| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "PEER SOFTWARE": |
|
|
Peer Software Development Teams, 2006.
An analysis of the Peer Software Development Team structures that have become popular amongst organizations.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 2 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This document discusses the Peer Software Development Team structures that have risen to prominence in some organizations. These peer based teams are smaller in size than the traditional project team structure and are far more adaptive. The paper further discusses how, because the size is limited and because of innovations in the structure such as the Scrum method where teams and individual team members can delete, add or manipulate tasks anywhere in the development cycle, these peer team structures are directly aligned with the market and the customer/end-user requirements.
From the Paper
"Peer Software Development Teams (PSDTs) are a component of Agile Development methodologies which has become project management of choice among innovative organizations because its flexibility and results oriented focus. Many companies, such as Microsoft, have committed to Agile Development methodologies such as the Scrum method which is one of the most important PSDT expressions of community based innovation (Taft, 2005, para.3). Agile Development methodologies empower programmers to program rather than constraining them by traditional project management constraints and PSDT techniques ensure that the benefit of combined skills and talents are utilized in a team environment without saddling the individual programmer with the excessive structures that traditional project management techniques often do."
| |
|
Peer-to-Peer Software, 2004.
Examines social responsibility issues of engineers who design peer-to-peer software.
3,690 words (approx. 14.8 pages), 9 sources, APA, $ 102.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper provides an analysis of peer-to-peer software to determine how it is used, the current and possible future trends for these applications, and the social responsibilities of the software engineers who design them. A summary of the research is provided in the conclusion.
From the Paper
"Today, the trend is clear that there is an explosion in growth of peer-to-peer applications to facilitate online communications. In this rapidly changing and growing environment, it is important to develop an understanding of the level of technical versus human support needed in an online community. According to Kollock (1998), the labor required to support a rapidly growing community and maintain quality interactions is quite intense. While human contributions are invaluable, no "mere mortal" can do all things for all people at all times of the day. In the Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) '99, the participants suggested that it will not be long before technology, like intelligent agents, can supplement the support humans now provide. However, a number of important social issues arise when such technology is considered."
| |
|
Free Software and Open Source Software, 2006.
This paper discusses the differences between the terms 'free Software' and 'open source software'.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 3 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses free software and open source software, noting that free software actually refers to software providing specific kinds of freedom to users, while "open source software" means that the user is made privy to the code so he or she can change the software as well as use it. The writer maintains that much of the argument dates to 1984 and the publication of the "Gnu Manifesto," written by Richard Stallman.
From the Paper
"Software developers differ on the relative value of the terms "free software" or "open source software." The terms are not completely identical. Free software could be any software for which no charge is made, though it actually refers to software providing specific kinds of freedom to users, while "open source software" means that the user is made privy to the code so he or she can change the software as well as use it. By either name, the associated vision of software and users challenges the usual idea of copyright and intellectual property."
| |
|
Copyrights vs. Peer-to-Peer File Transfer, 2002.
A detailed examination of copyright laws, with a comparison to peer-to-peer file transfer.
5,300 words (approx. 21.2 pages), 7 sources, APA, $ 131.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The author takes the reader on an exploratory journey, in which the details and outcomes of several well-known cases of copyright laws are scrutinized. The author discusses the importance of copyright laws, and the elements of various cases that caused the rulings to go the way they did. The paper includes a discussion about the effect Hollywood has on copyrights when it comes to issues such as the ability to download movies and songs.
From the Paper
"Throughout the years, there have been many cases in which the copyright laws have been challenged and upheld. In more recent years many of the copyright cases have turned to the film and music industry because of the increased ability to duplicate and distribute such products. One of the famous case in recent history was the Sony vs Betamax case. This case was before the internet was invented and for its time it was about state of the art wars on ownership."
| |
|
Software Piracy, 2004.
Examines the issue of peer-to-peer software copying.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper begins by defining software piracy before showing how publishers are dealing with the problem of peer-to-peer (P2P) copying. It examines how companies are approaching the problem of lost revenues and the legalities of software piracy. The paper includes an outline.
From the Paper
"Other gaming publishers are trying a few different methods to work with the P2P issue. Trymedia, Softwrap and Macromedia offer software that stops games from being copied or restricts access to them, so that potential customers can try a game before deciding whether to buy it, or can play a demo version. Usually, when players download protected files on a P2P network, a link brings them to a site where they can pay to unlock the fun version or buy a legitimate copy. If they share that game with others, the copied version will revert to trial mode."
| |
|
Open Source Software, 2002.
