| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "ORIGINS COLD WAR": |
|
|
Origins of the Cold War, 2003.
One possible theory for the origin and continuation of the Cold War.
2,600 words (approx. 10.4 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 78.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the origins of the Cold War, focusing on the misinterpretations of both the Soviet and American leaders. It shows how the uncertain future of Germany, the country responsible for two world wars, caused tension between the two superpowers.
From the Paper
"At the end of World War II, Germany, in a state of utter ruin, has an uncertain future, this marks the beginning of the Cold War (Melvyn P. Leffler and David S. Painter, Origins of the Cold War: An International History. (London: Routledge, 1994), 1-136). The main issue causing the Cold War is the struggle between the Unites States and the Soviet Union, capitalism and communism, in order to obtain control over the country that had been responsible for two world wars. Given the experience of World War II itself, this division of Europe was perhaps inevitable. Both sides wanted their values and economic and political systems to prevail in areas that their soldiers had helped to liberate. If both sides had accepted these new spheres of influence, the Cold War might never have occurred. The future of Germany was the key issue in the emerging Cold War (128): ?The aftermath of Hiler?s war was too profound, too unsettling? (136)."
| |
|
The Origins of the Cold War, 1997.
A detailed historical description of the events and policies that brought on the Cold War.
875 words (approx. 3.5 pages), 0 sources, MLA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how the ?balance of power,? between Russia and the United States, as unstable as it may be, became the Cold War. The paper gives an historical overview of the events leading up to the Cold War such as the Kremlin's intentions concerning Italy, Iran, Greece as well as Communism as a whole. It describes the effects of the use of the atom bomb by the United States in Hiroshima. It also discusses the Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan and their effects on the situation.
From the Paper
"The United States? bombing of Hiroshima was the first in a series of events that lead to the system of international relations known as the Cold War. The US had ?Soviet Threats against Greece and turkey, Soviet aggression in Iran, and the maneuvers of Russian-dominated Communists everywhere raised serious questions about the basic intentions of the Kremlin."
| |
|
Origins of the Cold War, 2003.
Compares traditional, revisionist, and non-revisionist views.
2,475 words (approx. 9.9 pages), 18 sources, $ 87.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper examines the breakdown of World War II patterns of cooperation. It looks at the division of the world into competing armed camps and postwar Western-Soviet relations.
From the Paper
"ORIGINS OF THE COLD WAR: TRADITIONAL, REVISIONIST AND NEO-REVISIONIST INTERPRETATIONS
This research paper compares various traditional, revisionist and neo-revisionist views of the origins of the Cold War -i.e. the breakdown of wartime patterns of ..."
| |
|
The Cold War: Origin and Function, 2001.
This paper analyzes the how Cold War began over the Soviet-American conflict over Europe.
1,005 words (approx. 4.0 pages), 2 sources, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay is a discussion of the reasons the Cold War began. The author describes the intentions of Stalin, Churchill, Roosevelt, and Truman and discusses whether the Cold War actually began over Europe or Asia.
From the Paper:
"Throughout the Big Three negotiations during World War II, Franklin Roosevelt was determined to work with the Soviet Union. In order to guarantee Soviet adherence to the principle of unconditional surrender and to secure their participation in the war in the Pacific, Roosevelt, often against Churchill?s wishes, worked to accommodate Stalin?s desire for security. Hoping to establish a postwar order in which both the US and USSR would not feel threatened, Roosevelt agreed to a buffer zone of friendly states around the Soviet Union."
| |
|
The Cold War, 2004.
This paper is about the historiography examining the origins of the Cold War.
2,535 words (approx. 10.1 pages), 21 sources, MLA, $ 76.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that the historiography of the origins of the Cold War passes through three chronologically defined and ideologically distinct phases, which can be called ?traditionalist?, ?revisionist?, and ?post-revisionist?. Each reflects the cultural and political attitudes prevailing in the wider Cold War context of the particular era in which it flourished. The author points out that some historians believe that power politics and strategic considerations were more important than ideology in determining Soviet policy and behavior; therefore, the Cold War resulted from a contest of great powers, not a conflict of ideologies, and both the United States and the Soviet Union bear responsibility for the origins of the Cold War. The paper relates that a new element, which reflects important trends in modern Cold War scholarship, concerns the personality of Stalin, the nature of authoritarian government, and the character and content of Communist ideology.
