| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "PUBLIC POLICY ADMINISTRATION": |
|
|
Public Policy Administration, 2004.
An examination of public policy in the United States today, with a focus on same-sex marriage.
3,118 words (approx. 12.5 pages), 12 sources, MLA, $ 90.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at how public policy in America reflects the values, interests, and preferences of the governing elite and how believing that public policy reflects the demands of the people expresses the myth, rather than the reality, of democracy. It looks at how the simple reality is that public policy is made from the top down; the underlying values of democracy, liberty, and equality are fundamental moral values belonging to every individual. It focuses on the issue of gay marriage and the fight to have it legalized.
Outline
Introduction
Issue Statement
Beliefs and Values
History and Overview
Key Players and Influences
Actions
Barriers
Conclusion and Recommendations
From the Paper
"The gay-marriage issue has been on the back burner for decades, but it did not become a priority for gay-rights advocates till the 1990s. Before the Vermont case, state courts in both Hawaii and Alaska issued preliminary rulings in favor of gay marriage. The court moves in both of these cases were stopped by state constitutional amendments (Jost, 2003). During this same time period, the Netherlands and Belgium became the first and second countries to recognize same-sex marriage, by parliamentary action. In June 2003, the Canadian government announced that it would acquiesce to a ruling by Ontario's highest provincial court and would begin to prepare legislation to legalize same-sex marriages for couples throughout the country."
| |
|
Public Policy, 2008.
An overview of various issues regarding public policy and administration.
1,279 words (approx. 5.1 pages), 3 sources, APA, $ 43.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This document discusses and responds to a series of four questions or statements regarding public policy and administration. These issues are group think, the budgetary stimulus in public administration, and strategic planning and oversight within the public organization. The distinction is made that public organizations are not only structured differently from private enterprise but that they are different by design rather than accident.
Outline:
Abstract
Public Policy Questions
Group Think
Group Think in the War on Terror
Incrementalism & Decision Making
Drucker and the Public Institution
From the Paper
"Group think is a dangerous rationale to rely on or to allow oneself to fall into within public policy administration. In fact it is a dangerous logical fallacy to fall prey to in any field. Shafritz and Russell mention the group think characteristics of an illusion of invulnerability and collective rationalization in their review of group think examples historically in the United States and more recently related to the Bush administration in the current Iraq War (2005, p.298). These and other characteristics commonly manifest themselves when policy officials become mired in excessive stereotyping and conformity relative to policy decisions and the information that leads up to those decisions. As the case points out, the current administration brooked little dissension in its own closely held ranks prior to and during the buildup up to the Iraq War and this has led to a virtual replay of the events that led up to the Vietnam War from a policy perspective (Shafritz & Russell, 2005, p.298). The results of this group think are just now becoming apparent as the administration and the people aligned with it are beginning to disintegrate in terms of their ability to maintain the facade of unanimity. This is the same type of coercive thinking and mindset which developed during the height of the technology bubble when so many executives within the technology industry knew that such lavish spending was unsustainable and certainly catastrophic when combined with little or no revenues but, when faced with the option of stepping in and curtailing spending, very few executives, such as those at Pets.com chose to do so. There was a collective rationalization that there would be no consequences to their actions and certainly ongoing self-censorship since many executives chose to simply keep quiet."
| |
|
The Flawed Foreign Policy of the Bush Administration, 2008.
A critical discussion of the flaws in the Bush administration's foreign policy, with particular focus on incidents surrounding 9/11.
2,100 words (approx. 8.4 pages), 3 sources, APA, $ 65.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In an analysis of the Bush administration's conduct before and after 9/11, this paper discusses the shortcomings of the administration's foreign policy. The paper argues that the most celebrated of its foreign policy shortcomings is the failure by anyone in the administration to act on various bits and pieces of intelligence regarding individuals with known associations to the al Qaeda. The paper also criticizes the administration's unwillingness to confront the factual details surrounding September 11th and the contrast between the implications of the event and the opportunistic, internationally despised responses which the administration has been unwavering in applying in such venues as Afghanistan and Iraq. To conclude, the paper offers two major policy recommendations. First, it suggests that the only clear path for reconciliation with the international community is to begin anew with fresh leadership. Second, which is conditional upon implementation of the first, it suggests beginning a process of reconciliation with former allies.
