| Papers [1-12] of 12 | Search results on "PARMENIDES": |
|
|
Plato?s "Parmenides", 2005.
This paper analyzes Plato's "Parmenides", one of Plato's most important dialogues, which focuses on the critique of the theory of Forms.
1,695 words (approx. 6.8 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 54.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that Plato's theory of Forms, as presented in "Parmenides", is founded on the assumption that a higher, spiritual realm of Forms, or Ideas, exists beyond the world of physical things. The author points out that Plato was influence by pre-Socratic thinkers such as Pythagoras, who believed that all things are in number and that the universe is created and ruled by certain numerical principles, Parmenides, who built his philosophical structure around the concept of One, and Heraclitus, who perceived the world as a perpetual transformation of things into their opposites. The paper relates that Plato's "Parmenide"s has influenced many of the thinkers of the Western World such as Plotinus, Proclus, Dionysius the Areopagite, Nicholas Cusanus and GWF Hegel.
From the Paper
"Although in the "Phaedo" dialogue, Socrates seems to describe the theory of Forms as a very familiar concept that he has applied for a long time without any difficulties, "Parmenides", which is a dialogue of the second period, contains a set of criticisms of this theory. Therefore, scholars have asked themselves whether Plato had two distinct philosophies, an earlier and a later, or whether the main objective that Plato was trying to achieve by writing the first dialogues was to conserve the memory of Socrates, by presenting his ideas, although from a Platonic perspective, while the later dialogues contain Plato's own distinctive ideas."
| |
|
Plato's 'Parmenides', 2005.
This paper looks at Plato's 'Parmenides' and discusses the problems of the concept of Forms.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 2 sources, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The writer discusses that in his dialogue 'Parmenides', Plato uses the figure of Parmenides to raise a number of problems regarding the young Socrates' conception of Forms. This essay discusses these problems and with reference to Plato's explication of the concept of Forms in the Republic, attempts to reconstruct how Plato would respond to these problems together with an evaluation of the strength of these responses.
From the Paper
"In his dialogue 'Parmenides' Plato uses the figure of Parmenides to raise a number of problems regarding the young Socrates' conception of Forms. This essay discusses these problems and with reference to Plato's explication of the concept of Forms in the Republic, attempts to reconstruct how Plato would respond to these problems together with an evaluation of the strength of these responses. Parmenides represents a particularly interesting dialogue, in the context of Plato's work as a whole, for we see in it a young Socrates attempting to develop a theory of Forms in the company of older and more experienced philosophers."
| |
|
Heraclitus and Parmenides, 2002.
A look at the views of the philosophers Heraclitus and Parmenides on the universe.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 1 source, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents a detailed discussion about the philosophies of two different philosophers when it comes to the universe and nature. Heraclitus and Parmenides are used as examples of diametrical opposed ideas.
| |
|
The Meeting of West and East, 2002.
Examines the philosophy of rational love in a poem by Parmenides and compares it with Herman Hesse's novel, "Siddhartha".
2,025 words (approx. 8.1 pages), 2 sources, $ 75.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In the analysis of the representation of the "way of truth" and the "way of opinion" in the work of Parmenides, we are confronted with the problem presented by the second half of the poem where a description of the physical world seems to contradict the principles of method which Parmenides lays out in the first part of his poem. This paper will argue that a way of reconciling this apparent contradiction may be found if we compare Parmenides' approach to phenomenal reality with that of another philosophical tradition: Buddhism. The novel "Siddhartha", by the Swiss Nobel laureate Hermann Hesse, addresses many of the same issues as Parmenides with respect to how we are to distinguish between the "opinions" of mortals and grasp a "true" sense of the real world.
| |
|
Understanding the Universe, 2001.
This paper compares Heraclitus to Parmenides.
1,305 words (approx. 5.2 pages), 5 sources, APA, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at two Greek philosophers, Heraclitus, and Parmenides. It examines their different theories as to how the universe was created, understanding of the universe, 'way of truth,' 'way of opinion' and the third way. The author explains that Parmenides, who came after Heraclitus, addressed part of his writings as a refutation of Heraclitus? views. He objected both to Heraclitus? view of the universe and how Heraclitus felt people could gain knowledge of it.
