| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "NATION NEUTRAL": |
|
|
No Nation Will Be Neutral, 2004.
An extensive evaluation of rhetoric to illuminate U.S. foreign policy used in George W. Bush's speech, "No Nation Will Be Neutral in This Conflict".
2,384 words (approx. 9.5 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 73.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains how President Bush's speech is an extension of his foreign policy. All forms of rhetoric in his speech are carefully explored to show the extent to which he is trying to build a coalition in the name of his ill-rhetoric.
From the Paper
"In President Bush?s speech, ?No Nation Can Be Neutral in This Conflict,? he praises the support of the nations that are helping the fight against terrorism. In his address to those attending, the Polish, Central and Eastern Nations, at the Warsaw Conference on Combating Terrorism, the president uses many forms of rhetoric to set the tone of his speech. The title alone, ?No Nation Can Be Neutral,? sets the tone that there can be either ?good or bad.? A nation can either be on the side of American or the side of terrorist, or in other words, ?If you are not with us you are against us.? The tools of persuasion the president uses to accomplish winning the war on terror includes logical persuasion in the soundness for the move to action, emotional reactions to justify support, and his credibility as president of the United States to act in reasonable cause against terror."
| |
|
Swiss Neutrality, 2005.
This paper discusses Swiss neutrality, the choice not to take part in a war fought by other nations and to pursue a non-discriminatory and impartial policy toward these nations.
1,985 words (approx. 7.9 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, in 1291, a new nation-state the Confederation of Switzerland declared its independence and established what is now known as a neutral state-of-being or neutrality. The author points out that Swiss neutrality is distinguished by three characteristics; it is self-imposed, permanent and armed. The paper concludes that this neutrality has paid off significantly for Switzerland: (1) Business and labor prospects are steadily increasing on par and in many cases exceeding the United States, the United Kingdom and Japan, (2) the government budgets its largest percentage toward education resulting in world-renowned opportunities, (3) the economy and standard of living are among the best in the world, (4) tourism is demonstrating a major increase and (5) hundreds of international organizations such as the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and the United Nations Organization have found a safe and convenient headquarters.
From the Paper
"This is the basic code by which Switzerland proudly abides, as per the Confederation's code of international conduct. It was not until the Congress of Vienna in 1815 that Switzerland was officially established as a federation and guaranteed its independence and permanent neutrality (though the intention of independence and neutrality was informally announced during the month of August, in the year 1291). For the most part, the doctrine of neutrality concerns the right of any neutral state to be left undisturbed during conflicts and their obligations of impartiality and non-participation. The law of neutrality is applicable only in conflicts between states, and not in purely internal conflicts (e.g. civil wars). Neutrality policy is flexible enough for adaptation, taking into account the foreign and security policy situation of the day."
| |
|
Network Neutrality, 2007.
This paper discusses network neutrality, protecting the rights of those going online.
2,731 words (approx. 10.9 pages), 11 sources, MLA, $ 81.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper explains the argument for network neutrality, that whatever we surf on the Internet should be accessible and not regulated based on the commercial whims of the ISPs. The paper discusses the parties involved and who network neutrality affects. The paper maintains that there should be federal legislation on net neutrality - whether for or against - in order to settle the matter.
Outline:
Introduction
Parties involved in Network Neutrality
Who Will Network Neutrality Affect?
Current Views About Net Neutrality From Different Players
Regulations and Laws on Net Neutrality
Thoughts on Net Neutrality
From the Paper
"A new battle is brewing and this is not like any wars, conflicts or skirmishes we have ever seen. This is the battle for the right to cyberspace and although the Founding Fathers never imagined a world inundated with bits and bytes, the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights may have some provision protecting the rights of everyone and anyone going online. The fight is on for network neutrality or "net neutrality" wherein its "principle states that all contents and applications should be treated equally on the Internet and therefore the Internet service providers (ISPs) should not be allowed to implement pricing schemes that discriminate by type and content or application (Oxera, 2006)."
| |
|
National Retails Sales Tax, 2006.
This paper discusses the history of taxation in the U.S. and a proposed national retails sales tax and concludes in favor of these new systems of taxation.
