| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "SHORE DRILLING": |
|
|
Off-Shore Drilling, 1991.
This paper argues that in the case of off-shore drilling the oil producers, environmentalists and governments need to work together for the good of all: Costs, research, technology, dangers and benefits.
2,025 words (approx. 8.1 pages), 7 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Offshore drilling is a key method for extracting crude oil and gas from the earth. Oil is a key resource in today's world economy: more than 56 million barrels (33 gallons) per day were extracted in February 1988. Industrialized nations as well as developing nations depend on the income from oil to finance their economic growth, and industries throughout the world depend on oil for energy. This research examines the economic costs and benefits associated with using offshore drilling techniques for extracting oil. Included is a discussion of oil leases, oil rigs, technology associated with offshore platforms, environmental concerns, and recommendations to improve the relationship between oil companies and environmental concerns.
Offshore oil was first produced from a pier located in state ... "
|
| Term Paper # 62323 |
temporarily unavailable
|
|
|
|
Drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, 2003.
Discusses the pros and cons on drilling for oil in the ANWR.
690 words (approx. 2.8 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 23.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the pros and cons of drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). It looks at issues and conflicts of the drilling argument and the need for oil in the U.S. as opposed to the quality of life issue for certain animal species.
From the Paper
"One of the most controversial environmental issues being discussed recently is whether or not to drill for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. The ANWR was first set aside as ..."
| |
|
Drilling for Oil in Alaska, 2002.
A discussion of the pros and cons of limited oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR).
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 14 sources, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Discusses pros & cons of limited oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). History of attempts to protect ANWR and attempts to open up the refuge for oil drilling & gas exploration. Impact on environment. Economic factors (fuel prices, creation of additional jobs). Other forms of energy. Quality of life issue.
From the Paper
"Introduction
Although it was first discovered in 1799, Alaska was not officially admitted into the union as a state until 1959. Up until that time, Alaska?s history had been littered with settlers from all over the world who found opportunity in the harsh climate of the land, during the gold rush, when oil was first discovered, and even now in its thriving fishing industry. Alaska?s shores were also the sight of a sustained attack by Japanese forces during World War II that took two years to beat back (ExploreNorth 2001). Now, Alaska is also known for its wildlife, massive spaces, the pioneering and independent attitudes of its residents, as well as the brutality of its seasons. Indeed, Alaska has been called the last frontier of the United States."
| |
|
Oil Drilling, 2004.
A literary review on the impact of oil drilling.
2,760 words (approx. 11.0 pages), 15 sources, MLA, $ 95.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the impact of oil drilling waste on the environment of the Persian Gulf Region. It identifies the areas of petroleum extraction activities. The paper mentions types of ecological damage associated with petroleum extraction. The author considers some approaches to environmental risk management.
| |
|
Oil Drilling in the Arctic, 2004.
An analysis of the impact of oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
1,743 words (approx. 7.0 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 56.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the importance of porcupine caribou and other keystone species of Alaska's ecosystems. It revisits past oil spills and shows the negative effects oil drilling has and will have on the environment.
From the Paper
"Fish habitats are also in danger if drilling takes place in the refuge. Erosion, sedimentation, or alteration of drainage flow or wetland habitat can result from inadequate cross-drainage structures. Gravel removal from a floodplain can also affect fish by changing the patterns of flow or water quality. Water withdrawal can reduce the flow of a stream and potentially raise the temperature to dangerous levels if it becomes low enough. Causeways may inhibit the movement of fish, and change the quality or quantity of movement of sediment. Oil in water bodies will coat fish - making it impossible for them to eat, mate, or breathe - it also poisons them and makes them inedible for other predatory animals. "
| |
|
Drilling in Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, 2006.
The paper examines the debate regarding drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
2,563 words (approx. 10.3 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 77.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is the most promising onshore area for oil exploration and one of the wildest areas remaining in the United States. Therefore, the conflict between the need to develop energy resources and the desire to preserve wild areas has led to the prolonged debate over the merits of programs to lease the region for oil exploration and development. According to the paper, drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge would cause environmental costs that include some elements that are essentially certain, as well as elements that are uncertain, such as the unpredictable effects on the number and health of certain important species. The paper concludes that development is environmentally damaging no matter the cautions, because it alters the wild state of the region forever.
