| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "SOCIAL CHANGE SEX MARRIAGE CANADA": |
|
|
Social Change and Same-Sex Marriage in Canada, 2006.
An examination of same sex marriages and Canadian society.
1,988 words (approx. 8.0 pages), 9 sources, MLA, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the legalization of same-sex marriages in Canada and the shift in society that brought about this change. The paper discusses the negative attitude of Canadian society in the past toward same-sex marriages. The paper also notes that more same sex couples were becoming parents, while increasing numbers of lesbians and gays were coming out of the closet and, as a result, many more non-gay Canadians realized that people they knew - family members, friends, other parents at their children's schools - were gay and lesbian, and due to this became gradually more tolerant. The paper explains that the biggest social change in Canada this century has been the legalization of same sex marriage which happened in June of 2005, when the federal government, led by the Liberal Party under Paul Martin, legalized same-sex marriage for all of Canada.
From the Paper
"For a very long time in Canadian society, the very idea of same-sex marriage would have been preposterous. After all, up until 1967, sex between consenting adults of the same sex was actually illegal. This, it is argued, was absolutely unacceptable in a country that has enshrined equal rights for all adults in its Bill of Rights. However, it seems that this bill was not far-reaching enough, given that the state still saw fit to prescribe appropriate sexual behaviours between consenting adults."
| |
|
Same Sex Marriage Legislation in Canada, 2005.
This paper examines the development of legislation regarding same sex marriage in Canada.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 6 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This is a research paper on the topic of the legalization of same sex marriage. In this article, the writer concentrates specifically on how same sex marriage legislation has developed in Canada. The writer notes that the process began back in the 1960s and 70s, with the establishment of anti-discrimination laws for gays and lesbians. Further, the writer discusses that the actual process of changing the definition of marriage was the result of draft bill and several landmark court cases.
From the Paper
"Few social issues in North America today are as controversial and divisive as the possibility of fully legalizing same sex marriage. In both Canada and the United States, the tentative steps that have been taken toward full legalization have accelerated in the past few years, to the point that the new definition of marriage is on the brink of becoming legal in Canada. In this matter the United States lags considerably behind Canada, in that marriage licenses are being granted to same sex couples by some communities following their own independent decision to do so."
| |
|
Changing Attitudes Regarding Same-Sex Marriages, 2004.
An examination of the way society's attitudes are changing towards same-sex marriages.
815 words (approx. 3.3 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how this phenomenon has been around for centuries; however, only recently is public opinion warming to the idea. It looks at these changing attitudes by the government, the law makers, religious institutions, and society as a whole.
From the Paper
'However, many state and national agencies still have old-fashioned attitudes toward same-sex marriages. For example, the New Jersey Family Policy Council believes that the institution of marriage would be jeopardized if homosexuals were encouraged to wed. "States do have the right to set limits on who is allowed to marry," said Len Deo, the president of the council. The council ignores the fact that changing times always have brought changing attitudes about marriage."
| |
|
Canada's Debate on Same-Sex Marriage, 2002.
A policy cycle analysis and historical review of same sex marriage in Canada.
4,551 words (approx. 18.2 pages), 17 sources, MLA, $ 118.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper uses the public policy cycle to examine the government's current initiative to discuss possible solutions to same-sex marriage and provides a brief historical context. The paper provides an insight into this controversial topic from the legal point of view and outlines the role played by the courts and their rulings on these issues.
Table of Contents
History of Homosexual and Same-Sex Relationship Rights in Canada
Policy Formation & Decision Making
Discussion Paper
Response to Discussion Paper
Horizontal Consistency of Current and Proposed Policy
Conclusion
Policy Implementation and Evaluation
References
From the Paper
"The Federal Government of Canada is currently debating a discussion paper submitted by the Minister of Justice, Martin Cauchon, concerning the issue of same-sex marriage. The topic of same-sex marriage is one of great controversy in Canada and its journey to being placed on the current Government's public policy agenda has been a tumultuous one. For gay and lesbian couples, the journey has been long, seemingly travelling at a snail's pace. Yet in the grand scheme of things, the fact that the government is now seriously considering the issue of same-sex marriage is remarkable considering that thirty-three years ago homosexuality was still considered a criminal offence in Canada. Even when Prime Minister Trudeau decriminalized homosexuality in 1969, it was done so under the 'right to privacy' and thus deemed an issue best kept hidden from the public sphere and relegated to silence (Wood, 2002). The thirty-three years between decriminilization of homosexuality and today's consideration of same-sex marriage, has been marked by a very incremental and tedious process of gaining homosexual rights. While Canada is still far from a society that is accepting and condoning of same-sex relationships, progress has been made at a relatively steady rate. In 1999 the Federal Government changed the definition of spouse to include same-sex partners but tacked on an explicit clause stating that the definition of marriage would remain one man and one woman (Wood, 2002). Now, only three years later, the government is actively considering changing its policy on same-sex marriage."
