| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "SIR WINSTON LEONARD CHURCHILL": |
|
|
Sir Winston Leonard Churchill, 2005.
This paper analyzes the political defeat Sir Winston Leonard Churchill.
1,850 words (approx. 7.4 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 59.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, although Sir Winston Leonard Churchill led the British out of the Depression and in victory during World War II, his biggest loss came just after these biggest victories when he lost the 1945 election for prime minister in spite of his overwhelming popularity. The author points out that Churchill's troubles began in 1942 with what is called the "palace revolt"; the movement was lead by several newspapers, such as "The Times", "The Sunday Times" and "The Observer", and respectable politicians, such as Lord Salisbury, Lord Swinton, Lord Hankey and Sir Edward Grigg. The paper concludes that, in leading the country, Churchill made many enemies; in spite of his extreme popularity, the combination of (1) the country's wish for change after the war, (2) the desire of the soldiers in the Pacific to return home and (3) the lack of total support within his own party led to his failure to win the 1945 election. Several long quotes.
From the Paper
"Churchill still maintained strong support, but it was obvious a grass roots effort was beginning to unseat him. However, Churchill knew he faced problems in the future once the war was over. During a popular war, it would be very difficult to unseat a leader, because of the fear of dissension and confusion within the military ranks. Trying to unseat a leader during war would be seen as many as treasonous. Thomson says Churchill was aware "of the doubting approval of Parliament" and was concerned."
| |
|
Winston Churchill?s Political Career, 2004.
A discussion on whether Winston Churchill?s political career was a success or failure over the period prior to the outbreak of the Second World War.
2,147 words (approx. 8.6 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 67.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how history enlightens us that Churchill was excluded from office for a decade between 1929 and 1939 due to the fact that many political party members distrusted him and how nevertheless, Winston Churchill politically was just as effective (at that period in time) out of office as he would have been in it. It looks at how the 1930s generated many doubts over Churchill?s political career and attempts to reveal why Churchill?s political rivals buried him, why his enemies cut him off and why he was politically isolated out of money and power and was compelled to switch allegiances to other political parties for his own beneficial purposes. It also incorporates evidence that emphasises that it was Churchill?s anxieties of attaining the British Empire at all costs (imperialism of India) and of initiating the belief that Hitler wasn?t to be trusted, that British rearmament was necessary and that appeasement with the Germans was dishonourable.
From the Paper
"Credit where credit is due, artistically and journalistically Churchill was a fine painter and writer (he earned a respectable ?30 thousand a year doing it) however, as far as money and the economy was concerned, Churchill was far from the economist expert he thought he was.
Because not only did he lose a fortune in the stock exchange when Wall Street crashed in 1929 (he had to get a friend to bail him out), he also lost the position of Chancellor of the Exchequer when the Conservatives were defeated at the election that was brought about by the collapse in world economy."
| |
|
Winston Churchill, 2003.
This paper discusses the life and career of Winston Churchill from a historical perspective.
2,300 words (approx. 9.2 pages), 10 sources, $ 79.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the variety, complexity and intensity of life of Winston Churchill including his role in World War II. The author points out his remarkable talents as well as his shortcomings. The paper considers Churchill as the greatest political figure of the 20th Century.
From the Paper
"This research paper summarizes the life and career of Winston Churchill and assesses his historical significance. Churchill lived a very long, intense and varied life, which was full of contradictions, complexities and conundrums. Professionally, ..."
| |
|
Winston Churchill, 2004.
An analysis of the life of Winston Churchill, one of the greatest figures in world history.
2,721 words (approx. 10.9 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 81.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the life of Winston Churchill, claiming his importance to world history arises because he was able to lead his country with a sense of resolve and determination at a time when the world was clouded with uncertainty. The paper contends that Churchill changed history because he was not willing to compromise his beliefs, even when it seemed as though everyone was against him.
