| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "SUPREME COURT SEPARATION POWERS": |
|
|
Supreme Court on Separation of Powers, 1996.
Examines inconsistency of Court decisions from 1944 to 1989 affecting separation of powers among three branches of govt.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 13 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"SUPREME COURT ON POLITICAL QUESTIONS AND SEPARATION OF POWERS
This essay analyzes the decisions of the Supreme Court in the area of political questions and the separation of powers among the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government, as illustrated by selected cases, and examines critically related propositions. Issues of constitutional (and statutory) interpretation must be and have been dealt with by the Court in cases involving political questions. Likewise, practical issues should be but have not always been considered on a consistent basis by the Court in some separation of power cases. The Court has thereby contributed to an erosion of its own moral authority.
Diminished Scope of the Political Question Doctrine
In the broad sense of the term, all decisions by the Court.."
| |
|
The Supreme Court's Power ( 1850-1875 ), 1999.
Examines the extent and application of the Court's power, leadership, decisions on states' vs. federal power, slavery, territorial expansion, public vs. private welfare and economic regulation.
2,025 words (approx. 8.1 pages), 8 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This research paper summarizes and analyzes the approach taken by the American Supreme Court between 1850 and 1875 in its jurisprudence concerning the extent and application of its power.
During the last 14 years (1850-1864) when Roger Taney was Chief Justice, (1836-1864), the Court was largely preoccupied with the allocation of power between national and state governments
From the Paper
"EXTENT AND APPLICATION OF THE SUPREME COURT'S POWER (1850-1875)
This research paper summarizes and analyzes the approach taken by the American Supreme Court between 1850 and 1875 in its jurisprudence concerning the extent and application of its power.
During the last 14 years (1850-1864) when Roger Taney was Chief Justice, (1836-1864), the Court was largely preoccupied with the allocation of power between national and state governments. The Taney Court permitted more scope for the exercise of state power over commerce than did the Court of Chief Justice John Marshall (1801-1836), without rolling back the expansion of federal constitutional power pioneered by its predecessor. Although it sometimes exercised judicial self-restraint, the Taney Court overreached itself and damaged the standing of the Court by its sweeping but misguided assertion of ..."
| |
|
The Supreme Court and Public Opinion, 2006.
An analysis of the effect that the Supreme Court has on public opinion.
2,721 words (approx. 10.9 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 81.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper focuses the effects of Supreme Court decisions on public opinion as debated by Johnson and Martin in "The Public Conditional Responses to Supreme Court Decisions," Mishler and Sheenan's "The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions" and Rosenberg in his book "The Hollow Hope". This paper argues that the Supreme Court does have an effect on public opinion but that such effects are conditional.
From the Paper
"It would be simple to conclude that the Supreme Court either has an effect on public opinion or that it has no effect whatsoever on public opinion. The correct conclusion would be to say that the Supreme Court has an effect on public opinion and that such effect is not always clearly determinable. In other words, "The Supreme Court can and does influence public attitudes toward highly salient issues, but its effect is conditional" (Johnson and Martin, 1998, 306). This is known as the Conditional Response Theory, as established by Johnson and Martin in their article The Public's Conditional Response to Supreme Court Decisions. Johnson and Martin assert that the Conditional Response Theory is based on three facts: First, the Supreme Court is viewed as a creditable institution and therefore a highly legitimate one. "
| |
|
Interest Groups & Supreme Court, 1991.
This paper analyzes the role that interest groups play in Supreme Court cases: History and development of influence of lobbyists, accessibility of the Supreme Court, pros and cons and legal theory.
