| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "SOCIOLOGY SCIENCE": |
|
|
Sociology and Science, 2002.
Analyzes the topic of sociology in relation to science, using the works of several sociologists.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 3 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Based upon a study of several highly respected books by prominent sociologists such as Max Weber, Anthony Giddens and Martin Hollis, this paper critically explains and analyzes the relationship between sociology and science.
| |
|
Sociology and Science, 2006.
This article analyzes the connection between sociology and the scientific method.
1,234 words (approx. 4.9 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Sociology studies human behaviour and society. The writer points out that sociology also is a science; it subscribes to the accepted scientific method of the other natural sciences, however there is much debate and contention about the nature of the scientific method and whether it is entirely applicable to sociological discourse. The writer explains the debate and concludes that sociology is a science - but this statement has to take into account the changing view of what science is.
From the Paper
"Sociology as a discipline is part of the scientific examination and understanding of human behavior and society. In this sense, and as a science, it attempts to "... discover the causes and effects that arise in social relations among persons and in the intercommunication and interaction among persons and groups." ( Sociology) As a scientific enterprise sociology also includes within its parameters the "... the study of the customs, structures, and institutions that emerge from interaction, of the forces that hold together and weaken them, and of the effects that participation in groups and organizations have on the behaviour and character of persons." ( ibid) Sociology therefore subscribes to the accepted scientific method of the other natural sciences. However there is much debate and contention about the nature of the scientific method and whether it is entirely applicable to sociological discourse."
| |
|
The Sociology of Knowledge and Science, 2005.
A look at how post-modern sociology attempts to explore the relationship between society and science within organizational structures and between experts and the social constructions of reality.
1,456 words (approx. 5.8 pages), 17 sources, APA, $ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the post-modern phase of sociology and explains how this phase is one of assertive questioning and an investigative tone regarding the issue of science and the problematics of expertise.
From the Paper
"A work that relates to this tradition of sociological analysis and deconstruction is a paper by Paul Forman entitled Weimar Culture, Causality and Quantum Theory, 1918-1927: Adaptation by German Physicists and Mathematicians to a Hostile Intellectual Environment. (Forman, P. 1971. vol. 3,) This paper "shows just how deeply the sociology of knowledge can penetrate into the cultural evocation of scientific concepts and (in this case) whole approaches to natural phenomena. The issues raised by the sociology of knowledge are always in danger of undermining the foundations of the claims of science to value-free objective knowledge, and there is a large and fraught literature concerned with shoring up those foundations - something that is much easier to do in the physical than in the biological and social sciences. (Young, R. 1979)"
| |
|
Sociology, Science and Theories, 2002.
A comparison of Max Weber and Karl Marx on the idea of scientists and theorists.
1,650 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 4 sources, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper will discuss the comparison between the philosophies of Karl Marx and Max Weber in deciding on the idea of scientists and/or theorists of science in their time. By understanding the reasoning behind the writings of both of these men, we can see how they agreed on the same nature of philosophy and the empirical thinking, which was so much a part of their reasoning for the development of science in their time. By understanding the teachings of both men, we can learn how they felt about the theorist in this scope.
| |
|
The Science of Sociology, 2004.
This paper analyzes the impact of science and the scientific spirit on sociology.
920 words (approx. 3.7 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the importance of the scientific method to sociological research. The author explains the way it is employed in sociological studies.
From the Paper
"When considering the field of sociology, many researchers reject the idea that it may be classified as a science in the same sense that biology and chemistry are. Indeed many believe that because sociology studies phenomena that usually..."
| |
|
Science as Culture, 2005.
This paper explores the inter-relationship of science and culture through the experiences of the author as related to sociological theory.
1,780 words (approx. 7.1 pages), 10 sources, APA, $ 57.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that things believed to be rational and normal in life today have not always been that way; throughout history, culture, conditioning and science have been the leading influences in this change. The author points out that today, sociology is considered a science of examining society through actions, trends and projections based on observable evidence; thereby, in this type of scientific study, science, technology and the influence of society can be placed into a working relationship. The paper reflects that today many individuals are no longer willing to conform to a paradigm, which can not answer the question of "where we came from, why we are here and where are we going". 9 annotated bibliographies.
Table of Contents
What do we Know about Reality?
