| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "SKINNER FREUD BEHAVIORISM": |
|
|
Skinner and Freud on Behaviorism, 2006.
A study of the behaviorism theories of Burrhus F. Skinner and Sigmund Freud.
2,450 words (approx. 9.8 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 74.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper compares and contrasts Burrhus F. Skinner's and Sigmund Freud's theories on behaviorism. The paper begins with an assessment of Skinner, who maintained that behavior is strengthened by its consequences. Through close reliance on Skinner's texts, the author details the behaviorist's theories, which pointed consistently to stimuli and responses as the primary agents of change and development in human behavior. Next, the paper studies Freuds' ideas on behaviorism, which differed greatly from Skinner. As the author points out, Freud believed that the fundamental determinants of human behavior were internal and external environmental conditions, which occur during the first years of a person's life.
From the Paper
"Skinner believed that the environment alone conditions individual behavior and influences personality and development. He conducted research on the various types of human conditioning - fixed ratio, fixed interval and variable interval - and delved into more complex behaviors with his ideas of shaping and chaining. Finally, Skinner gave no credence to mental or physiological explanations of human behavior, but preferred to use the stimulus-response patterns between organism and environment as his primary explanation for human behavior."
| |
|
Damasio, Descartes, Skinner and Freud, 2002.
A comaparative analysis of the theories of Antonio Damasio, Descartes, Skinner and Freud.
1,650 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 3 sources, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses Antonio Damasio's theory of the physical nature of psychological states and the role of emotion in human reasoning. The author refers to Descartes' "Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain" in evaluating Damasio's theories and comparing them to Skinner and Freud.
| |
|
A Comparison and Contrast of B.F. Skinner and Sigmund Freud, 2002.
Looks at B.F. Skinner and Sigmund Freud, two of the most important figures in the history of psychology and psychological development and compares their systems of analysis.
1,848 words (approx. 7.4 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 59.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper compares and contrasts Freud's and Skinner's vastly different and conflicting theories of the study of psychology. It looks at how they differed on their views of psychology's basic function and compares the differences in the way each one approached the study of psychology. The paper goes on to look at both Freud's and Skinner's most important focus and contribution to the field of psychology
From the Paper
"So Freud noted not only that we are motivated and moved by forces that exist outside of our conscious cogitation and understanding, but also developed a theoretical explanation for how and why these unconscious elements existed. Freud argued that the primary drive for human interaction was, at its base, sexual, and that the majority of repressed and unconscious motivations were different sublimations of a primal sexual impulse that society had necessarily and understandably required to be repressed."
| |
|
B.F. Skinner and Behaviorism, 2004.
An overview of B.F. Skinner's behavior theory.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents a history of B.F. Skinner's theory of behaviorism. The paper then contrasts Skinner's theory with Freud's theory and combines it with the interpersonal model to explain adolescent development.
From the Paper
"The following research paper presents B.F. Skinner and the history of his behavior theory. Skinner's theory is contrasted with Freud's theory and combined with the interpersonal model to explain the development of adolescents and personality Skinner's theory is then applied to the mental health nursing field. Findings are applied to a black male child."
| |
|
B.F. Skinner's Behaviorism Theory, 2004.
This paper compares B.F. Skinner's theories on behaviorism with Jean-Paul Sartre's existentialist views.
1,805 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 58.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, while Sartre defines freedom as the ability to determine things for oneself, Skinner defines it as the attempt or ability to remove oneself from adverse conditions. The author points out that philosophy has not evolved like the natural sciences because humans insist on believing that they are somehow different from the natural world; however, for behavior science to advance, Skinner believes that that society must exorcise the so called "inner principles" in order to have an open mind for the real truths about human behavior. The paper rejects Skinner's theory because by doing what Skinner suggests, the natural balance of human nature is destroyed as not everything is perfect.
From the Paper
"Still, there are questions raised about the possibility of truly predicting human behavior as a science and to what extent can we use this information. Skinner believes that as soon as we get past the concept that humans are different from other creatures we will be able to create a true science of human behavior. Part of his response is that it would be difficult so we say we shouldn't try it and this is a weak excuse. He says that we know it is not outside the realm of possibility so just because it is difficult does not mean we should give up on it completely. What we know now, he argues, is not effective so why should we spend more and more money and effort on negative reinforcement, if it has not proved successful."
| |
|
B.F. Skinner and Behaviorism, 2005.
