| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "PROPHET AMOS JESUS CHRIST": |
|
|
Prophet Amos and Jesus Christ, 2003.
This paper shows how Prophet Amos and Jesus Christ are considered kindred spirits.
1,320 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 0 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Both Prophet Amos and Jesus Christ represent a radical demarcation from the Jewish traditional prophecy. This paper discusses how both the prophets criticized the prevailing religious practices and the social order. Jesus and Amos did not belong to a high rank, by profession a carpenter and a sheep herdsman, and never prophesied for money. It explains how, in these two figures, we see a radical stand against rigidity in religion and against traditional beliefs and practices.
From the Paper
"Prophets Amos was one of the first Israelite prophets whose words were recorded on a scroll. Amos is also one of the unorthodox figures in the Jewish history and the lineup of the prophets. Amos was a blue collar prophet and unlike many other prophets did not belong to the aristocratic; he earned his living as a "herdsman and dresser of sycamore figs." [Amos 7:14]. In his scriptures he explicitly tells us that he was neither a prophet nor the son of a prophet, that is, in the professional sense of that term. In Israel many prophets use to prophesize for money and being a prophet was also a profession. Amos was born and grew up in small town Tekoa which was about twelve miles southeast of Jerusalem and five miles south of Bethlehem. We can thus imagine that to the cultured elite of his day Amos was an outcast" who probably spoke with an accent. Amos had no intension of becoming a prophet but he was called by God to do so and this was a difficult job for a herdsman of a small town. Being from the southern kingdom of Judah, Amos had the unenviable task of speaking God's prophetic word to the northern kingdom of Israel. Amos was an unwelcome outsider and therefore was forced out of town, "Get out, you seer! Go back to the land of Judah. Earn your bread there and do your prophesying there.? (Amos 7:13?15)."
| |
|
Prophet Mohammad and Jesus Christ, 2004.
The differences and similarities between the two great leaders.
2,172 words (approx. 8.7 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 67.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the lives of Prophet Muhammad and Jesus Christ and focuses on their teachings. The paper also compares the personalities and teachings of the two religious leaders and discusses important aspects of these in the light of important research sources.
From the Paper
"Islam and Christianity are two of the most popular and readily growing religions of the world with the former gaining wider acceptance in some parts of the globe in recent years. Despite the differences in the religious tenets, historians and religious experts maintain there are several similarities between the teachings of Jesus Christ and Prophet Muhammad. However our inability to see those similarities has led to the development of a very hostile relationship between the two religions where followers of each seek to criticize the other for their lack of knowledge and their alleged misinterpretation of divine scriptures. While Muslims have a more tolerant view of Jesus Christ, considering him a prophet of God and showing deep respect for the person himself, Christians have more or less failed to show similar reverence to Prophet Muhammad, often misunderstanding his teachings and calling him prophet of war."
| |
|
"The Trial of Jesus Christ"--An Article Review, 2007.
A discussion of Russell Aiuto's article "The Trial of Jesus Christ."
1,017 words (approx. 4.1 pages), 1 source, APA, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews Russell Aiuto's article, "The Trial of Jesus Christ", about the trial, conviction and execution of Jesus. The reviewer points out that Aiuto's intention was to present his information in the historic context of ancient Judea, ultimately determining who was guilty in causing the death of Jesus. The paper is written from a religious Christian perspective and gives an in-depth examination of the role of the Jews and the Romans in Jesus' death.
From the Paper
"For many people, especially those evangelical Christians who know little about the historical and political conditions in ancient Judea, it seems clear that the Jews killed Jesus. While it is certainly true that some Jews played an important role in bringing about the trial and execution of Jesus, it is a gross oversimplification to suggest that there was a vast Jewish conspiracy to kill Jesus. On the contrary, there were three main groups of Jews competing for power during Jesus' time: the Sanhedrin, the Pharisees, and the Sadducees. Aiuto describes these three groups of Jews as "interchangeable," which is not entirely historically accurate. (Aiuto). In fact, at times these groups competed viciously with one another for control of Jewish civil and religious law. However, they did share a religious and social background that separated them from the Roman population that occupied ancient Judea. Furthermore, all three groups believed that the Old Testament prophecies regarding the Messiah would be fulfilled. (Aiuto). In fact, Jesus was not the first person to be proclaimed the Messiah. Understanding that there was a tremendous amount of strife and competition in the Jewish community is important, because it makes it clear that while some Jews were responsible for the death of Jesus, it can hardly be suggested that all Jews were responsible for Jesus' death. Instead, Jewish involvement in Jesus' death seems explainable by one of the truisms of murder investigation: murders are generally committed by same-sex members of the victims' racial group. Because Jesus was a Jewish male, it should come as no surprise that some Jewish males played a central role in his trial and execution. However, that statement should not be viewed as either anti-Semitic or as an excuse for anti-Semitism. While some Jews played a central role in Jesus' death, his apostles were also widely Jewish, Jesus self-identified as a Jew and had no interest in preaching to Gentiles, and the founders of the Church were Jews who initially preached to a strictly Jewish audience."
