| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "SHAKESPEARE MEASURE": |
|
|
Shakespeare's "Measure for Measure", 2006.
An analysis of William Shakespeare's play, "Measure for Measure".
2,605 words (approx. 10.4 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 78.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses and analyzes Shakespeare's play, "Measure for Measure", focusing primarily on Act V, Scene I. The paper explains that this play uses the theme of a duke disguising himself as a commoner and going among the people to find out what they really felt about his rule, as a ploy to bring out the truth about the characters of those surrounding the Duke. The paper also explains that Shakespeare adds a twist to the theme when he has the Duke portray a Friar or Holy man who is able to hear confessions and speak to the dying and the condemned.
From the Paper
"We notice that Angelo is more harsh with an individual who was legally betrothed to a woman, got her pregnant and did not marry her than he was with the prostitutes. He did his best to put prostitutes out of business, but no where in the play did it mention Angelo had either them or their "johns" beheaded. Some of this discrepancy is the result of class prejudice. The upper classes had assets and titles. Out of wedlock children were not only and embarrassment but often could contest for both the assets and titles of their deceased father if he had no legitimate male offspring. The lower working classes often had children out of wedlock. Since little or no property was involved, the law turned its head."
| |
|
Shakespeare and Society: "Measure for Measure" as a Reflection of English Society and Advice to King James, 2002.
This paper contends that Shakespeare's "Measure for Measure" is a reflection of English society and advice to King James.
2,340 words (approx. 9.4 pages), 14 sources, APA, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper argues that Shakespeare wrote "Measure for Measure" as a complimentary tutorial for King James. In doing so, he portrays the current state of affairs in England and attempts to provide James with advice concerning the problems facing his kingdom.
From the Paper
"Shakespeare?s England at the time that Measure for Measure was written was in a state of internal conflict and discord. King James I came to power in 1603 and inherited a kingdom rife with a myriad of social and cultural problems, including corruption in the justice system, religious disputes and crises, and rampant sexual immorality. Shakespeare, the ?King?s Playwright,? as Alvin Kernan dubs him, wrote Measure for Measure as a complimentary tutorial for King James. In doing so, he portrays the current state of affairs in England and attempts to provide James, as a ruler with Divine Right and responsibility to his country, with advice concerning the problems facing his kingdom."
| |
|
Shakespeare's ?Measure for Measure? and Shaw's ?Major Barbara?, 2002.
This paper compares the many parallel images in the comedies William Shakespeare's ?Measure for Measure? and George Bernard Shaw's ?Major Barbara".
2,405 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 73.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The author believes that Shaw quite consciously modeled some portions of ?Major Barbara? on Shakespeare's ?Measure for Measure?. The paper discusses the many similarities such as the religious overtones in both plays and the characterization of the female main characters Isabella and Barbara. The author points out that both plays make the same philosophical point: The need to let something go in order to achieve or gain something else, perhaps of greater value.
From the Paper
""Measure for Measure" is gloomy in the beginning; but Shakespeare, as does Shaw, is able to work out the transition from potential tragedy to comedy. Unfortunately, in the transition, Shakespeare, unlike Shaw, does not always make his characters behave consistently. Like Shaw, however, he does order everything that happens in "Measure for Measure" on the principle that the play must be kept a comedy. That was his given reason for making his heroine Isabella a novice nun and for bringing Lucio into her first scene with Angelo (II. ii.); every detail must play its part in intensifying the effect of comic irony. Once used though, such a detail may later be ignored by Shakespeare. Isabella is found to be not too nun-like after all. She is not squeamish or sanctimonious and can be intensely practical, as her "0, let him marry her!" (I. iv. 49) reveals. During the play she develops into a vociferous, ironical nun?almost a Major Barbara."
| |
|
William Shakespeare's "Measure for Measure", 2006.
This paper discusses religious skepticism in William Shakespeare's "Measure for Measure".
