| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "PROCESS TEAM BUILDING": |
|
|
The Process of Team Building, 2002.
This paper discusses the important elements of team building.
2,400 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 6 sources, $ 89.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
It focuses on the necessity of task accomplishment, problem-solving, decision-making, role clarification and goal setting. The paper stresses that building and maintaining effective interpersonal relations is a necessity in the process of team building.
| |
|
Team-Creation and Team-Building, 2004.
This paper is an extensive discussion of the use of teams for organizational operation and management in both the public and the private sectors.
35,210 words (approx. 140.8 pages), 102 sources, APA, $ 249.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses that teams go through various stages of development and changes based on the environment and the task to be undertaken. The paper points out that teams have problems of their own, problems that can ruin or seriously hurt the organization. The paper stresses that methods of decision making, trust and mutual respect, and the level of team member accountability can help improve the morale and performance of the team.
Table of Contents
Introduction
History of Organized Labor and Teams
Building an Effective Team
Team Member Selection and Requirements
Team Development Stages
Characteristics of an Effective Team
Decision Making in Teams
External Factors in Team Dynamics
Performance and Rewards for Team Members
Organizational Environment
Organizational Structures
Organizational Systems
Organizational Knowledge
Organizational Values and Culture
Types of Teams
Classification Based on the Environment for which the Team is Setup
Functional Teams
Hierarchy Teams
Organic Team
Management Teams
Classification Based on the Operational Tasks for which the Team is Setup
Work Teams
Project Teams
Focus Teams
New Product/Service Design Team
Classification of Teams based on the Control and Power Team Members Possess
Self-Managed/Empowered Teams
Controlled Work Teams
Classification Of Team Based On The Objectives For The Organization
Tactical Teams
Problem-Solving Teams
Creative Teams
Learning Teams
Classification of Teams based on Organization Representations
Teams from within the Industry (National/Global)
Teams from within the Organization
Global Diversified Teams
Virtual Teams
Classification of Teams based on the Studies by Researchers in the Field
Communication Needs in Teams
Types of Communication
Mediums Used in Team Communications
Frequency, Volume and Value of Communication
Communication Goals
Managing Conflicts and Team Dynamics
Dissonance and Conflicts
Teams and Conflicts
The Work Environment and Conflicts
Culture and Conflicts in Teams
Need for Controlled Conflict in Teams
Types of Conflict
Conflict Management in Teams
Team Leadership
Leadership based on the Team Classification
Leadership and Trust
Leadership Styles and Team Members Cognitive Abilities
Team Leadership Styles Displayed
Leadership in Global Team Settings
Motivating of Team Members
Social and Biological Impact on Motivation
Motivational Theories
Motivation and Learning Theory
Training of Team Members
Trust in Teams
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Blind trust can be very damaging for team members. This is especially important if the teams are not in close proximity or do not correspond and interact frequently. Teams and team members need to set up boundaries and limits to enable trust building between members of the team. When trust is broken, effective measures have to be undertaken to identify the reason for breaching the trust and the suitable ?punishment? or reprimand that might be needed based on the situation."
| |
|
Team Building and Conflict Management, 2008.
This paper proposes a non-traditional team building method.
823 words (approx. 3.3 pages), 2 sources, APA, $ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper explores an innovative way of building a team through personality, as opposed to the traditional way of skill sets and titles. The paper also explores how this creative team building style results in efficiency in employees and how it truly reduces opportunities for conflict. The paper concludes that companies can tailor specific aspects and characteristics the company wants its employees to posses by staying away from traditional models that may be quick and easy, yet produce mediocre results.
Outline:
Introduction
Traditional Team Building versus Non Tradition Team Building
Team Building Exercises
Team Assimilation
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Many companies lack the time, the resources or simply the desire to build their teams any other way than the traditional models that a multitude of businesses practiced before them. Teams are comprised of individuals with impressive resumes or internal clout due to the amount of time the individual has worked for the company. While this has worked for some companies the traditional model of team building pays no mind to the particular dynamics of a team or any potential conflict that can arise within the team. The success is left to mere luck and today that is quite simply an unacceptable way of doing business."
| |
|
Project-Based Team Building, 2007.
An analysis of effective management of project-based team building for the success of an organization.
2,163 words (approx. 8.7 pages), 5 sources, APA, $ 67.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the importance of team building and specific team roles within an organization. The paper describes ways that effective team building can occur and discusses how, when selecting a team, organizations should consider the individual member's skills and abilities, experiences and history, but also the diversity of the team and the ability of team members to work effectively with one another. The paper concludes by suggesting that performance evaluation is also necessary to assess the efficacy of team measures and processes.
Table of Contents:
Literature Review Team Building
Team Roles and Strengths
How To Choose a Project Team
How to Change the Current Functional Management Structure to Carryout Project
Conclusions/Discussion
From the Paper
"Much of the research examined suggests that while participative management and leadership is essential to good team functioning, it is not necessary for achieving a teams goals and ensuring team efficiency (Biech, 2001). In the current functional management structure the organisation is still dominated by hierarchical lines of authority. While a team based approach may encourage more participative management, hence empowering teams, it is not the ideal structure for facilitating maximum success in projects within the organisation."
| |
|
Team building, 2008.