| |
|
The Resurrection of Jesus Christ, 2004.
A debate on whether the resurrection of Jesus Christ can be considered fact or fiction.
1,406 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 46.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how, by utilizing the best-established facts surrounding this topic, the question as to what really happened after Jesus Christ was crucified at Golgotha can be addressed with some certainty, while allowing room for much speculation. It looks at how a majority of contemporary Christian scholars, who study the Holy Bible and, especially, the New Testament, genuinely believe that the disciples saw the risen Jesus after his crucifixion, whereas the lack of hard data to support this belief leads others to believe that the story is, in fact, a myth.
From the Paper
"In support of the information that Paul, Peter and James supplied about the resurrection of Jesus Christ, it is clear that the disciples experienced some kind of visual manifestation, for "it is almost impossible to dispute that at the historical roots of Christianity lie some visionary experiences. . . understood as appearances of Jesus, raised by God from the dead" (West, 235). But is it truly as clear as West maintains? Could the apostles have possibly fabricated all the material with the intention that it serve as the basis for their new religion, being Christianity? Logically, any new religion must have converts and the information provided to these converts must be strong and infallible, for without a solid foundation to lie upon, the entire structure will collapse."
| |
|
Belief in Jesus Christ, 2006.
Argues that the only way to heaven is through a belief in Jesus Christ.
1,387 words (approx. 5.5 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 46.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper, written from a pro-Christian perspective, argues that the only way to gain salvation and a way into heaven is an unquestionable belief in Jesus Christ. The paper uses sources from the scriptures to prove its points. It also looks at how non-Christian believers fit into this argument.
From the Paper
"That key is a belief in, and trust of, Jesus Christ. Of course, there are religions other than the Christian one, and they have a right to their beliefs and customs. But, for a dedicated Christian who believes in the words of the Scriptures and follows and obeys the Ten Commandments, and understands that there is God, his Son and the Holy Spirit, it is this firm belief that man will find salvation through Jesus that keeps him hopeful and confident about his final place in the universe. The belief that Jesus existed and is what he said he was- and what his disciples said he was, makes some historical examinations difficult to rationalize for the true believers."
| |
|
Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, 2008.
An analysis of the ideological approach of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.
2,961 words (approx. 11.8 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 87.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper uses ideological criticism to attempt to discover the true ideology behind the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (FLDS). In order to fully understand the ideology of this religious sect, it dissects it through Neo-Aristotelian and cluster criticism methods which allow the paper to separate specific elements of the speeches and display the full effect that rhetoric has in the FLDS belief system.
Outline
Nature of the Ideology
Research Question
Method
Ideological Criticism
Neo-Aristotelian Criticism
Cluster Criticism
Ideology of the FLDS
Three Artifacts: A Look Behind the Real Ideology
Contribution to Rhetorical Theory
From the Paper
"Through this close analysis of speeches made by Warren Jeffs it is obvious that the FLDS seem to have, in their minds at least, a hegemonic ideology. They believe that they are the chosen ones on earth and that anyone who disagrees with what the Prophet says is deemed unworthy, ultimately placing themselves above every other non-FLDS member person in the world. They abide closely to the Prophet's word and are brought up from a young age embedded with the belief that the Prophet really is a human representation of God on earth. Jeffs uses an intense level of ethos in the beginning of each of his lectures and sermons. By cutting the FLDS members off from the radio, most television stations, and other outside influences, the Prophet is able to mold the minds of these young members from an early age."
| |
|
Jesus Christ and the Gentiles, 2002.