2,275 words (approx. 9.1 pages), 0 sources, $ 70.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, in William Shakespeare's problem comedy "Measure for Measure", there is a certain sense of Shakespeare's discomfort or downright cynicism toward the concepts of religion such as Providence, divine mercy and the afterlife. The author analyzes the way the actions of the characters of Duke Vincentio, Isabella and Claudio reflect the religious skepticism that Shakespeare so frequently insinuated into his work. The paper concludes that Claudio is the only one for whom the play ends with a truly happy ending; insinuating that perhaps for all of those, who deny their true nature and insist on living their lives to achieve the impossible standards of religion, perhaps there is no happy ending.
From the Paper
"The questionable actions of Isabella, too, can be construed as Shakespeare commenting on divine mercy. For instance, when dealing with her brother Claudio, Isabella shows little or no pity toward his eminent death when it is directly weighed against her chastity. Yet when Angelo is condemned for basically an identical crime for which he doomed Claudio, Isabella pleads to the Duke that Angelo might be spared because Angelo did not, for all intents and purposes, actually succeed in his objective. Since Isabella did not stand to lose anything in her defense of Angelo, she made it willingly. When Isabella was forced to give up something precious to herself, however, she chose her own salvation over her brother's salvation."
| |
|
The Moral Compass in Shakespeare's 'Measure for Measure', 2001.
A look at the approach of various critics to the play 'Measure for Measure'.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 4 sources, $ 57.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the drastically different interpretations by critics of "Measure for Measure". The comments of H.C. Goddard, Harold Bloom and Martin Lings are contrasted, who variously take the play as: a moral tale on the nature of authority and governance, a spectacle of extreme nihilism, and a mystical quest for spiritual redemption. The paper asserts that each of these writers has a distinctly valuable approach to Shakespeare's text, but none has captured the mysterious whole.
From the Paper
"Measure for Measure has always been a difficult play to interpret, engendering many conflicting viewpoints. Much of twentieth century criticism tried to find a moral direction in the story, redeeming it from charges of inconsistency and vulgarity. R.W. Chambers, for example, insisted that "from first to last, the plot turns on the problem of punishment and forgiveness." [1] He took particular care to defend both Claudio and Isabella against accusations of selfishness, pointing out that Isabella is simply being human when she erupts at her brother Claudio in his prison cell, noting "there are things about which we cannot argue calmly.""
| |
|
William Shakespeare?s "Measure for Measure", 2004.
A look at how Shakespeare is able to capture the complexity of many of life's issues explored in this play.
2,400 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 73.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the way that Shakespeare presents many of the complex issues of life, such as love, honor, and shame in his play, "Measure for Measure". The paper analyzes the characters in the play and explains how Shakespeare is able to deftly capture the spirit of the human psyche in each one.
From the Paper
"Isabella becomes a pivotal character in the play because as we become concerned with what she should do, we realize the problems her choice means to her. Part of the difficulty associated with Measure for Measure is that the answer to this question is not clear. What we discover about Isabella is something peculiar about her chastity. In short, her actions reveal that she is not as pure as she may seem. She no doubt wants to save her own soul, life, and chastity, obviously at whatever the cost. While Isabella?s behavior causes her to appear to be somewhat selfish, it is also important to realize that there is little else she can do."
| |
|
"Measure For Measure" by William Shakespeare, 1990.
An examination of the relationship between the Duke and Isabella as a commentary on the plot, theme and other characters in Shakespeare's "Measure For Measure". The play is a dark comedy about sexual morality and power.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 1 source, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Measure for Measure, like a number of Shakespeare's plays, is an exploration of the use and abuse of power. Closely tied to the issue of power is morality, and in particular, sexual morality. Yet, even while issues of sexual conduct do a great deal to forward the plot, it may not be safe to say that Measure for Measure is a romantic comedy.
Throughout the play, there is always the looming specter of death, which renders it, more or less, a tragicomedy or dark comedy. Claudio must die by Angelo's decree for simply anticipating, with fornication, the legalization of his marriage to Juliet. Ostensibly, only his sister, Isabella, can save his life by committing the crime, with Angelo, that her brother is accused of. Ultimately, it is not this relationship that saves her brother, but the one she forms with the disguised Duke. It is also this relationship that best..."
| |
|
"Measure for Measure" & "Henry IV Part I", 2006.