From the Paper
"From the end of the Second World War until the mid-1960s, the ?traditionalists? held the field with a standpoint that can be summarized as essentially pro-American/pro-Western and anti-Soviet. Essentially, such scholars held the Soviet Union responsible for the onset of the Cold War by undermining the Second World War alliance between East and West, increasing the level of military confrontation between Russia and America, and acting aggressively to promote the imposition and spread of Communism in Europe and elsewhere. It was thus argued that the United States was correct in its policy of containment towards the USSR and the Eastern Bloc, and that the American position was essentially a defensive one forced upon it by the hostility and aggression of the Communist East."
| |
|
Rhetoric of the War on Terror vs. the Cold War, 2008.
An analysis of the power of the definition of terms such as "Cold War" and "War on Terror."
1,288 words (approx. 5.2 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 43.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper compares the rhetoric and arguments that surround the Cold War and the War on Terror. It discusses how the definition of terms such as "Cold War" or "War on Terror" has a large impact upon how these wars are viewed. The paper argues that those who define and utilize the terms, primarily governments, often do so with ulterior motives, with the understanding that the one who controls the definition also controls the methodology of approach and influences public attitudes.
From the Paper
"The orthodox interpretation of the Cold War, for instance, stated that the beginning of the Cold War can be traced to the Soviet attempt to expand its sphere of control into Eastern Europe. This theory notes that the Soviets violated treaties made during the war to limit its reach. Thus, the U.S. is portrayed as acting in a purely defensive way to protect itself and stem the expansion of communism worldwide, through such strategies as the Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan. This standard view of the Cold War, which certainly had much evidence in its favor, began to be questioned in the 1960s, as the failure of the Vietnam War, then a major theater of operations in which the U.S. faced off the communist expansion, became impossible to ignore. Some writers around that time began to argue that the U.S. itself was an "empire" with global reach, not unlike many other empires throughout history, and thus was not solely in a defensive position against its opponent. More recent writers, notably Noam Chomsky, make a similar argument. Related to this critique of U.S. actions is the argument that the U.S. economic motivation, to force all nations in the world to open themselves to U.S. trade and economic influence, is also a source of worldwide conflict and opposition, both during the Cold War and during the current War on Terror (Richelson and Evans)."
| |
|
The Cold War, 2003.
An exploration of the origins of the cold war and a discussion on whether it was inevitable.
1,798 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 57.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper attempts to determine whether or not the cold war was unavoidable by identifying both its origins and its outbreak. It looks at how, although 1945 is recognised by many as the ?start? of the war and 1992 its ?end?, many also identify the the post-war conferences and subsequent developments of the 1940?s as key issues in the origins of the cold war. It explores the relationship/grand alliance between America and the Soviet Union, the influence of personality on the war and the role of nuclear weapons as well as exploring the influence of the 1919 revolution in a larger historical context.
From the Paper
"The influence of ideology in the emergence of the cold war must not be underestimated. The potential for conflict arose in 1917 with the ending of the ?old order? and the creating of a power vacuum. At the same time, events of that year planted a seed into Russian society that could be said to have flowered in the perfect climate of post-war Russia. This seed was communism. Lenin and Marx were responsible for the development of communism, yet not for the cold war. A ?communist? Soviet Union together with a ?capitalist? America illustrate the single most likely origins of the cold war and suggest to a degree, that tension was unavoidable. Traditionalists argue that the very existence of two superpowers, with similar destructive capabilities (after the USSR became an atomic power), made tension inevitable."
| |
|
The Cold War, 2004.
This paper discusses the origins of the Cold War.
775 words (approx. 3.1 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 27.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses two views on the causes of the Cold War: Russian treachery and a long history of lack of trust. The author points out that the roots of the Cold War go much further back into history than the events of World War II. The paper concludes that Russia?s clear attempt to do what Hitler had failed to do, dominate Europe, made the Cold War inevitable.
