| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "NAPOLEON REIGN ESSENCE BENEVOLENT DICTATORSHIP": |
|
|
Was Napoleon's Reign In Essence A Benevolent Dictatorship?, 2002.
This paper evaluates the claim that Napoleonism was in essence a benevolent dictatorship?
4,650 words (approx. 18.6 pages), 12 sources, $ 169.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper evaluates the claim that Napoleonism (Napoleon's Reign) was in essence a benevolent dictatorship?
| |
|
The Essence of Teaching, 2008.
A narrative paper on the essence of teaching and its implications for designing a curriculum.
950 words (approx. 3.8 pages), 3 sources, APA, $ 33.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this paper, the writer expresses her belief that the essence of teaching has nothing to do with standardized curricula but has everything to do with helping children to become the best human beings they can possibly be. The writer explains her sources of inspiration in developing her curriculum ideas and offers concrete examples of how she would hope to achieve her ideals in her teaching practice.
From the Paper
"If I was taking up a position in a local school in BC, I would be focused on making sure that my teaching addressed what I believe to be the essence of teaching. The essence of teaching, in my opinion, has nothing to do with standardized curricula. Although one has to factor these into one's thinking as a teacher, they do not address the essence of teaching. The essence of teaching has more to do with helping children to become the best human beings they can possibly be. This has to do with their ability to do the best they can in this society, with the attributes they have been given. What I mean by this will become clearer as I give concrete examples of how I would hope to achieve this goal in my teaching practice."
| |
|
The Essence of the Human Spirit, 2002.
Discusses three themes that encapsulate what reasonably can be considered the essence of the 'human spirit'.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 4 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
These topics, which first developed in parallel with the emergence of ancient Greek society, have played a determining role in shaping the development of subsequent western civilization and, indeed, continue to have an important influence on contemporary society. Although conceptually distinct, these themes are, as we shall see, closely related to each other. They are, (a) the adoption of reason and a scientific attitude to explain the natural world and the individuals it contains; (b) the view that humans can impose order on the world around them; (c) the emergence of the ideals of democracy and freedom.
| |
|
Existence and Essence: Sartre v. Plato, 1999.
A comparison paper between the famous Greek philosopher, Plato, and modern philosopher, Sartre.
3,099 words (approx. 12.4 pages), 2 sources, $ 90.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is an attempt to compare the differences between famous Greek philosopher, Plato, and modern philosopher, Sartre, namely the ideas of essence, human nature, the human condition, belief in god(s), and optimism. The paper has, as a basis for discussion, a fictional conversation between the two philosophers. A detailed look at each belief and how it compares to the opposite follows each brief conversation.
| |
|
Karl Marx and the Human Essence, 2007.
An analysis of Karl Marx's use of the theory of species-being
982 words (approx. 3.9 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 34.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how the species being is basically the human essence and how to be a species being is to be truly human. In particular, it examines how Marx uses the idea of species-being to make a connection to the alienation of labor and how it is then a stepping stone to his thoughts on capitalism and an eventual communist revolution.
From the Paper
"Marx wrote that man exists as two different beings. On the one hand, man exists as a selfish being who cares only of himself and his own needs. On the other hand, man exists as a member of society and freely helps other members of society. (Marx 53) "He has a life both in the political community, where he is valued as a communal being, and in civil society, where he is active as a private individual, treats others as a means, [and] degrades himself to a means." (Marx 53) It is as this "communal being" that man is truly human. Although others in society are essentially objectified to achieve a means to an end, the species-being does not value his own needs over others. In the sixth thesis on Feuerbach Marx wrote, "The human essence is no abstraction inherent in each single individual. In its reality it is the ensemble of the social relations." (Marx 172)"
| |
|
The Essence Of Un-American: Persuasion And Propaganda, 2004.
Discusses the tactics of persuasion and propaganda as they relate to American democracy.
1,808 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
A paper discussing the tactics of persuasion and propaganda as they relate to American democracy and notions of citizenship. The paper examines the extent to which the political establishment should go in order to secure the good opinion of the public to gain or retain office.
From the Paper
"Doesn't the saying go 'Beauty is in the eye of the beholder'? In other words Perspective is everything. In the context of government of a democratic nation then public opinion that is the perspective of the beholder is the most prized possession. So to what extent should the political establishment go in order to secure the good opinion of the public, indeed the majority, so as to gain or retain office? Where in democracy does the power ..."
| |
|
"Trifles": A Simple Play with a Rich Essence, 2004.