A look at the validity of Jesus Christ through the eyes of a Gentile through the analysis of biblical writings.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 3 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper will seek to understand how a Gentile might have perceived Jesus or Peter in the early days of Christianity. By understanding the writings of the Bible, and more especially of those in Mark, and Paul, we can see how a Gentile might be extremely confused by these points of view. Not only did Christ think he was the Son of God, the Gentiles believed that God was an idolatry, and that Jesus might, indeed, have been this sort of 'royal' character. In any case, Paul and Mark proved to them to believe in his testimonial, and confusion and disagreement might have been put aside in the example Jesus set for them.
| |
|
Parallel's between Samson and Jesus Christ, 2002.
The paper analyzes the comparisons and differences between Old Testament strongman Samson and Jesus Christ of the New Testament.
1,875 words (approx. 7.5 pages), 3 sources, APA, $ 59.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses seven similar aspects of, and events in the lives of Samson and Jesus based on the Biblical texts that tell their stories. The paper mentions similarities such as-- their births were both announced to their mothers by Angels, both were betrayed, Samson by his wife Delilah and Jesus by the Apostles and both died with arms outstretched. It also points out the differences between the two men, such as: Samson had a weakness whereas Jesus had none, Samson was a mere mortal while Jesus was both man and God at the same time.
From the Paper
"Samson was thrice strongly entreated by Delilah to reveal the secret of his awesome strength, but he yielded to her wiles the fourth time. Jesus Christ, on the other hand, was also tempted three times and powerfully by the devil himself in different manners, but did not yield, because He had no weakness. Samson acknowledged that his fall brought much dishonor to God and scandal to Israel. But Christ's death and resurrection fulfilled God's plan for mankind, brought infinite honor to God His Father and salvation to those who would choose to be redeemed in Jesus Christ. Samson also acknowledged the pride, vanity and pettiness with which he used the privilege God gave him."
| |
|
The Theology of the Parables of Jesus Christ, 2002.
Discusses these parables which reflect the ministry of Jesus Christ.
2,900 words (approx. 11.6 pages), 5 sources, $ 106.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper will examine the tradition of the parables. It will be argued that - although minor textual differences exist between parables in different gospels - all nonetheless reflect the singular theology and ministry of Jesus. The interpretation of the purpose of the parables as differentiating between an "in" and an "outsider" group will be shown to be based on a misreading of a Gospel passage. Finally, it will be demonstrated that the significance of the parables for modern Christians lies in their power to translate complex theological issues into everyday terminology and, in the process, allow us to establish an intimate awareness of the presence of Jesus in our lives.
| |
|
The Incarnation of Jesus Christ, 2002.
Looks at references in the New Testament that support the Christian notion that Christ was both a human and a God.
2,416 words (approx. 9.7 pages), 1 source, APA, $ 73.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper attempts to explain the Christian belief that Christ was both God and man. It cites specific passages in the New Testament that support this doctrine. The paper presents theological arguments that support various basic tenets of Christianity, such as the belief that Jesus is both God and the son of God.
From the Paper
"Faith is founded on mysteries. Christians simply accept the facts of the Virgin Birth, the Immaculate Conception, Original Sin, and that most central of all the tenets of the religion: the Incarnation of Jesus Christ as both God and Man. That Jesus is at one and the same time, both Divine and human lies at the very core of Christianity. It is a doctrine that many have found difficult to accept. Since the earliest days of their own religion Muslims, for example, have been want to ask the question of how one being can composed of multiples substances and comprise multiple natures."
| |
|
Jesus Christ as the King in the Book of Matthew, 2006.
A paper exploring the Book of Matthew's use of the symbol of king to authenticate Jesus as the Messiah.
4,680 words (approx. 18.7 pages), 7 sources, APA, $ 120.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how, throughout the Gospel, Matthew uses the symbol of king, in its various manifestations, to authenticate Jesus as the Messiah, to link with the Old Testament and the Torah, and to describe Jesus' role as the bringer of the law and the model and teacher of righteousness.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Genealogy
Infancy Narrative
Herod Comparison
Comparisons with Old Testament Figures
Law and Torah
Pharisees
John the Baptist
Unmerciful Servant Parable
King and Teacher
Passion Narrative
Conclusion
From the Paper
"The Gospel of Matthew endeavors to show that Jesus of Nazareth was the promised Messiah, he "of whom Moses in the law and the prophets did write," the King, and that in him the ancient prophecies had their fulfillment. In writing his Gospel, Matthew set out to illustrate that Jesus, in his life and in his death, fulfilled the prophecies and effectively made Judaism complete. This Gospel sets forth a view of Jesus as Christ and portrays him as an heir to King David's throne. The Gospel of Matthew describes all social relationships under the core symbol of the kingdom of God. The dominant subject is Jesus, and Matthew explicitly claims the law and the prophets of the Hebrew Bible as the source."
| |
|
Jesus Christ and The Zealot Movement, 2006.