From the Paper
"While we have discussed what both men see as the make up of the material world, it is equally important to take up how each man felt he could know what he knows about the universe. Mimicking a bit the structure of Parmenides? own writings, this section covers the ?way of truth,? ?the way of opinion,? and then directly addresses Parmenides critique of Heraclitus. Heraclitus used ?logos? in multiple ways. The first, discussed above, is as the ordering principle of the universe. However, the most common use of ?logos? at the time of Heraclitus? writing was ?Word.? Heraclitus felt strongly that our ability to use and understand language is the same ability that allows us to understand and describe the world. So ?logos? is both the actual order of the universe as well as the means of our ability to understand it."
| |
|
The Illusion of Motion, 2006.
A look at the philosophy of Zeno/Parmenides as it relates to the concept that motion is an illusion.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 2 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains how the philosophy of Zeno/Parmenides relates to the scenario with the concept that motion is an illusion. Zeno, in support of Parmenides' teachings, created the paradox of dichotomy. The paper then discusses this paradox and how it contends that an object may be observed as traveling from point A to point B within a given time frame. However, Zeno concluded that on a scale of travel the object was consistently tasked with traveling to other points in between point A and point B. Each of these points, according to the philosopher, could be divided in half, which led to the object continuously having to pass through points of travel. Since the distances had the possibility of being divided without end, the process of travel was infinite, or never ending.
| |
|
The Riddler and the Poet, 2001.
A comparitive analysis of two Greek philosophers, Heraclitus and Parmenides.
1,790 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 3 sources, $ 57.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This is a comparative essay of the two Greek philosophers, Heraclitus and Parmenides. This essay highlights the similarities and differences which these two share and discusses the main themes in their works.
From the Paper
?To be, or not to be. That is the question? (Shakespeare 3.1.58). Had Shakespeare been alive around the 450's BC, there would of been great dispute over this quote from his play Hamlet. The Greek philosophers, Heraclitus and Parmenides would be ?at each others throats.? Parmenides would argue that it is impossible for something to not be. Heraclitus, on the other hand, would agree with Shakespeare that you can not be, because true being is a circular path, being becomes not being, and not being becomes being. At first glance many would agree that Heraclitus and Parmenides have completely different views of what true being is; one affirms becoming and change, while the other denies them. As indifferent as these two seem, their works share a common attribute, in that they are both constructive while at the same time destructive."
| |
|
Influences on Plato?s Style and Philosophy, 2001.
A look at several aspects of the philosophy of Plato, such as the "Forms" (Ideas), and how they relate to ideas of Pre-Socratic philosophers such as Heraclitus, Parmenides, and Anaxagoras.
3,275 words (approx. 13.1 pages), 2 sources, $ 93.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
On the surface, his may seem to be the first real philosophical works to emerge from Greek society and might appear to do so spontaneously when compared with many of the fragments left by earlier Greek philosophers. Closer analysis reveals, however, that his ideas were affected heavily by Eleatics, the Pluralists and the Pythagoreans. As Guthrie points out, ?Plato did not think in an intellectual vacuum. Some of his profoundest and most original ideas resulted from the attempt to solve problems bequeathed by his predecessors, in whom he took the liveliest interest?
| |
|
Character and Development of Greek Philosophy, 2001.
The paper discusses the development and character of philosophy, beginning with the intellectual Lonian thinkers and leading up to the most important philosopher before Socrates, Parmenides.
1,710 words (approx. 6.8 pages), 7 sources, $ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is about Greek philosophy and the thoughts of the philosophers particularly during the flowering of Greek civilization. The paper tells the importance of the Greek philosophers between 600BC and 200 BC, and how they moved from myth to science to form the basis of all philosophical speculation in the Western World. The author discusses how the first philosophers looked for reality and truth, away from the traditions of mythology and religion.
From the Paper
"Greek philosophy, particularly during the flowering of Greek civilization between 600 BC and 200 BC, comes to form the basis of all philosophical speculation in the Western World. The word philosophy comes from two Greek words ?philo? and ?sophia?, which together mean ?love of wisdom.?. Experts are not really sure why the Greeks were the first to come up with the concept. To them it is a way of looking for reality and truth, away from the traditions of mythology and religion. ?Aristotle suggested that philosophy arose out of ?wonder? or ?puzzlement?? (Browning 17). Due to the Greek alphabet and its simplicity, literacy was widespread. Trade was the way of life that involved dealing with all sorts of novel peoples, cultures, practices, and ideas. The Greeks lacked professional priests and palace bureaucracies whose interests and teachings could have hindered their own speculative thought (Zeller 42)."
| |
|
Zeno?s Paradoxes of Motion, 2002.