Examines what factors contribute to governments choosing open source software or proprietary software.
3,388 words (approx. 13.6 pages), 23 sources, MLA, $ 96.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Open source software has recently emerged as the front runner for many industries as the primary method of code production, as it is widely predicted to provide more options for its users in a quicker, quality improved and cost effective format than the more traditional proprietary software. Linux, the dominant player in the market, is a considerable threat to the Microsoft operating system, which has successfully established itself in the global market. Beyond its commercial potential, open source software possesses a potential goldmine in the government sector. However, questions regarding security and privacy continue to plague government officials in their pursuits of this option. This paper provides an overview of open source software as well as proprietary software and their primary components. It provides an evaluation of government options in relation to the products available on the market and discusses the social construction of open source software versus the technological determinism of proprietary software. The paper includes colored graphs.
From the Paper
"The Linux operating system is the chief product that many new open source customers consider as their primary choice. Many IT experts find that Linux is more powerful when enthusiasm is brought into the picture (Zetlin 38). Therefore, learning the ins and outs of the system can take some time and may require some work beyond normal business hours. For this reason, training in Linux and other similar open source offerings should be a primary concern for IT professionals in order to improve its potential and to reduce the possibility of security flaws."
| |
|
Software Testing In The Product Life Cycle, 2007.
A research analysis of the place of software testing in the development and life-cycle of a software product.
4,289 words (approx. 17.2 pages), 12 sources, MLA, $ 113.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper aims to provide an overview of software testing throughout the development and life-cycle of a software product. It focuses on the need for testing and how testing fits into the software development life-cycle. The paper presents a research component that analyzes how to formulate a software testing strategy prior to deploying and releasing a software product.
Table of Contents:
Definitions and Terms in the Research
Objective
Introduction
Software Testing Overview
Purpose of Software Testing Categories
Life-cycle Phase Testing Categories
Software Testing Tools
Test Automation Overview
Product Life Cycle Test Automation
Product Life Cycle
Application Test Tools
Classic Testing Mistakes
Developing a Team of Testers is Key in Software Development and Testing
Summary and Conclusion
From the Paper
"The introduction of technology and features being developed in the rapid action which this occurs and to, at the same time, make improvement to the quality of the product and as well to respond to the issues of customers in product development is quite an initiative to undertake. Driving development and quality assurance of software are the technology market which is characterized by an extremely fast past and the revisions are released just as quickly. While quality is considered to be important in the high-tech marketplace new and robust features are considered even more important. (Ben-Yaacov and Gazlay, 2001) Four key measurements of the software product quality have been identified to be the technology, features, freedom from bugs and responsive support. (Ben-Yaacov and Gazlay, 2001)"
| |
|
The Use of Open Source Software, 2006.
A research paper on the legal implications for European Union governments concerning the use of open source software in government and public service.
11,532 words (approx. 46.1 pages), 15 sources, APA, $ 225.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This research paper focuses on European Union (EU) government policy relating to market economies of open source software. The paper discusses the official position and current EU policies regarding open source software, examines a legal case study concerning open source software vs. proprietary software and looks at Brazil's policy regarding this subject. Additionally, the paper looks into EU intellectual property law and a new proposed software patent directive and how each will affect open source legality in the EU.
Table of Contents
Current EU Software Policy: Any Directives,
Regulations, White-papers and Official Documents
Detailing the Current Official Position of the European
Union on Software
Free and Open Source Software versus Proprietary
Software Legal Case Study -
How will E.U. Governments be Affected if They Follow
the Brazilian Example, and its Effect on E.U.
Intellectual Property Policy?
How will E.U. Intellectual Property Law and New
Proposed Software Patent Directive Affect Open
Source Legality in the EU?
Legal Cases that Set Precedents for Intellectual
Property Concern in Open Source Software Use
Conclusion and Summary
From the Paper
"The "Television without Frontiers Directive" focuses on the creation of necessary conditions to allowing television broadcasts free movement all across the EU region. Secondly "Communication" of 2004 clarifies the method by the Directive is applied in relation to the interactive techniques of advertising that are yet new." (Information Society and Media, 2005) Other issues are yet under review and are stated to have the capacity to result in amendments of the TVWF Directive or the new directives proposal by 2005 years end. Other EU policy framework is inclusive of regulations that "promote competition between infrastructure providers and service providers while ensuring access for user of networks and citizen's rights; measures on copyright and digital rights management; access to and use of public information, as specified under the Public Sector Information Directive; and eInclusion, ensuring that all Europeans can access the new generation of digital content and services." (Information Society and Media, 2005)"
| |
|
Educational Software Evaluation, 2008.
