| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "SYSTEMS GOVERNMENT": |
|
|
Systems of Government, 2002.
A comparison between the presidential and parliamentary systems of government, using the American and Canadian systems as examples.
2,400 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 9 sources, $ 89.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents a comparison and contrast of the presidential and parliamentary systems of government in terms of their key characteristics as well as their strengths and weaknesses. It finds that, to varying degrees, both systems are concerned with the promotion of accountability, responsibility and efficiency. Each system has a leader, the President and the Prime Minister, respectively, and power is held on the basis of popular support through political constituencies that are generally equal in population. A major difference between these two systems of government is that while the Senate in the American presidential system of government is an important and integral part of the day-to-day functioning of the system, the same cannot be said for the Senate in the Canadian parliamentary system. A major weakness of the American presidential system of government is that the legislative process can be slow and cumbersome.
| |
|
Systems of Government, 2007.
A comparison of the strengths and weaknesses of the parliamentary and presidential systems of government.
2,358 words (approx. 9.4 pages), 9 sources, APA, $ 72.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes the relative strengths and weaknesses of the parliamentary and presidential systems of government. It discusses various aspects of each form of government and compares their pros and cons. The paper specifically focuses on the issue of separation of power or the ability to limit the amount of power awarded to the head of state. The paper presents examples primarily from the United States and Canada.
From the Paper
"Another important difference between Presidential and Parliamentary systems of government has to do with the relative ease with which heads of state may be dismissed. As we noted, in a Presidential system of government, presidents serve for a fixed period of time. In practice, this tends to mean that a president must be utterly outrageous in order to be ousted - and even then, he may sometimes manage to cling onto power. For example, Richard Nixon is the only American president who has ever been forced to resign. Other American presidents have managed to survive massive scandals. These include President John F. Kennedy, who survived a scandal over the untimely death by drug overdose of actress Marilyn Monroe in 1962; Bill Clinton, a married man and president who weathered the embarrassment of being publicly exposed as having had oral sex with an aide, Monica Lewinsky (Sands, 2000); and currently President Bush, who not only survived but was able to be elected for a second term of office, despite having lied to his people about the existence of so-called weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. (Roper, 2004)"
| |
|
Cisco Systems & Government Regulation, 2002.
This paper looks at Cisco Systems, a company that provides networking products for the Internet.
797 words (approx. 3.2 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 28.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
As the leading provider of networking products for the Internet, Cisco Systems uses e-commerce via the internet. Therefore, according to the paper, Cisco Systems adamantly opposes any government regulation, such as taxing internet traffic, that would impinge on the efficiency and growth of e-commerce. This paper looks at the ways in which Cisco Systems is affected by government regulation.
From the Paper
"Other laws and proposed laws also have caused concern for both Cisco Systems and the industry. Both the Congress and several states are considering laws to protect individual privacy on the Internet. Both Cisco and the industry oppose such a law, holding that the industry can be more effective through self-regulation. Another law that has been proposed frequently by some members of Congress and by some states would apply taxation to Internet activity. Both Cisco and the industry argue that taxation would cripple e-commerce just as it is beginning to grow. Thus far, the lawmakers have backed down on taxation proposals for the Internet."
| |
|
The American System of Government, 2002.
This paper discusses the reasons behind the structure of the American system of government.
2,675 words (approx. 10.7 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 80.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the role of that the American Constitution played, and continues to play in helping to shape the American system of government. The paper begins with a discussion of how a pluralist democracy differs from majoritarian democracy and why the framers of the U.S. Constitution felt it was so important to have a pluralistic form of government. In order to demonstrate this point, the paper presents and analyzes several different articles of the U.S. Constitution which pertain directly to the distribution of power in the government. Some of the examples used in this paper include the Senate's role to advise and consent, the balance between the powers of the federal government and the powers of the individual states and the importance of the first ten ammendments to the Constitution. Particular attention is payed to the nature of the Judicial branch and the central role that it has played over the years in helping, but not always succeeding, in protecting the minority from the majority in the United States.
From the Paper
"Again, this latter pluralist type of provision is part of the balance of powers element in the Constitution. This is in keeping with the form the government finally took as a republic rather than a strict democracy. A strict democracy would by necessity have been a majoritarian system, while a republic is a pluralist democracy, which protects the minority from the majority. John Adams pressed for this type of government as one of the anti-Federalists at the Constitutional Convention. John Adams was the premier theorist of conservatism, and he wrote: "The foundation of every government is some principle or passion in the minds of the people" (Ball and Dagger 33). He saw the republic as the best of governments. In terms of the developing debate over the Constitution, this Anti-Federalist considered a single assembly to be inherently faulty and subject to all the vices and frailties an individual might evince. As a solution he suggested the creation of two bodies, with the smaller elected as a council from the larger. He also recommended the creation of a balance of powers between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches (Ball and Dagger 34-35)."
|
| Term Paper # 4238 |
temporarily unavailable
|
|
|
|
The American System of Government, 2002.
