effects of placing together an anti-terrorist coalition and having being lead by the United States. The author determines that as long as the United States continues to lead the anti-terrorist coalition, the coalition will only be serving U.S. interests on terrorism and not international interests. The author suggests that it should be the United Nations that should be leading the coalition and not the United States."
| |
|
"Terrorism and U.S. Foreign Policy", 2002.
Focuses on Paul P. Pillar's famous writing against terrorism, "Terrorism and U.S. Foreign Policy".
1,484 words (approx. 5.9 pages), 2 sources, APA, $ 49.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper puts forward Pillar?s analyses about terrorism and how it can be eliminated. It also outlines certain evidence that Pillar gives in his work to support his claim.
From the Paper
"Terrorism and U.S. Foreign Policy by Paul Pillar focuses all of its attention on terrorists attacks on the United States and the approach used by the United States in combating these attacks in the right and meaningful way. Recently the Chicago Council conducted a census on Foreign affairs and discovered that the most captious threat to the United States was International Terrorism. America being a super power is under a continuous danger of being threatened of its security. Of course the government and the United States President takes this issue very seriously in order to safeguard the well being of the country?s citizens but the question is are they doing it in the right manner?"
| |
|
United Nations Policy Formulation and Policy Implementation, 2004.
Provides an overview of United Nations policy formulation and policy implementation in the context of international public administration organizations.
1,478 words (approx. 5.9 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines, through a literature review, instances of policies that were developed and not effectively carried out, as well as recent requirements for the formulation of policies put into place at the UN. It looks at how a sustained public information campaign is extremely important for the success of the UN?s attempt to reinvent its system of policy formulation and policy implementation due to all the ?bad news?, including terrorism and war and AIDS, etc., dominating the TV and print news agencies.
From the Paper
"There are myriad examples of the UN?s good work ? in many and diverse areas where there are desperate human needs throughout the world ? and also, on the other hand, there is no shortage of evidence that some policies, although they were drawn up with the best of intentions, failed in their mission, or were thwarted either through no direct fault of the UN, or because the UN?s policy implementation could not match the promises in the policy formulation. One example of the apparent failure of a policy which was to be implemented was recently reported by the British Medical Journal (Tayal, 2003). The journal claimed that a UN policy designed to tackle the health and human rights needs of ?indigenous people? ? a policy which was formulated in 1995 ? has not been very effective in its implementation."
| |
|
Terrorism and Counter Terrorism, 2004.
A study of the development of international terrorism and counter terrorism, both in general and specifically, since the events of September 11th, 2001.
1,754 words (approx. 7.0 pages), 11 sources, APA, $ 56.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper focuses on the way counter terrorism and terrorism have changed since 9/11 and the growing role of the U.S. It also looks at the development of 'modern' terrorism and the possible consequences of the continuing War on Terror. It debates whetherr or not September 11th, 2001 can be seen as a day that changed the face of terrorism. It also discusses how since the invasion of Afghanistan, terrorist attacks have become more numerous and high profile although their basic purpose remains the same, to gain attention. It puts forward the view that what has changed about terrorism since 9/11 is the amount of media attention it now controls.
From the Paper
"As well as presenting a recent point of reference for terrorist activity, the conflicts in Palestine and Northern Ireland also show two different ways of dealing with the problem, certain aspects of which have been adopted by the United States. In the case of Britain and Northern Ireland, the conflict is one of territory and security for those who want British rule. In Palestine and Israel however, the situation is based purely on territory. This difference in the foundation for the terrorist action seems to have dictated the way in which terrorism has been dealt with. Because of the presence of British citizens in Northern Ireland, and the small section of society that is involved in the unrest , it has been British policy in recent years to try and settle the situation through political sanctions and increased security measures to prevent terrorism."
| |
|
Domestic Terrorism, 2007.
An analysis of the challenge of homegrown terrorism for the American counter-terrorism policy.
2,254 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 69.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper asserts that homegrown or domestic terrorism is the greatest challenge for American counter-terrorism policy. The paper argues that there needs to be a greater focus on homegrown terrorism in light of the evidence of this growing threat. The paper begins by defining domestic terrorism and then goes on to explore the main reasons that this threat is growing.
Table of Contents:
The Threat Of Domestic Terrorism
The History Of Homegrown Terrorism
Conclusion
From the Paper
"However, as we explore contemporary history we find that evidence of domestic terrorism and the aims of the homegrown groups and individuals are not diminishing. In fact instead of domestic terror decreasing in the aftermath of 9/11, there are many experts who are of the view that domestic terror groups are in fact learning from and emulating eternal groups like al-Qaeda; and are in the process of becoming an even greater threat than before. "Experts say domestic terrorism is becoming more dangerous as groups adopt looser organizational structures similar to that of the al-Qaeda network, plan larger attacks, and consider turning to weapons of mass destruction." (American Militant Extremists)"
| |
|
"Terror" in the Mind of God: A Study of Terrorism, 2005.
