| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "SEX MARRIAGE": |
|
|
Same-Sex Marriages, 2007.
This paper argues that, after examining both sides of the issue, same-sex marriages should not be allowed because they do not fit the criteria for a legal partnership according to the U.S. Constitution.
2,980 words (approx. 11.9 pages), 11 sources, MLA, $ 87.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, despite the various re-definitions of the term "marriage", from a legal standpoint, only "civil unions" or legal marriages offer the full package of federal benefits and protections. The author points out that case law concerning same-sex marriage is contradictory and contains inconsistent rulings from state to state and that the court cannot decide how to apply the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) or even if DOMA is constitutional. The paper concludes that, although progress in certain states had been made to allow for same-sex marriages, a majority of the country still agrees that same-sex marriages go against established moral codes and ethics.
Table of Contents:
Weighing the Facts on Same-Sex Marriage
What's the Big Deal about Federal Recognition?
A Question of Culture
DOMA and Case Law
Rethinking Marriage: An Argument for Same-Sex Marriages
Arguments against Same-Sex Marriage
From the Paper
"Regardless of the logical arguments proposed by those in favor of same sex marriage, homosexuality is considered a sin by many religions. There are many that feel it would weaken family ties and values. They also feel that we would have to take a step backward in society and reexamine issues such as polygamy and other types of marriage, in all fairness. Legal actions of the past several years reflect the sentiment of a majority of the American people. The American people stand clear, same-sex marriage violates the very moral ethics upon which this country was founded."
| |
|
Same-Sex Marriages, 2004.
This paper discusses the media and political issues regarding same-sex marriages.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 23.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer examines media and political issues surrounding same-sex marriages. The writer discusses President Bush's belief that same sex marriages would be harmful to society. The writer examines President Bush's support for a Constitutional Amendment banning same sex marriage. The writer also discusses the response of the media in this regard.
From the Paper
"United States President George Bush endorsed a constitutional amendment that would restrict marriage to two people of the opposite sex. In making the endorsement, Bush stated that the union of a man and a woman is the most enduring human institution honored and encouraged in all cultures and by every religious faith. Perhaps more importantly however Bush also stated that heterosexual marriage cannot be severed from its cultural religious and natural roots without weakening the good influence of society."
| |
|
Same-sex Marriages, 2007.
A discussion on the legal acceptance of same-sex marriages.
1,007 words (approx. 4.0 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper introduces the topic of same-sex marriage. It continues to discuss the official laws of New York State vs. the "law of the people" relating to same-sex marriage. It explains that the law of the people does indeed exist and often supercedes the laws of a state or nation. It analyzes the bitter battle going on in the U.S. today regarding same-sex marriage and the law. The author concludes with a personal subjective opinion on the matter.
From the Paper
"In some cases, same-sex partners marry even if the law does not condone their union in their state. Recently, a Presbyterian minister faces a trial by her church because she officiated over same-sex unions. Historically, it has been religious organizations, particularly the Catholic Church, who have been so valiantly opposed to same-sex marriage. Another author notes, "The most outspoken and consistently negative response to proposals that the state recognize same-sex marriage has come from the Catholic Church" (Pope). However, the Catholic Church does not rule over all the people, and in general, society has become more accepting of gays in the past few decades. Thus, archaic laws may remain on the books, but the law of the people may swing to support gay marriage in the near future."
| |
|
Same Sex Marriages, 2006.
An opinionated discussion against same sex marriages.
2,380 words (approx. 9.5 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 72.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper deals with the same sex marriage issue and analyzes the problems with it. The paper discusses how there is a general move toward the acceptance of gay marriages. It then states reasons why these marriages should not be legitimized or practiced. It is the aim of this opinionated paper to give the reader sound knowledge of the reasons to oppose same sex marriages.
Table of Contents:
Abstract
Introduction
Same Sex Marriage
References
From the Paper
"A family's primary focus is on the nurturing and development of children. Same sex marriages are denying the children their right to have a father and a mother. Changing the definition of marriage and including same sex marriage same can have far-reaching changes that can influence the development of children. By changing the definition of marriage and including same sex marriage in that, one is changing the family dynamics and societal structures as well. Firstly same sex couples cannot have any children together as it is biologically impossible. What females can do is that they can either opt to adopt a child or go for test tube babies. If they do undergo in-vitro fertilization, they must use the sperms of the male. What more obvious a hint can nature give them that same sex marriage is not a part or plan of nature. The males in a same sex marriage have no option but to adopt a child. During the upbringing and nurturing of a child, both maternal and paternal care is required. He needs the love of a father as much as the love of a mother and there is no way that an adopted child can be given the love of a father as well as a mother. Only the love of two fathers can be given or two mothers and the love of two fathers or two mothers do not equal the love of a mother and a father."
| |
|
Same-Sex Marriages, 2006.
A discussion regarding the controversial issue of same-sex marriage.