From the Paper
"It has been indicated with absolute consistency, both domestically and internationally in case after case of intelligence community documentation, that there was a widespread awareness of the growing threat of domestic terrorism. In the transition between the Clinton and Bush administration's, outgoing National Security Advisor Sandy Berger informed the incoming Condoleeza Rice to anticipate that Osama bin-Laden would be her number one priority. This was a message that was consistent with President Clinton's exponentially increasing financial and diplomatic focus on the terrorist threat of bin Laden that even resulted in a nearly successful attempt on the Saudi mastermind's life."
| |
|
Public Transportation Policy, 2003.
A discussion of public transportation as a policy issue.
3,220 words (approx. 12.9 pages), 9 sources, APA, $ 111.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses aspects of public policy administration and then applies them to a case study regarding public transportation. The paper presents a summary of the case, which involves the Metro Market Development. The paper also discusses the goal of public policy processes in general and examines the intersection between public and private responsibilities.
| |
|
American Vietnam Policy During the Eisenhower Administration, 2002.
Examines the change in the U.S.'s policy on Vietnam between the years 1953 and 1961.
8,304 words (approx. 33.2 pages), 28 sources, MLA, $ 177.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper traces the evolution of the United States' policy toward Vietnam during the administration of President Dwight Eisenhower (January 1953-January 1961) and discusses the factors which shaped that policy and contributed to its ultimate failure. The focus of this paper is on the mind-set and operating assumptions of President Eisenhower and other key members of his national security team and their manifestation in Vietnam policy. The paper includes an annotated bibliography.
From the Paper
"After Japan occupied military bases and ports in southern Indochina in June 1941, the oil resources of the Dutch East Indies lay exposed. The United States then restricted the export of high octane gasoline to Japan which Fall said "hardened the Japanese Navy's insistence upon an attack on Southeast Asia before its petrol supplies were completely exhausted." According to the historians of the Pentagon Papers, "ambivalence characterized U.S. policy [toward Indochina] during World War II." President Franklin Roosevelt opposed the return of French colonial control over Indochina. On January 24, 1944, FDR said: "France has had that country . . . for nearly one hundred years, and the people are worse off than they were at the beginning." However, Winston Churchill and Charles De Gaulle vigorously opposed FDR's plans to place Indochina under international trusteeship so Indochina's postwar status was left unresolved. In late August 1945, President Harry Truman assured De Gaulle that the United States recognized French sovereignty over Indochina. Truman never replied to letters sent to him by Ho Chi Minh, leader of the communist Vietminh and the Democratic Republic of Vietnam which Ho announced on September 2, 1945."
| |
|
Public Policy, 2003.
Discusses definitions and philosophy of public policy.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 6 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Discusses the application of formal methods and programs, how public policies are shaped and implemented, the function of public administrators, decision making in the public sector, and the problem solving process.
From the Paper
"Governments provide goods and services, and can produce goods and services, as well. Such goods and services are generally in support of broader public policies which are put in place by the federal ..."
| |
|
The Clinton Administration's Foreign Policy, 2002.
This paper argues that the foriegn policy of the Clinton administration has sacrificed American national interests for the sake of domestic interests.
2,400 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 13 sources, $ 89.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay argues that the Clinton administration has mishandled its management of foreign policy. It has sacrificed American national interest and power for the sake of domestic political interests. The administration has failed to articulate a coherent American interest. This failure has led to a weak foreign policy.
| |
|
The Shift from ?Old Public Administration? to ?New Public Management', 2002.
This in-depth paper seeks to clarify, thoroughly explain and critically debate the idea as to whether there is a shift from old styles of Public Administration to new styles under the name New Public Management (NPM).
10,115 words (approx. 40.5 pages), 21 sources, MLA, $ 204.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The main tenets of NPM are explored and their application to the U.S., New Zealand, and the U.K. is documented. The application of the NPM to developing countries of Africa, Latin America, South East Asia and the Anglophone Caribbean is also evaluated for their strengths and weaknesses.
