| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "SOCRATES PLATO REPUBLIC LEADERSHIP": |
|
|
Socrates, Plato's "Republic" and Leadership, 2006.
This paper outlines the qualities that Socrates believes leaders should have as described in Plato's "Republic."
1,294 words (approx. 5.2 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 43.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is based on Plato's Republic and a conversation that Socrates has with another philosopher on leadership qualities. The role of a good leader, according to the ancient Greeks, is described, along with the necessary character traits. The author also draws attention to the qualities of weak leaders and the methods they use.
From the Paper
"In Plato's Republic, Socrates discusses importance of being a good ruler and the qualities that person should have. The key trait that he brings to light is having knowledge, often saying that philosophers would make the best rulers because they have the most knowledge of anyone in the state. In the case of Creon from Sophocles' famed play Antigone, he seems to prove Socrates' point by demonstrating that ruling with an iron fist is just a way to cover up for incompetence and lack of the aforementioned knowledge."
| |
|
Socrates and Justice in Plato's Republic, 2001.
The following paper discusses how Socrates set out to define the idea of justice and the just man when he began the conversations archived in Plato?s Republic.
2,035 words (approx. 8.1 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 64.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores Socrates attempt to define the ideal city, hoping within it to discover the form of justice itself. The author takes the reader through critical points in this book and shows us how no Apollonian dedication to the things of the mind, nor virgin dedication to warfare and the ways of the hunt, could truly save Socrates' city from the uprising of its youth.
From the Paper
"As part of creating this utopia, he set about to entirely restructure the modern family. He suggested, reasonably, that men and women should be set to the same sorts of work, according to their gifts, being equal in all things save that the men were stronger. To prevent conflict, and continue the owning of all things in common, he spoke of having wives and husbands and children all in common. So that the stock of his city should all be strong and healthy, he suggested a rigged lottery determining who should mate with whom, the outcome determined by genetics and success. The healthy offspring should be raised, the inferior disposed of appropriately."
| |
|
Philosophy: Plato's Republic, 2006.
A discussion regarding the theme of justice and the well ordered soul in Plato's Republic.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 1 source, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This philosophical study examines the theme of justice and the well ordered soul in Plato's Republic. By examining the basis of Truth in Plato's Republic, the paper realizes the foundation for justice within this city. Also, the objective of truth should relate to the basis of the soul, which should be guided by the principles of justice within Plato's ideology. In this manner, Plato's Republic identifies the basis of justice upon the foundation of virtue and truth within the well ordered soul in this philosopher's ideal city state.
From the Paper
"In this paper, the basis of justice within The Republic relies on the various facets of knowledge and the foundation for universal truths in governing. Plato and Socrates often agree that right and wrong often changes through the passage of time, but through a reference to justice, the Republic gives virtue and truth as the basis for honoring order. Through this construct of justice and order, the soul becomes the foundation for realizing the greater good of society. The well ordered soul is the key to realizing a universal truth that is unchanging and reliable. "
| |
|
Plato's "Republic", 2007.
A discussion on whether Plato's concept of a republic can be considered a utopia.
1,714 words (approx. 6.9 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper attempts to analyze Plato's "Republic" by simply answering the questions of whether or not the Republic is a utopia, if it can be brought into existence and whether it is realizable. While focusing on and answering the questions above, this paper also provides the reader with a basic understanding of the concepts and ideas conveyed by Plato in the "Republic".
From the Paper
" In the Republic, the words "mine," "not mine," "another's," and "not another's" will be applied to the same things throughout the community, for it is words like these that cause a disunion in society (Plato, "The Republic"). "In our community, then, above all others, when things go well or ill with any individual everyone will use that word 'mine' in the same sense and say that all is going well of ill with him and his. And, as we said, this way of thinking and speaking goes with fellow-feeling; so that our citizens, sharing as they do in a common interest in which each will call his own, will have all their feelings of pleasure or pain in common" (Plato, "The Republic"). "
| |
|
Morality in Plato's "Republic", 2007.
A discussion of morality as presented in Plato's "Republic."
1,256 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 1 source, APA, $ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes the concept of morality as seen in Plato'o "Republic." The author examines morality drawing on arguments presented in the first chapter of Plato's work. Several other philosophers' outlooks are examined, which include Socrates, Polemarchus and Simonides. Their opinions on morality are compared and contrasted, with the central focus given to Socrates.
From the Paper
" Thus through this first chapter of the book, we come to understand that Socrates' idea of a moral person is based on his own original thinking and conclusion drawn from dialogue. He didn't believe in one exact definition of morality but believed in drawing some attributes of a moral person through discussion and dialogue. For this purpose, he found the loopholes in traditional view of morality and based his definition on long dialogue with those who believed in the former. He believed that morality was good and immorality bas because "immorality makes for mutual conflict, hatred, and antagonism, while moral behavior makes for concord and friendship" (p. 40). Thus Socrates maintained that morality could not be judged through truthfulness or return of borrowed items, it had to be based on character attributes of the person. He felt that a moral person was one whose action led to something good and beneficial while immoral person's action led to exactly the opposite. In other words, it is the actions that make a person. If an action leads to positive results from highest number of people, we can claim that it was a moral action and vice versa. Socrates' main argument was not in favor of his view of morality but rather it was in opposition of the prevailing view. "
| |
|
Socrates and Plato, 2006.
