| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "RULES": |
|
|
Legal Rules for Deciding Cases, 2006.
A debate on legal rules in case rulings.
2,250 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 4 sources, $ 89.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper argues that issues other than legal rules often determine how cases are decided. It offers advance arguments to support this thesis. Counter arguments will be considered such as the formalist point of view of Roscoe Pound. However it will be shown that in fact issues such as whether the country is at war, or what race the defendant is, or what best serves the need to protect society are very likely to be more important than the rules in determining how cases are decided.
From the Paper
"The American Legal Realism perspective stipulates that issues other than legal rules often determine how cases are decided. This paper will argue that this is true, and will advance arguments to support this thesis. Counter-arguments will be considered, such as the formalist point of view of Roscoe Pound. However, it will be shown that in fact issues such as whether the country is at war, or what race the defendant is, or what best serves the need to protect society, are very likely to be more important than the rules in determining how cases are decided. In other words, pragmatic, ..."
| |
|
Rules, 2002.
Explains the meaning and importance of rules and considers what a world without rules would be like.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 2 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses what rules are and why they are made. It will also explain some of the personal rules and will exemplify what a world without rules would be like.
| |
|
Interpreting the Hague-Visby and Hamburg Rules, 2006.
This paper defines in detail the Hague-Visby and Hamburg rules while clarifying the maritime shipping laws of the Hague Convention.
3,880 words (approx. 15.5 pages), 5 sources, APA, $ 106.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper focuses on the confusion over the exact definition of the Hague Convention, The Hague-Visby Rules Amendments and the Hamburg Rule. The writer of this paper explains in-depth the definition for each rule and how they affect the liability of maritime shipping carriers and what effects the amendments have on carriers while also examining the limitations placed, beyond the existing treaties, concerning liability.
Topics covered in this report include:
Introduction and Thesis
The Hague Convention
The Hague-Visby Rules
The Hamburg Rules
Liability of the Carrier
Basis of Liability
Limits of Liability
Liability of the Shipper
Special Rules on Dangerous Goods
Bills of Lading: Reservations and Evidentiary Effect
Guarantees by the Shipper
Conclusions
Bibliography
From the Paper
"Starting with the First Peace Conference at Hague, signed July 29, 1899, a maritime agreement was entered into force on September 4, 1900. This treaty provides for general rules of conduct for carrying Merchant Shipping throughout the world. However, the convention realized at the outset it was an incomplete and unrefined document with flaws that could be worked out through negotiations at later conferences to be held in the future.
Thus the Second Peace Conference at Hague, signed October 18, 1907 and entered into force January 26, 1910 further refined the Merchant Shipping Provisions."
| |
|
Dworkin, Coleman and Secondary Rules, 2005.
An overview of Dworkin's and Coleman's philosophies on secondary rules.
2,530 words (approx. 10.1 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 87.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses Dworkin's argument that secondary rules cannot be social rules, because they are not applied uniformly. He believes that they must be normative rules which have an underlying morality as their basis. It also looks at hoe Coleman argues that they are social rules and that the conventions of the U.S. legal system give judges the right to fine-tune laws to meet the convergent beliefs of society.
From the Paper
"In the U S Ronald Dworkin and Jules Coleman over the course of thirty years engaged in a debate about the source of the power of secondary rules. Dworkin argues that these cannot be social rules which exist because....."
| |
|
Following ?Russell Rules?, 2006.
A review of the book "Russell Rules: 11 Lessons on Leadership" by Bill Russell and David Falkner.
1,685 words (approx. 6.7 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 54.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews and critiques the book "Russell Rules: 11 Lessons on Leadership" by Bill Russell and David Falkner. The paper explains that the core of the book's focus is on how to communicate successfully. According to its so-called Russell's Rules, not only do effectual leaders need to become adept at identifying change, but also in dealing with it and making a commitment to use it to their best advantage. The paper reviews each of the book's 11 rules about change, commitment and communication. The author of this paper concludes that he agrees with most of Russell's suggestions, except for in one area. Unlike Russell, the author of this paper does not support change merely for the sake of change. He argues that this is what caused the "New Coke" fiasco, the widespread censure of Windows '98 and a host of other business-related disasters.