A description of how the model of the American system owes much to ancient Greek and Roman governmental structures.
2,250 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 9 sources, $ 79.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Describes how the model of the American system owes much to ancient Green and Roman governmental structures. The philosophy of goverence of the ancient world that influenced how the Founding Fathers shaped the new United States government. Democracy of Greek City-States. Rome's development of a system of law and citizenship.
From the Paper
"The American system of government owes much the governmental structures of the ancient Greek and Roman worlds. Those systems were different than the one we have today, but the philosophy of governance influenced how the Founding Fathers shaped the government in the New World. They also derived certain ideas from Greek and Roman originals. The government of the Roman Republic was not a democracy, though it did have democratic elements.
In the earliest era of human history, areas were ruled by chieftains or tribal leaders who became leaders by inheritance or raw power. In the earliest civilizations, an all.powerful ruler or king governed, and these early rulers like Hammurabi, Sennacherib, Xerxes, and Pharaoh Ramses I held immense power while their subjects had few rights. Many of the Greek..."
| |
|
Information Systems Governance, 2002.
This paper discusses corporate information management .
3,150 words (approx. 12.6 pages), 12 sources, $ 115.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains the problems associated with developing and implementing a system of information management today.
| |
|
Selecting the Government System, 2002.
This paper defines and describes the similarities and the differences between the three major systems of government suggested for the United States at the time of its inception.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 3 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses these three forms of government are the unitary system, the federal system, and the nonfederal system.
| |
|
The Lebanese Corporate Governance System, 2005.
This paper discusses the prospects and challenges of the Lebanese corporate governance system.
3,690 words (approx. 14.8 pages), 13 sources, APA, $ 102.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper explains that the Lebanese Corporate Governance system, evolving after 15 years of civil war (1975-1990), is built on family business structure, block shareholdings and an active banking system and is moving to a market-based system. The author points out that the regulatory initiatives aim to develop an equity finance culture where external mechanisms allow firms to improve their performance, to reduce their cost of capital and to enhance the long-term economic performance. The paper relates that several positive regional developments will improve the local equity culture but significant challenges lie ahead.
Table of Contents
An Overview of the Lebanese Corporate Governance System: Main Challenges
The Origins of Corporate Governance Systems: the Lebanese Case
The Characteristics of Corporate Governance Systems: Toward a Lebanese CG System.
The Financing Sources: Market- versus Bank-based System
The Control and Decision-making: External-Markets versus Internal-Committees
The Future of the Lebanese CG System: Further Issues
From the Paper
"The existence of widespread public and private sector corruption is key. While this may help answer why the legal and institutional framework for corporate governance is so weak, the existence of significant corruption goes farther by making the overall business environment less attractive to investors, particularly foreign investors. This is especially true with respect to investment opportunities with firms that depend on significant contractual relations with the government. Lebanon, to quote the US Embassy Country Commercial Guide 2003, has "laws and regulations to combat corruption but historically these laws have not been enforced." Based on the 2003 Corruption Perception Index developed by Transparency International, where the higher the ranking the greater the level of corruption, Lebanon ranked 78 out of 133. On a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 being highly corrupt, Lebanon scored only 3. Furthermore, according to the Lebanese research company Information International, Lebanon loses over $1 billion a year due to corruption. It is widely reported that significant bribes have been paid to win key public contracts. Such a level of corruption is a major cause for concern as the judicial system lacks the ability to provide shareholders and other corporate stakeholders with ample opportunity to receive proper redress for grievances."
| |
|
British vs. United States Government, 2002.
A comparison of the British Parliamentary System of Government with the United States Federal System of Government.
2,312 words (approx. 9.2 pages), 10 sources, APA, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper provides a comparison and brief review of the working of the British and American systems of government. The paper illustrates that they have several major differences and some similarities too. The reasons for the differences are explained. The paper shows that supremacy of the democratically elected representatives is, however, reflected in both systems of government.
From the Paper
"The British Parliamentary system of government is one of the oldest political systems in the world that has evolved over a period of centuries. The British model has influenced the system of governments in many countries of the world including the United States. On the other hand, the US system of government is a Federal system that came into existence when the United States (the former American colonies) rebelled against British rule and declared its independence in the latter part of the eighteenth century, followed by the adoption of its own constitution in 1787. Although having some similarities with the British System of government, the US system of government is unique in several aspects, having its own characteristics. In this paper we shall look at some key features of the two systems of government and compare and contrast the British Parliamentary system of government with the United States Federal System of government."
| |
|
The Government that Governs Best, 2004.
Asks the question: does the government that governs least govern the best?
