| Papers [1-15] of 40 :: [Page 1 of 3] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 —> | Search results on "NOAM CHOMSKY": |
|
|
Noam Chomsky, 2006.
An overview of the work and politics of famous linguist and activist, Noam Chomsky.
989 words (approx. 4.0 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines Noam Chomsky's pioneering and revolutionary work in linguistics (including a devastating dislike of a pioneer of another generation, B.F. Skinner), and his outlook on America's foreign policy.
From the Paper
"What is interesting about Chomsky's various linguistic investigations is that he seems to believe that there is a sort of universal repertoire of possible sounds from which natural language selects some. Chomsky, in this, opposes the once-popular views of B.F. Skinner, who felt that giving a baby repetitive sounds that have no formal meaning, that baby will ultimately respond, depending on the tone of those nonsense syllables. Chomsky, on the other hand, believes that anything other than a specific meaning for a specific tone and word is fallible and useless."
| |
|
Noam Chomsky and Linguistics, 2003.
An analysis of the contribution of Noam Chomsky to linguistics.
1,674 words (approx. 6.7 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 54.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper tidentifies and analyzes the important contributions made by Noam Chomsky to the field of lingusitics. It looks at important concepts such as generative grammar, I-language and universal grammar. The resistance to the behaviorist approach to understanding language is ultimately linked to his anti-establishment politics.
From the Paper
"The idea of universal grammar is a central one to Chomsky?s linguistic theory. Inherent to this idea is the concept that human beings are equipped with a distinct language faculty in our minds; this faculty is governed by an innate understanding of universal grammar, ?All the minds of human beings include the principles that movement is structure-dependent and that heads are on certain sides of phrases; they are part of the common Universal Grammar. It is not relevant to UG theory that English has a particular set of properties, French another, German another; what matters is what they have in common? (Cook & Newson, 1996, p. 32)."
| |
|
Noam Chomsky, 2005.
Synopsis of the life and career of Noam Chomsky.
1,698 words (approx. 6.8 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper begins with a brief biographical look at the life of linguist and philosopher, Noam Chomsky, and then proceeds to examine his contributions to both of these fields, the main theme of scientific realism evident in all of his work, and early influences on his political and social views.
Introduction
Influences
Linguistics
Ethics and Society
From the Paper
"Noam Chomsky?s contribution to linguistics and philosophy, as well as contemporary theoretical and political thought, is extensive. He received numerous awards and accolades, specifically for his work in linguistics. Chomsky was born in Philadelphia in 1928. As the son of Russian immigrants he was influenced by their belief in pacifism. His early education took place at a progressive school as well as at Philadelphia Central High school. He later attended the University of Pennsylvania where he studied mathematics, philosophy and linguistics. He completed his PhD in Linguistics in 1955 and was appointed Professor at the the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1976."
| |
|
Noam Chomsky's Theory of Universal Grammar, 2006.
An analysis of the pros and cons of Noam Chomsky's theory of universal grammar.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 3 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In recent years Noam Chomsky has become more famous as a political activist and critic of various American governments than he has ever been as a linguist. Be that as it may there was a time when Chomsky was one of the leading linguistic theorists in America and this paper looks at arguably his most important scholarly contribution to that area of inquiry. Specifically this paper explores the strengths and weaknesses of Chomsky's theory of universal grammar, in particular what it reveals and what it does not reveal or rather what it obscures.
| |
|
'Noam Chomsky's MisEducation', 2007.
This paper examines Chomsky's theories on education as seen in the book "Noam Chomsky's MisEducation" by Donaldo Macedo.
1,146 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper presents the opinion that the author of "Noam Chomsky's MisEducation" provides an excellent evaluation of schooling. The book provides the edited text of five essays, lectures, interviews, and a debate in which Chomsky took part, on the subject of education. The paper relates that Chomsky presents an exceptional assessment of schooling that reclaims the idea of schooling as both a public good and an autonomous strength. The paper maintains that Chomsky and Macedo's book accomplishes this assessment with great courage and thorough insight. The paper concludes that this is a book which is recommended to everyone interested in education and the crisis of democracy.
Outline:
Introduction
Background
Summary of the Book
Analysis of the Book
Conclusion
From the Paper
"In the book Chomsky has put together global technological change as well as the dominance of responsible media along with the autonomous role of schools and higher education. The objective of writing on this subject was to inform his readers that a true democratic society cannot prosper in a swiftly transforming world till the approach to education is formal or else it's dramatically reformed (McChesney, 2000).
The first chapter opens up with a dialog between Chomsky and Donaldo Macedo, where the author argued that American schools do not encourage independent thinking and are more keen in controlling students and catering to the wishes of only those who have wealth and power. However, Chomsky very quickly goes off the track of the subject and steers the discussion to American foreign policy (Westbrook, 1991)."
| |
|
The Linguistical Philosopher: Noam Chomsky's Revolution, 2000.