From the Paper
"Russell also points out that "good questions are more important than easy answers" (Rule #1 of commitment and curiosity) and that "curiosity is a process" (Rule #2). Yet later in the book, the author admits that changing a negative situation into a positive one is not always an easy task. Russell suggests that people can resist change for a number of reasons. These include self-interest, such as instances in which an individual has achieved status, privilege or self-esteem through the effective use of a traditional system. In these cases, the individuals will usually perceive certain changes such as an increase in employee empowerment to be an ominous threat because their ego overshadows their common sense. The author also points out that fear of the unknown is another factor that can facilitate the creation of imaginary barriers to success."
| |
|
St. Francis's Rule and St. Benedict's Rule, 2004.
A comparison and analysis of these two Christian rules, which explain how one should live one's life.
1,459 words (approx. 5.8 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Both the Rule of St. Francis and the Rule of St. Benedict pertain to how to live a life in chastity and how to live a life with God. The major rules of both focus on the foundations of a life in being a God?s servant, particularly the apostolic way of life and that of belonging in a monastery. This paper explores these two rules and compares their major points.
From the Paper
"Though both rules focuses on the same principles of putting God in everything and that everything must be subservient to God, they however generally differ in the characteristics that they were implemented. St. Francis?s rules were highly set in terms of practice. Their implementation were more of severity in character especially on matters regarding appropriating temporal things to one?s self."
| |
|
Who Rules America?, 2001.
A critique of the book "Who Rules America? Power and Politics in the Year 2000". It provides an overview of the book and an analysis of its content.
950 words (approx. 3.8 pages), 1 source, $ 33.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents a critically evaluates "Who Rules America? Power and Politics in the Year 2000" by G. William Domhoff. The author
gives an overview, and proceeds to analyze several aspects of the book such as theory, argument and concept.
From the paper:
"The American Dream consists of many things including the obtaining of money and wealth. Most of us want it, few of actually get there and some of use even thinks it?s a bad place to be. William Domhoff is one such person. He wrote a book titled Who Rules America? Power and Politics in the Year 2000 and in that book he presents his theory of the way our economy and standard of living currently work. "
| |
|
Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals", 2006.
This paper is a personal book review of Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals".
1,145 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 3 sources, APA, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that community organizer and political activist Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals"(1971) contains concepts of organizing the masses, action, tactics and communication by means of mutual understanding. The author lists Alinsky's rules for social change as they relate to the profession of social work, which is inextricably intertwined with social reform. The paper states that the author, who is Latino, the largest minority in the U.S., during moments of feeling powerless and helpless, feels the importance of serving as an advocate for this at-risk population as suggested by this book.
From the Paper
"Alinsky's in-depth description of how to go about mass organization was truly motivating for me as I related his teachings to my passion and the current "hot topic" of immigration reform. You made a comment in class one day that has stuck with me and made me reevaluate my role/support of this campaign. You said that a successful movement could not exist without a captivating "Hearts and Minds" campaign. Subsequent viewings of the news and other political hype made me realize that proponents of this issue are all over the board. If I was not as informed on this topic as I currently am, I would have no idea what organizers were trying to present to me. Amnesty for undocumented workers? Citizenship? Workers' rights? Mass deportation? What does it all mean?"
| |
|
Social Science Rules, 2006.
This paper examines the book "The Rules of Sociological Method" by Emile Durkheim.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 1 source, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses how it is usually thought that the natural sciences deal with objective facts that may be empirically observed, while social sciences such as sociology and psychology deal with more subjective matters and as such these social sciences cannot be as scientific and objective as the natural sciences. However, the paper explains that many theorists would like to assign rules to the methods of social sciences, so that they can lay claim to unearthing information that is as reliable and valid as the information discovered by natural scientists. This is essentially what Emile Durkheim tried to do in "The Rules of Sociological Method."
| |
|
E-mail: Rules of Etiquette, 2002.
The importance of rules of etiquette in email correspondence.
1,400 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 3 sources, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses why some etiquette rules are important to follow while using E-mail. It highlights what etiquette the E-mail system borrows from traditional professional writing and what is unique to it. The paper groups essential etiquette rules into three broad categories - language and content, electronic tricks, and replies. It argues that users become efficient by using the system, but they become effective by knowing the etiquette.
| |
|
"Rules of the Game", 2007.
This paper analyzes the characterization in Jean Renoir's 1939 movie "Rules of the Game".