2,700 words (approx. 10.8 pages), 10 sources, $ 95.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"This paper will critically analyze the role that interest groups play in Supreme Court cases. As a general rule, it is assumed that special interests do not belong at the level of the federal judiciary. The function of the Supreme Court is solely to interpret the Constitution as it pertains to matters of law. In order to arrive at fair and equal judgements, the Court needs to be free from the influence of outside sources. Interest groups are permitted by law to seek influence among members of Congress through the practice of lobbying. In this regard, the Supreme Court has played an important role in regulating the extent to which interests may take advantage of this First Amendment right.1 Nevertheless, the Court itself has for the most part attempted to remain "insulated" from the influence of lobbyists and other groups.2 The idea that this freedom from ... "
| |
|
Federalism and the Supreme Court In the 1990s, 1998.
Examines new trends towards states rights seen in Supreme Court cases since 1992. Examination reveals that these Supreme Court cases have given more power back to the state rather than the federal government.
2,000 words (approx. 8.0 pages), 11 sources, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Supreme Court cases since 1992 have given more power back to the states rather than the federal government. In the history of the nation, the balance of power between the states and the national government has shifted many times. The Supreme Court has previously provided additional support to congresses obsessed with the further federalization of government control by upholding federal supremacy in almost every area. This is no longer so. The current Supreme Court under Chief Justice Rehnquist has supported the states in four recent and significant cases. Two of these cases, United States v. Lopez and Seminole Tribe of Florida, Petitioner v. Florida, et al., have ended the congressional practice of regulating local and intrastate affairs via the commerce clause in the Constitution. States' rights to local sovereignty reserved under the 10th Amendment were upheld by two other cases, New York v. United States and Printz, Sheriff/Coroner, Ravalli County, Montana v. United States. When considered together, these four cases as well as the nature of the opinions written about them present an overall trend towards states' rights."
| |
|
The Supreme Court, 2005.
This paper extensively reviews the Supreme Court, two of its Chief Justice--- Earl Warren and William H. Rehnquist--- and some of the cases relating to their tenure.
5,610 words (approx. 22.4 pages), 19 sources, APA, $ 136.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper relates that, when studying the Supreme Court, the views of the Chief Justice becomes the generalization for the Court as a whole because, when each new Chief Justice is appointed, the view of the Court tends to change. The author points out that two of the main changes that the Supreme Court has gone through over the last half century were periods when it was headed by Chief Justices Earl Warren, who became a liberal and by William H. Rehnquist, who remained a staunch conservative; both were Republicans but they had completely different views on how the decisions of the Supreme Court should be made. The paper concludes that the Supreme Court would not be considered the most prestigious court in the United States, and perhaps even the world, if it was not a court with diversity, not only in the justices themselves who represent various races, genders, ethnicities and religions, but also in ideologies and political views.
From the Paper
"Throughout Warren's years as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, he changed the entire way the nation operated. Warren and his court overruled precedents and set new ones. When an individual wakes up, gets ready, and goes to school, that individual will most likely step into a classroom where there are people of many different races, ethnicities and religions. If it was not for the liberal views of the Warren Court, especially Warren himself, there is no way to determine if the United States would have the civil rights that it does. If it were not for the Warren Court, we would not hear, "you have the right to remain silent..." on the television show, Cops, every night. Warren's liberal views helped mold the United States into what it is today."
| |
|
Supreme Court, 2007.
An analysis of the issues arising from the power that the Supreme Court has over the Constitution in the United States.
1,141 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the power of the Supreme Court in the United States. The paper suggests that the Supreme Court is the final arbiter of constitutionality on just about any issue that is debated among citizens of the United States and it discusses the political and legal problems that have arisen from this situation. It specifically discusses the public outcry regarding activist judges who appear to want to legislate from the bench.
From the Paper
"The need for judicial reforms, then, is rather obvious. What is less evident, however, is the means through which to accomplish this reform. Some commentators have suggested a constitutional amendment limiting justices to term limits, albeit long ones, to avoid the political maneuvering inherent in the timing of Justices' retirements and nomination; the amendment provides significant equality among administrations to nominate candidates for the Court without placing undue emphasis on when certain Justices retired (as Justice William Douglas attempted to do by waiting to retire until a Democratic president was in office) (DiTullio and Schochet 2004). Other reforms proposed include different nomination processes, a more significant emphasis on qualifications over political affiliation, less outside lobbyist and interest group involvement, and various other tweaks to the process of choosing members of the judiciary (Yoo 2000, 1465)."
| |
|
The U.S. Supreme Court and Politics, 1998.