1. Creation and birth
2. Death
Science in Sociological Perspective
1. The Science of Life
2. Consciousness and the Perception of Reality
The Big Picture
1. Perspective Reality
2. From Microbes to the Universe
Conclusion
From the Paper
"As we look up at the stars at night and see the vastness of our universe, we can see how small we really are in the big picture. We can imagine that at one time, all of these stars must have been created by something, but we have insufficient information to positively prove any of the current concepts developed by scientists. The same is true with human life. We understand how eggs and sperm unite, how meiosis in humans continues to reproduce DNA that after nine months produces a new human baby. The thing that we do not understand is how all of these intricate and complex events produce a life that will grow and develop into a cognitive and productive individual."
| |
|
The History of Sociology, 2001.
This paper traces the history of the development of the study of Sociology and examines the works of its founders , including Marx, Durkheim and Weber.
1,450 words (approx. 5.8 pages), 6 sources, $ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper provides a complete overview of the development of the science of sociology. It focuses on three major players - Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim and Max Weber and their influence on the early stages of the science. It shows how they they helped form the basis for the three general perspectives in sociology: conflict theory, functionalism, and interactionism.
From the paper:
"It was Auguste Comte (1789-1857) who coined the term ?sociology.? He believed this new science should study the question of ?how is society possible?? (Bartek/Mullin14) He based his own science on the idea that society is composed of individuals in the same way as a line is composed of points. The focus must be on observations of society and the collections of those individuals. Because of Comte?s work, other sociologists began to study the changes in society."
| |
|
Conflict Theory, 2002.
A discussion of theorists from sociology and political science.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 4 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Discusses theorists from sociology and political science. How they complement each other. The sociological model that posits organizations have usurped the power from individuals' individuals & societal interests. The political science model of applying conflict theory to world conflicts; role of peacekeeping. Common intervention strategies of both groups of theorists.
From the Paper
"With their objectives of addressing human problems and finding solutions, both the disciplines of sociology and political science share common theoretical approaches. The goals of conflict theory are to address the repression and exploitation of people by social organizations and overcome these problems by creating an alternative paradigm for genuine interaction (Young, 1975). While conflict theorists from the disciplines of sociology and political science share this fundamental objective, they deal with this issue on a different level and scope. Sociologists are concerned with individuals' interaction with society. Political scientists are interested in the relationships between larger entities such as social organizations and states.
From the sociological perspective, the conflict theory is..."
| |
|
"Reflections on Gender and Science", 2005.
This paper evaluates Evelyn Fox Keller's "Reflections on Gender and Science" in terms of Sigmund Freud's concept of Weltanschauung as presented in his "New Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis".
1,685 words (approx. 6.7 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 54.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that Sigmund Freud defined his concept of Weltanschauung as an intellectual construction which gives a unified solution of all the problems of our existence in which no question is left open and in which everything has its place. The author points out that, as a scientist and a feminist, Evelyn Fox Keller, known for her work in history, sociology and the philosophy of the inter-relationship of science and gender, is neither too easy on the male-dominated scientific establishment nor is she calling for a "feminist science" of a different order from the current and classical prevailing form. This paper relates that Keller is calling not for a different science but for a science that recognizes the value of differences in approach and cognition, a gender-free science, a truly scientific Weltanschauung.
From the Paper
"For example, Keller acknowledges that more and more women have been going into scientific careers, but until recently, most have been in the soft sciences, not the hard sciences such as physics, mathematics, chemistry, and biology. She notes that even these characterizations as "hard" and "soft" revel a sexist, masculine bias in the way people think about science--an attitude that is hardly objective and scientific. She even mentions that her five-year-old son stated that "science is for men." What better proof of the pervasiveness of the genderization of science than when your own child says that to his mother, who is a mathematical biophysicist who has done groundbreaking research in some of the "hardest" areas of quantitative scientific research?"
| |
|
Social Science Rules, 2006.
This paper examines the book "The Rules of Sociological Method" by Emile Durkheim.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 1 source, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses how it is usually thought that the natural sciences deal with objective facts that may be empirically observed, while social sciences such as sociology and psychology deal with more subjective matters and as such these social sciences cannot be as scientific and objective as the natural sciences. However, the paper explains that many theorists would like to assign rules to the methods of social sciences, so that they can lay claim to unearthing information that is as reliable and valid as the information discovered by natural scientists. This is essentially what Emile Durkheim tried to do in "The Rules of Sociological Method."
| |
|
Introduction to Sociology, 2006.
This paper examines the origins of sociology as well as the impact of the industrial revolution which changed the face of the social and physical environment.
1,315 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The writer of this paper defines sociology as the study of society and social institutions. This paper explores the new discipline of sociology which began in the 19th century with the introduction of the industrial revolution in Europe. This paper describes how sociology is applied when studying various interaction patterns in both individual and group settings. The writer also discusses how various aspects of culture impact society.