How, through a careful look at Chomsky?s life, philosophy of language, and contribution to the field of linguistics, one can see his overwhelming power over the now widely accepted notions regarding the discipline.
2,090 words (approx. 8.4 pages), 7 sources, $ 65.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The work of Noam Chomsky overturned all former approaches to language, from ancient Greeks? to those of his own teachers, and challenged assumptions about linguistic research, including both empiricist and nonempiricist methods (Newmeyer 1986:66). One of modern linguistics most influential contributors, Noam Chomsky, rose from a humble background to not only add fresh insight, but to revolutionize the way the world thought of linguistics as a discipline. Chomsky is a renowned professor of linguistics at MIT, in addition to being one of North America's most prominent political dissidents; he has authored over 30 political books dissecting such issues as U.S. intervention in the developing world, the political economy of human rights and the propaganda role of corporate media. This care for the unvoiced people of the world shines through in his theory of the innateness and creativity of language. Through a careful look at Chomsky?s life, philosophy of language, and contribution to the field of linguistics, one can see his overwhelming power over the now widely accepted notions regarding the discipline. His substantial addition to the field cannot be overlooked in a survey of linguistics, for he single-handedly created numerous breakthroughs in theories and research styles."
| |
|
Second Language Acquisition: Noam Chomsky, 1993.
Discusses Chomsky's theory of language acquisition, in which there exists some sort of "language organ" that makes language possible for humans & impossible for animals.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 9 sources, $ 23.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Nativist Theories of Second Language Acquisition: Noam Chomsky
Introduction
According to Larsen-Freeman and Long (1991), nativist theories posit the existence of a specific, innate biological capacity or organ that makes learning possible. Some of those nativist theories are specific to language acquisition, with Noam Chomsky perhaps the earliest and foremost exponent of the theory that language acquisition follows a universal pattern based on an innate language organ, or system of hard-wiring within the brain.
Noam Chomsky and Universal Grammar
Chomsky became most visible in his struggles with the researchers who were working with chimpanzees and gorillas to ..."
| |
|
Noam Chomsky's Language Theory, 1996.
Describes linguist's ideas on second language learning, transformational grammar, applications, critical views.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 10 sources, $ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The purpose of this paper is briefly delineate Chomsky's theory of language learning and to then examine research and theory which has attempted to delineate and/or test the extent to which this theory might be related to foreign language teaching in high school and middle school. The review begins with a very brief description of some of the key concepts of Chomsky's linguistic model.
Chomsky's Perspective of Language Learning
Noam Chomsky was a linguist who first came to fame when he took issue with the behavioristic notions of B.F. Skinner arguing that no theory of language learning could be practically based on operant conditioning principles; as Chomsky viewed it, parents simply did not go to such ends to correct their children's..."
| |
|
"Turning The Tide"( Noam Chomsky ), 1997.
Critical review of 1985 work on destructive effects of U.S. intervention in Central America.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 1 source, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Noam Chomsky, in Turning the Tide: U.S. Intervention in Central America and the Struggle for Peace, effectively examines the pervasive and destructive role of the United States, especially in El Salvador and Nicaragua, but he wants to do more than that. Specifically, Chomsky seeks to enlighten the public and progressive leaders so that they will change that policy, so that the nations of Central America will be able to become more sovereign, free and democratic, and so that the United States will begin in nations abroad to live up to the democratic ideals and practices about which it so proudly boasts at home. The book has its shortcomings, as we shall see, but its lessons are applicable to not only Central America but to the world, despite those shortcomings.
Chomsky makes his arguments with passion and with much.."
| |
|
Language Acquisition - Skinner & Chomsky, 1988.
Comparison of B.F. Skinner & Noam Chomsky's theories on language acquisition. Looks specifically at values & problems of each.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 2 sources, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"One of the issues of psychology is language acquisition, and different theories of how this process takes place have been offered. Each theory has its good points and its bad points, and none as yet seems to be definitive in explaining this complex learning experience. Two of the important theories are those of B.F. Skinner and Noam Chomsky, and they can be compared for their values and their problems.
B.F. Skinner
Skinner discusses the issue of language acquisition in his overall context of behaviorist psychology. He notes that language was acquired relatively late in the development of the human species, and this involved a remarkable change as the (...)"
| |
|
"Syntactic Structures", 2005.
An analysis of how Noam Chomsky's syntactic revolution overpowered B.F. Skinner and the behaviorist approach to language.
1,239 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Prior to 1957, the two most popular ways of analyzing grammar were the methods of prescriptivism and structuralism, or structural grammar. The paper examines how all this changed with the release of Noam Chomsky's "Syntactic Structures" in 1957 in which he introduced a new way to analyze grammar called 'transformational grammar'. The paper discusses how Chomsky publicly destroyed Skinner's theories and argues that Chomsky's ability to explain certain quirks of the English language, such as ambiguity, and the behaviorists' utter lack of a retort, makes it clear that Noam Chomsky deserves his title as a living legend among linguists today.