| |
|
Same Sex Marriage from a Legal and Social Perspective, 2007.
This paper looks at same-sex marriage and homosexual rights in Canada from a legal and social perspective.
1,300 words (approx. 5.2 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 43.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer deals with the contemporary debate over the legal and social acceptance of homosexual couples. The paper maintains that, from legal perspective, the acceptance of homosexual couples is supported under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, as well as the case of "M. v. H". The writer concludes that, protected legally under sections 2 and 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, homosexuals are legally accepted as part of society; with equal rights as heterosexuals. The writer maintains that, if some find homosexuality to be a problem, they must still realize that homophobia, hate crimes, and overall discrimination is not the solution.
From the Paper
"Canada is well known for being a 'tossed salad', rather than a melting pot of cultures like the United States. This is due to its acceptance of different cultures and promotion of cultural diversity. In such a diverse society it is difficult to create laws that are pleasing to all. Pluralism in Canada does not cease at culture alone, but also includes religion and sexual orientation. Homosexuality has become a rising issue in society and should be accepted in the same manner as cultural and religious diversity. Unfortunately, this is not the case. From a social standpoint, homosexuality may be found morally corrupt for those with certain ethical and religious principles. Contrarily, it may be found as a new form of self-expression and freedom for those who wish to condone or practice it. From a legal standpoint, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the freedom of association, as well as the freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression."
| |
|
Same-Sex Marriage, 2007.
An argument in favor of Bill C-38, which legalizes same-sex marriage in Canada.
1,213 words (approx. 4.9 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the controversy in Canada over whether same-sex marriage should be allowed. It analyzes the controversial bill called Bill C-38 that legalized same-sex marriage and discusses why the issue remains controversial. The paper argues that same-sex marriage should continue to be legal in Canada, because only in this way can all Canadians continue to enjoy equal rights.
From the Paper
"In conclusion, we have seen that if we argue against same-sex marriage, then we are in fact saying that we believe that it is acceptable to treat some adults as if they are inferior citizens. As we know, this is not acceptable in Canada, where everyone is protected by the Charter of Civil Rights. Secondly, if we do not care about equal rights for gays and lesbians, then at least we should care about equal rights for their children. Children should not be punished for the lifestyles of their parents. Finally, it is unfair to deny marriage to same-sex couples because it denies them access to a range of legal benefits that are only available to married couples. Therefore, this is another reason that same-sex marriage should remain legal - for the sake of the children."
| |
|
The Politics of Same Sex Marriage, 2005.
A political debate over same sex marriages within Canada.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 7 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses same sex marriages in Canada. It discusses the conflict between the government and the Canadian people with regards to this issue and the calls for a change in the legal system of Canada because of it. The paper discusses the way in which the issue of same sex marriages directly affects the citizens of the country with regard to social structure, freedom, and the rights of the people.
| |
|
"The Fundamental Argument for Same-Sex Marriage", 2005.
An argument in favor of same-sex marriages, based on the article, "The Fundamental Argument for Same-Sex Marriage," by Ralph Wedgwood.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 2 sources, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews the article "The Fundamental Argument for Same-Sex Marriage," by Ralph Wedgwood. The paper discusses the arguments in the article in favor of same-sex marriage. It analyzes the history of same-sex marriages and looks at the efforts to lobby the government to legitimize these marriages as equal rights.