An examination of the theories of B.F. Skinner as they relate to operant conditioning.
1,954 words (approx. 7.8 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
B.F. (Burrhus Frederic) Skinner is regarded by many as the founder of operant conditioning, a form of behavior modification that, simply stated, depends on rewarding desired behaviors and initiating unpleasant consequences for undesirable behaviors. This paper explains that Skinner proposed that immediate and appropriate reinforcement of both good and bad behaviors would very likely increase the likelihood that the desirable behavior would be repeated and the undesirable one repeated less often. This paper provides a brief review dealing with the ways in which Skinner's theories are being looked at by educators today.
Outline:
Introduction
Historical Truisms Applied to Modern Classrooms
Current Point-Counterpoint Regarding Skinner's Theories
Using Skinner Early and Often
References
From the Paper
"While Skinner and half a dozen contemporaries were expert at running animal experiments, with their forte being maze-running and operant conditioning of the sort employed in a Skinner box, they were also noted for "dustbowl empiricism" or, in other words, finding out what worked in reality, not in theory alone. The burden of their findings, including Skinner's, was that "repetition of a task, with suitable reinforcement for completing each trial, improved performance" (Bruner 2004, 13+)."
| |
|
Contrasting Existentialism and Skinner's Neo-behaviorism, 2006.
A paper which discusses the existentialist theory and Skinner's neo-behaviorist theory.
1,877 words (approx. 7.5 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 60.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper begins by discussing the theories of existentialism and how they fit into modern philosophy. The paper discusses the various proponents of existentialism and their theories. The paper then discusses the theory of behaviorism, and Skinner's theory of Neo-behaviorism. The paper explains Skinner's research and theories, showing how they differ from existentialist theories in that they claim that human beings do not fully control all of their behaviors.
From the Paper
"It must be remembered that over the hundreds and thousands of years from the beginning of the existence of man, Western philosophy has become more and more abstract, and also become quite removed and distant from the real lives of human beings. This fact is especially evident in the quest for answers to questions like the true nature of knowledge, the nature of truth, and so on, the real person or the real human beings have been relegated to the background and, in the high philosophical theories, there is no room today for the real people of this world anymore. This is the reason that existentialist theory focuses on real people, and states that all human beings must be given independence, a choice, etc., and that one must be able to make one's own choices in one's own life, and therefore take up responsibility for the choices that one has made out of his own free will. (What is Existentialism? History of existentialism, Existentialist Philosophy)"
| |
|
Behaviorism: A Work in Progress, 2008.
An examination of individuals and theories of Ivan Pavlov, John Locke, John Watson and Burrhus Frederic Skinner and their impact on the theory of behaviorism.
3,121 words (approx. 12.5 pages), 5 sources, APA, $ 90.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses and defines the theory of behaviorism and how it relates to present day therapy. The paper examines many historical scientists' theories and ideas which provided the needed information so that behaviorism could be born. It also explains how John Watson is considered the founder of behaviorism even though the theory has been documented back to the times of Aristotle. The historical roots of behaviorism and present day uses are also examined in this paper.
Outline:
Abstract
Behaviorism
History of Behaviorism
John Watson: Behaviorism
Ivan Pavlov: Classical Conditioning
John Locke: Tabula Rasa
B.F. Skinner: Operant Conditioning
Aristotle
Current Use
From the Paper
"Throughout history, many scholars have theorized that environment plays an important role in defining the outcome of an individual. Aristotle first hypothesized that the mind of or psyche of a person existed because of external factors. Other theorist expounded on this premise until John Watson made it a focus of his studies of behavior. Behaviorism projects that individuals are products of their experiences and have become who they are because of conditioning. John Watson, who is credited with Behaviorism made the comment that he could take twelve healthy infants and take any one of them and mold them into any given occupation regardless of genetics, race, talents and/or abilities. Watson believed that all "healthy" individuals are the same at birth but are only differentiated by the specific stimuli in their own experiences throughout their lives."
| |
|
Behaviorism, 2005.
This paper studies Skinner and Thorndike's theories of behaviorism.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 5 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper focuses on the psychologists Skinner and Thorndike and their theories of behaviorism. The paper discusses these widely discussed psychologists and their research of animals that was directly correlated to the minds of humans. The paper explains that this research was in great debate for many years. The paper discusses their beginnings in the field, their theories and the criticism of their findings.