A discussion of the various topics that the U.S. Supreme Court deals with.
1,670 words (approx. 6.7 pages), 3 sources, $ 54.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
A detailed examination of the U.S. Supreme court and the type of matters it addresses. The author argues that issues of politics and political controversies should be taken into account by the supreme court as often they form constitutional issues, and supports this view by emphasizing the chief objective of the U.S. supreme court: to preserve the principles and rights guaranteed in the U.S. Constitution. The paper includes an analysis of various politicians and an explanation of the roles of the supreme court and judiciary.
From the Paper
"When political beliefs and thoughts evolve into law, often times, constitutional issues arise alongside. Although the U.S. Supreme Court has the license to decide whether or not to adjudicate matters involving hot political topics, past history has indicated that the Court has not been inclined to evade such questions, but rather, to thoroughly delve into such controversies. As a staunch Federalist, Alexander Hamilton had strong beliefs and ideas as to how the infant U.S. government should be set up and efficiently run. As opposed to Thomas Jefferson?s notions on the importance of strong state governments, Hamilton believed in the superiority of a powerful central government body. He set forth his political views in the Federalist papers, examining all aspects of government and focusing on the role of the judicial branch in numbers 78, 79 and 80."
| |
|
The United States Supreme Court, 2008.
This paper examines the United States Supreme Court, looking into its history and procedures.
1,248 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer provides the background to the U.S. Supreme Court through a brief history of the Court. In addition, the writer presents an explanation as to how cases from trial court work their way up to the Supreme Court for review. The writer notes that both topics are rich with layers of complexity and for the purposes of this paper, an overview of the history and process of the Supreme Court is provided.
From the Paper
"Additional restrictions on appeals to the Supreme Court include some of the general restrictions applied to all appellate review. For example, appeals are restricted to losing parties, questions of law to be addressed must have been raised during trial court, and time restrictions exist in permitting the filing of an appeal.
"Once a case successfully reaches the Supreme Court docket, a lengthy review process begins which can take as long as three years to complete. Once the process is completed, the Supreme Court issues a number of opinions representing the different views held by the justices following the review process. The opinion most widely shared amongst the majority (the majority opinion) represents the final decision of the Supreme Court. "
| |
|
The Second Amendment and the Supreme Court, 2006.
A review of the five cases of the Second Amendment that have been heard in the U.S. Supreme Court.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 3 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how the United States Supreme Court has heard only five cases in relation to the Second Amendment to the Constitution. These cases include US v. Cruikshank, Presser v. Illinois, Miller v. Texas, US v. Miller, and Lewis v. US. In 1876 US v. Cruikshank was brought before the Supreme Court. The paper reviews the case of 1876, when U.S. v. Cruikshank was brought before the Supreme Court. The Court held that it was not an individual's right to "bear arms", that the ability of citizens to carry weapons was intended to address the need of the states to form a militia for the purpose of protecting the population.
| |
|
The U.S Supreme Court, 2002.
An analysis of the U.S Supreme Court and their impact on the constitution.
1,935 words (approx. 7.7 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 61.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the constitution against the decisions of the Supreme Court and evaluates how the meaning of the U.S. Constitution has been shaped by the personalities, philosophies and composition of the members of the U.S. Supreme Court. The writer compares and contrasts two U.S. Supreme Court Justices with different philosophies of law and interpretation. The paper covers the theory and cites specific case examples and their impact on the United States.