This paper discusses the benefits of team building as well as how to select team players, team expectations and dealing with team problems.
1,050 words (approx. 4.2 pages), 10 sources, APA, $ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Have you ever had a problem that you could not solve? Maybe if you presented the problem to a team this would help. This paper examines the advantages of building a team, team members responsibilities, and the expectation of the team. It shows how important it is to ensure that the team for any specific task is comprised of members who are knowledgeable and possess the required skills needed to carry out the task.
I - Team Building
II - Is a Team Needed?
III - The Benefits of Organization
IV - Selecting Team Players
V - Team Expectations
VI - Problems with Teams
From the Paper
"Striving to meet organizational goals enables a team to reach their goals. Performance of a team in any organization is largely dependent on its members, their visions and goals, their individual performance, their willingness to work with each other and their desire to make the project a success. This is sometimes referred to as a group process and can be defined in teams to three maintenance behaviors - open communication, supportiveness, and conflict (Bottom & Baloff, 1994)."
| |
|
Team Building and Conflict Resolution, 2007.
This paper addresses the issues of teamwork, team-building, conflict resolution and strong leadership.
3,575 words (approx. 14.3 pages), 20 sources, MLA, $ 99.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses the importance of teamwork and team-building and provides the history of team development. The paper explains that if any conflict exists among employees, this will become a barrier in reaching the company's desired strategies. The paper examines conflict resolution that can be addressed through team efforts that lead to increased communication, consensus decisions and positive results. The paper discusses the role of a leader in managing conflict in a positive way and in building strong, successful teams.
Outline:
Introduction
History of Team Development
Conflict Resolution
Building Effective Teams
Types of Internal Conflicts
Leadership and Communication
Conclusion
From the Paper
"The interactions of small groups have been of interest to social psychologists for sometime. However, it has only been in recent years that they began to look at teams and how they function within the organizational setting. The term "sociometry" first appeared in the Psychological Abstracts index in 1940 with references to the work of individuals such as psychiatrist Jacob Levi Moreno, and the term "group dynamics" was listed in 1945 with reference to the work of Kurt Lewin and his colleagues. The first use of "small groups" and "group interaction" was in 1950 in conjunction of researchers such as Robert Bale."
| |
|
Motivation, Leadership and Team Building: Keys to Success, 2006.
This paper shows how motivation, leadership and team building skills are keys to the success of an organization's management.
1,450 words (approx. 5.8 pages), 13 sources, MLA, $ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The writer explains the importance of having these three basic skills in today's business world of fierce competition. Motivation encourages the pursuit of goals, strong leadership opens the channels of communication for the employees and creates the strong team, whilst team building forms the atmosphere of trust and integrity that is crucial to productive work. It concludes that a leader with the right qualities is vital for the success of the business.
From the Paper
"Competition is brutal and the market continues to shrink due to communication technologies. It is important in leadership to embrace change and stick to a vision. By having Emotional Intelligence one can "recogise the physical and mental signs of our feelings/emotions before we can act on them meaningfully and constructively" (Eby Ruin par. 20). It is by recognizing these attributes that one can build an effective team structure. A leader acts as a coach to not only reinforce the game plan with directions but also encourage creativity, new ideas and acquiring new skills. A leader should implement new and fun ways to learn on the job while offering rewards for excellence. Today's organization is not about just a pay check but a rewarding career. A leader can define the environment for striving toward an experience that matters."
| |
|
Team Building, 2004.
An overview of the importance of team building within an organizational structure.
1,716 words (approx. 6.9 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at how many organizations increasingly use teams to oversee various undertakings and projects within the organization. A team is defined as a group of people who have complementary skills, a higher commitment to common goals, and a higher degree of interdependency and interaction. It explores how a team setup can help motivate and improve the productivity of the employees within the organization. It also examines how teams need good structure and guidelines, however, if the team has to work effectively, and how it is important to ensure that every team works jointly towards maximum profit for the product.
Outline
Effective Decision-Making Strategies to Use When Working With Groups
Guidelines for Consensus Building
How Do Leaders Build Teams?
From the Paper
"Most teams generally utilize five levels of decision-making: command, consult, majority, consensus and unanimity. It is easy to understand that these decision types are very closely related to the time factors teams may have in arriving at a decision. When the command type of decision-making process is used, the team leader identifies the tasks at hand and designates responsibilities to all the team members. This type of decision-making can be accomplished in the shortest possible time?it however has a major drawback. It will be difficult for the team leader to get buy in for the task from the team members of the team members do not agree with the decision made. Unanimity, on the other hand, ensures that all members like and accept the decision?they have to ?buy-in? to the decision."
| |
|
Team Building, 1994.