752 words (approx. 3.0 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper takes a look at same-sex marriage and the opposition this controversial subject is receiving. According to the paper, Massachusetts is the only state that allows same-sex marriage. The paper argues that opposition to same-sex marriages must be overcome by developing new definitions of marriage and by dispelling stereotypes that impede change.
From the Paper
"Opponents of same-sex marriage fear gay parenting for many reasons. Many believe that the family structure that helps the child the most is a family headed by two biological parents. One rationale given is that children need same-sex role models to teach them how to behave as a man or as a woman (Knight). Opponents of same-sex marriage also claim that children raised by homosexuals are more dissatisfied with their own gender, suffer a greater rate of molestation within the family, and have homosexual experiences more often (Knight). Indirectly, opponents go on to say that gay marriage will encourage teens who are unsure of their sexuality to become victims of suicide, depression, drug abuse, and sexually transmitted diseases (Benne and McDermott, 2004). "
| |
|
Same-Sex Marriages, 2001.
Presents arguments in favor of the legalization of same-sex marriages.
1,470 words (approx. 5.9 pages), 8 sources, $ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is an argumentative essay promoting the legalization of same-sex marriages. The author focuses on the legal aspects of same sex marriages arguing for the legal rights such as insurance and parental status that need to be enforced.
From the Paper
"The proposed legalization of same-sex marriages is one of the most significant, yet controversial issues facing America today. Same-sex marriages, also known as Civil Unions, should be legalalized in every state in the United States. Right now, in the United States, same-sex couples do not receive the same benefits and legal rights that married couples take for granted. These benefits include cheaper health insurance rates, life insurance benefits, funeral leave of absence from work, legal parental status with a partner's child, and significant tax reductions."
| |
|
Same Sex Marriages, 1999.
An examination of the issue of same-sex marriages.
2,360 words (approx. 9.4 pages), 10 sources, $ 72.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper lists arguments both for and against same-sex marriages. The author discusses the different schools of thought that both support and argue against same sex marriage and concludes with a personal opinion about the issue.
From the Paper
"I now pronounce you husband and husband," the priest might say. "You may kiss the groom." This sounds a bit odd, doesn't it? This could be an excerpt from the ceremony of a same-sex marriage. Although they are not currently lawful in the United States, gay and lesbian activists are presently campaigning both in and out of the courtroom for same-sex marriages to be declared legal. However, there are several schools of thought that either support or oppose this issue."
| |
|
Same Sex Marriages, 2006.
This paper examines the controversial issue of same sex marriages while focusing on the religious and legal implications.
1,173 words (approx. 4.7 pages), 8 sources, APA, $ 40.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the recently passed law in Massachusetts permitting same sex marriages. This paper delves into the basic laws as interpreted in Massachusetts and now a precedent for other states to follow which offers an easy solution to the "heterosexuals only" problem. This paper analyzes the issues now facing same sex couples regarding certain rights and recognition previously accorded to heterosexual couples, including tax relief, hospital visits and real estate purchases. This paper also discusses the various religious views on same sex marriages.
From the Paper
"We need to confront the real issues, therefore, which may have little if anything to do with sex, or "love" (whatever that definition may be) but with recognition of certain rights, the same as heterosexual couples now have, both in terms of tax relief, will right of survivorship, even hospital visits, real estate purchases, and so on. While more and more states, Texas and Nebraska being two, have "legally" had same sex marriages banned by means of an actual constitutional amendment, or the plans for one, in some cases it seems the states, in their zeal, may have gone too far. "On May 12, U.S. District Court Judge Joseph Bataillon of Lincoln, Neb., struck down Nebraska's constitutional amendment that banned same-sex marriage. Bataillon's ruling in Citizens for Equal Protection v. Bruningdeals in part with the plaintiffs' argument that the amendment deprives same-sex couples of First Amendment rights, creating 'a significant barrier to the plaintiffs' right to petition or to participate in the political process."
| |
|
"The Fundamental Argument for Same-Sex Marriage", 2005.
An argument in favor of same-sex marriages, based on the article, "The Fundamental Argument for Same-Sex Marriage," by Ralph Wedgwood.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 2 sources, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews the article "The Fundamental Argument for Same-Sex Marriage," by Ralph Wedgwood. The paper discusses the arguments in the article in favor of same-sex marriage. It analyzes the history of same-sex marriages and looks at the efforts to lobby the government to legitimize these marriages as equal rights.
From the Paper
"A Critical Review of "The Fundamental Argument for Same-Sex Marriage," by Ralph Wedgwood Same-sex relationships have been part of human life for thousands of years. During those years, people in those relationships have sought some kind of legitimacy for them. Recently, efforts have been made to gain both legal and societal acceptance of same-sex marriages. These efforts have been made largely in the political arena, with various groups lobbying for what they term as equal rights under the law. Ralph Wedgwood addresses the objections that accompany this argument in his article, "The Fundamental Argument for Same-Sex Marriage." "
|
| Term Paper # 70542 |
temporarily unavailable
|
|
|
|
Same-Sex Marriages, 2004.