From the Paper
?We live in what is supposed to be the best nation on earth. We have freedoms that many do not have and we have opportunity that many never see. This country is one that embraces diversity and personal rights. While we have all of these things we have also reached a point in our existence where there are so many people and so many diverse ideas that its difficult to sort out what is and isn?t a constitutional right sometimes. The Supreme Court is often charged with making those decisions, which outs the Supreme Court in the position of not only interpreting the constitution but also shaping it as well by its decisions and rulings.?
| |
|
The Supreme Court And Civil Rights, 2007.
An examination of civil rights cases in the Supreme Court, in the post-Reconstruction period.
2,301 words (approx. 9.2 pages), 15 sources, MLA, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The writer argues that one of the major reasons why African-Americans failed to achieve equality in the United States, following the Civil War, is due to the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States. The writer proposes that this makes it necessary to examine the records of this branch of the American government in order to determine how these decisions impacted African-Americans after the Civil War. The paper analyzes five important Supreme Court cases adjudicated following the war, which made equality in the United States impossible for African-Americans. The paper concludes that these decisions of the Supreme Court undermined the ability of African-Americans to obtain equality under the law and had a very detrimental effect on this brave and often dangerous quest to gain equality in America during the days of the post-Reconstruction Era.
From the Paper
"One of the first major Supreme Court cases considered after the Civil War was the Slaughterhouse cases, brought before the Court by the butchers of New Orleans in response to a law passed in 1869 by the legislature of the State of Louisiana which allowed the incorporation of the Live Stock and Slaughterhouse Company in New Orleans and granted them exclusive rights to slaughter livestock within the city, effectively granting them a monopoly. Thus, the butchers had no choice but to seek redress through the courts via a lawsuit which argued that the new law violated their fourteenth Amendment right to due process."
| |
|
Race Relations and the U.S. Supreme Court, 2002.
This paper discusses the use of the U.S. Supreme Court, from the end of the Civil War through 1917, to support the beliefs that truly all men are created equal.
1,075 words (approx. 4.3 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the use of the U.S. Supreme Court by Blacks, Chinese and others to end discrimination, segregation and disenfranchisement by initiating and challenging regional legal decisions. The paper describes important U.S. Supreme court cases of this period: Roberts vs. the City of Boston ("separate but equal" doctrine), Ho Ah Kow vs. Nunan (discrimination against Chinese), Plessy vs. Ferguson (state's rights to enact its own laws) and Buchanan vs. Warley ( states cannot officially segregate African Americans into residential districts).
From the Paper
"For example, the Chinese, who comprised a critical element in building the fortunes of the West, were denied many of the rights whites freely enjoyed. The Chinese persevered in this hostile climate and succeeded in broadening the definition of "American." The Chinese achieved Constitutional rights and led the way for other immigrant groups yet to come. In Ho ah Kow vs. Nunan, Ho Ah Kow sued a San Francisco sheriff who followed a racially-motivated law that decreed all prisoners have their hair cut at the uniform length of one inch long upon entering jail."
| |
|
Changes on the Supreme Court, 2005.
An analysis of the changes on the Supreme Court and what that means for the ideological make-up for the Court at present and in the future.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 10 sources, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper looks at the historical process of Supreme Court nominations and confirmations. It looks at the individuals the current president has nominated for the highest court in the land, his reasons for selecting these individuals, the arguments for and against each one, and what has happened to the nominations and to the nomination process in recent months. Finally, the paper concludes with an examination of what President Bush's nominations portend for the future direction of the American Supreme Court and for the ideological make-up of the court in the present and future.
From the Paper
"The changes on the Supreme Court: What it means for America Each time the President of the United States nominates someone to the Supreme Court, he is making a decision that is among the most important of his administration - perhaps the most important."
| |
|
Supreme Courts and the Commerce Clause, 2002.
This paper examines the U.S. supreme courts interruption of the commerce clause of the constitution.
2,400 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 4 sources, $ 89.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In depth analysis of U.S. Supreme Court decisions on how the commerce clause has been interrupted from the Kennedy Court to the Clinton Court (1962-2001). This paper also examines Supreme Court cases in detail to track this change.
|
|
|