5,590 words (approx. 22.4 pages), 12 sources, APA, $ 135.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, as proposed, the national sales tax (also called the Fair Tax) would be a 15 percent sales tax on the final purchase of goods and services at the retail level and would include the abolishment of the Internal Revenue Service. The author points out that some of the arguments for the Fair Tax are that all Americans will take home their entire paycheck resulting in revenue neutrality and that there will be no tax on business inputs. The paper relates that some of the arguments against the Fair Tax are the fear of burdening the poor who spend most of their income on retail in contrast to the wealthy who invest much of the income, and the cost of implementing a system of controls.
Table of Contents:
Objective
Introduction
History of U.S. Taxes and Tax Law
War of 1812 - The First Sales Tax
Civil War Effort - The First Income Tax Law
Congress Rules Income Taxes as Unconstitutional
The Sixteenth Amendment - Income Tax made Permanent
World War One
The Great Depression
World War II - Transformation of the Tax System
1981 - The Largest Tax Cut Ever
Yearly New Tax Acts - 1986 through 1990
Tax Acts of President George Bush
World Trade Organization Rules Corporate Tax Provision Illegal
The National Sales Tax
Three Major Proposals - Alternative Reform Initiatives
Another View of the NST
Gregory (2004) agrees with Crawford (2005) most emphatically
Another Vote for Real Reform
Primary arguments of Fair Tax proponents are as follows:
Primary Arguments of Those Against the Fair Tax
Knowledge to Assist in the Comprehension of the Fair Tax Law
The Views Expressed by 'The Ways and Means Committee - Washington"
Regressive Tax System Characteristics
Discussion
From the Paper
"The proposed 'national sales tax' would be the replacement for the personal income tax, corporate income tax, and estate and gift tax and would have an impact on the U.S. economy, the national standard of living, the cost of compliance and the degree of intrusiveness of the tax system in the lives of U.S. citizens. The NST would stand in the place of all individual and corporate income tax, transfer taxes, as well as most non-trust fund excise taxes with a single 15 percent flat-rate tax on the purchase of final goods and services at the retail level. The rate of 15% would be applicable meaning that an item costing $.85 would cost a total of $1 including tax. he present income tax system in the U.S. has several defects. The National Sales Tax plan is purported to be the answer for correcting those defects."
| |
|
Switzerland's Neutrality, 2003.
Examines the reasons for Switzerland's unique ability to remain neutral during the Great Wars of the 20th Century.
2,502 words (approx. 10.0 pages), 13 sources, MLA, $ 76.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper focuses on Switzerland's foreign policy of armed neutrality during the 20th century. It details why the Swiss have remained neutral and why they have been successful in maintaining this policy when most countries were engaged in war. Switzerland remained neutral during both world wars in the 20th century because of their strong army, geographical advantages, strong will to enforce and protect their foreign policy and the benefits that their neutrality provides for other countries.
From the Paper
"Switzerland has always turned to its army to protect its foreign policy and has one of the strongest armies considering its small size. Switzerland has more weapons per square mile than any other nation in Europe (Levy 66). Service in the military is universal and obligatory for all able-bodied male citizens (Milivojevic 25). Men from ages twenty to fifty must first attend initial training and then refresher training a few weeks per year (27). During peacetime, the army has 1500 regular troops, 18500 recruits, and 625,000 reserves (25). In addition to its large size, Switzerland is able to mobilize all of their troops in less than forty-eight hours (Meier 34)."
| |
|
Swiss Neutrality, 2002.
A look at the history behind Switzerland's neutrality and what has kept them motivated.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 5 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines Switzerland's neutrality. The author provides specific details about the current government, discusses why the Swiss have stayed neutral for so long, and analyzes Swiss opinions about their government.
| |
|
Dutch Neutrality in WWI, 2002.
Discusses the neutrality of Holland during the First World War by examining a text about an internment camp.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 6 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews an article written by a prisoner at a Dutch internment camp during World War One in order to demonstrate that Holland practiced true neutrality during the war.
| |
|
Turkish Neutrality in WWII, 1994.
This paper discusses Turkish neutrality in WWII: Geopolitical background, leadership, foreign relations, weak military, authoritarianism, treaties with Allies and Germany, opportunism and trade.
3,150 words (approx. 12.6 pages), 8 sources, $ 111.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"This paper will discuss Turkey during the Second World War, focusing upon how Turkish leaders kept their country neutral. The first part of the paper will present a background of Turkey's geopolitical position in the middle of the Twentieth Century; the second part of the paper will examine the role played by Turkey in the Second World War.