An analysis of Susan Glaspell's play, "Trifles"
1,869 words (approx. 7.5 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 59.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
What, at first glance, may come off as a simple one-act play, is really a rich piece of work. This paper explains that, through the creative use of setting and symbols, Susan Glaspell carries out the complex themes of isolation and traditional gender views.
From the Paper
"Susan Glaspell's play, Trifles, is a modern play depicting the dark reality of rural life for women in America in the early twentieth century. A one act play, centered on a character that is never present on stage and carried out through a total of five playing characters, Trifles is a simple play. Despite its structural simplicity, however, the play is incredibly rich in essence. The main themes are complex ones and are reflective of the issues of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. To present such intricate themes in such a minimalist piece of work, Susan Glaspell creatively uses setting and symbols. These two elements will be further analyzed in pertinence to the two main themes in Trifles: isolation and traditional gender views."
| |
|
Cleanth Brooks and the Essence of Poetic Expression, 2007.
An overview of the work and ideas of Cleanth Brooks.
1,537 words (approx. 6.1 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 50.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper describes the work of Cleanth Brooks who was a figure in the founding of the formalist school of "New Criticism". The author of this paper provides several examples of texts that Brooks claimed should be freed from authorial, historical, and socio-political associations, to create a space in which the text is able to speak for itself.
From the Paper
"Cleanth Brooks' methodological approach to literary criticism seeks to locate the essential experiential voice of a text through an authentic interaction with the text as experience itself. Brooks was an instrumental figure in the founding of the formalist school of "New Criticism", which called for a freeing of the text from its historical and authorial intentions in order to focus upon the critical indications of the text itself. These indicated vectors of interpretation would be revealed by a close reading of the structural interplay of the textural elements, which could then be used to generate a normative evaluation of the work. Such strategies axiomatically located a meaning that transcended the formal indications of language to express 'concrete universal' truths of the human existential experience. The fact that these 'universals' are assumed on faith problemitizes such a methodology by essentially placing limits upon human comprehension even as it seeks to express that which is beyond it. Brooks, however, held that it was in this space of wonder that literature did its work by interacting with the 'real' world.
Brooks asserts that the study of literary texts must begin with a freeing of the text from its authorial, historical, and socio-political associations, to create a space in which the text is able to speak for itself. It is in this space that the critic performs a close reading of the text, from which the multitudes of associations emerge. The first of his interestingly termed "articles of faith" is "[t]hat literary criticism is a description and evaluation of its object". This assertion was intended to direct the focus of literary study away from the bibliographic and historical approach that dominated the discourse prior to the emergence of Formalism. The meaning and significance of the text was derived from its position in history and the assumed intentions of the author. Brooks was instrumental in the development of a new perspective that posited the text itself as the primary object of critical investigation. While a strict formalist approach would render the textural object wholly disassociated from anything but itself, Brooks' holds the belief that there is a value and meaning in literary objects that can be accessed through a thorough consideration of the structural unity created by the content of a text. From these assumptions, Brooks does not disregard extrinsic evidence, as amply demonstrated in his Historical Evidence and the Reading of Seventeenth-Century Poetry; rather, the text itself must dictate the necessity of such support."
| |
|
Napoleon Bonaparte and the French Revolution, 2002.
This paper discusses that the Age of Napoleon Bonaparte has its roots in the French Revolution and that it was Napoleon Bonaparte who spread the teachings of the French Revolution throughout Europe.
2,385 words (approx. 9.5 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 73.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that the French Revolution ignited new ideas regarding equality, justice, freedom and the very nature of social interaction; but, ironically, it was a dictator, Napoleon, who perpetuated and spread many of these ideas. The paper points out that the Napoleonic Code, the introduction of liberal ideas to Egypt, and the beginning of the drive for the unification of Italy were all things that resulted from ideas derived from the French Revolution that spread because of Napoleon and his rule. The author believes that the impact of the French Revolution and Napoleon?s dissemination of its ideas can be demonstrated by the fact that even after the defeat of Napoleon, none of the old European monarchies or regimes ever enjoyed the absolute power that they once held.