A comparison of two of Shakespeare's plays, "Measure for Measure" and "Henry IV Part I".
1,300 words (approx. 5.2 pages), 0 sources, $ 43.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes, compares and contrasts the plots and protagonists of two of Shakespeare's plays, "Measure for Measure" and "Henry IV Part I". The author asserts that in these two plays, strong character is defined not by who is more right, but rather by the ability to become more than the sum of one's faults. The author concentrates his analysis on secondary characters, who, despite being fault-ridden, are endearing to the audience for their humor and steadfastness. The paper concludes that Shakespeare's ultimate point is that while all people are flawed, the test of their character is whether they are molded by these flaws -- or overcome them.
From the Paper
"In both of these plays, these people may be questionable or shady characters that often are crude or have abominable habits, they may be people of power and prominence, or they may be just average, everyday citizens. Simply put, they all have faults of their own. Yet, the audience can't help but find them endearing, and the protagonists find that their ability to overcome their faults has a lot to do with the help they receive from these characters. Furthermore, the inability of the antagonists to overcome their vulnerabilities also has something to do with these characters."
| |
|
"Measure for Measure", 2003.
Examines the dangers of extremism in William Shakespeare's "Measure of Measure".
1,321 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the characters of Isabella and Angelo in Shakespeare's play "Measure for Measure", examining their character traits and interactions, as well as their evolution over the course of the work. The paper provides a careful analysis of the meaning of their extreme characters, as well as an explanation of Shakespeare's intent that the Duke represents a balancing of naive purity and corrupt worldliness.
From the Paper
"With Isabella standing as the example of purity and Angelo representing the absolute darkness that corrupts the souls of men, Shakespeare plays the two extremes against each other in order to emphasize the importance of justice and balance. Although Angelo appears to be pure, this is only skin deep, and with his attraction to Isabella, he radically changes into a being consumed with evil intentions. His descent, however, is driven by a symbol of purity and innocence, because he longs to have the true purity that exists in him only as pretense. Isabella represents absolute purity, but Shakespeare deliberately moves her from entering a convent to considering the possibility of entering a marriage with the Duke, thus showing that even the extreme purity of Isabella should be tempered by wisdom of the real world in the form of the Duke."
| |
|
"Measure for Measure", 2006.
An analysis of the theme of moral hierarchies in William Shakespeare's "Measure for Measure".
2,040 words (approx. 8.2 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 64.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how the four main characters in William Shakespeare's "Measure for Measure", the Duke, Angelo, and the two siblings, each draw moral standards from different sources. The paper also attempts to show how these characters subsequently shape or even abandon those standards to suit themselves.
From the Paper
"In the Duke's personal moral hierarchy, it is by mercy that he seems to rule Vienna. And yet, where is his mercy and sense of justice in his treatment of Isabella? He could have saved Claudio and punished Angelo without withholding the news of Claudio's safety from Isabella. "I will keep her ignorant of her good,/ To make her heavenly comforts of despair/ When it is least expected," he explains (4.3.110-112). He then theatricalizes the situation to the point of emotionally torturing Isabella so that he may "sentence" her to marry him when all is revealed (Magedanz, 328). The Duke's mercy disappears when he sees an opportunity to attempt to woo Isabella, even if it means that he must cruelly manipulate her. "
| |
|
"Measure for Measure", 2002.
Analysis of Shakespeare's "Measure for Measure."
525 words (approx. 2.1 pages), 1 source, $ 21.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how William Shakespeare's Measure for Measure has a good deal to say about the proper nature of rulers and other persons who hold power.
| |
|
Honor in ?Measure for Measure? and ?King Henry?, 2004.
An examination of the theme of honor in two of Shakespeare's plays, "Measure for Measure" and "King Henry".
1,058 words (approx. 4.2 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how Shakespeare focuses on the fact that honor can means different things to different people, and it can also be regarded as less than virtuous in some minds. It shows how Shakespeare clarifies the definition of honor in "King Henry", but he leaves the issue muddy in "Measure for Measure". He leaves us with personalities that may not seem be honorable ultimately being the most honorable of all. It is such characters that have made Shakespeare unmatched in his skill.