From the Paper
"The United States and its Western allies saw this as little more than the colonization of Eastern Europe. These countries knew first hand what the U.S.S.R. was doing. As the Soviets emerged as a world power, they were expanding their economic base just as many Western powers had done in the previous three - four centuries -- by conquering other lands and people."
| |
|
The Cold War, 2001.
A look at the years of the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union. A discussion of the history and the effects of the Cold War.
20,660 words (approx. 82.6 pages), 10 sources, $ 249.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is about United States and Soviet Union relations in the Cold War period. The author investigates the causes of this war, positions of the countries which took part in it, the main events of the war and the effects that the Cold War had on the diplomacy of the United States.
Table of Contents.
Introduction.
Chapter 1: Historical Background of the Cold War.
1.1 The Historical Context.
1.2 Causes and Interpretations. Chapter 2: The Cold War Chronology.
2.1 The War Years
2.2 The Truman Doctrine.
2.3 The Marshall Plan.
Chapter 3: The Role of Cold War in American History and Diplomacy.
3.1 Declaration of the Cold War.
3.2 ?old War Issues
Conclusion
Glossary
References
From the Paper
"The Cold War was characterized by mutual distrust, suspicion and misunderstanding by both the United States and Soviet Union, and their allies. At times, these conditions increased the likelihood of the third world war. The United States accused the USSR of seeking to expand Communism throughout the world. The Soviets, meanwhile, charged the United States with practicing imperialism and with attempting to stop revolutionary activity in other countries. Each block's vision of the world contributed to East-West tension. The United States wanted a world of independent nations based on democratic principles. The Soviet Union, however, tried control areas it considered vital to its national interest, including much of Eastern Europe."
| |
|
The Cold War, 2002.
A look at the origins and outcome of the Cold War.
1,650 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 8 sources, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This seven-page undergraduate essay discusses the origins, character, and development of the Cold War. The author examines why and how the United States and the Soviet Union reacted to what they each perceived to be the other's hostility, and analyzes the effect the Cold War had on Europe, the United States, and the rest of the world.
| |
|
The Roots of the Cold War, 2002.
A look at the origins of the Cold War prior to World War I.
809 words (approx. 3.2 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 28.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how there are historians who say the seeds of the Cold War, the long struggle of wills, ideology, plus brutal military might being brandished to the loyal allies of both Cold War antagonists, the West and Russia / Soviet Union, were created by the not-so-perfect peace that ended WWI. It also explores other claims that say the Cold War seeds were planted in 1914, when the heir to the Austro-Hungarian Empire, Archduke Franz Ferdinand, was assassinated. It looks at the background history of these events and attempts to make a connection between what happened and the later conflict between East and West.
From the Paper
"However, although new maps were drawn ? and the Austro-Hungarian empire became fragmented, with Serbia and Bosnia becoming part of Yugoslavia ? in the bigger picture, guns were also drawn. Indeed, one month following Franz Ferdinand?s murder, Austria declared war on Serbia ? after Serbia had rejected an unreasonable and impossible set of conditions in an Austrian ultimatum. The announcement of Austria?s war declaration prompted Czar Nicholas II to ally his Russian nation with Serbia (fellow Slavs). Two days after Russia?s declaration of support for Serbia, Germany?s Kaiser Wilhelm urged Nicholas to recall his troops."
| |
|
The Cold War, 2002.
A brief paper on the cold war, including its main causes and effects.
1,969 words (approx. 7.9 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents a background and history of the Cold War. The paper explains the origins of the war including the main characters and countries involved in it. The writer then offers an interpretation of the main causes behind the conflict and how it developed into the long-term conflict it became. Finally, the paper examines its effect on Europe, the United States and the rest of the world.
Contents:
Introduction
The Origins
The Main Causes
Start of the Cold War
The Cold War Intensifies in Europe
Division of Germany
Other Tit-for-Tat Cold War Events in Europe
How the Cold War Affected the Rest of the World?