A study of the motivations and affiliation of Jesus to determine whether he was seeking a political kingship and if he was aligned with the Zealot movement.
3,300 words (approx. 13.2 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 94.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper makes a strong case that Jesus was supportive of and aligned with the Zealot movement, if not in deed, then certainly in principle. The author presents evidence that Jesus was seeking the throne and would therefore have enlisted the aid of the militant Zealots.
From the Paper
"The manner in which Jesus was said to have entered Jerusalem, was that of a Jewish king with a claim to the throne. His conviction that he was the King of the Jews, was in deliberate fulfillment of Zechariah's prophecy, that the Messiah would ride into Jerusalem on an ass's colt. As Jesus himself was described making his entrance into Jerusalem , the people were said to have greeted him with palms and cries of "Hosanna," which was the ancient cry of Jewish independence. From this very beginning, it has been claimed that Jesus had to have been well aware of the seditious actions implied, as well as the political impact that would be caused. This supposition was in direct contrast with the Gospels, which attempted in contradiction of Jesus' actions, to claim that he was not seeking an earthly kingdom."
| |
|
The Righteous Teacher and Jesus Christ, 1994.
A comparison of the proclamations of the figure in the Scroll of Habakkuk and Jesus of Nazareth as represented in the Sermon on the Mount.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 5 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"This paper will offer a comparison and contrasting of the "Righteous Teacher," as suggested in the translation of the restored Scroll of Habakkuk recovered from the first cave at Qumran in 1948, and the figure of Jesus of Nazareth, the Christ of the New Testament, as presented in the Gospel of Matthew; specifically, the "Sermon on the Mount" in Chapters 5, 6, and 7, which was His first discourse, on the Righteousness of the Kingdom.
The Midrash Pesher of Habakkuk, as Brownlee titles it, is perhaps a mixed metaphor in terms of biblical commentary. In the strictest sense, midrash is seen as scholarly, rabbinical commentary on and interpretation of the books of the Hebrew Scriptures, and Jewish religious observance and practice in the light thereof. The Midrashic tradition traces its origin to the..."
| |
|
Jesus and Amos, 2002.
A discussion of the outsider status in biblical heroic accounts of suffering.
770 words (approx. 3.1 pages), 0 sources, $ 27.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how the prophet Amos, the ?tested? man Job and Jesus of the Gospel of Luke are all positioned as ?outsiders? to their respective societies. It looks how, due the fact that they accept the outsider status conferred upon them by God, they are granted the unique ability to give the worlds from which their origins are derived an effective theological and societal critique. It shows how, by accepting their outsider status in relation to society, these individuals attain a heroic quality, because of their unique insights and stoicism.
From the Paper
"What is also so interesting about all of these individuals is that they are not initially ?outsiders? in the sense that their personal origins do spring from within the communities to which they speak. Amos is identified as a local shepherd and a herdsman (1:1 & 7:14). Job begins his saga as one of the most beloved members of his community because of his wealth and prosperity. Even Jesus, though the son of a carpenter, establishes a following and is given an initially elevated status because of his miraculous birth in the Gospel of Luke and subsequent baptism by John the Baptist. (In the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus? origins are explicitly traced to King David?s line.) However, all of these individuals become outsiders because they become prophets, because God tests them, or because they attain a unique status in relation to God. Rather than rejecting this status, they accept it, as Jesus says in Luke while suffering on the cross that God?s will ?be done.? "
| |
|
Jesus as Prophet, 2002.
How Jesus is viewed as a prophet in both Christianity and Islam.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 4 sources, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the role of Jesus Christ as a prophet in both the Christian and Moslem religions. Examined are Christ's role as a lawgiver, his prophecies, his relationship with God, and his historical role as the greatest prophet in a long line of Hebrew prophets.
|
|
|