From the Paper
"When Alaska entered the Union in 1958, Congress transferred an exceptionally large amount of land to the new state, and at the same time, the Department of the Interior used its authority to administratively reserve land for federal use, resulting to decades of controversy and disputes (Grover). Since 1957, the United States Department of the Interior has exercised primary administrative authority over most of the land comprising modern-day ANWR Grover). This fact has meant that a great deal to people who care about the Refuge (Grover). Federal management has produced a land that is valued as much for its unique wilderness character as it is prized for its suspected mineral wealth, and in particular, it has precluded significant petroleum exploration and development of the Refuge (Grover)."
| |
|
Alaskan Drilling, 2002.
An examination of the controversial oil drilling in Alaska.
720 words (approx. 2.9 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 25.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
A look at the controversy surrounding the drilling of oil in Alaska. The writer presents political opposition as well as environmental concerns. On the other side, economic factors are taken into account.
From the Paper
"For some years, Congress as well as those interested in both the energy industry and the preservation of wild areas in the United States have argued whether drilling sites in Alaska should be expanded. One area of debate has been the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) in Alaska."
| |
|
The Oil Drilling in Alaska.
This paper discusses the problems of drilling for oil and gas in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR).
1,040 words (approx. 4.2 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that the northern slopes of Alaska's one hundred fifty million acre coastal plain, which is part of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), is abundant in both oil and gas reserves and is the number one prospect for United States' oil and gas development. The author points out that the use of wildlife refuges and wilderness areas for energy development has become a very hot topic, especially in Alaska, because of the United States' dependence on foreign oil. The paper relates that researchers and developers are seeking new technologies to drill for and transport the oil without hurting the surrounding environment in the process.
From the Paper
"According to government estimates, the equivalent of one billion, four hundred million barrels of oil are tucked away under Teshekpuk Lake. This lake is Alaska's third largest lake. Teshekpuk, which means big enclosed coastal water. This is where the Pacific Black Brant migrates for its annual molt. Migratory birds, as well as moose, bear and fish take full advantage of this wild life refuge. Many make their home there and
others migrate to this placid lake every year."
| |
|
Corrosion In Drilling Operations, 1987.
Discusses the problems, solutions, & current developments in the phenomenon of drilling operation corrosion.
2,025 words (approx. 8.1 pages), 5 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Corrosion, in terms of drilling operations, was responsible for at least 70 billion dollars in losses in 1975, or 4% of the gross national product. Reportedly, 10 to 45% of that loss was preventable (Bertness and Chilingarian, 1983, 559). Understanding the causes of corrosion in terms of drilling operations is?tantamount to saving time and money. The trends towards drilling of deeper wells, the use of higher strength steels, the presence of higher stress levels and the use of lower pH drilling fluids all contribute toward increased corrosion susceptibility.
The destruction of metals by corrosion is caused by direct (...)"
| |
|
Oil Drilling in Alaska, 2004.
Research paper debating whether or not to drill in Alaska for oil.
1,560 words (approx. 6.2 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 51.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper describes what the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge actually is. It covers the pros and cons of drilling for oil in the refuge from political, economical, religious perspectives. It gives the writer's opinion on the topic, which is NOT to drill in the refuge. It then gives alternative ideas to drilling and backs them up with facts from credible sources like the U.S. Geological Survey.
From the Paper
"An environmental masterpiece to be preserved, or an economic opportunity waiting to be tapped? This is the debate that has been persistent around the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for over 40 years. It is also a mainstream argument for many environmental philosophies. Pro-drilling advocates tend to take on Judeo-Christian beliefs, while anti-drilling organizations stick with conservation or preservationist values. These two groups portray their views over the internet using many types of representation, false or not, to convince readers their position is correct. Both sides have their pros and cons, but my opinion on the topic is that drilling for oil in the ANWR is a poor idea due to inevitable environmental complications."
| |
|
Offshore Oil Drilling, 1991.
This paper studies the ecological risks involved in drilling for oil offshore on the continental shelf.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 8 sources, $ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Although efforts have been made to find alternative fuel sources, at this time the United States continues to be dependent upon oil for the majority of its energy needs. Unfortunately, the nation does not produce enough oil domestically to meet this need. Therefore, the U.S. must import foreign oil from unstable regions of the world such as the Persian Gulf. Studies indicate that the United States imports half of the 6 billion barrels that it needs each year, at an annual rate of approximately $42 billion. It has been noted that as much as 50 percent of the nation's current trade deficit is due to this large-scale importation of oil. Because of this situation, it has been argued that the United States should make a greater effort to exploit domestic oil resources. Although there are many onshore sites for oil, the ... "
| |
|
Alaskan Oil Drilling, 2006.