This paper discusses team building, the organizational method for joining individuals to accomplish common goal: Types, benefits, theory, effectiveness, autonomy, stages and acceleration of development.
3,375 words (approx. 13.5 pages), 5 sources, $ 119.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Team building is the process of bringing together individuals into a group for the purpose of accomplishing a common goal, or goals. The concept removes the traditional adversarial and hierarchical relationship that exists between management and labor, and places the responsibility and authority for productivity at the team level.
Implementing a team environment can lead to increases in productivity, but managers need to be aware that team development typically passes through four stages. Not all teams reach the most productive last two stages of this development, and care must be taken to ensure that all appropriate steps are taken to assist team building.
Teams can be temporary or permanent, and individuals may ... "
|
| Term Paper # 64131 |
temporarily unavailable
|
|
|
|
Team Building, 2008.
This paper looks at the approach of a work team strategy and discusses this process within an organization.
931 words (approx. 3.7 pages), 8 sources, APA, $ 33.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article the writer discusses that a team building strategy follows the logic model by accounting for inputs, changes, and outputs in the form of improved communications, improved performance, and increased productivity. The writer notes that this serves to assure the accomplishment and maintenance of elements of the organizational mission. The writer maintains that the use of a work team fundamentally changes the way work is organized and gives employees more control over their jobs. Adopting the work team approach is not a simple matter and involves tearing down bureaucratic barriers between departments and eliminating tiers of managers. The writer concludes that such radical changes are being undertaken by business, however, in order to gain workers' commitment and knowledge for the future.
From the Paper
"Two primary classifications of organizational structure are mechanistic and organic. The differences between mechanistic and organic organizational structures are expressed in the context of the level of formal structure and control embodied in the two organizational concepts. Successful implementation and execution of the team development technique leads to improved communication, enhanced creativity, more effective decision-making, and higher levels of organizational performance. One of the most important manifestations of the team organization decision-making technique is the quality circles concept that was pioneered in Japanese manufacturing organizations, and which, in the 1990s, is found in a number of major American organizations. Most organizational structures are product/process- or functional-based. Mixed organizational structures, however, have long been common."
| |
|
Team Building for Sports, 2005.
An analysis of the functioning of groups and their relationship with amateur sports teams.
5,625 words (approx. 22.5 pages), 5 sources, $ 223.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how the membership and involvement of groups is a primary element in almost every aspect of life, both positively and negatively influencing individuals. It looks at how individuals come together to form groups for a variety of reasons, both personal and professional and how these groups include the formation and function of sports teams. It focuses on groups and their relationship with amateur sports teams. First, the sports team as an effective group is discussed, followed by team leadership development and a discussion on team morale.
| |
|
Team Building, 2005.
A proposal to evaluate and understand the effectiveness of team working and constant learning in an organization.
8,952 words (approx. 35.8 pages), 45 sources, APA, $ 186.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how there are many advantages of constant learning and team working and how a team setup can help motivate and improve the productivity of the organization. It shows how it is important to ensure that the team for any specific task is comprised of members who are knowledgeable and posses the required skills needed to carry out the task.
Outline
Introduction
Literature Review
Methodology
Discussion
Recommendations
Conclusion
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Bibliography
From the Paper
"Worker empowerment is a powerful tool that can be used by the management. Training and motivating workers to constantly educate and improve their skills achieve empowerment and then allowing them the freedom to define modes they can use to perform their tasks. Simply put, empowered workers are individuals that are responsible and display a sense of ownership in the task that is entrusted to them. In addition, empowered workers derive personal satisfaction in the completion of the task by the best means possible. Their peers and supervisors for their high quality of work recognize them."
| |
|
Building Self-Managed Teams, 2004.
An overview of how to build and manage self-managed teams within an organization.
800 words (approx. 3.2 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 28.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Self-managed teams are teams within an organization that are supervised by the team members themselves. This paper examines how, before implementing self-managed teams as a business strategy, organizations must first determine their purpose, their advantages, and how best to build and sustain them, to determine if it is an effective strategy for their unique organizational goals. As such, this paper reviews the current research on self-managed teams to determine these factors. In the end, this paper concludes that self-managed teams have a variety of purposes, have numerous advantages, and are fairly straightforward to build and sustain. The writer points out that these factors make self-managed teams a worthwhile endeavor for a variety of organizations hoping to gain a competitive advantage in their industry.
From the Paper
"By implementing self-managed teams, organizations can replace their hierarchical thinking. Self-managed teams take the collective team?s knowledge, skills, and motivation and turn it into a commanding synergistic tool for the organization. Self-managed teams, the researchers found, not only increased employee satisfaction with their work, but also increased employee commitment, improved management-employee communications, increased efficiencies, and reduced costs. (Rudolph & Sashkin, 2002)"
| |
|
The Learning Team Process, 2002.
This paper explore the learning team process, used in business.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 4 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper critiques the learning team process, where the overall impact of the learning team process on a specific issue or organization is addressed.
|
|
|