From the Paper
"A Critical Review of "The Fundamental Argument for Same-Sex Marriage," by Ralph Wedgwood Same-sex relationships have been part of human life for thousands of years. During those years, people in those relationships have sought some kind of legitimacy for them. Recently, efforts have been made to gain both legal and societal acceptance of same-sex marriages. These efforts have been made largely in the political arena, with various groups lobbying for what they term as equal rights under the law. Ralph Wedgwood addresses the objections that accompany this argument in his article, "The Fundamental Argument for Same-Sex Marriage." "
| |
|
Same-Sex Marriage Law, 2008.
This paper discusses the constitutionality of the same-sex marriage law in Canada.
750 words (approx. 3.0 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer notes that the controversial issue of same-sex marriage has dominated both floors of the Canadian Parliament for nearly a decade. The writer points out that while legislators were decidedly split on the issue during its first inception into legislative committees, the Canadian citizenry pleaded with their legislators to push for the legalization of same-sex marriages. The writer discusses that effective July 20, 2005, the Civil Marriage Act took full effect however, many of the bill's opponents vowed to rescind the bill once the balance of power shifted. The writer concludes that in accordance with the Canadian Charter of Rights, the Civil Marriage Act upholds its pledge to treat every citizen equally, in addition to recognizing the equality of minorities and the rights of those in the minority.
From the Paper
"The main challenge for proponents of the Civil Marriage Act was not only to ensure the equal rights for same-sex marriages, but also to uphold the religious freedom also outlined in the Charter of Rights. Dissenters argue that religious freedom is still violated by this bill, however the Civil Marriage Act is very explicit on religious institutions. Religious groups and institutions are not to be forced to wed those who seek same-sex marriage, and it is not the responsibility of the government to enforce federal power over religious groups to provide said service to those seeking a wedding.
"More importantly, a good amount of time was spent incorporating the Civil Marriage Act into other pieces of legislation."
| |
|
Same Sex Marriage, 2005.
An argument for the constitutional legitimacy of same sex marriages in Canada.
2,025 words (approx. 8.1 pages), 3 sources, $ 80.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes the policy in the constitution of Canada regarding same sex marriages. The paper argues that same sex marriages are constitutional because they follow the spirit of the charter of rights and freedoms. This means that everyone's rights are being respected and to make them illegal would be to trample human rights.
From the Paper
"Same Sex Marriage in Canada is it Constitutional? Same-sex marriage has become one of the most controversial issues in Canada. Gay and lesbian couples are obviously very fond of the idea and believe it is a natural extension of their human rights(Alderson 107). Many religious leaders and conservatives believe that same-sex marriage is a fundamental attack on their faiths and or value systems (Todd A.5). Essentially the argument is based on determining which group's human rights will be least damaged by any particular decision. With these arguments in mind the next question that should be asked is what type of policy could be used to make same-sex marriage legal and constitutional?"
| |
|
Same-Sex Marriage, 2004.
Is same-sex marriage a civil rights issue? This paper considers major arguments against same-sex marriage and contrasts them with arguments in favor of it.
2,045 words (approx. 8.2 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 64.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper focuses on religion, the influence of religion on politics, the Federal Marriage Amendment, and marriage rights and privileges. The paper sheds a positive light on the topic of same-sex marriage. Resources are current, and the paper is argumentative.
From the Paper
"Recent political events have shed sudden light on an issue that the American public has long been avoiding: Same-sex marriage. Should same-sex couples be allowed to marry? As human beings and American citizens, are same sex couples entitled to the same protections that law provides to heterosexual married couples? Unlike the usual pro/con debates, this particular issue has three sides. There?s the ?no? side that argues that the benefits of marriage are sanctimonious and that they should be provided only to opposite sex couples. The ?yes? side would argue that marriage is a basic civil right and should be provided to all couples, regardless of sexual orientation. The third side meets the previous two extremes somewhere in the middle, stating that while the term ?marriage? is sanctimonious and should be reserved only for opposite sex couples, the benefits of marriage should be available to all couples regardless of sexual orientation. Each side has its own theories in a debate that is anything but black and white."
| |
|
Same-Sex Marriage, 2004.
A proposal for legalization of same-sex marriage.
1,081 words (approx. 4.3 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how, with the passage of time, more and more people have come to believe that same-sex marriages should be permitted legally, in contrast to many who still believe that it shouldn?t. It looks at how those who are against same-sex marriages refuse to relinquish their hold on traditional beliefs and values and how, today, these people serve as barriers to same-sex marriage proponents. It also explores how the audience that the proponents of same-sex marriage wish to address includes the legislators and also those who are opposed to the legalization of same sex marriage. The purpose of legalizing same-sex marriage is argued from a historical, legal, and humanistic standpoints.