This paper provides an evaluation of different educational software, concentrating on language-learning software.
1,136 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer reviews and presents several language-learning software programs. In reviewing 10 software packages, the author chooses three which seem to be the best in their category. The writer focuses attention on the following programs: Speak2Easy Language Learning Expert 3.07, French Verb Games 1, and Human Japanese. Specifically, the paper discusses the different types of language learning criteria, and compares the software packages to the criteria which the author feels are the most important.
Outline:
Language-learning software
Types of Language Software
Criteria for Selection
What they were all missing
Comparative table
Speak2Easy Language Learning Expert 3.07
French Verb Games 1
Human Japanese
Russian Language Learning 1.0.1
Mandarin Learning Assistant
Learn French Vocabulary 1.6
Flash Cards for Learning 1
Choice 1.4
Learning Spanish Like Crazy
Learn Chinese 2007 5.1
From the Paper
"The primary question is: how close does the language software come in achieving its stated goal? The language software must be engaging, give feedback, and be fun for the student to use. The old-fashioned, non-computer methods of rote memorization weren't effective because the student became bored quickly. Retention is helped by games, visual clues, and socialization.
"The primary selection criteria for these software packages were therefore user involvement: how many senses were involved in the use of this software? How much fun can a student have with it? Can the student get feedback from his/her own voice? Are the methods progressive, with a sense of advancement? Can it be tied to social interaction, such as working with fellow students? To this end, the author used the criteria selected by the National Foreign Language Resource Center."
| |
|
Software Testing and Design, 2000.
An examination of the interdependent process of designing new software and testing it for errors and debugging, focusing on procedural software and object-oriented software.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 4 sources, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Before discussing the comparative testing requirements of traditional, procedural software and object-oriented software, it is necessary to ask a basic question: what does it mean to test software? The answer given by one authority is simple and straightforward. According to Glenford Myers, "testing is the process of executing a program with the intent of finding errors" (Williams, 1995, p. 252). Errors are inevitable; has anyone ever written "Hello, world" in a new language for the first time and had it run on the first attempt?
Moreover, the most serious errors are not those that cause the program to fail to compile, or even runtime errors that produce obvious nonsense output. A tricker class of errors -- and particularly difficult for the designers to find -- are those that result from unintended "error" inputs. The designers, who know..."
| |
|
Software Requirements Engineering, 2002.
A look at the software requirements engineering process part of the analysis phase of the software development life cycle.
1,200 words (approx. 4.8 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how today software requirements analysis has become an indispensable part of software development. It examines how the system development life cycle incorporates the complete analysis, design and maintenance of any software project wherein each phase of the project is meticulously planned and based on the previous phase. It considers the requirements engineering process in a little detail.
Outline
Introduction
The Software Requirements Specification
Languages for Requirements Specification (Automated Tools)
PSL/PSA
RSL/REVS
Structured Analysis and Design Technique
Effect of Bad Requirements Analysis
Conclusion
From the Paper
"The software requirements specification is a comprehensive document, which presents all the different aspects involved in the software development. This includes the product overview, data flow, functional requirements, performance requirements, methods to handle exceptions, provisions for modification etc. It is desirable that the software specification or requirements report should be correct, complete, consistent, clear, functional, verifiable, traceable and easily changeable. If the requirements are badly stated or incomplete we might end up developing software that satisfies the requirements but still way behind the user expectations."
|
| Term Paper # 56647 |
temporarily unavailable
|
|
|
|
Risk Assessment Software Applications, 2004.
An analysis of the effectiveness of risk assessment software applications in the workplace.
11,473 words (approx. 45.9 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 224.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The risk assessment process is becoming increasingly important, but it has assumed enormously complex dimensions at the same time. Risk assessment has reached a new level of importance in the Information Age. The growth of sophisticated networked information systems and distributed computing has created a potentially dangerous environment for private and public organizations. This paper examines these issues and provides an analysis of popular risk assessment applications. An original comparison table is provided.