From the Paper
"Isabella becomes the focus of honor and ?doing the right thing? in Shakespeare?s ?Measure for Measure.? During the course of the play, she is propositioned by three different men to break her vows and go against her conscious. Her honor is important to her, and she does not accept Angelo?s proposal. In fact, she is forthright in her initial reaction to Angelo?s request. In other words, she knows what he is all about. Even as Angelo begs Isabella to ?Believe me, on mine honor,/My words express my purpose? (II.iv.46-7). She responds, ?Ha! Little honor to be much believed,/And most pernicious purpose! Seeming, seeming!? (II.iv.49-50). This scene helps us appreciate Isabella because she knows the right thing to do, despite what it means for her brother. She declares she will, ?live chaste, and, brother, die:/More than our brother is our chastity? (II.iv.185-6). She is disgusted by the attitudes that surround her and to remove herself from it, she decides to enter a convent."
| |
|
?Shadows and Fog? and ?Measure for Measure?, 2004.
A look at the roles of women in Woody Allen's film, ?Shadows and Fog?, and William Shakespeare's ?Measure for Measure?.
1,155 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews "Measure for Measure", written by William Shakespeare in the early 17th century, and "Shadows and Fog", a movie written and directed by Woody Allen in the late 20th century. It looks at the contrasting portrayal of the female characters and the roles of women by their actions and their qualities. It shows how "Measure for Measure" presents a view where women are pure and not expected to be promiscuous, where women are dependant on men, and where women have few options or choices. In contrast, it shows how "Shadows and Fog" presents a view where women are promiscuous rather than pure, where woman are independent from men, and where women have almost unlimited freedom.
From the Paper
"The first difference observed with the role of women is related to whether women are expected to be pure or promiscuous. In Measure for Measure, the major female character is Isabella. She represents a very pure female character. This is first seen at the start of the play by the fact that she is training to become a nun and by the strong Christian values she appears to have. This is then emphasized later when she is told her brother?s life will be saved if she agrees to sleep with Angelo. She refuses this offer, placing her chastity and her Christian values above her own life. This illustrates that a woman?s purity is highly valued, while a woman being promiscuous is not accepted. Mariana is another female character in the play and she is quite different to Isabella."
| |
|
"Measure for Measure", 2002.
This paper discusses Shakespeare's "Measure for Measure".
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 1 source, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper defines the role of Isabella in the play, "Measure for Measure," by Shakespeare. The author evaluates her behavior. The paper examines her role of a woman during this era.
| |
|
"Measure for Measure", 2005.
This paper discusses the role of Pompey in William Shakespeare's dark comedy "Measure for Measure".
1,595 words (approx. 6.4 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 52.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, in William Shakespeare's "Measure for Measure", one character, Pompey Bum, servant of Mistress Overdone, a bawd, serves better than the other characters to highlight the impossible hypocrisy of the play's social situation in which the Viennese legal system conflicts with human nature when public law forbids illicit lovemaking and makes the crime punishable by death. The author points out that Pompey appears at first to be a minor character; however, if Pompey were different, or even absent, the play's weighty morality might well outstrip Shakespeare's need for humor in this hybrid creation. The paper relates the story of the play demonstrating that Pompey's attitude extends beyond the current themes of virtue and morals and moves into the realm of accepting the inevitable that people will always strive to satisfy themselves especially their sexual desires.
From the Paper
"Throughout the play, Pompey's attitude carries this universal perspective. In his next scene, he is meeting with Lord Escalus in less than fortunate circumstance. A constable named Elbow drags Pompey and a gentleman named Froth in front of old Escalus and Angelo. The latter have just been arguing the virtues of moderation, with Escalus bemoaning the severity of the new law: "Some rise by sin, and some by virtue fall...and some condemned for a fault alone." When Elbow accuses Pompey of being a "tapster," Escalus quickly notices Elbow's ineloquence and gives Pompey the opportunity to defend himself."
|
|
|