From the Paper
"Chomsky makes clear that the input-output approach is better and different from the approach of the behaviorist, because he points out once again how it can handle certain nuances of the language such as ambiguities. "Whatever a habit-structure is, it's clear that you can't innovate by habit, and the characteristic use of language, both by a speaker and a hearer, is innovation" (103)."
| |
|
Chomsky's Theory of Universal Grammar, 2002.
This paper is a discussion of the ideas espoused by Chomsky that the capacity for language acquisition is something we are born with.
1,810 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 4 sources, $ 58.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper provides a detailed evaluation of Chomsky?s theory of Universal Grammar and innate Language Acquisition Device, which is central to the field of linguistics and psycholinguistics. It reviews the controversies surrounding Chomsky?s theory and discusses alternative theories.
From the Paper
"Language acquisition is undeniably biologically programmed as children all over the world, from varying cultures and linguistic environments produce the same levels of language at the same stages. Chomsky proposes that this is a direct result of Universal Grammar, which is an inherent part of every human mind. However, his theory of an innate Language Acquisition Device provokes controversy on two grounds. First is the debate between nature and nurture, with many theorists criticising Chomsky for dismissing any environmental factors. Second, is the dispute as to whether language acquisition is an independent innate faculty as Chomsky claims, or part of the child?s wider cognitive development. Such disagreements demonstrate the enormous impact Chomsky?s theory has had on the field of linguistics and reflects how ?the Universal Grammar theory is for many the central pillar in our understanding of language.? (Cook, V. Inside Language. Arnold. 1997, p249)"
| |
|
Theories of Language Acquisition: Peters, Chomsky, and Brown, 1999.
An assessment and description of the different aspects of the Peters' Chomsky's and Brown's theories in detail and opinions on which theory proves to be the most successful and credible based on research.
2,706 words (approx. 10.8 pages), 8 sources, $ 81.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"How does a child begin to speak? Why? These are questions that many linguists set out to answer as they explore the world of language acquisition. Three credible linguists, Ann M. Peters, Noam Chomsky, and Roger Brown, all have different opinions and theories of language acquisition. All of them address influences, grammar, and patterns of speech in their theories, but in different contexts. Chomsky believes it is genetic, Peters believes it is totally up to the environment, and Brown believes it is due to positive reinforcement and trial and error. All three theories are credible and have provided great insight into the ways children do acquire language. Language acquisition is a widely researched topic, and will continue to have new theories evolve as long as children keep talking. This paper assesses and describes different aspects of each linguists? theory in detail and offers the author?s opinion on which theory proves to be the most successful and credible based on reasearch."
| |
|
Class and Privilege, 2002.
Examines the issue of social privilege in relation to one's class, using the works of Noam Chomsky and Marxist theories as references.
1,540 words (approx. 6.2 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 50.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Pierre Bourdieu observed that human beings demonstrate a strong need to classify objects and groups. A large part of a person?s identity is determined by how he or she is classified into social groups that are divided by factors like ethnicity, social or economic status, race and gender. In addition to identity, a person?s social and economic privilege are derived from and defined by his or her economic class. In many ways, the economic class a person is born into remains a determining factor over other aspects of his or her life. This paper thus draws from the writings of Marxist theory and Noam Chomsky to examine the continuing influence of class and its concomitant social and economic privilege.
From the Paper
"Despite the astute realization that consciousness is defined in relation to one?s economic conditions, this classical Marxist analysis of a superstructure (political institutions and consciousness) resting on an economic base proves inadequate to explain the many forms of social stratification. For instance, gender and race often affect privilege, even more than class. Furthermore, even Marx himself recognized that the peasant and working class often use their limited voting rights to further subjugate themselves, rather than establishing themselves as a revolutionary challenge to the ruling class (Fletscher 89)."
| |
|
Terrorism, 2005.
A comparison of the views of Noam Chomsky and Michael Ignatieff on terrorism the Western world and the war on terror.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 1 source, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay compares the conception of the term "terrorism" by Noam Chomsky in "Who are the Global Terrorists" and Michael Ignatieff in "Liberty and Armageddon". The paper argues that both have essentially different views on this subject and it discusses each of their views in detail, pointing out in which ways they differ most.
From the Paper
"Terrorism as Defined by Noam Chomsky and Michael Ignatieff Two positions on global terror could not be more different than those taken by Noam Chomsky in "Who are the Global Terrorists?" and Michael Ignatieff in "Liberty and Armageddon." In both articles, the respective authors deal with the topic of modern global terrorism. However, they display a markedly different understanding of the issue. Chomsky argues that the Western liberal democracies, lead by the United States and Israel, have been guilty for decades of countless cases of state sponsored terrorism and transgressions, while Michael Ignatieff completely ignores potential Western guilt while arguing for an increase in the effort of the war on terror."
|
|
|