Table of Contents
Introduction
The French Revolution
Napoleon Early in the Revolution
Quest for Power
Napoleon as a Ruler and Conqueror
The Tragedy of Napoleon?s Life
The Legacy of Napoleon and the French Revolution
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Napoleon is a tragic figure in that few have had so much and lost it all. From being the world?s most powerful man to becoming a lonely exile must have been a bitter pill to swallow. Napoleon?s life is also tragic in that so many people were fanatically loyal to him, yet his first love Josephine, was unfaithful to him and never provided the male heir that he so desperately wanted. But, the greater tragedy is the waste of Napoleon?s talents. True, he achieved monumental military accomplishments, but his conquests were ephemeral; they did not last. Universally recognized as one of the great military minds, Napoleon was equally talented as an administrator. If he had turned his attention to these pursuits, he could have done so much lasting good. He was also a man of contradictions. Vain, arrogant, and ambitious, he loved himself, but he was not afraid to recognize and praise ability in others. He was ruthless when necessary, but he does not seem to have been driven by hate as some later dictators were. All in all, he still fascinates us today."
| |
|
Napoleon and his Conquest of Europe, 2006.
An essay looking at how France and the world would be different had Napoleon been more like George Washington.
2,156 words (approx. 8.6 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 67.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how the world would be today if Napoleon had approached his conquest of Europe from a democratic point of view. The paper begins with a brief history and overview of Napoleon and his politics and then analyzes his rule in France and Europe from a democratic point of view.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Overview of Napoleon and His Politics
Hard to Be Humble When You Are Great
Napoleonic Rule in France from a Democratic Point of View
Democratization Through Conquest
Napoleonic Rule in Europe
The Downfall of Napoleon
France Today Based on President Napoleon
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Napoleon I (1769-1821) was the emperor of the French who consolidated and institutionalized many reforms of the French Revolution. Much like George Washington, he was one of the greatest military commanders of all time. Napoleon conquered the larger part of Europe and did much to modernize the nations he ruled. Napoleon was born on August 15, 1769, in Ajaccio, Corsica, and was given the name Napoleone (in French his name became Napoleon Bonaparte). He was the second of eight children of Carlo (Charles) Buonaparte and Letizia Ramolino Buonaparte, both of the Corsican- Italian gentry. No Buonaparte had ever been a professional soldier. Carlo was a lawyer who had fought for Corsican independence, but after the French occupied the island in 1768, he served as a prosecutor and judge and entered the French aristocracy as a count. "Through his father's influence, Napoleon was educated at the expense of King Louis XVI, at Brienne and the Ecole Militaire, in Paris. Napoleon graduated in 1785, at the age of 16, and joined the artillery as a second lieutenant.""
| |
|
The Napoleonic Wars and the Realist Paradigm, 2008.
This paper examines the Napoleonic wars as an example of modern warfare and an assessment of contradictory explanations of war, the liberal and realist paradigms.
4,280 words (approx. 17.1 pages), 11 sources, MLA, $ 113.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, while the major battles of the Napoleonic Wars occurred between the years 1803 and 1815, 18th century long-range factors, such as increased manpower and agricultural, financial and industrial resources, contributed to this prolonged and intense conflict. The author points out that the increase of available resources called for revised methods for command and control over armies. The paper describes, in detail, the relationship of countries, the wars and Napoleon's rise to power. The author states that the downfall of Napoleon can be said to rationalize the liberal paradigm, which proposes that interdependence based on internationally shared interests can mitigate international conflict; however, not all components of the liberal paradigm apply to the Napoleonic Wars. The paper states that the realist paradigm, which argues that the actual international structure may be conducive to warfare, offers a more complete analysis of the the Napoleonic war era.
From the Paper
"Nearing the turn of the century, the French Revolution started to collide with greater European interests, posing a potential threat to international stability and order. To avoid being overthrown, the French king made an unsuccessful attempt to escape. When he was returned to Paris, he was suspended of all power and virtually placed under arrest. Leopold the II of Austria petitioned the royal families of Europe to help restore the French royal family, stating in the Declaration of Pillnitz that reinstating France's monarchy was in Europe's common interest and ultimately necessary to maintain international stability.
| |
|
Napoleon?s Economic Failure, 2001.
Examines the failure of Napoleon Bonaparte due to his inability to challenge Britain's economic power.
2,742 words (approx. 11.0 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 82.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper shows how Napoleon failed to match Britain?s economic policies of a sound currency, direct taxation of the rich, naval power and a consolidated national bank. It shows that the army drained the French economy, so taxes rose and hyperinflation took place. This led to mass unemployment and high bread prices after the 1811 harvest. As confidence waned, the bourgeoisie deserted Napoleon, and the country was in disarray. Napoleon was a military genius who was far ahead of his counterparts in the early 1800?s. However, his opponents modernized their military strategies and brought themselves up to his level. The paper shows that Napoleon allowed the French economy to stagnate while being shored up by short term finances stemming from military victories. Ultimately, this greatly contributed to the collapse of the Empire and Napoleon?s eventual defeat.