From the Paper
"Winston Churchill is one of the most important figures in world history because of his leadership skills, resolve, and insight. He was able to change history by connecting with the very people he was expected to lead. He was brave enough to be honest and smart enough to be real. In a time when the world was filled with war and despair, Churchill was able to literally speak to the hearts of men. His efforts were instrumental in changing history and this was only possible because the man allows followed what his instincts told him to be true. One incredible aspect of his character is the fact that he did not back down or change his mind even when those around him were in complete disagreement with what he believed. Churchill struggled against one of the most powerful forces the modern world has known and was able to bring his country to victory because he believed in the freedom. Overall, he served his country for more than 60 years, always providing a sense of hope not only for his country but also for the world."
| |
|
Winston Churchill, 2003.
This paper assess Winston Churchill's leadership.
1,380 words (approx. 5.5 pages), 3 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses Winston Churchill's remarkable leadership as a lone voice in the wilderness during Hitler's rise to power in Europe in 1939 and 1940. The author points out Churchill's role in shaping the outcome of world history.
From the Paper
"There have been few leaders considered as great or as responsible for shaping the outcome of world history as Prime Minister of Great Britain Winston Churchill. As Joseph Keegan maintains, "The political history of the 20th century ...""
| |
|
Examining The Popular Image of Winston Churchill, 2005.
This paper examines Winston Churchill's professional career throughout the 1930's, as a military strategist and through his time as Prime Minister.
8,740 words (approx. 35.0 pages), 30 sources, MLA, $ 183.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This work assesses whether the popular myth of Winston Churchill is accurate and evaluates whether he deserves the acclaim that popular sentiment has given him. This evaluation takes the form of three chapters. Chapter one examines his role in the 1930s, chapter two his abilities as a military strategist and chapter three the period immediately following him becoming Prime Minister on 10 May 1940. The paper relates that areas of his life were focused upon specifically, as they form the integral components of the popular myth and thus are essential in assessing whether that myth is accurate. Furthermore the author states that although the popular myth is impossible to substantiate for reasons that are outlined in the paper, chapter three provides the evidence that makes Churchill a truly great and remarkable human being.
Outline:
Statement of Objectives
Introduction
Chapter 1 - The 1930s
Chapter 2 - Military Strategy
Chapter 3 - The Saviour of his Country
Conclusion
Bibliography
Appendix A
Appendix B
From the Paper
"Churchill espoused similar views immediately following the German Anschluss, or union with Austria. In the debate on 14 March 1938 as with the one just under a year earlier he made no call for a military response to Hitler's latest European incursion. As with the Rhineland, the Anschluss was not the point at which Churchill believed a stand should be made against Hitler. This is of course contrary to the position he outlined in The Gathering Storm, and consequently contrary to his popular myth. However, it was at this point that he came to the conclusion that military force or at the very least the threat of such force, was the only possible avenue open for dealing with Hitler. In the Commons just ten days after the Anschluss debate he made an eloquent but resolute call for firmness declaring that now it was time to 'raise again a great British nation standing before all the world', and that even at this point Britain 'rising in its ancient vigour (could) save civilisation'. However, he saved his most severe denunciations of the government for the crises over Czechoslovakia."
| |
|
Winston Churchill, 2003.
A biographical sketch of Winston Churchill up to the First World War, concentrating on his contributions to the war.
3,074 words (approx. 12.3 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 89.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the early years of the British Prime Minister, Winston Churchill. In particular, it examines how, although he received an incredible amount of criticism for his decisions during World War I, he made many valuable contributions to the British and Allied cause. It looks at how he restructured and modernized the navy, saw merit in the implementation of such machinery as tanks and airplanes even though others did not, strengthened Allied relations, and commanded a brigade on the Western Front.
From the Paper
"In 1904, Churchill crossed party lines and joined the Liberal Party due to his disagreement with proposed higher tariffs by the Conservatives. At this juncture in political history, the Liberal Party was at its strongest and committed to social reform; therefore, Churchill participated in much of this era?s social reform. As President of the Board of Trade, he established the first of the great welfare services: labor exchanges, which would subsequently lead to state unemployment insurance. In addition, he helped produce legislation that regulated wages and provided safety standards for workers. Simultaneously and more importantly to the international scene, Winston was involved in issues of defense."
| |
|
Winston Churchill, 1999.