This paper examines the teachings of Greek philosopher Socrates as well as that of his student, Plato.
902 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 32.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper focuses on the Socratic method, which unlike most philosophical teachings, seeks to debase beliefs rather than build them up. This paper discusses the views and opinions of both Plato and Socrates in regards to the Socratic method. The writer of this paper contends and explains why readers of Plato's works should be skeptical of his presentation of philosophical notions through the argumentative style, which he attributes to Socrates. This paper discusses the basic philosophy behind the Socratic method, in which Socrates' reliance upon the soul to lead into the discussion of virtue could be attacked upon the assertion that insufficient evidence exists to contend that there are such things as souls. On the other hand, Plato believes that souls must exist because they explain the competing inclinations people can possess. This paper also delves into Plato's and Socrates' roles as philosophers and theorists.
From the Paper
"However, the chief limitation of the manner by which Socrates is expressed through Plato is that his lessons are no longer personalized with respect to the audience; they are only personal with respect to the characters Plato generates. The power of Socrates' technique is that it forces him to investigate many of his centrally held beliefs simultaneously with the person he is communicating; any questions that arise from his audience, or possible objections to his line of reasoning, must be addressed. This capacity is necessarily lacking when it is placed upon paper because any questions or objections that might be evoked in the reader inevitably go unanswered. For example, when Socrates argues, "So one may say this about everything; all other human activities depend on the soul, and those of the soul itself depend on wisdom if they are to be good."
| |
|
Plato's "Republic", 2005.
A review of Plato's "Republic".
920 words (approx. 3.7 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses Plato's "Republic" and the discussion between Glaucon and Socrates concerning the relationship between justice and happiness. The paper asserts Plato's viewpoint, which is that justice is a reward in itself, regardless of whether it results in personal advantage.
From the Paper
"In Plato's Republic the philosophical question of justice arises between Socrates and Glaucon. Glaucon suggests three categories of justice and posits that justice is just a man made convention that humans practice because it is to their ..."
| |
|
Philosophers and Citizens in Plato's Republic, 2006.
An analysis of the desirable civic traits of both philosophers and citizens according to Plato in the "Republic".
2,700 words (approx. 10.8 pages), 1 source, $ 106.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This book discusses the similarities and differences in Books II through VII of Plato's "Republic" regarding the best combination of civic traits desirable for citizens and philosophers in the city. For example, in his description of the most admirable traits of a warrior-guardian, Socrates declared that those who on each occasion would do what is best for the city would be the best guardians. He also declared that they would also be the best citizens because good citizens devote themselves to the good of the city as a whole.
| |
|
Plato?s "The Republic", 2002.
An analysis of Plato?s "The Republic" and ideal society.
1,728 words (approx. 6.9 pages), 0 sources, $ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews Plato?s "The Republic" and shows how the ideas of Plato and his peers center on the social conditions of an ideal republic, which leads each person to the perfect possible life. It shows how Plato differentiates between three classes of people by their ability to grasp the truth of the forms and their understanding that each class contributing to society by fulfilling its proper function. Plato believed that wisdom, courage, moderation and justice could easily combine together to form the ideal society. The paper concludes with how Plato does not ask his readers to accept his views and how this perhaps makes his argument stronger as he simply asks the readers to question and challenge his theories.
From the Paper
"Socrates then explained his theory in a different way, shifting his focus from the individual to the city. According to Socrates, people merged in cities so that each person could perform the task best suited to their individual nature. He described the various classes of people in a city, from the peasant to the highest ruler. He asked the group: "Do you not think, that one who is to be guardian-like needs something more besides a spirited temper, and that is to be in his nature a lover of wisdom?" He wondered how potential rulers could be trained and educated with these traits."
| |
|
Socrates, Plato and Descartes, 2005.
A discussion regarding the work, teachings and relationship between Socrates, Plato and Descartes.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 3 sources, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews the history, work and teachings of Socrates, Plato and Descartes. This paper goes on to discuss Descartes' attempt to distinguish between the real world and the metaphysical which, much like Plato, comes up with a duality.
From the Paper
"Perhaps no two philosophers are more discussed and more revered among the modern study of philosophy than Plato and Descartes. Plato, famous for taking the wisdom of his teacher Socrates and forming it into something completely different than what had come before him and being the teacher of Aristotle who would come after him, is probably most known for devising a system of metaphysics based on perfect, theoretical "forms." It is this theory of forms that will inform this paper, so far as Plato is concerned. The father of modern philosophy, Rene Descartes, was also as groundbreaking as the afore-mentioned Greek who came centuries before him."
| |
|
Plato's "Republic", 2005.
