| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "PLATO CAVE LAO TZU": |
|
|
Plato's Cave vs. Lao-tzu's Way, 2002.
A critical analysis comparing Plato's "Allegory of the Cave," a section taken from "The Republic" and Lao-tzu's "Tao-te Ching."
860 words (approx. 3.4 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this paper, the writer shows how Plato and Lao-tzu both display similarities within their theme of enlightenment and political success and the modern day influence of their works. However, the methods of dialogue and poetry to present their writings helps to maintain their philosophical uniqueness.
From the Paper
"Philosophy is the rational investigation of the truths and principles of being, knowledge, or conduct . Plato, a Greek writer and teacher, is thought to be one of the most influential thinkers in Western philosophy. In his work, "The Allegory of the Cave," he discusses politics and perception within a symbolic narrative. Lao-tzu's "Thoughts from the Tao-te Ching," is another document containing philosophical ideology, focusing on government and moral behavior. Both Plato and Lao-tzu display similarities within their theme and their influence in the modern world; however, one distinct variation they possess is the method in which their material is presented."
| |
|
Thought Processes: Plato, Machiavelli, Lao-Tzu, 2002.
This paper compares the works of Plato, Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu.
2,150 words (approx. 8.6 pages), 3 sources, $ 80.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper compares the works of Plato, Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu.
| |
|
Plato & Lao-tzu, 1999.
Describes views of Western & Eastern thinkers on nature of reality, dualism, yin-yang and idealism.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 2 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
" Human beings have from the beginning tried to discover the relationship between themselves and the universe in which they live. They noted the life cycle of birth, life, and death and wondered if there was something more beyond, and this a question that has been addressed by religion and philosophy ever since. Taoism as represented by the writings of Lao-Tzu and Idealism as represented by Plato differ in certain key aspects of how the world is viewed, how human beings are thought to relate to that world, and so the philosophy developed by each writer. Lao-Tzu is a pantheistic thinker and views the human being as one with the universe. Plato, like most Western philosophers, sees a dualism between man and nature and within man himself, separating mind and body. Plato is even more of a dualist in that he sees this world as a reflection of an ideal world existing on some.."
| |
|
Lao Tzu and Chuang Tzu, 1995.
Compares philosophies, impact on Taoism, ideas on immortality and individuality, implications for governing oneself and others.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 5 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"This study will examine Taoism in terms of the impact of that religion of Lao Tzu and Chuang Tzu. The study will compare these two men's philosophies and ideas as they relate to Taoism, and will explore the implications of their thoughts for governing oneself and others. Also included will be the consideration of the relationship of their approaches and contemporary counterculture.
A comparison with the conformity of Confucianism shows the non-conformity to be a clear reflection of contemporary counterculture. The latter rejects the traditional culture just as Taoism rejects Confucianism. It is no surprise, then, to find the contemporary counterculture leaning toward Taoist thought, Lao Tzu and Chuang Tzu in its attempts to find an alternative world view and a fresh, radical, individualized and more ..."
| |
|
Plato's "Allegory of the Cave", 2004.
Analysis of the significance of enlightenment in Plato's "Allegory of the Cave".
9,750 words (approx. 39.0 pages), 12 sources, MLA, $ 198.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes the meaning of Plato's "Allegory of the Cave", explaining how it represents a pilgrimage of the human mind from ignorance to enlightenment. The paper begins with a biography of Plato's life and a discussion of some of the scholarly differences regarding the type of man Plato actually was. Next, the paper focuses on Plato's concepts of truth, reality, and knowledge as represented in "The Cave" and summarizes its dialogue. Additionally, the influence of Socrates's friendship with Plato and of his death on Plato's writing of "The Cave" is discussed in this paper.
Abstract
Introduction
The Allegory of the Cave - an Analysis
Conclusion
From the Paper
"The Republic is written by the Greek philosopher Plato in 500 BC. It is said that Plato?s real name was Aristocles and that Plato was a nickname. Plato was the youngest son of Ariston and Perictione and came from a wealthy family who had lived in Athens for many many generations. Plato?s real father died when he was very young and he grew up in his step-father Pyrilampes house. History shows that Plato studied under Cratylus who was a student of Heracleitus. The most interesting and most talked about relationship of Plato is that with Socrates with whom he became friends while very young. Plato got to know Socrates through his Uncle Charmides who himself was a close friend of Socrates."
| |
|
Martin Luther King and Lao Tzu, 2004.
Compares the philosophies of two great leaders, Martin Luther King and Chinese Lao Tzu.
1,034 words (approx. 4.1 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Martin Luther King of the modern United States and Lao-Tzu of ancient China were two great philosophers whose great differences stemmed from their core beliefs. The paper shows that Lao-Tzu believed that the way for humankind to achieve happiness was to connect fully with nature and to not try to control everyday events. It shows, in comparison, that Martin Luther King believed that humankind should confront evil and correct the wrongs of the world.
