| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "PHILOSOPHIES LEGALIZATION EUTHANASIA": |
|
|
The Philosophies and Legalization of Euthanasia, 2004.
Explores the ethical and moral issues surrounding the topic of euthanasia.
1,257 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 5 sources, APA, $ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper addresses the concern most often vocalized about euthanasia, namely, whether it is a form of murder or mercy. The author of the paper puts forth arguments that euthanasia should be legalized and applies the ethical theories of consequentialism and non-consequentialism to help assess and evaluate whether or not euthanasia should be legalized and, ultimately, to support the author's point of view. The paper also provides suggestions for legal protections and policies that should be put in place if euthanasia is legalized.
From the Paper
"Most of the issues in the legalization of Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS), or better known as Euthanasia, rest under contentious questions of ethics and morality. The process of euthanasia, in which death of a terminally ill patient is hastened by some means to end sufferings from a terminal disease, presents a question between two situations wherein concerns of ethics and morality are debated as to where it properly lies ? When is it morally correct, to hasten the death of a dying patient from a terminal disease to end his sufferings, or to let him suffer from pain and let the course of his disease?s nature take place? This question has been one of the moral issues concerning the legalization of euthanasia. In simple and legal terms, it is associated to the debatable question ?Is euthanasia a form of murder??"
| |
|
Legalization of Euthanasia, 2005.
This paper argues in favor of legalizing euthanasia in the United States.
1,355 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 7 sources, APA, $ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, in certain cases, passive euthanasia is legally accepted in the United States; however, at the present time, active euthanasia is never accepted. The author points out that a growing number of a people in America are in favor of legalizing both passive and active euthanasia specifically claiming that terminally ill patients have a right to choose death over the torment of the final stages of their disease. The paper stresses that euthanasia should never be carried out without a patient's consent; this is why a living will is important.
From the Paper
"The legal profession in the United States takes a similar view to that which is expressed by the AMA. Thus, the Supreme Court has passed decisions which support the use of passive euthanasia in certain instances. In this regard, it has been determined that a competent person "has a constitutionally protected liberty interest in refusing unwanted medical treatment." Many states have passed legislation permitting passive euthanasia in specific cases."
| |
|
Legalization of Euthanasia, 1994.
This paper argues that euthanasia should be legalized for passive and active good death for terminally ill on moral, legal, medical, familial and economic grounds.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 8 sources, $ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Euthanasia has become an important issue in the protection of human dignity. It has been in the news a good deal lately because of the crusade of the so-called "suicide doctor," Dr. Jack Kevorkian, who has "assisted" at some 17 or 18 suicides over the past few years, all of people who were facing some debilitating and painful degenerative disease. As medical science becomes more adept at prolonging life, but not necessarily at making that life valuable, euthanasia becomes an option to be considered by those who suffer, those who love them, and those who are charged with their care. Euthanasia comes from two Greek words meaning "good death" or "happy death," and the term refers to any action that brings a painless death to a person suffering from an injury, disease, or the ravages of age. There is a distinction between active euthanasia and passive ... "
| |
|
Legalization of Euthanasia, 1992.
An examination of the types (passive vs. active), the American Medical Association position and legal and ethical aspects.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 7 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"This paper will argue in favor of legalizing euthanasia in the United States. There are two basic types of euthanasia. The first, known as passive euthanasia, involves the withholding of medical treatment. With passive euthanasia, the terminally ill patient is simply allowed to die. The second type, known as active euthanasia, occurs when a doctor or other health care practitioner takes active steps toward terminating the patient's life. With active euthanasia, the doctor might give a lethal injection or use other means to kill the patient. In certain cases, passive euthanasia is legally accepted in the United States. However, at the present time, active euthanasia is never accepted."
| |
|
Should Canada Legalize Euthanasia?, 2006.
This paper presents the pros and cons for the legalization of euthanasia in Canada.
920 words (approx. 3.7 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents the pros and cons for the legalization of euthanasia in Canada. It comes out on the side against legalization, saying Canadian society is not yet ready for such a move as they are afraid it will be misused.
From the Paper
"This paper will present the case against the legalization of euthanasia in Canada It will present the evidence against and the evidence for passing this legislation and then summarize the findings in the conclusion Definitions Euthanasia is .."
| |
|
Euthanasia: To What Extend Should It Be Legal?, 2003.
Argues against any form of euthanasia.