From the Paper
"The ideas that revolved around the theories of behavior began with the research of the Russian scientist, Pavlov. Pavlov discovered that animals would begin to salivate when food was being brought to their cages and through experiments with the animals found that it was not the food that caused this occurrence. The dogs had become accustomed to the sounds associated with being fed and therefore, they salivated in a response to the stimuli surrounding the event, not the event itself. From this theoretical beginning the concepts of both B.F. Skinner and Edward L. Thorndike were born. Both psychologists wrote extensively about the aspects surrounding behavior, and both developed ideas that became considerably controversial throughout psychological history."
| |
|
Theories of Personality, 2004.
Examines theories by Albert Skinner and Sigmund Freud on anti-social behavior.
1,586 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 5 sources, APA, $ 51.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Anti-social personality disorder is defined as ?a psychiatric condition characterized by chronic behavior that manipulates, exploits, or violates the rights of others. This behavior is often criminal.? (A.D.A.M., 2003). Another source describes adds that individuals with anti-social personality disorder violate the rights of others ?without remorse or loyalty to anyone? (Butcher, Mineka, & Hooley, 2004). The causes of anti-social personality disorder are not known, though many sources have provided theories that can be used to explain the development of the disorder. Two of these theories are considered in this paper. It begins with a consideration of Sigmund Freud?s theory and then looks at the theory of Albert Skinner. In each case, the theory is first described. This is followed by a consideration of how an individual would develop anti-social personality disorder based on the theory.
From the Paper
"In Freud?s theory, the focus is on the subconscious mind. Freud?s theory describes how every individual is born with a basic set of desires, which he calls the id. These are essentially selfish drives. Individuals then develops an ego, which works to control the id. As one source explains, the ego?s function involves ?seeking optimal compromises between the demands of biology and those of the real world" (Seamon & Kenrick, 1994, p. 421). The next stage of development is the superego, which is described as being developed at around age five. One source describes both the superego and its development saying, ?young children form a superego, or conscience, by identifying with the same-sex parent, whose moral standards they adopt? (Berk, 2004, p. 253). These three parts of the subconscious then combine and interact with the outside environment. This means that an individual determines their behavior based on both the subconscious and the demands of the outside world."
| |
|
The Accomplishments of B.F. Skinner, 2005.
A description of the accomplishments of B.F. Skinner in the realm of behavioral psychology.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 3 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the accomplishments of B.F. Skinner. The paper discusses the psychologist's history, particularly focusing on the fact that he has accomplished all that he has in psychology and behaviorism without actually studying psychology. The paper describes Skinner's interest in the behavior of animals and humans that led to his work in behavioral science.
From the Paper
"The Accomplishments of B.F. Skinner "Skinner is the most important American psychologist of the twentieth century, and arguably the most important world psychologist since, or including, Freud," yet he never directly studied psychology (Smith, 1999, 1). B.F. Skinner obtained his college degree in literature. He never took college courses for psychology, yet his gift of understanding behavior has made him famous as a behavior psychologist. His interests in behavior of animals or humans led to his vast amount of work concerning behavioral science. Skinner wrote a number of books and articles that continue to be important in the field of psychology. B.F. Skinner found the behavior of organism fascinating and began to study how animals reacted to different stimuli. Skinner changed the meaning of psychology, which is the study of humans. "
| |
|
Theories of Social Behavior, 2002.
Contrasts the primary theories of social behavior: behaviorism, functionalism and sociobiology.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 3 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The theories discussed in this paper represent most of the spectrum of materialist (i.e. non-mentalist) thought about human society. The paper contrasts the work of BF Skinner, Marvin Harris, and Edward Wilson in behaviorism, functionalism, and sociobiology, respectively.
| |
|
B.F. Skinner's "What Is Man", 2006.
A review of the 1971 philosophical work about behaviorism by B.F. Skinner entitled "What Is Man".
1,780 words (approx. 7.1 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 57.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper provides a retrospective of the ideas about behaviorism and the environment contained in B.F. Skinner's 1971 book "What Is Man". The paper first summarizes Skinner's belief that man is shaped by his environment and experiences, and provides several examples from the text. Then the author critiques those theories, finding that Skinner is "heavy on conjecture, but light on proof."