Examines the teachings of Greek philosopher and author Zeno on plurality and change.
4,421 words (approx. 17.7 pages), 17 sources, MLA, $ 116.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
As an adherent of Greek philosopher Parmenides? teachings that plurality and change are unreal, Zeno (approximately 490 - 430 B.C.E.) set out to prove Parmenides right. His demonstrations attempted to show the absurdities of the opposite view, that the world really contains plurality and change. The paper explains Zeno's methods of taking his opponents? hypotheses and, by deducing from them contradictory consequences, reduce them to absurdity. The paper concentrates on Zeno's set of four riddles which he devised to illustrate the unreality of motion. By means of these riddles Zeno demonstrated that Pythagorean science cannot define motion without running into inconsistency or impossibility. The paper examines why these four short stories are paradoxes and explores some of the solutions put forward to resolve them.
From the Paper
"Brumbaugh says that the Pythagoreans seemed to agree that separate ?points,? and ?moments? make up the physical world, including space and time. They thus would have defined motion as passing through a number of spatial points during a number of time moments, a definition similar to that which we have of velocity today. There was also agreement among the Pythagoreans that any continuous stretch, such as a line, could be bisected. However, the Pythagoreans did not agree on the size of the moments or points. They might have no size, or they might have a minimum, but finite, duration and extension, respectively. Furthermore, Brumbaugh suggests that the Pythagoreans did not agree on how they should think of the points making up or determining a line. Should they be thought of as points next to each other, or as points marking off segments, with spacing filling in the intervals between? (Brumbaugh, 63f)"
| |
|
Aristotle, Change and Stability, 2007.
An analysis of the philosophical doctrines of Aristotle as they relate to
change and stability.
843 words (approx. 3.4 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the doctrines of Aristotle, as they relate to change and stability and how they are superior to those of Plato, Parmenides and Heraclitus. It also examines his astonishing ability to realize the true nature of physical reality some two thousand years before it was officially recognized and understood.
From the Paper
"One of Aristotle's specific categories of explanation is related to "origin of movement," or what we commonly refer to as "change." This is a subject which the Greek philosopher Plato, Aristotle's mentor and teacher, often thought about when contemplating the mysteries of time,
space and reality. According to Plato, "real things (being forms) do not change" except in the realm of appearances, i.e., the physical world. In contrast, Aristotle insisted that "there must be three basic ingredients in every example of change--a pair of opposites and an underlying subject of change," something which Plato wholly disagreed with, for he was convinced that a pair of opposites were all that was necessary for change (Cohen, Internet)."
| |
|
Zeno's Paradoxes, 2005.
This paper discusses the life of philosopher Zeno of Elea and his paradoxes and compares his work with the philosophy of Empiricism.
1,610 words (approx. 6.4 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 52.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that most of the information known about Zeno, who explained and developed the philosophical system of his mentor Parmenides, is based on the writings of Plato and from other works by Aristotle. The author explains that Zeno wrote forty different paradoxes based on the assumptions of plurality and motion. The paper relates that Empiricists' doctrine, which states that knowledge must be the result of experience, sees Zeno's doctrine as a form of Monism and therefore the paradox's on motion and pluralism fail as a philosophical theory.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Who was Zeno?
Zeno's Paradoxes
Empiricism
Compare the Empirical Argument with Zeno's Paradoxes
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Zeno's argument regarding the idea of not being able to exist without magnitude revolves around adding a thing with no magnitude to something else does not make the receiving thing larger and subtracting a thing of no magnitude will not make the receiving thing smaller. This then entails that since the magnitude-less items do not make things bigger or smaller then the thing of no magnitude most be nothing. Although Zeno's pluralism here is perplexing at the least, his ideas of motion are even more complicated."
|
|
|
If you can't find your topic here, try another search
or try our affordable, unique custom paper alternative
Custom Research Services include:
- Papers written from scratch, according to your specifications.
Every paper is UNIQUE - Guaranteed
- Professional, top-notch writers
- All topics covered
- Any deadline
- Your satisfaction guaranteed
Place a Custom Research order now
Find out more about Custom Research
|
|
|