From the Paper
"Like the Traditional bureaucracy, the New Public Management approach is yet another ?problem-solving tool? in the schema of public administration, that has emerged with a style of ordering the delivery of public goods and services, however, with a different method in mind. In discussing the so-called ?shift? from Old or Traditional forms of Public Administration, or as some such as Christopher Hood term it, Progressive Public Administration, quite a number of circumstances, situations, contexts as well as a variety of explanations should be proffered and assessed. One needs to critically examine the concept of a shift to New Public Management. The term ?shift?, if one is not careful, could indicate a sharp distinction in the change from Old to New styles of Public Management, or a leap from one paradigm to the other excluding essential features of the old, by replacing such features of the old with the new. This is certainly not the case. It should be noted tentatively, that New Public Management, as Hood, Patrick Dunleavy and others will later confirm, not only exists alongside other aspects of the traditional Model, but also that other features of other ?Intermediate Models? such as those of the Management, Comparative Development and the influences of earlier Market Models, still persist alongside NPM."
| |
|
"Public Administration & Public Affairs "( Nicholas Henry ), 1996.
Critical review of work on public management methodologies & techniques & policy formulation & implementation.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 1 source, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
" The purpose of this research is to review the book by Nicholas Henry, entitled Public Administration and Public Affairs (1995). This review will analyze the central themes of the work and address its strengths and weaknesses.
Henry begins by explaining the role of public bureaucracy and public administration in democratic society. He notes that bureaucracy and democracy are in fact antithetical. Bureaucracy tends to be hierarchical in nature and elitist. Democracy, on the other hand, tends to be egalitarian in nature. But in order for a democratic society to function properly, the bureaucracy and democracy must be reconciled (p. 1). Bureaucracy represents the technological elite, the body of persons skilled in how to get things done. The democratic mass is charged with determining the direction of public policy, but it is the skilled.."
| |
|
Public Administration: Public and Private Management, 1993.
Discusses the various arguments and approaches toward reorganization of government services through privatization and other approaches.
2,025 words (approx. 8.1 pages), 6 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"INTRODUCTION
The debate over the need to reorganize government and how best to accomplish that has been raging in academic and public administration circles for some time, but the debate has become a national and very public issue first because of the considerable dissatisfaction expressed in recent years on the part of much of the public with their public institutions and leaders and second because of the present effort by the Clinton Administration to do something about it. With the announcement early in September of Vice-President Gore's analysis of the issue and his recommendations for change, the debate is likely to become more heated in the months to come. One complaint has been that government is inefficient, especially when compared with the ..."
| |
|
Public Administration: Four Major Administrative Traditions, 2004.
This paper reviews four fundamentally different intellectual traditions and offers input as to where the ?public administration? of the U.S. is in 2003.
1,425 words (approx. 5.7 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper introduces the issue of public administration and then discusses four major theories of public administration: the Hamiltonian Tradition, the Jeffersonian Tradition, the Madisonian Tradition, and Wilsonian Tradition. The paper then compares these traditions and provides an analysis of the traditions and today?s U.S. executive administration.
From the Paper
"Alexander Hamilton?s insistence on a strong executive branch was not based solely on his desire to push his own philosophy of public administration on the young nation. He had seen the failure of the Articles of Confederation in its attempt to solidify the country; states quarreled about everything before ratifying the Articles, and some even went out on a limb and had their own foreign policy. States couldn?t agree on paying for a national army, nor on taxation and spending. Hamilton?s balancing act was, how does the country create an executive ?powerful enough to make the government strong? (Kettl, page 30) and yet how does the country prevent a concentration of too much authority and power in the White House? Hamilton had plenty of experience in executive decision-making, as he was the very first treasury secretary in the nation; and it was his authorship of documents on public credit, national banking, and manufacturing that later formed the basis of the executive branch of national government."
| |
|
Information Technology and E-Government in Public Administration, 2008.
A literature review to study information technology (IT) and e-government in public administration.