Chapter One: Introduction
Statement of Hypothesis, Research Problem, or Statement of the Purpose
Outline of Thesis/Project
Chapter Two: Methodology/Layout or Reason
Chapter Three: Literature Review
Industrial Settings and Software
Business Credit Settings and Software
Primary Software
Secondary Software
Risk Assessment Software for Credit Applications
Accounts Receivable Processing (ARP) Company
Advisa, Inc.
C/LECT Consulting, Inc.
Competix
Credit & Management Systems, Inc.
Dun & Bradstreet
eCredible, Ltd.
eCredit.com
Experian
GETPAID Corporation
I-many, Inc. (formerly ChiCor, Inc.)
Magnum Communications, Ltd.
9ci, Inc.
NMC Technologies, Inc.
Risk Assessment in Financial Institutions
Selected Banking Risk Management Software
Chapter Four: Pros and Cons
Chapter Five: Findings
Establish the Context
Identify Situations that Have Risk Implications
Analyze and Assess Risk
Design Response Strategies
Implement and Integrate
Measure, Monitor and Report
Chapter Six: Conclusion and Recommendations
Works Cited
From the Paper
"Risk assessment has reached a new level of importance in the Information Age. The growth of sophisticated networked information systems and distributed computing has created a potentially dangerous environment for private and public organizations. ?Critical data -- such as from trade secrets, proprietary information, troop movements, sensitive medical records and financial transactions -- flows through these systems? (Hammond 1999:69). Consequently, organizations are becoming increasingly concerned with potential exposure and are looking for ways to evaluate their organization's security profile today. Risk assessment software applications systems allow researchers, managers and others to perform "what if" analyses of the value of their information and various threats and vulnerabilities. For instance, risk assessment software systems such as NetSolar by Cisco, use both passive analysis and active probing methods to identify security vulnerabilities, which may increase the efficiency of vulnerability identification and reduce false-positive results. Hamilton reports that these technical assessments can differentiate between infrastructure devices (routers, switches, or firewalls) and host devices (user workstations or servers such as e-mail servers and Web servers). ?Technical vulnerability tools can find vulnerabilities in network TCP/IP hosts, UNIX hosts, Windows NT hosts, Web servers, mail servers, FTP servers, firewalls, routers and switches? (Hamilton 1999:69)."
| |
|
Forensic Software Testing, 2005.
A product test of the software known as Zilla Data Nuker which shreds sensitive files so they cannot be recovered or undeleted.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 5 sources, APA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Zilla Data Nuker uses what the company terms as "shredding algorithms" to obliterate data. The software is designed to be used to improve the functionality of a computer by deleting unnecessary files from the hard drive. The paper shows that Zillasoft also claims that the software can function to help protect the user's privacy by completely destroying information targeted by Zilla Data Nuker. The paper presents the results of performance testing on this software and discusses conclusions and recommendations.
Paper Outline:
Software Title
Software Functionality
Performance Testing
Results
Conclusions (Usefulness, Recommendations)
From the Paper
"Using a tool that operates with a GUI interface within the Windows environment such as Zilla Data Nuker has some inherent drawbacks. Some proponents of command line forensic tools "argue that most users really do not know what is going on when they 'point and click' their way around a computer forensic examination." (Kuchta, 2001) This may be a true statement but is somewhat beyond the scope of this text since the testing information is not being submitted in a legal proceeding. Conditions where the specifics regarding the process that the software uses to perform its function will often require software experts from the company that wrote the software to help solidify the reliability of the program in question."
| |
|
Software Development, 2007.
An analysis of the software development process.
1,007 words (approx. 4.0 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses the importance of following a predefined process during software development. This minimizes risks and ensures that software quality is predictable, protecting both the IT department and management, because all requirements are agreed upon before actual development. The paper examines how the software development process can also provide estimates with regards to manpower, schedule, and other resources. Software quality is also controlled through testing and version control. The paper concludes that the software development process assures that a high quality product is produced.
Outline:
I. Introduction
II. Software Development Process
III. Paradigms and Methodologies
IV. Conclusion
Bibliography
From the Paper
"Agile Software Development/Extreme Programming (XP) - These are both techniques that follow the concept of Iterative and Incremental Development. This modern approach is opposed to the traditional software development process that follows fixed pre-defined steps. Instead, it emphasizes learning and software evolution. It also attempts to minimize risk by re-evaluating project priorities regularly, and modifying objectives as needed. These techniques are especially applicable to risky projects that have dynamic requirements."
|
|
|