1,338 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
There are many who believe that a true, freedom-loving democracy consists of a government that stays out of the business of its citizens as much as possible. This paper questions whether a government that does not govern much at all can really be an effective government. Even more importantly, it questions whether a government that does not govern much can protect and preserve the very democracy and freedom that created it in the first place. This paper looks at the writings of Alex de Tocqueville, specifically, his book, "Democracy in America", in order to determine if the government that governs least really is best.
From the Paper
"For most of the history of the United States, the idea that the government should not be very strong and should leave the people mainly to themselves has been a common theme of opinion among both the people and the politicians. It was certainly the common idea of the day when the Articles of Confederation were installed as our first constitution. The Articles of Confederation created a weak, loose league of friendship between the states, but established no real sort of federal government. The federal government it did create had no power beyond what the states gave it. As a result, nothing much ever got done, and the government and the states soon found out that the United States as a whole was not able to pay its bills, regulate its commerce, or ensure domestic tranquility."
| |
|
The Government and the Governed, 2004.
Compares and contrasts John Locke's and Jean Rousseau's theories about government and the people it governs.
2,700 words (approx. 10.8 pages), 3 sources, APA, $ 95.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the theories put forth by John Lock and Jean Jacques Rousseau concerning the ways that government and those governed should interact. The paper compares and contrasts both theories and examines their differing ideas on ways in which government must act to ensure a stable, orderly, just and prosperous society.
From the Paper
"Two philosophers who have contributed a great deal to an understanding of the relationship between citizens and government are Jean Jacques Rousseau and John Locke. The purpose of this report is to compare and contrast Rousseau's and Locke's theories regarding the ways in which the governed and the government must and should interact in order to ensure the continuation of a society that is stable, orderly and conducive to prosperity, equality and justice for its members. To that end ideas advanced..."
| |
|
California Government versus the Federal Government, 2007.
A comparison of the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the federal government versus California government.
1,852 words (approx. 7.4 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 59.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper compares the California Government to the Federal Government. It discusses the United States executive branch, (the presidency), the United States Congress (the legislative branch), the United States federal court system and the federal bureaucracy. The paper then compares the running of the federal government to the California government with regards to its executive branch, the legislative process and the judicial system.
Table of Contents:
The Executive Branch
The Legislative Branch
The Judicial Branch
From the Paper
"One thing that helps keep a separation of power between the three branches is the President's limited lawmaking abilities. The president can recommend laws and changes to laws, but he cannot implement them. Only the Congress can do that. He can however, veto laws that Congress passes and he finds unacceptable. This keeps any one of the three branches from having too much power or influence over the others."
| |
|
Federal Government versus State Government, 2002.
A comparison of the United States Federal Government versus the Michigan State Government.
1,900 words (approx. 7.6 pages), 3 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of the government system used by the state of Michigan and uses this overview to compare the situation in Michigan to the governing style of the country as a whole. This paper therefore provides the reader with a concise summary of the ways in which Michigan is both alike and different from the U.S. federal government.
| |
|
Government, Human Development and Democracy, 2008.
This extensive paper is a research study asking if a democratic systems of governance remain the most ideal form of government to effectively achieve a state's developmental aims.
7,165 words (approx. 28.7 pages), 12 sources, MLA, $ 159.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper investigates the connection between the types or forms of government and their performance in terms of the human development index (HDI), which is a more reliable measurement of development as a referent of its effect and contribution to the human person. The author argues that democratic forms of government are better able to provide for the advancement of human development because they allow for more meaningful public participation. The paper indicates that more than 60% of all dominant-assembly-oriented types (mostly referred to as parliamentary systems of government) and 20% of accountable-executive-oriented (mostly referred to as presidential systems) fall within categories regarded as "high human development" and roughly 24 percent of the former and 57% of the latter countries are within the "medium human development" category.
Table of Contents:
Abstract
Introduction
Related Literature
Structures of Government
Table. Riggs's Classification of Polity's (Political Systems)
Democracy and Development
Human Development
Classification of Forms of Government
Table. Classification of Forms of Government Used in the Paper
Human Development Index and Forms of Government
Table. High Human Development
Table. Medium Human Development
Table. Low Human Development
Distribution of Each Governmental Type across HD Levels
Table. Distribution of Each Type of Governmental Form across HD Levels
Table. HDI by Designated Regions and Clusters
Conclusion: Democracy for Human Development
From the Paper
"There are governments as well, which may have plurality in terms of decision-making but it is dispersed among a few like-minded individuals advancing a common cause and not allowing for existence of competing groups or parties. This characterizes the third type of governmental system which still greatly persists in the present era--the ruling-party oriented type (Type 3). Theocratic governments are sub-classified under this since theocratic governments whether multi-party or not, allow a rather very little room for ideological dissent and since their main goals are to conservatively advance a particular religion and way of life and sometimes at the expense of political rights and civil liberties."
|
|
|