Centrally located in the Near East and controlling the only waterway connecting the Black Sea with the Mediterranean Sea, Turkey was both an asset and an obstacle in the Allied and Axis strategic plans.. At the beginning of the war the Turkish government maintained diplomatic relations with both sides, asserting its position as being strictly neutral. Both sides wanted control of the Straits and a presence in the Balkans. The British ... "
| |
|
Network Neutrality, 2007.
This paper discusses the debate surrounding the interference of network carriers in the free access and choices of consumers.
1,604 words (approx. 6.4 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 52.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper explores the arguments for and against neutral networks. The paper examines the perspective of the cable and telephone companies in light of the consumer's serious issues of democratic freedom and free access to information and content. The paper suggests that perhaps companies can receive some control but not enough that would infringe on the essential rights of freedom of expression and information.
Outline:
Introduction
What is Network Neutrality?
The Arguments For and Against Neutral Networks
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Network neutrality has become one of the most discussed issues in communications and the Internet today. As one pundit states network neutrality is "...a large, unresolved debate..." (Mark R.) The issue is so contemporary and hotly debated because the outcome of this debate could have a direct and far-reaching impact on the future of the present concept of the Internet as a democratic zone for free exploration and enterprise. One of the central arguments for network neutrality is that the demise of network neutrality would, many assert, mean that innovation and accessibility for all would be stifled."
| |
|
Canadian "Neutrality" During the American Revolution, 2002.
Addresses the question which asks why the Canadian colonies of Great Britain decided to remain neutral during the American Revolution.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 1 source, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper argues that the Canadian colonies of Great Britain did not join the American colonies in Revolution because of mixture of fragmented discontent and self-interest.
| |
|
Neutralization, Private Justice and the Black Panther, 2002.
An examination of Gresham Sykes and David Matza's model of justifications of deviant behavior and its application to the Black Panther Party.
2,692 words (approx. 10.8 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 80.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes Gresham Sykes and David Matza's five-part model of justifications of deviant behavior that is also known as techniques of neutralization. It looks at how the five techniques include denying responsibility, denying the injury, blaming the victim, condemning the authorities and appealing to higher principles or authorities. It discusses whether the Black Panther Party resorted to Sykes and Matza's techniques of neutralization to justify the criminality of their behavior and whether the social acceptability of their doctrine was aided by a social and cultural era in upheaval, particularly concerning the civil rights of blacks and America's involvement in Vietnam.
Outline
Introduction
Techniques of Neutralization
Denial of Responsibility
Denial of Injury
Denial of the Victim
Condemnation of the Condemners
Appeal to Higher Loyalties
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Sykes and Matza argue that the third technique of neutralization is the criminal's attempt to deny that the victim can in fact be victimized. In other words, the criminal argues that that the victim is the wrongdoer and their own action is an attempt to create justice, not defy it. It was the whole basis of the Black Panther Party for Self-Defense that the entire system of government as run by white Americans was a criminal and violent oppression of the civil rights and human dignity of American blacks. They had the right to bear arms to defend themselves against such injustice. Consider, for example, the ideology of the Party's intellectual leader in its early stages, Eldridge Cleaver."
| |
|
A Neutral International Language, 2003.
A look at the growing need for an international language in the current era of globalization and increased interaction between the global population.
3,556 words (approx. 14.2 pages), 11 sources, MLA, $ 99.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the importance of communication between countries and government representatives that is efficient and effective and does not require the the aid of expensive translators. The paper further argues that the only way to achieve this important and essential efficient communication is through the adoption of a universal language, which all the people of the world understand and speak. Finally, the paper contends that such a language should be an artificial language, such as Esperanto, because it is politically neutral and not linked to any specific country, culture, or political ideology; is easier to learn than any other language; and is well-developed enough as a language to fulfill the action of communication for all purposes. A complete outline and an annotated bibliography is included with the paper.