From the Paper
"Man, Skinner claimed, was shaped and is maintained by his environment. He agrees with Gilbert Seldes rather remarkable claim that environment changes people, that it "thirty little Hottentots" and thirty aristocratic English children had their environments switched, the English children would become Hottentots and the Hottentots conservative Englishmen. Skinner says that environmentalists actually tended to believe that if a Mongol on horseback were switched at birth with an Astronaut, they would accomplish the same things. The environmentalists may be literally saying that, if you put a rabbit along with lion cubs and is nursed along with those cubs, the rabbit will react like a lion when he gets older. There is something to be said about environment, especially when it comes to the lower order of animals, since, surely, as Darwin discovered, survival depended on adaptation to climate, environment, and other elements of nature."
| |
|
Behavior Management in the Classroom, 2004.
A discussion of modern behavior management approaches in the classroom with a focus on the theories of B.F. Skinner.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses theories of classroom behavior management and B.F. Skinner's theories on behavior as applied to a 7th grade classroom. The paper further looks at how to break up teaching into successive steps and reinforcements for each stage. The paper's focus is on positive reinforcement.
| |
|
Freud on Art and Literature, 2001.
The paper looks at Freud?s conceptions about art and literature and the creative forces of motivation on an author.
2,953 words (approx. 11.8 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 87.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is about Sigmund Freud's concept of 'unconscious' and its relevance in the arts. The author discusses how Freud is commonly recognized as having invented the concept of the ?unconscious?. The author explaines that the subordination of the ?pleasure principle? by the ?reality principle? is done through a mental process that Freud refers to as sublimation. According to Sigmund Freud, dreams and fantasies (or phantasies) are the symbolic expression and fulfillment of wishes and desires that as a result of sublimation by the ?reality principle? cannot be fulfilled through daily life and are consequently repressed into the ?unconscious.? To Freud, ?the motive forces of fantasies are unsatisfied wishes, and every single fantasy is the fulfillment of a wish, a correction of unsatisfying reality? (Freud 485). Freud affirms that dreams are disguised, hallucinatory fulfillment?s of repressed wishes. He concludes that if expressed in undisguised form, they would be so disturbing that it would wake the dreamer from sleep. Freud?s fundamental assumption is that the sublimation of the artist?s unsatisfied libido is responsible for producing all forms of art and literature whether it be painting, sculpting, or writing. David H. Richter notes in his introduction to ?Sigmund Freud? that Freud was once criticized by Carl Gustav Jung, a fellow psychoanalytic theorist, for insinuating that artists were diseased individuals creating art out of their own personal neurotic needs. The writer feels that Freud insinuates that art is primarily an escapist method, that ?in an ideal world in which everyone had matured sufficiently to replace the pleasure principle by the reality principle, there would be no need for art? (Storr 103).
From the Paper
"The historical tradition of scholarly theory has been one in which literary texts are subjected to scrutiny regarding whether they are either implicitly or explicitly ideological in nature. Arguably so, nothing reflects a society?s fears, hopes, and desires about gender, class, and power more than what the society maintains about art and artists. A literary text is credible of fully reflecting the culture in which it was written, that is to say, it has the potential to embody certain sociological assumptions presented in the dichotomy between ?normal? and ?abnormal.? Sigmund Freud, the patriarch of psychoanalysis, is associated with Charles Darwin and Karl Marx as being ?one of the three original thinkers who have most altered man?s view of himself in the twentieth century? (Storr 145). Yet, even literary theorists, including Freud, realized that ?any comprehensive vision of human nature such as he provides must have implications for the nature of happiness, and for the relation of man?s natural capacities to his normal or ideal state? (Sousa 196). That is, numerous later theorists and critics believe that Freud?s own theories about the function and nature of the mind uncovered some fundamental truths about how an individual?s notions of ?self? are formed and how culture and civilization operate and are affected by these notions. Coinciding with Freud?s own account, the significance of everyday action is determined by motives that are far more numerous and complex than people are aware of or commonsense understanding takes into account. The most basic and constant of motives that influence our actions are those of the unconscious, moreover, those that are difficult to acknowledge or avow. Freud?s conception of the unconscious and his rediscovery of the importance of dreams encouraged painters, sculptors and writers to pay serious attention to their inner world of dreams; to find significance in thoughts and images they previously would have dismissed as absurd or illogical. Therefore it is plausible that notions of art and literature as described by Sigmund Freud, are created through the ramifications of the unconscious or the sublimation of an unsatisfied carnal appetite."
|
|
|