From the Paper
"King?s philosophy was more in line with that of Confucius, who believed that people must make a social difference. However, Lao-Tzu?s approach to ?do nothing? was not the same as King?s approach to ?do nothing? when demonstrators were attacked. Lao-Tzu?s view was mystical. He would have recognized that while Martin Luther?s King?s approach may have appeared to be ?doing nothing? at first, actually it was the final action of an elaborate plan designed to make a very big social difference. It started with King?s followers educating the activists very careful about the philosophy of non-violence. They planned where they would demonstrate, and when. They planned what they would wear and exactly what they would do when they ?did nothing.?"
| |
|
Plato?s Cave Analogy, 2002.
This paper examines Plato?s Cave Analogy from Book 7 of the "Republic".
815 words (approx. 3.3 pages), 1 source, $ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper describes Plato's presentation of the kind knowledge that is necessary for a philosopher king. This paper states that the Cave Analogy is used to compare the effect and the lack of knowledge on human nature and the responsibility, which accompanies education. The author feels that there is a distinct parallel between Plato?s Cave Analogy and the modern world particularly the many individuals who live in poverty and ignorance and the subjugation of women in certain countries.
From the Paper
"Plato describes the cave as an underground dwelling with an entrance up at a distance. The men that live there are chained. They can only see in front of them. (They represent the uneducated). A fire that provides them light, but it is above and behind them. Between the light and them is a path that has a low wall alongside it. Men carry all sorts of things along the wall. But, the chained men only see the shadows casted by the fire and believe the shadows to be the real objects. (This is the world of shadows)."
| |
|
Plato's "Allegory of the Cave", 2004.
Summary and analysis of Plato's "Allegory of the Cave".
1,038 words (approx. 4.2 pages), 0 sources, $ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper summarizes and interprets the dialogue in Plato's "Allegory of the Cave". The paper explains the symbolism of the allegory and interprets Plato's message about ignorance and the human ability to achieve knowledge, the travails of a philosopher, invisible truths, and how we should educate people.
From the Paper
"The allegory of the cave can be summed up in one single sentence. It symbolizes the place of perceptions in the pursuit of knowledge. Indeed, in a preamble to the actual relating of the allegory, Plato is involved in a discussion as to who can be considered a true philosopher. The discussion meanders around attempting to answer the following enigmas: Just because someone subscribes to a specific philosophy, does that make him or her a philosopher? Does a person who indulges in a certain muse that is premised on a philosophy?directly or indirectly related to it?become a philosopher? Plato goes through pains explaining that a philosopher was (or should be) cut in a different mould. A philosopher, Plato avers, should be able to see beyond what is merely obvious or superficial. A philosopher should see the inner beauty of things and understand, abstractedly, the natural causes of this beauty. In other words, the philosopher should be perceptive."
| |
|
"The Matrix" and Plato's "Cave Allegory", 2002.
A comparative analysis of the themes of light and darkness in the film "The Matrix" and Plato's "Cave Allegory".
1,400 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 2 sources, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper will discuss the relation of Plato's "Cave Allegory" with the movie "The Matrix". By understanding the relationships between light and darkness within the movie, we can understand the relationship that both these stories share in their scope. The movie will be examined to show the light and darkness relationship, as will the "Cave Allegory" in comparison to make clear how the two stories are interconnected in their scope of knowledge verses ignorance.
| |
|
Lao Tzu's "DaoDeJing" and the "Zhuangzi", 2008.
This paper explores the themes of inaction and spontaneity as discussed in Lao Tzu's "DaoDeJing" and by the "Zhuangzi".
1,985 words (approx. 7.9 pages), 3 sources, APA, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that the Chinese philosophical tradition has produced two preeminent doctrines on the ways to achieve a balanced life: Lao Tzu's "DaoDeJing" and the "Zhuangzi" (named after its alleged author). The author points out that, although both doctrines center on a mutual concept of the Tao as a way of life, the two texts differ in their explanations of the power of non-action and the virtue of spontaneity. The paper relates that the opening passage of the "DaoDeJing", entitled 'The Way', presents a refined definition of the Tao (Dao) with a directive for negotiating the universe. The author underscores that there is a close parallel between 'wu-wei', which is the principle of non-action from 'The Way' and Zhuangzi's characterization of the flow of nature. The paper concludes that the notions regarding action and inaction in the "DaoDeJing" and the "Zhuangzi" are merely divergent interpretations of the same end goal to feel, perceive and act with balance.