A paper which looks at Churchill's influence on his nation and the world.
1,195 words (approx. 4.8 pages), 8 sources, APA, $ 40.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper looks at British Prime Minister Winston Churchill's life from his childhood until his death in 1965. The paper traces Churchill's political career as it developed into a role of major leadership in the world. It describes his charisma and ability to rally British troops and inspire the British people to overcome severe adversity during WWII. It shows how Churchill's was a great source of strength not just for the British, but also for the entire Allied forces and how his dogmatic views of victory became the corner stone of the entire British Armed Forces.
From the Paper
"When Winston Churchill was born on the thirtieth of November in 1874, no one ever dreamed that he would have such a significant impact on the British people (Churchill 1). As a school boy, he did not care for the school work given to him. He was interested in history, poetry and writing but the school tried to teach him mathematics and Latin (15). He was at the bottom of his class at Harrow, his grade school. He was later taught English instead of Latin because it was believed that he was too dumb to learn other languages (16). At the age of eighteen, after leaving Harrow, Churchill enrolled at the Royal Military Academy at Sandhurst (Rodgers 27). There, he found that Latin and Greek were not needed to be successful. He studied about tactics, fortification, topography, military law and military administration. He also learned gymnastics, drill and horseback riding (Churchill 21). It was at Sandhurst that Churchill gained a respect for strict military discipline (Rodgers 27)."
| |
|
Historical Writings Of Winston Churchill, 2002.
Presents a historiographical analysis.
5,625 words (approx. 22.5 pages), 12 sources, $ 135.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Presents a historiographical analysis. Contends Churchill was no historian in spite of his writing talent and vast output of books. Commends his style. Popularity of his writings and lack of critical acclaim. Contends his writings were not scholarly because he imposed his personality and personal experiences in everything he wrote.
From the Paper
"THE HISTORIES OF WINSTON CHURCHILL:
A HISTORIOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS
Winston Churchill turned out literally millions of words in his considerable lifetime - he died at ninety in 1965 - and from the beginning, his copy was "gorgeous" (as some editors would put it). He thrilled readers with reportage of his own turn-of-the-century military adventures in India and South Africa. He described, analyzed and speculated upon a host of topics for eager magazine readers in the decades between the two world wars; he completed immense biographies of his own ancestors and other British bigwigs of the past; and he capped his career in the 1950s with a six-volume history of The Second World War and his four-volume A History of the English Speaking Peoples.
Churchill's writings were immensely popular. An impoverished arist ..."
| |
|
Mahatma Gandhi and Winston Churchill, 2001.
Analysis of leadership of both men; their ideas, accomplishments & influence.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 5 sources, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
" Mahatma Gandhi and Winston Churchill were two of the leading figures of this century. They came from very different backgrounds and represented different traditions and ideals, with Gandhi fighting against many of the British views that men like Churchill represented.
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was born at Porbandar, Kathiawar in 1869. He was the youngest son in a family of three sons and one daughter. Mohan was an ordinary child who was halting in his speech and nearly frightened of his own shadow, and much of what he saw in the external world puzzled him. He was not a very good student, and books did not interest him. He was left largely to himself by his classmates. At home, the family rigidly observed the Hindu pieties (Shahani, 1961, 1-3).
Mohan was betrothed to Kasturbai Makanji at the age of.."
| |
|
Roosevelt, Churchill and World War II, 2002.
This paper discusses the different personalities of Franklin D. Roosevelt and Winston Churchill during WWII.
1,340 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that despite occasional disagreements, Franklin D. Roosevelt and Winston Churchill never lost sight of their ultimate goal of defeating the Axis powers. It shows how the two leaders were very different men. The paper presents many examples such as Churchill and Roosevelt?s personalities: Churchill?s approach to life?s challenges was one of confrontation, order and hierarchy; wherein, Roosevelt?s was one of evasion, competition and improvisation. The author believes that the most important difference between Churchill and Roosevelt during the war was their vision of the future of the colonial territories: Churchill retained an imperialist vision for the future of the empire and opposed independence for its members; Roosevelt saw the demise of European colonialism as inevitable.