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Although the Cold War occurred after the Second World War, it had its roots in the events that took place towards the fag end of World War I. At the time of the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, the First World War was nearing its end; Russia?s new Communist leader Vladimir Lenin decided to withdraw his country from the war. Military intervention in Russia by the United States, Britain, France, and Japan, soon followed? purportedly to restore the collapsed Eastern Front in their war effort against Germany. (Legvold, para on ?Background.?) The Communist Russia saw the intervention as an attempt to undermine the fledgling revolution. This sowed the seeds of the Cold War between the Soviet Union and the United States that came to fore several decades later in the post World War II period."
| |
|
McCarthy and the Cold War, 2005.
Discusses the events leading up to the Cold War and the impact the Cold War had on the society and politics of the United States.
2,863 words (approx. 11.5 pages), 5 sources, APA, $ 85.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at how the Cold War with the Soviet Union fed fears of Communism and feelings of paranoia and, ultimately, allowed Joseph McCarthy to wield tremendous political and social power in the United States. The paper describes the history of McCarthy's anti-communist campaign, his obsession with the communists-in-government issue, the conditions at the time that allowed him to feed on the American fear of Communism, why he was so popular, and how he was finally defeated.
From the Paper
"One aspect of history is that a country?s so-called ?friend? one day, can be an enemy the next and visa versa. The United States and Soviet Union during World War II joined ranks against the real threat of Nazi Germany. However, it did not take long after the end of the war for Russia and the United States to once again bully each other. Even before the final surrender of Germany in 1945, the two super powers rapidly found themselves in a new military and diplomatic rivalry. Meanwhile, in the United States, the economy was taking time to build and unemployment was growing. Thoughts of the Depression loomed in people?s minds. The friction with the Russians, which would receive the name of Cold War, did not help. Yet it did create a scapegoat for fears and feelings of paranoia. As the tensions between the U.S. and U.S.S.R. mounted, the Communist threat reached American shores. Surely, Russia was infiltrating the government. The Rosenberg?s trial in 1951 put all the props on the stage for the director Joseph McCarthy."
| |
|
The Cold War Winner, 2007.
This paper discusses whether Ronald Reagan should be credited with winning the Cold War.
6,341 words (approx. 25.4 pages), 20 sources, MLA, $ 147.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper explores the Cold War, the circumstances that led to the resolution of the Cold War and the social and political factors that influenced Ronald Reagan's ability to put an end to this period of fear and terror. The paper discusses the history of the Cold War and explains the war from the American and Soviet perspectives. The paper defends the position that Ronald Reagan was largely responsible for putting an end to the Cold War and the fear it generated. The paper relates how even Mr. Gorbachev admitted years later that he was outmatched by Reagan's strategy. The paper concludes that everyone was a winner by the end of the Cold War. The threat to both American and Soviet lives and future was greatly reduced.
History of the Cold War
Two Different Viewpoints
Changing Leaders in the Global Arena
The End of an Era
The Importance of the Collapse of the Soviet Economy
Technology and the US Rise to Power
Strategic Changes and Paradigm Shifts
Reagan's Contribution in Retrospect
Conclusion: Who Won the War?
From the Paper
"The Cold War began in 1947 and ended with the collapse of the Soviet Union on December 25, 1991. The two forces at the heart of the conflict was the United States and their allies against the Soviet Union and their set of allies. This struggle is called the Cold War because open hostility never occurred. However, the situations never escalated into full scale war or battle. The war was fought using posturing and information swapping regarding who had the worst weapons and who would likely to be able to inflict the most damage on the other should a full scale war occur."
| |
|
The Causes of the Cold War, 2002.
Asks the questions: How did the Cold War begin, and who started it? Also shows that the answer is not as clear-cut as it seems.
3,650 words (approx. 14.6 pages), 5 sources, $ 133.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this paper it is argued that the origins of the Cold War remain the subject of historical controversy. This paper critically examines how the Cold War began and the question of who started it. This paper argues the thesis that the question of who started the Cold War is irrelevant and that it was an inevitable outcome of the geo-political arrangement of the world in the 20th century. This essay also evaluates the two competing historical points of view on the Cold War: the so-called "orthodox" and "revisionist" schools.
|
|
|