This paper discusses the history of same-sex marriages and their impact on society as seen through the courts.
2,555 words (approx. 10.2 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 77.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that same-sex unions used to get people thrown in jail, but, as society became more tolerant of same-sex couples, so did the legal system. The author states that the first case of same-sex marriage was tried in the District of Columbia where the court ruled that D.C. had the right to refuse a marriage license to same-sex couples. The paper points out that the trend in the courtroom mirrors the trends in society to accept same-sex couples as the committed partners, a status they want to be recognized.
From the Paper
"Pre-1970's society kept a tight rein on homosexual issues and couples remained quietly in the closet for fear of losing their jobs, their families and their support. Once the 1970's began to accept more open lifestyles the homosexual issue began to come out of the closet as well. In 1973 the nation saw the second court case regarding the rights of homosexual couples when a lesbian couple argued they had been deprived of three constitutional rights with the state's refusal to allow them to marry. Their claim was the refusal interfered with their right to practice their religious faith which mandated marriage to live together, the right to marry, and the right to associate."
| |
|
Same-Sex Marriages, 2006.
This paper argues in favor of same-sex marriages.
2,025 words (approx. 8.1 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 64.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that the civil rights movements of the 1960s and early 1970s dramatically altered the political landscape for homosexuality and began the lingering battle over gay rights. The author points out that many laws banning homosexual marriage arose during the 1950s and 1960s because of the fear of the breakdown of American morality; however, targeting gays as scapegoats is inane because there are no connections between homosexuality and degenerate morals. The paper stresses that no state has the right to ban homosexual marriage any more than it has the right to prevent women from voting or blacks from serving in Congress because same-sex marriage is ultimately a civil rights issue.
From the Paper
"Times are changing. The 1960s saw a wave of social and political activism that put a stop to Jim Crow, secured greater freedoms for women, and enabled gays and lesbians to be included in anti-discrimination legislation. Much remains to be done in all three of these core civil rights rubrics. Race relations remain touchy in many parts of the United States and minorities are still underrepresented in positions of political and economic power. Similarly, women are underrepresented in many key professions and still earn less money than their male counterparts."
| |
|
Same Sex Marriages, 2005.
An overview of the implications of same sex marriages on the traditional family in Canada.
1,468 words (approx. 5.9 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how with the increasing visibility of gays and lesbians in society, religious leaders, child psychologists, and other professionals are beginning to question whether children raised by a gay or lesbian couple will function the same as children raised by heterosexual couples. It looks at how there are many arguments against same sex couples raising children and how these arguments come from the religious community.
From the Paper
"It is evident that the traditional nuclear family has changed. It is no longer just mother, father and child. The family has become single parents, biracial couples; blended families, communal living, and homosexual couples are only a few among others. In the last decade Canada has seen a huge change in the legal and social status of lesbians and gay men. They are now able to marry divorce, adopt and have custody of children. Same sex marriage is now legal in parts of the world. Many believe this kind of unions is redefining what marriage and family is. It is true the number of same-sex families in Canada is unknown because the statistics Canada census "does not distinguish between unrelated individuals sharing living quarters and those who have a sexual relationship. "
| |
|
Changing Attitudes Regarding Same-Sex Marriages, 2004.
An examination of the way society's attitudes are changing towards same-sex marriages.
815 words (approx. 3.3 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how this phenomenon has been around for centuries; however, only recently is public opinion warming to the idea. It looks at these changing attitudes by the government, the law makers, religious institutions, and society as a whole.
From the Paper
'However, many state and national agencies still have old-fashioned attitudes toward same-sex marriages. For example, the New Jersey Family Policy Council believes that the institution of marriage would be jeopardized if homosexuals were encouraged to wed. "States do have the right to set limits on who is allowed to marry," said Len Deo, the president of the council. The council ignores the fact that changing times always have brought changing attitudes about marriage."
| |
|
Same-Sex Marriage, 2004.
A proposal for legalization of same-sex marriage.
1,081 words (approx. 4.3 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how, with the passage of time, more and more people have come to believe that same-sex marriages should be permitted legally, in contrast to many who still believe that it shouldn't. It looks at how those who are against same-sex marriages refuse to relinquish their hold on traditional beliefs and values and how, today, these people serve as barriers to same-sex marriage proponents. It also explores how the audience that the proponents of same-sex marriage wish to address includes the legislators and also those who are opposed to the legalization of same sex marriage. The purpose of legalizing same-sex marriage is argued from a historical, legal, and humanistic standpoints.
From the Paper
"The issue of same sex marriage is problematic because of the fact that it proposes significant change to traditional values and beliefs of society. It is worth asserting this because of several people who still hold fast to their traditional values and beliefs, which are mostly religious and to some extent it is cultural. However, with the awareness that people in contemporary times have regarding same sex or gay rights, it is worth asserting how strongly they all feel towards the rights of every individual; proponents of same sex marriage believe that the rights to same sex marriage is a major portion of their individual rights."
|
|
|