An analysis of the relationship between the "Allegory of the Cave" and the "Myth of Metals" in Plato's "Republic".
1,495 words (approx. 6.0 pages), 1 source, APA, $ 49.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes the symbolic relationship between the "Allegory of the Cave" and the "Myth of Metals" in Plato's "Republic" and the purpose of one with respect to the other. It attempts to show how the role of the "Myth of Metals" can be defined inside the cave, since the cities at their present state are the caves, and the citizens are prisoners. They neither see the way of good life nor are capable of getting there without the help of the philosopher.
From the Paper
"One cannot tell how big of a concern that would be for the escaped prisoner who has no obligation to the other prisoners. To our philosopher, however, who is by Socrates' condition also a guardian of a city, this would be a major impediment. Not able to show the true Good and true happiness to the ruled, not able to explain their meaning in a language understandable by non-philosophers, the guardian is yet bound by his obligation to do whatever is the best for the Republic and its citizens. The philosopher would realize that perfect happiness, the one he was exposed to in the light of the knowledge, cannot be seen in shadows or explained with language used by the other citizens."
| |
|
Plato's "Republic" and "Bhagavad-Gita", 2006.
A comparison of sun analogies in the "Bhagavad-Gita" and Plato's "Republic."
1,203 words (approx. 4.8 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the use of the sun and analogies of the sun in the "Bhagavad-Gita" and Plato's "Republic." The paper points out that both works view the sun as a crucial part of existence - a life-giver and source of good.
From the Paper
"Given its prominence in the sky and its ability to provide humankind with warmth and sustenance through agriculture, it is little wonder that the Sun has played such an important role in literature through the centuries. To this end, this paper examine the various sun analogies that occur in both the Bhagavad-Gita and the Republic to identify what the Sun represents in each case, what can be learned regarded the role of knowledge and its implications for good conduct, followed by a discussion of whether this type of knowledge serves to
illuminate humankind's understanding in each of these instances."
| |
|
Plato's "Republic" and More's "Utopia", 2002.
A comparison of Plato's "Republic" and Thomas More's "Utopia".
2,360 words (approx. 9.4 pages), 4 sources, $ 72.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper compares aspects of Plato" Republic" and More's "Utopia", including political systems, economic systems, societal responsibilities and communications. The author also discusses the pros and cons of each Utopia.
Each utopia has fundamental ways to keep society from
degenerating. Their economic system, communications,
societal responsibilities, and political systems show how
they try to do this.
Communications: Each utopia has a different stance on
communicating with the outside world.
Societal Responsibility: Each utopia provides a different
way to produce the desired effect of having each
member of society provided for.
Political System: Leaders of each utopia are chosen
through different means.
Most attractive aspects of each utopia.
Least attractive aspects of each utopia.
From the Paper
"People complain most about economics, their ability to communicate, their responsibilities to society, and who is leading them. Both Plato and More attempt to solve the problems within these categories. They create societies in which these problems, according to them, are solved, so that the societies will run smoothly, and the citizens will remain happy. The two authors create differing societies; societies that are easy to compare and contrast as to their usefulness. Each society, because they do differ, contain both attractions to it, as well as things that would disenfranchise citizens."
| |
|
Plato's Republic, 2004.
This paper discusses Plato's "The Republic."
1,356 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper shows how in Plato's "The Republic" the soul and the city are analogous entities, with corresponding virtues. The paper discusses how this relationship is elegant but problematic.
From the Paper
"In Plato's immortal philosophical treatise "The Republic" a notion of the Good is advanced that defies subjectivity. Through Socrates, Plato illustrates that a rationalistic approach conjoining virtue and knowledge will yield certain objective truths about human nature and the ideal modes of human conduct. In a sense these truths apply directly to and correspond with the human soul and the human city."
| |
|
Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, 2007.
This paper compares the philosophies of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle.
1,083 words (approx. 4.3 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper examines the similarities present in the beliefs of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. The paper looks particularly at their logic and argumentation, their views towards knowledge and how best to acquire it, what love signifies for them and their definitions of existence. The paper shows how while the similarities between the three are significant, Aristotle appears to be the non-conformist in the group in some important respects.
From the Paper
"About Socrates' logic and argumentation many things can be said. For one thing, it appears as though he proceeds from generally-accepted facts to general conclusions based upon those facts. Like Plato, it appears as though Socrates believes that real knowledge could not be achieved through the human senses but only through philosophical inquiry into metaphysical items. By comparison, Plato viewed logic (and, within that, argumentation) as being similar to a mathematical proof inasmuch as the terms being used to arrive at a higher state of understanding must be clearly defined and the procedures by which one may define terms and/or deconstruct "figures" - so that the relations between their parts may be clearly established - must be clearly defined, as well (White 2002; please see Hogben 1999)."
|
|
|