920 words (approx. 3.7 pages), 3 sources, APA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Based on James Rachels' undermining of the doctrine of the distinction between active and passive euthanasia made by law and medical ethics, this argument uses other research to support a stance of opposing any form of legal euthanasia.
From the Paper
"As new technologies and research enabled physicians the means to prolong the lives of terminally ill patients the controversy surrounding the debate over euthanasia continues to escalate ..."
| |
|
Euthanasia, 2003.
Presents arguments in favor of legalized euthanasia.
1,562 words (approx. 6.2 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 51.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper cites applicable legal cases to support its arguments in favor of legalizing euthanasia. Included, also, are ethical reasons for favoring legalized euthanasia and rebuttals against arguments that oppose euthanasia. Finally, the overall moral dilemma of euthanasia is discussed, with both the pro and con arguments presented.
From the Paper
"We all must die one day, and most people hope for a quick and painless death. But sometimes life isn?t so easy. Some people suffer unbelievable pain from cancer or other diseases. Others may lie in a permanently unconscious state due to an accident or some other cause. Euthanasia is the practice of kindly and painlessly putting a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or extreme oldness to a supposedly peaceful death. Derived from the Greek words eu, good, and thanatos, death, euthanasia is ordinarily identified as mercy killing. Today, only Oregon and Maine have legalized euthanasia or PAS."
| |
|
Euthanasia, 2007.
An argument against the legalization of euthanasia in the United States.
2,422 words (approx. 9.7 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 74.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the controversy surrounding euthanasia. It considers the arguments both for and against its practice. In the end, the paper argues, by providing example cases, that the benefits of allowing euthanasia are outweighed by the potential harm that it causes to society. The paper concludes that euthanasia should not be legalized in the United States.
From the Paper
"It has also been eloquently pointed out that permitting euthanasia would amount to promoting the rights of the individual at the expense of the best interests of society. (Callahan) For example, Callahan cites an example from the trial of Dr. Jack Kevorkian. Kevorkian was tried for assisting in the euthanasia of a 43-year-old multiple sclerosis (MS) victim named Sherry Miller. At the trial Dr. Stanton Elias pointed out that Miller's death had been extremely demoralizing for other multiple sclerosis victims, who were deeply concerned that her death sent a message to society that "they [people who suffer from MS] are somehow less of a human being and don't count for as much if they can't get out of a wheelchair." (Callahan, 247)"
| |
|
Adult Education Philosophies, 2005.
This paper discusses five adult education philosophies and their application to the classroom.
1,430 words (approx. 5.7 pages), 5 sources, APA, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that adult education, or andragogy as it is called, has been in existence practically since the founding of the country and, today, has become a major educational field used to empower millions of adults across the United States. The author discusses five philosophies, which have been created to explain and to improve the practices related to educating adults in the United States: The liberal, humanist, progressive, behavioral and radical philosophies. The paper stresses that the philosophical approach or combination of approaches must fit the specific needs of the adult learn and may vary for that learner from situation to situation; therefore, the learner needs to understand their own goals.
Table of Contents
The Progressive Philosophy
The Behaviorist Philosophy
The Humanist Philosophy
The Radical Philosophy
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Like the progressive philosophy, behaviorism is also focused on scientific means to achieve its end. Education occurs within a controlled environment, with objectives that can be measured. The educational goal is then to change the learner's behavior only through environmental stimuli, without a concern for any other aspects of humanity such as emotion. The objective here is only to change behavior according to specific goals such as competency and programmed learning. Occupational training and professional development programs have benefited from this philosophy. The focus is heavily on stimulus-response designs in order to stimulate new behavior."
| |
|
Philosophies of Life, 2005.
A paper looking at how we develop our personal philosophies and what influences that development.
1,424 words (approx. 5.7 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the topic of personal philosophies and how the philosophies we develop are influenced by a variety of different factors. The paper maintains that religion, spirituality, government, fear of punishment and longing for reward, as well as doubt and introspection are all significant influences on the development of our personal life philosophies and that without these influences or with only a single influence, such as religion, our life philosophies would be too narrow and damaging.
From the Paper
"When one considers the many aspects of one's "inner life," it becomes clear that most, if not all of them are based upon some philosophical conception. Psychologists have long known that individuals, who have a strong sense of their life's purpose, as well as a spiritual, religious, or ethical viewpoint, tend to live longer, healthier lives. Further, they are less likely to suffer from depressive episodes (Hassad, 2000). Although each person's individual "philosophy of life" is different, there are some well known philosophical interpretations that can shed some light upon common attitudes concerning personal identity. Six famous life philosophies are attributed to Socrates, Freud, Albert Camus, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Muhammad."
| |
|
Euthanasia, 2007.