From the Paper
"In the era of globalization and increase of interaction between the global population, the importance of an international language increases. The numbers reported by Kep Enderby, the author of "The Problem of Language In International Affairs," and a former government minister and judge, support this argument. Enderby informs readers that the world's 5.2 billion people speak 3,000 different world languages and 7,000 dialects (par. 2). As global cooperation is necessary, thousands of people from across the world attend over 2,000 international conferences a year (par. 26). Since they do not have a common language, at least four different languages are officially used, with translators still needed (Enderby par. 33). People and governments do not have a common language, and this results in misunderstandings, waste of time and waste of money. In the age where all countries are connected and dependant on one another, and where representatives of governments have to meet regularly and often, it is essential that communication between them is efficient and not requiring the aid of expensive translators. The only way to achieve this important and essential efficient communication is through the adoption of a universal language which all the people of the world understand and speak. Furthermore, a universal language will have the practical objective of giving all people, from all countries, a global identity. Most people agree with this idea but disagree on whether this universal language should be a natural language such as English, or an artificial one such as Esperanto. Although many people favor the adopting of English as an international language, believing that it is an obvious choice because it is already a popular and widely spoken second language, that is easy to learn, it is not a good alternative. The best choice for an international language is an artificial one like Esperanto because it is politically neutral, not linked to any specific country, culture or political ideology, is easier to learn than any other language, and is well-developed enough as a language to fulfill the action of communication for all purposes. However, the success of adopting Esperanto as a "lingua humana," like Gardner Ralph White calls it in "Towards the Construction of A Lingua Humana," (113) is greatly dependant upon its introduction into the educational systems of countries as a second language and the chances for its success are poor."
| |
|
The Neutrality in Political Science, 2006.
This paper examines Charles Taylor's belief that political philosophy and political science are intrinsically linked.
1,638 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper reveals that there is an ongoing debate as to the status of political philosophy and its relationship to political science. The paper examines Charles Taylor's attempt to demonstrate a convergence between science and normative theory in the field of politics. Additionally, the paper explains how Charles Taylor provides a thorough and persuasive argument against those who believe that political science should be separated from the field of political philosophy.
From the Paper
"There exists an ongoing debate as to the status of political philosophy and its relation with political science. One group of scholars holds that political philosophy is dead, being replaced by the growth of science and the end of ideology, and that political science has come of age in freeing itself finally of the incubus of political philosophy and its prejudiced moral positions by adopting the scientific method and becoming value-free. (Charles Taylor, Neutrality in Political Science, 58). Others however doubt the thesis of the logical separation between facts and values, and claim that political science cannot be separated from political philosophy. Charles Taylor, in his chapter "Neutrality in Political Science," takes the latter of these positions, and attempts to show a convergence between science and normative theory in the field of politics (61)."
| |
|
Questionable Neutrality, 2002.
American involvement in The Second World War prior to Pearl Harbor.
2,500 words (approx. 10.0 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 75.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The major focus of this paper is on American-European relations during the period 1939-1941 and any actions and/or incidents that arose from these relations in this period. American Japanese relations are briefly examined but are generally beyond the scope of this paper. The paper shows the hostile warlike actions of the United States towards Germany prior to a formal declaration of war. Directly related to this, and also examined, is the support for and alliance with Britain by the United States in this period.
From the Paper
"On December 7, 1941, elements of the Imperial Japanese military attacked the United States military bases at Pearl Harbor in Hawaii. The next day the United States declared war on Japan. Three days later Germany and Italy supporting their Japanese ally, declared war on the United States. The Americans now began their involvement in the Second World War. Or was this in fact the beginning of American involvement in the war? The purpose of this paper is to prove that the United States was actively involved in the war long before the incident at Pearl Harbor. American involvement began in earnest at the outbreak of the war in 1939 coinciding with its declaration of neutrality on September 5th 1939. From neutrality the United States moved to undeclared war and then to war itself (1)."
| |
|
Pre-WWII U.S. Neutrality, 1994.
A historical background from 1899, including pros and cons, peace pacts, public opinion and government policy toward Japan and Germany, the Lend-Lease Act and economic and political considerations.
4,950 words (approx. 19.8 pages), 26 sources, $ 135.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The Pre-Second World War Neutrality Controversy in the United States
Introduction
This research examines the pre-Second World War neutrality controversy in the United States. The most vocal opponents of changes to the nation's position of neutrality were the isolationists; however, German-American and Irish-American groups strongly opposed changes they feared would ally the United States more closely with the United Kingdom, and commercial and industrial interests opposed changes that would impinge on their freedom to trade with willing buyers. The most visible proponents of changes to the nation's neutrality laws were those individuals and groups who denounced what they perceived to be the inherent evilness of the sitting governments in Germany, Italy, and Japan. The most..."
|
|
|