This paper studies the dangerous influence that religion has on some believers-- an influence that ignites terrorism.
2,250 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 69.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Using Mark Juergensmeyer's book "Terror in the Mind of God" as a reference, this paper examines how religion sometimes influences its believers in such an extreme way that they turn to terrorism in the name of God. The paper examines the origins of terrorism, cultures of violence and the future of terrorism.
From the Paper
"Juergensmeyer's ideas discussed in the book go against what most criminological theories of crime causation tell us. Rational Choice theory, which is the theory used almost exclusively in today's criminal justice field, believes that criminals choose to commit crime by weighing the potential benefits versus the potential risks. (Siegal, 107). This assumption that offenders make a rational informed decision affects crime prevention strategies (Siegal, 129). The religious terrorist, however, is in a cosmic frame of mind where moral religious values override any sense of legal right or wrong."
| |
|
War on Terrorism, 2004.
An analysis of the book, "Before and After: U.S. Foreign Policy and the War on Terrorism", by Phyllis Bennis.
1,401 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 46.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to introduce, discuss, and analyze the book, "Before and After: U.S. Foreign Policy and the War on Terrorism", by Phyllis Bennis. Specifically it presents a book report, including a summary. "Before and After" is a book about the terrorist attacks, but it is also a book about a nation's arrogance and how the United States has turned into a world power with 'attitude'. The author shows how that is affecting our global presence and our global situation.
From the Paper
""Before and After" is a compelling book about the September 11 terrorist attacks on the United States. Reading it is difficult, because it does not always convey the same sense of "patriotism" that pervaded America after the terrorist attacks, but it portrays another side of the attacks ? what led up to them ? and their aftermath. The author's main thesis for writing the book was to give a deeper understanding of the events surrounding the September 11 terrorist attacks. What actions by the US led up to the attacks, and what will the US's insistence on the pursuit terrorists on a global scale mean to us, and to the world? Bennis hopes to create more understanding of the US policies that mean so much to the entire world, and give an inkling of why so many people around the world see us as a threat and a menace."
| |
|
The U.S. and Global Terrorism, 2002.
This paper discusses the policy that the United States needs to adopt a strong policy against international terrorism.
2,650 words (approx. 10.6 pages), 6 sources, $ 97.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, to combat the threat to international security, the United States must try to have the United Nations play a leading role in the effort. The author believes that there also must be strong unilateral action.
| |
|
Underlying Causes of Terrorism, 2007.
This paper argues that current U.S. policies in the "war against terrorism" have been ineffective in combating terrorist activity.
1,915 words (approx. 7.7 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 61.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper describes the history of unrest in the Middle Eastern region. The paper contends that through Western policies, embargoes, fear and greed, the Middle East has been caught in a continuous cycle of oppression and restriction with very little hope of escaping. The paper maintains that the interest the Western world has in the Middle East's natural resources generate frustration, fear and poverty, which in turn generates a highly fertile environment for the violence and deliberate aggression of terrorism. The paper shows how U.S. foreign polices have done nothing to reduce the threat of terrorism in the Middle East. The paper asserts that only truly humanitarian efforts can bring about a positive change in the region.
Outline:
Introduction
Thesis
History
Resources
Frustration and Oppression=Terrorism
Conclusion
From the Paper
"The struggles of the Ottoman Empire against the Western world are well documented all the way back through the conflicts with the Roman Empire. Even then the focus was on the resources that the Middle East, such as silk and spices, that were sorely missed in Europe. Not only were the resources a major issue, but the struggle for Christian domination over Islam was a major goal as well. Constant clashes over trade routes and control in then independent countries laid the foundation for centuries of conflict."
| |
|
Terrorism, 2005.
This extensive paper analyzes terrorism and argues against the approach of the Bush administration.
8,430 words (approx. 33.7 pages), 40 sources, APA, $ 178.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, because the wide variety of destructive avenues and methodologies opening up to modern terrorists are so numerous, the nature of terrorist threats appear intangible and too general to efficiently combat or even to comprehend. The author states that the U.S. policy regarding war and terrorism has continued to be a search for ways to generate immediate and short term gains at the expense of the rest of the world. Essentially, the U. S. continues the pursuit of a neo-imperialist empire to maintain its grip upon the planet's resources. The paper suggests that there may never be a preventative cure for all forms of terrorism, but a governmental policy that soothes international and inter-social disputes may eliminate the desire of individuals to inflict pain and death upon others.
From the Paper
"The war is further devalued by the incongruity between international laws regarding terrorism, the United States' definition of terrorism, and the subsequent methods by which the U.S. has endeavored to fight terrorism. Fusing these notions together suggests that the United States government is almost as guilty of terrorist acts as the leaders of the Al Qaeda; the primary difference being that, with the United States, there is usually an intermediary involved, and it is not apparent that any acts engaged in by the government could be perceived as acts of terror for the purpose of global demonstration-any association with terrorism has been in connection with a substantive goal."
|
|
|