A look at the Alaskan oil reserves and the affect on business and consumers.
1,884 words (approx. 7.5 pages), 13 sources, MLA, $ 60.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how the issue of the Alaskan oil reserves and their potential for the economy of the United States has become extremely contentious. The Bush Administration and the corporate sector are of the opinion that the Alaskan oil reserve offers a potentially large resource and a possible solution to the energy needs of the country. However, there are also contending voices which see the usage of the reserves as ecologically unsound. Another perspective, which is explored in this paper, is that the Alaskan reserves will make very little difference to the overall energy problems and economy over the next decade.
From the Paper
"The National Petroleum Reserve of Alaska (NPR-A), is situated between the foothills of the Brooks Range and the Arctic coastline, and is about 120 miles from the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). (Rosen, Y. 2003. ) The Bureau of Land Management ( BLM) estimates the area will"... supplement production from the Alpine fields, which hold 429 million barrels and have a daily oil output of about 100,000 barrels." (US OKs Commercial Drilling in Alaska Oil Reserve) In terms of geography the oil in the petroleum reserve" lies in reservoirs only about 50 feet thick, stretched across an area 300 miles wide and 200 miles from the coast inland to the Brooks Range. In ANWR, the oil is largely concentrated in reservoirs as thick as 300 feet." "
| |
|
Off-Shoring and Staff Augmentation, 2007.
Analyzes current trends for off-shoring and staff augmentation.
1,750 words (approx. 7.0 pages), 7 sources, APA, $ 56.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Offshoring projects are costly and complicated, and their payoffs are uncertain. As jobs are moved overseas, this controversial strategy creates an anxiety filled atmosphere, for those remaining onboard. This paper shows that job security is one of the primary factors in job satisfaction, and with the threat of offshoring looming overhead, significant damage can be caused to employee morale. The paper shows that, in addition, there are many functional and structural challenges that lie ahead for companies who augment their staff through offshoring. Despite these challenges, offshoring is certain to be an important strategy for many organizations. As such, this paper shows that analyzing current trends in offshoring and staff augmentation is an important topic.
Outline:
Introduction
Evolution of Outsourcing
Types of Jobs Being Off-shored
Destination Countries
Reverse Offshoring and Multi-shoring
Conclusion
References
From the Paper
"Political stability of a country is also a significant factor in whether or not the country will be involved in offshoring trends. But, although political stability is important, according to Shramm (2004), economic conditions are even more critical (4). Creating foreign operations is a large investment for organizations, and even building outsourcing relationships can see significant time and money invested into developing that relationship. For this reason, it does not serve a company to make such an investment in a country where economic fluctuations , such as significant shifts in currency, in relation to the dollar, or even rapidly rising wages, can eat away at the savings the organization hopes to realize over the course of several years."
| |
|
Outsourcing and Off-shoring, 2007.
This paper discusses the mechanisms of outsourcing and off-shoring, with reference to Armstrong Holdings.
1,121 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 5 sources, APA, $ 38.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper explains that Armstrong Holdings could not remain competitive for very long if it did not offshore some or all of its manufacturing. The paper then also points out the risks involved with such a strategy and warns that Armstrong must be diligent in not exporting proprietary knowledge or techniques or it risks being undermined by foreign competitors who acquire its intelligence.
Outline:
Overview
Offshoring/Outsourcing & Globalization
Effects of Global Outsourcing & Off-shoring
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Outsourcing, and its sister strategy of off-shoring, are by-products of globalization and the U.S. market has been deeply impacted by globalization. Armstrong Holdings (Armstrong) itself utilizes offshoring strategies since it has long maintained a manufacturing facility in Mexico. The U.S. economy has been one of the global economy's hardest hit by some of the side-effects of globalization: outsourcing and off-shoring. Outsourcing or the contracting out of functions previously handled in-house, and off-shoring, which is the use of overseas firms to provide a product or service previously handled nationally, both contribute to shrinkage of jobs and manufacturing (Globalization, 2005, p.1). Armstrong, in order to maintain its competitive edge, like most other companies availing themselves of these strategies, is merely taking advantage of a market strategy."
|
|
|