From the Paper
"The issue of same sex marriage is problematic because of the fact that it proposes significant change to traditional values and beliefs of society. It is worth asserting this because of several people who still hold fast to their traditional values and beliefs, which are mostly religious and to some extent it is cultural. However, with the awareness that people in contemporary times have regarding same sex or gay rights, it is worth asserting how strongly they all feel towards the rights of every individual; proponents of same sex marriage believe that the rights to same sex marriage is a major portion of their individual rights."
| |
|
The Place of Same-Sex Marriage, 2004.
This paper evaluates differing perspectives on the issue of same-sex marriage.
1,130 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the meaning of the institution of marriage is discussed. The writer looks at the place of same-sex marriage in society. In this paper, same-sex marriage is primarily discussed from a conservative religious perspective. The views and outlook of supports of the concept of same-sex marriage is also described and critiqued. Although the gay and lesbian movement consider the prohibition of same-sex marriages to be discrimination, the writer views the position of marriage as a moral and religious institution.
From the Paper
"In recent years the legalization of same-sex marriages has become an increasingly controversial issue that pits the gay and lesbian movement against religious conservatives. According to the gay and lesbian movement, the prohibition of same-sex marriages constitutes social oppression and discrimination. This paper however takes the position, adopted by the religious conservative movement. Marriage is a religious and moral institution that is confined to a monogamous relationship between a man and woman. Derived from the religious scriptures ... "
| |
|
Same-Sex Marriage, 2007.
This paper looks at both sides of the controversial argument regarding same-sex marriage.
1,625 words (approx. 6.5 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 52.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer notes that the question of whether same-sex marriage should be allowed or not has generated considerable argument between those who support the idea and offer their reasons, and those who oppose the idea and offer theirs. This essay offers a consideration of each side and their basic arguments. The writer argues that the claim that allowing same-sex marriage destroys the institution of marriage and the family is not supported by the facts, so same-sex marriage in some form should be allowed. The writer discusses that weighing the two sets of arguments suggests that most of the reasons why opponents say they oppose same-sex marriage are not valid, while the real reason would appear to be aversion to homosexual activity in any guise. The writer concludes that these people often see homosexuality as a choice rather than a condition, while more and more evidence suggests it is inherent and not a choice at all.
Outline:
Pro
Con
Personal View
Conclusion
From the Paper
"A basic aspect of the argument for gay marriage is a call for fairness, noting that married couples benefit from a variety of rights and privileges that are denied to unmarried persons, such as the right to inheritance, to insurance benefits, for one partner to visit the other in a hospital, and so on."
"Thomas B. Stoddard argues that gay people should seek the right to marry. He discusses the institution of marriage and finds it wanting, but in spite of these he believes that gay couples should seek their right to make this choice."
| |
|
Same-Sex Marriage, 2005.
This paper argues that same-sex marriages should be legalized.
2,000 words (approx. 8.0 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that the proponents of same-sex marriage believe that gays and lesbians are being systematically denied their civil rights; but, on the other hand, opponents of same-sex marriage see gay and lesbian unions as a threat to the idea of "traditional" marriage: Both sides argue that the government has a duty to protect and enforce marriage laws. The author supports same-sex marriage by citing the Bill of Rights, which guarantees the freedom of association and the right to privacy. The paper refutes arguments many opponents of gay marriage use as a means of challenging the idea of same-sex marriage: (1) Religion, (2) homosexuality is unnatural, (3) defies the historical definition of marriage and (4) harmful to children.
From the Paper
"Many opponents of gay marriage use religion as a means of challenging the idea of same-sex marriage. This paper will not spend much time addressing the religious issues surrounding the idea of same-sex marriage. The United States Constitution guarantees religious freedom and separation of church and state. Therefore, whether one personally agrees or disagrees with a religion that condemns homosexuality, members of that religion are free to practice their beliefs. However, the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment makes it abundantly clear that religious groups are constitutionally prohibited from legislating based on religion. The religious argument may be the most vehemently argued one, but it is the most easily dismissed because of the guarantees of the United States Constitution."
|
|
|