3,097 words (approx. 12.4 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 90.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses the stark contrast between the world of the aristocrats and the world of the servants who attended to them in rural France before World War II. The paper shows how Jean Renoir brings these two groups together in the classic 1939 movie "Rules of the Game." The paper explains how Renoir violated many rules of writing, both in the number and complexity of the characters and the number of subplots that he allowed. This allowed Renoir the ability to create an entire world within the Chateau. The paper discusses how this film offers modern viewers a glimpse at the mood which prevailed in France during World War II.
Outline:
The Importance of Characterization
Plot Summary
Stylistic Notes
Characterization
Symbolism and Theme
From the Paper
"Movies and novels are classified as to the key driving force of the plot. Some stories are clearly plot driven. Plot driven story lines depend on the events to create interest for the audience. Plot driven stories depend on forces outside of the characters themselves to create interest. These types of stories have several pitfalls. The first is that the characters can seem shallow. The true test of a plot driven story is if one could imagine other characters in the same situation without affecting the impact of the film. The characters themselves are not essential to the success of the story. Plot driven stories often involve generic characters such as hero and heroine archetypes."
| |
|
Canadian Rules of Evidence, 2008.
A discussion on whether the rules of evidence in Canadian law discriminate against defendants.
2,720 words (approx. 10.9 pages), 15 sources, APA, $ 81.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the issue of whether or not the rules of evidence in Canada discriminate against defendants or, conversely, work in their favor. After examining a representative sampling of the available legal record, the writer concludes that - in both civil as well as criminal law - every effort is undertaken to protect defendants from evidence being admitted that might unjustly prejudice them in the eyes of a judge or, more likely, the eyes of a jury. Along the way, the paper looks at how judges have grappled with the challenges posed by new information-collecting technologies as they pertain to the issue of what is, and what is not, an appropriate document as well as what the legal concepts "trustworthiness" and "Best Evidence Rule" really mean - and what their implications are for defendants. From there, the paper proceeds to enter into a discussion of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and how it protects defendant prerogatives.
From the Paper
"Generally speaking, the admissibility of documents in Canadian courts is more open to interpretation than ever before; for example, by the 1990s there was a growing trend towards trial judges exercising discretionary power with regards to what documents should be ruled admissible in courts and which ones should not be admissible. What should not be overlooked in all of this is that justices are making these determinations at a time when technology is changing the way in which technology is stored dramatically."
| |
|
?Anti - Monopoly Agency Rules Against Intel", 2005.
An article review of AP Wire. (8 Mar 2005) "Anti - Monopoly Agency Rules Against Intel." The New York Times. Business News.
814 words (approx. 3.3 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 28.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper provides a brief analysis and discussion about this article which deals with the issue of anti-monopoly rules as applied to Intel. The paper questions whether, when a firm does not directly abuse its status as a monopoly, it should still be allowed to continue its practices.
Introduction
Market Outcome
Political Impact on Economic Behavior
Social Diversity
Technological Innovation
Market Structure
Work Cited
From the Paper
"Japan's FTC might have a social agenda-to increase the dominance of home-based Japanese chipmakers that are currently minute in comparison to Intel. However, some of Japan's largest companies have dominated the scandal, such as Hitachi, as they have willingly done business with Intel, and agreed to its arrangements of exclusivity, much to their apparent business and market advantage, even though this may cause some social detriment to the nation, overall, in terms of Japanese companies making inroads into the chip market. Intel's share of the CPU market in Japan rose to 90 percent in 2004, from 78 percent in 2002 and in contrast, the Japanese Advanced Micro Devices' share fell to 8 percent, from 18 percent, over the same period. (AP Wire, 2005)"
| |
|
Majority Rules and Minority Rights, 2005.
This paper looks at the concept of majority rules and minority rights in the Constitution of the United States.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 23.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer examines the concept of majority rules and minority rights in the U.S. Constitution. The writer gives some present day examples of controversies regarding these issues.
From the Paper
"A basic principle of democracy is majority rule and the protection of individual and minority rights which although seemingly contradictory are the very foundation of democratic government. Majority rule is a means of organizing government and deciding public issues without taking away the basic rights and freedoms of minority groups or individuals. Majority rule is spelled out in the ... "
| |
|
?Breaking All the Rules?, 2002.
This paper discusses the book titled ?Breaking All the Rules? by Marcus Buckingham and Curt Coffman.
3,650 words (approx. 14.6 pages), 1 source, $ 133.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes several of the key points from the book ?First Break All the Rules? by Marcus Buckingham and Curt Coffman. The author provides insight as to the current and immediate future business environment in relation to this book's message and usefulness.
|
|
|