From the Paper
"The concept of inaction as it is characterized in the DaoDeJing should not be taken as an endorsement of a stagnant life, a lazy approach to responsibilities or a metaphysical doctrine designed to subvert practicality in the interests of spiritual enlightenment. Quite to the contrary, it is a means though which the subscriber is advised to take on the challenges, suffering and shortcoming of expectations in life, as well as the means through which one remains level through the achievements, joy and attainment of his pursuits. Thus, it is remarked upon as a strategy of finding balance in the distracting rigors of the human experience."
| |
|
Plato's Allegory of the Cave and the Non- Material World, 2002.
A discussion of the perception of a non- material world through a review of Plato's allegory of the cave from "The Republic".
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 1 source, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper investigates whether human beings have the ability to perceive a non- material world through investigating Plato's allegory of the cave from "The Republic".
| |
|
Plato's Cave and Individualism, 2008.
This paper discusses Plato's allegory of the cave and the group think mentality common in organizations today.
1,468 words (approx. 5.9 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper analyzes the dangers inherent in blind obedience and group think as illustrated in Plato's allegory of the cave. The paper discusses the relevance of the allegory to contemporary organizational law by drawing upon the author's experiences as a member of law enforcement. The paper then looks at the mechanisms that we use to avoid or subvert ideas that appear different from our own and challenge the status quo. The paper concludes that we must embrace different ideas and nurture a respect for different cultures and world views.
From the Paper
"Plato's allegory of the cave captures the essence of organizational culture. Obviously, the ideology of sameness and normative thinking has transcended from Plato's time to today. Thus, the allegory is relevant to contemporary organizational life. Organizations are known for fostering a culture of group think. The dangers inherent in group think is the object lesson that Plato tries to convey. When we refuse to engage in critical thinking, we are goaded into a false sense of security, and create our own prison. The allegory of the cave is particularly relevant to corporate culture, and the blind obedience that is encouraged and often rewarded. There is an insidious force in organizational culture, which subsumes individualism for the corporate good. Like prisoners chained in a cave, employees have been trained to see through the lenses of the corporate image."
| |
|
Plato's "Allegory of the Cave", 2005.
A discussion of Plato's "Allegory of the Cave".
920 words (approx. 3.7 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper provides a discussion of Plato's "Allegory of the Cave" in order to demonstrate how classical Greek civilization explored the human condition, recognizing the realities and constraints of human life, yet constantly striving to achieve ideals.
| |
|
Plato's "Allegory of the Cave", 2004.
An analysis and interpretation of Plato's "Allegory of the Cave".
6,803 words (approx. 27.2 pages), 13 sources, MLA, $ 154.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper gives a vivid picture about Plato?s "Allegory of the Cave" from his book of "Republic". It examines his contention of Ideal Rule with reference to his "Allegory of the Cave" and also the various considerations that are considered necessary to build an ideal state. It looks at how the "Republic" of Plato is considered a treatise on how to lead life in personal, professional, and social circumstances and how the ideals that he mentions in his work have their limitations in becoming practical. In this paper, the emphasis is kept on the simile of the cave suggested by Plato, and the Ideal Rule is explained in relation to this allegory.
From the Paper
"Plato compares the fire in the cave to that of the sun?s power. The journey that the prisoner takes from the cave into the light of the sun stand to signify the journey of the soul to the intelligent realm. Here he makes the sun stand to represent all that is good, and the source of all goodness or the summum bonum or the greatest good thereby indicating that reaching goodness is the ultimate goal of knowledge. He feels that we have not completed our journey until we accept it. The journey is not complete until we have arrived here. He feels that an individual who has seen the sun cannot pretend to like it as he has not done so."
| |
|
Plato's "Allegory of the Cave", 2005.
This paper discusses Plato's "Allegory of the Cave" in Book VII of "The Republic" .
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 1 source, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines Plato's argument on learning and education in Book VII of The Republic. The author points out that, in the "Allegory of the Cave", Plato makes his argument for the dialectic method of learning through a dialogue of the characters of Socrates and Glaucon. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of the validity of the dialectic process in the modern world.
From the Paper
"In Book VII of Plato's "The Republic", Plato uses the character of Socrates to discuss two models of education: the process of learning by seeing and the process of learning by questioning what is seen. This distinction is apparent in the "Allegory of the Cave," in which Plato, through the character of Socrates (henceforth referred to only as "Socrates"), demonstrates how the 'truth' that an individual see can differ from the 'Truth' of reality. These two models correspond to direct learning and indirect learning. Direct learning is that of 'teaching,' which Socrates did not favor. Indirect learning is that of learning through dialogue and reasoning, or 'dialectic' reasoning, which is the Socratic method. In his allegory, Socrates demonstrates the problematic construct of direct learning."
|
|
|