4,045 words (approx. 16.2 pages), 7 sources, APA, $ 109.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that the implementation and deployment of information technology (IT) solutions in public administration have tended to strengthen the hierarchical bureaucracies already in place instead of transforming these processes. The author then identifies propositions and barriers to effective e-governance. The paper concludes that e-governance has a long way to go in actually delivering public service administration via the Internet. A better understanding of the potential of public administration via the Internet is critical for public administration employees and officials if the benefits of e-governance are to be realized in a manner that truly benefits the public. Several tables and figures are included with the paper.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
Theoretical Ideal of Information Technology Examined
Key Issues in E-Government and Public Administration
E-Government Initiatives and Local Government
Summary and Conclusion
From the Paper
"The second reform proposition claiming that IT has the power to change the structure of an organization and was therefore a tool for reform is "grounded in the belief that information technology can directly impact the data structure of public administration enforcing or relaxing traditional hierarchical forms." The main-frame computer was viewed from the perspective of being a consolidator of data and expertise which resulted in a reinforcing of hierarchical organizational structures and this is upheld in research findings."
| |
|
Power, Institutions, and the Role of Public Administration, 2008.
A review of the role of public administration in society, as an instrument of the state, in assisting citizens.
2,614 words (approx. 10.5 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 78.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper states that public administration is crucial to the achievement of developmental aims and that it is substantially inextricable from its wider governance and societal structures and social milieus. The paper relates that an important unit of analysis is the nature of institutions and the "inherently" perceived phenomenon of power dynamics. The concept of power is important in understanding the intra- and inter-organizational political dynamics and reality of public institutions. The paper further states that it is crucial to understand the nature and role of public administration in society in light of globalization and changing role of the state. Lastly, the paper looks at the evolving role of public administration as an instrument of the state in "serving" citizens.
Outline:
Power and Institutions
Intergovernmental Relations: Bargaining and Negotiating
Public Administration in Democratic Governance
UNDP Governance Characteristics
Role of Government
Development Goals (MDGs)
From the Paper
"Thus, there is an imminent need to provide for a more balanced and holistic perspective of power in institutions so as to mitigate its predatory consequences and ensure positive implications on current normative trend espousing respect for human rights and rights of minority. The benign conceptualization of power dynamics in political institution, in a way, has a terrible effect on policies and public administration as it would seem espousing for institutionalized discrimination and oppression while benefiting others (usually those holding power or associated with them)."
| |
|
Public Administration, 2002.
A research paper on the makeup of the public administration system in America.
1,987 words (approx. 7.9 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay deals with prominent figures in public administration and considers the effect of their writings and theories on the field of public administration. The paper provides an analysis of the core areas of public administration and how these areas interrelate with one another; taking into account the theories and writings of major players in the field of public administration and how their views shaped these areas.
From the Paper
"The principles of public administration are the clearest description of its usefulness to society and government. This administrative science is barely 100-125 years old in the U.S. and a little over 200 years old in France. Tracing its roots back to Napoleon, public administration evolved largely as a result of the increasing complexity of society, economy and technology. The French system of Public Administration is still considered by many to be the world?s best. Compared to Germany and Britain, the U.S. was relatively slower to utilize public administration in widespread government."
| |
|
Public Administration, 2005.
This paper discusses public administration, making use of chapters of the book "Managing the Public Sector, Seventh Edition" by Grover Starling.
4,050 words (approx. 16.2 pages), 1 source, $ 160.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer offers summaries of chapters in the book "Managing the Public Sector, Seventh Edition" by Grover Starling. The writer notes the need to define the field and to differentiate public administration from other forms of administration or management. The writer points out that the author does this first by introducing two public administrators and considering their jobs and clarifying just what they do.
From the Paper
"Starling first addresses the need to define the field and to differentiate public administration from other forms of administration or management, and the author does this first by introducing two public administrators and considering their jobs and just what they do. Both handle public agencies which serve the needs of the populace in a governmental structure. Such agencies are organizations, like any other, but organizations, which are directed at certain specific and public tasks. Such organizations do not seek to make a profit but instead seek to spend public monies effectively and efficiently. The public administrator oversees a number of employees and must apply effective management practices just as would a manager in a private firm, though the rules may be different and the service is different from what would be provided by a private company."
|
|
|