From the Paper
"The friendship that developed between Churchill and Roosevelt was not without its difficulties, and it is important not to lose site of the fact that the primary responsibility of both men was to look after national interests. This inevitably led to tensions, which at times became quite pronounced. Serious differences arose, for example, over the question of when and where to open the second front in Europe, and a host of other issues, particularly with respect to economic matters. Furthermore, as the years passed and victory in Europe appeared more and more certain, Roosevelt began to cultivate a bilateral relationship with Stalin that wounded Churchill's pride and signaled the emergence of a bipolar postwar world, dominated not by the British Empire, but rather by the two new Super-Powers."
| |
|
An anlaysis of Churchill's Speech, 2004.
An analysis of a speech delivered by Winston Churchill on the 21st July 1951, during the election campaign.
872 words (approx. 3.5 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper analyzes a speech delivered by Winston Churchill during the 1951 election campaign that would return him to the position of Prime Minister and return the Conservatives to power. The paper highlights how the speech is incredibly negative and is clearly directed at attacking the policies that the Labour party had pursued over the previous six years. The paper points out Churchill's subtle intention to glorify his role as war leader and notes the absence of any indication of how a prospective Conservative government would direct policy any differently. The paper discusses the many uses of this speech for a historian. The speech is included in an appendix to the paper.
From the Paper
"The attack on the record of the Atlee administrations comes from various quarters. Firstly Churchill outlines how Britain's position in the world has drastically diminished since the end of the war. He details in particular how countries that Britain played a part in liberating from Nazi domination, now perceive Britain to be weak and in decline. The retreat from empire is also a strong theme, highlighting the decline in British control over Egypt and Persia (Iran). The devaluation policy of the government is also attacked as seriously damaging the purchasing power of ordinary Briton's."
| |
|
Churchill and Stalin, 2002.
A literary review of the impact of the wartime relationship between Winston Churchill and Josef Stalin.
4,900 words (approx. 19.6 pages), 22 sources, $ 178.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines and analyzes Winston Churchill's wartime relationship with Josef Stalin, and discusses how the relationship influenced policy in the Second World War. The paper uses primary and secondary sources, journal articles, documents, and contemporary newspapers as sources.
| |
|
Great Leaders, 2007.
This paper looks at the lives of Sir Winston Churchill, Dwight D. Eisenhower and Ulysses S. Grant.
1,443 words (approx. 5.8 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses how Sir Winston Churchill, Dwight D. Eisenhower and Ulysses S. Grant made lasting impressions on the United States and Western civilization. The paper contends that these leaders stand out as exemplary examples, due to their powerful and influential leadership styles and their ability to alter the face of history under often extreme political, social and cultural conditions. The paper discusses each of these personalities separately and presents a literature review of recommended reading.
Outline:
Introduction
Sir Winston Churchill
Dwight D. Eisenhower
Ulysses S. Grant
Literature Review
From the Paper
"As the war raged on in Europe in 1945, Sir Winston Churchill, then Prime Minister of England, urged Josef Stalin, the Communist leader of the Soviet Union, to join him and President Franklin Roosevelt at a conference to discuss their common goal to defeat Nazi Germany. Yet Stalin refused to leave Russia which prompted Churchill to recommend that the conference be held in Yalta in the Russian Crimea. Stalin quickly agreed and as these three national leaders came together, they soon agreed to discuss four primary areas of concern--the immediate future of Germany following an Allied victory, post-war political arrangements in eastern Europe, the entry of the Soviet Union into the war against Japan in the Pacific and the details of the United Nations Charter."
| |
|
Stalin, Churchill and Roosevelt, 2006.
A discussion regarding the ego management of prominent political figures during World War II.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 5 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the heads of state, Winston Churchill, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Joseph Stalin and their egos that matched their ambition and status as leaders with unparalleled political and military authority. The paper further discusses how their relationship with one another during World War II was often strained as they disputed the merits of various Allied strategies and disagreed about related military issues. Disputes regarding how to conduct the war were not the only problems they had to overcome, for there was a significant degree of distrust between these three leaders.
From the Paper
|
|
|