An analysis of the argument in favor of legalizing euthanasia.
1,524 words (approx. 6.1 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 50.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the contentious issue of modern medical ethics - euthanasia. It describes the "right to die" argument from three related perspectives: the rights-based perspective, the ethical perspective and the practical perspective. The paper discusses the logic behind each of these perspectives. It also explains why, according to these views, the law should protect euthanasia as a fundamental civil right.
From the Paper
"Therefore, the law should protect euthanasia as a fundamental civil right. Decriminalizing physician-assisted suicide does not mean that doctors must agree to euthanasia but rather, that patients have the right to choose doctors who are willing to ease their suffering. Any individual who opposes euthanasia should by all means refuse to take part in it. Individuals who suffer from terminal illnesses and individuals who are in extremely compromised medical situations should be able to choose euthanasia as a civil and legal right. Health care practitioners have an ethical duty to honor the wishes of their patients and to heal their patients in body, mind, and soul. Moreover, doctors and health care practitioners should become more educated about situations that might warrant mercy killing. If euthanasia remains a taboo subject, no health care practitioner has the opportunity to make the professional decisions that are judicious and humane. Family members also have a moral duty to respect the wishes of their loved ones. End-of-life decisions are a deeply personal and even though a mother or a son might not agree, they still have the ethical obligation to honor a wish to terminate a painful or traumatic life. Ultimately, euthanasia is a personal choice that deserves protection under the law so that, like abortion, it can be practiced safely and under the care of a licensed physician."
| |
|
Health Education Philosophies, 2005.
A look at the the best teaching philosophy to employ when teaching health education.
1,169 words (approx. 4.7 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 40.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper describes different health education philosophies as well as the author's own health education philosophy and how and why she arrived at such a philosophy. The author emphasizes that her own philosophy on teaching health education is derived from a combination of several teaching philosophies which she believes will promote the knowledge and skills necessary for her students, their families and the community to achieve a better quality of life.
From the Paper
"Our profession is at a critical stage of self-evaluation, of which philosophical inquiry is a key element. Answers to the questions of what health education is and how one accomplishes this will determine the place of health education now and in the future. (Welle, Russell, & Kittleson, 1995) My initial reaction while reading the Welle et al article, was that there seems to be a need to define a single philosophy for the credibility and effectiveness of health education in general. After some thought, however, my focus shifted. Since such a wide variety of settings, audiences and issues exist; a single philosophy of health education would not be beneficial or even possible. It makes sense that there were significant oppositional views when it came to the study participants' philosophical choices, given their differences in educational settings."
| |
|
Morality within Law and Legal Philosophies, 2002.
Discusses the naturalist versus the positive theorist philosophies.
1,650 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 4 sources, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper shall compare the philosophies found in the naturalist perspective against those of the positivist theorist philosophies. This paper shall achieve this through focusing primarily on the beliefs of the philosophers St. Thomas Aquinas, Ronald Dworkin and H.L.A. Hart.
| |
|
Philosophies and the Workforce, 2002.
A general overview of the different philosophies found within the workplace.
2,650 words (approx. 10.6 pages), 8 sources, $ 97.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper shall examine different ways of examining the philosophies found within the workplace. The basic two forms are the "management" and the "team" philosophies. There is also an emphasis on the epistemology of the workforce.
| |
|
A Comparative Study Between the Economic Philosophies of Adam Smith and Karl Marx, 2003.
The following essay compares the economic philosophies of Adam Smith and Karl Marx with reference to their historical works.
2,270 words (approx. 9.1 pages), 0 sources, $ 70.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay compares the philosophies in Adam Smith?s ?The Background to the Wealth of Nations? and Karl Marx?s ?Communist Manifesto? & ?Das Kapital?. The way in which both Smith and Marx agreed upon the importance of capitalism for unleashing productive powers, amongst other similarities, is discussed. In addition the contradictions in their philosophies, such as their reasons for expanding markets, are also highlighted.
From the paper:
?Smith and Marx both agreed that capitalism required expanding markets. Smith believed this was so because jobs could not be divided too much without a large market. The money that went to paying wages came from profits. There always had to be an expanding market, so that there could be more profits or else there would not be more jobs.?
|
|
|