Outline:
Definitions
The Development of Sociology
The Origins
Early Sociologists
Subject Matter of Sociology
Collective Behavior
Limited Social Interactions
Unclear Social Boundaries
Weak & Unconventional Norms
Culture
Aspects of Culture
Socialization
Social Structure
Social Institutions
Bibliography
From the Paper
"The new discipline of sociology began to merge in the middle of the nineteenth century, in the contest of the sweeping changes the industrial revolution brought to Europe. No social changes in the history had been as wide spread or as far-reaching, as this information which is still taking place in the less developed nations of the world cried out for analysis and explanations. Industrialization threw into turmoil societies that had been relatively stable for centuries. New industries and technologies changed the face of the social and physical environment. Peasants left rural areas and flocked to the towns, where they worked as industrial laborers under appalling conditions."
| |
|
The Benefits of Social Science Research, 2006.
This informative paper analyzes how social science research has long been used to gather crucial information to improve our way of life and influence our view of the world.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The writer of this paper examines the wide range of subjects covered in social sciences including: Women's studies, economics, political science, law enforcement, psychology, sociology and anthropology. This paper explains how the research gathered from these areas have had a deep influence on our view of the world. Also discussed is the new field of social geography which examines the affects of geographical factors and how environmental factors affect society.
From the Paper
"Perhaps no field of social studies has a more pervasive and important role on the way we live than the field of economics. Economics students must learn to think deeply and creatively about important economic concerns facing the country and the world as a whole. Because economists have such a wide and varied set of perspectives and political views, they often come up with vastly different conclusions. They in turn apply these varied perspectives to such issues as economic efficiency, economic growth, globalism, cultural values, and environmental concerns. One need only to look inside a newspaper on a given day to realize the importance of studying economics."
| |
|
Developmental Studies and Sociology, 2006.
Contrasts and compares the fields of scientific sociology and developmental studies.
2,551 words (approx. 10.2 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 77.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the fields of scientific sociology and the broader field of developmental studies, examining both similarities and differences in the two fields. The paper explains that while the worlds of scientific sociological investigation and developmental studies are indeed closely related, the field of scientific sociology has yet to overcome a great deal of its "snobbery," before it can work effectively with the newer and broader field of developmental study.
Table of Contents
Thesis Statements
Comparisons and Contrasts of Sociology and Development
The Scientific Sociological Viewpoint
A Typical Example
The 4 S Society
Conclusions
From the Paper
"The Scientific Sociologist, Psychologists and other professionals in attendance at these various meetings received their "wake-up," calls where this issue was concerned. However, not all agreed that the events of the past quarter-century confirm Mead's precocious reasoning that academic scholars and professional societies have unwisely abdicated public education and cultural leadership to others. Putting it somewhat less politely, academic research relevant to the general public is a challenge that cannot be put off any longer."
| |
|
Sociology of Sleep, 2003.
This paper is about sleep as a sociological discipline to be studied and investigated by researchers, as well as students and professors of sociology.
3,150 words (approx. 12.6 pages), 13 sources, MLA, $ 91.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper investigates sleep as a sociological process. The writer explains the methodology used, including an introduction, a literature review, and results of the findings. It looks at a history of the study of sleep and further examines modern-day literature on the topic. It finds that the sociology of sleep has its roots deeply planted in rational choice theory, in the sense that the human being must make a rational, coherent choice in weighing out the costs and benefits before deciding how much sleep to engage in on a particular occasion.
From the Paper
"When I first decided to investigate sleep as a sociological process for the 2003 Sociological symposium, I had no idea where my research would take me or what I was getting into. I basically conducted my project as a research paper, finding an abundance of information regarding sleep within cultures, but finding an enormous lack of research regarding sleep in the field of sociology. Even studying sleep cross-culturally was a field left mostly up to anthropologists. As I continued to research various cultures and their methods of sleeping, I found there are very deep sociological implications for sleep. Thus my original research question was becoming more of a mystery than a solution: why is sleep not being researched within the field of sociology?"
| |
|
Sociology Over Psychology, 2002.
An argument for sociology over psychology in dealing with issues such as emotion, intelligence and suicide.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 2 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper will discuss why sociology is more important than psychology when it comes to such issues as emotions, suicide and intelligence that can have a diverse affect on society, but more importantly than what psychology can teach. Sociology discusses more solutions within the scope of a society and therefore, can be a better way to handle the systems that are crated in a society to deal with it more effectively. Some examples of studies will be offered to make these points more clear and to show how sociology is a more important angle on the issues. Furthermore, an example of a future study that may applicable to intelligence will be brought forth by myself to try and make an argument for sociology over psychology.
|
|
|