From the Paper
"Financial issues played a major part in the conflicts and developments of the 18th and 19th centuries. Sound fiscal policy was the key to whether a nation could feed its people and supply its armed forces. Finance, and tax in particular, had been significant in bringing down the ancien regime in France. J.R Stephenson described Chartism as ?a knife and fork question, a bread and cheese question? and there is certainly much truth in the assumption that radical feelings and societal insecurity are at their greatest during times of economic depression. Therefore a sound economy was paramount for a prosperous and harmonious nation."
| |
|
Napoleon: Tyrant or Hero?, 2002.
Discusses what type of leader Napoleon Bonaparte was to the French people and to the country.
2,021 words (approx. 8.1 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 64.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Many hail Napoleon as one of the greatest men of all time. He was emperor of the French who consolidated and institutionalized many reforms of the French Revolution. One of the greatest military commanders of all time, he conquered the larger part of Europe and did much to modernize the nations he ruled. The paper shows that many consider him a hero to the French people and to all the lands he conquered; bringing forth the same reforms that he had put into effect in France, such as The Napoleonic Code, abolishing serfdom and feudalism and guaranteeing basic rights. Many like to think of Napoleon not as a tyrant to his people but rather a hero. The paper shows, though, that others argue that his iron grip on the people cost them their freedom and his code was more against the people than for them. This paper, therefore, questions whether Napoleon was a tyrant or a hero to his people.
From the Paper
"With all the glory and the splendor that some countries may have experienced, never has history seen how only one man, Napoleon, brought up his country, France, from its most tormented status, to the very pinnacle of its height in just a few years time. He was a military hero who won splendid land-based battles, which allowed him to dominate most of the European continent. He was a man with ambition, great self-control and calculation, a great strategist, a genius; whatever it was, he was simply the best. But, even though how great this person was, something about how he governed France still floats among people?s minds. Did he abuse his power? Did Napoleon defeat the purpose of the ideals of the French Revolution? After all of his success in his military campaigns, did he gratify the people?s needs regarding their ideals on the French Revolution? Was he a tyrant or a hero? This is one of the many controversies that we have to deal with when studying Napoleon. So the question we must ultimately answer is what kind of a leader was Napoleon Bonaparte?"
| |
|
Napoleon Bonaparte, 2004.
This paper discusses the rise of Napoleon Bonaparte.
2,174 words (approx. 8.7 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 67.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, after Napoleon was commissioned as a second lieutenant and garrisoned at Valence in Burgundy, he developed the habit of voracious reading, which definitely affected all of his future endeavors; almost every subject was part of his reading, including law, political economy, geography, medicine, political science, the philosophies of Voltaire, and a great deal of history, especially ancient history with an emphasis on Alexander the Great. The author relates that, in October of 1795, as part of Comte de Barras?s uprising in Paris against the Thermidorians, Napoleon so impressed Barras that Napoleon was named commander-in-chief of the Army of the Interior. The paper concludes that, having finished the Revolution, Bonaparte proclaimed himself emperor of France, an act that outraged most of Europe and infuriated Ludwig von Beethoven to the point that he tore up his 'Eroica symphony', which was written as a dedication to Napoleon.
From the Paper
"By 1793, Napoleon, caught in the midst of the revolution, was in Paris when Louis XVI was dethroned. As a result, he joined the government troops who were attempting to capture Toulon, where anti-Revolutionary factions had turned over the great naval base to the British and Spanish fleets. And at Toulon, Bonaparte the artillery officer ?accomplished that which he had been trained for in 1784, for he demonstrated himself as a formidable officer, a budding tactician and a born strategist? (Markham, 167). In this atmosphere, Bonaparte placed his batteries in position to bombard both the port and the British fleet, but above all, it was Napoleon?s forcefulness and energy that impressed his superiors, which had played an all-important part in the recapture of Toulon. At the age of twenty-four, Napoleon was soon promoted to brigadier general which seemed to indicate that his future would be bright and magnificent."
| |
|
The Code Napoleon, 2003.
This paper discusses the Code Napoleon, known as the French Civil Code, and its role in the unification of the revolutionary France and the Empire.
1,820 words (approx. 7.3 pages), 16 sources, MLA, $ 58.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that Napoleon firmly believed that Frenchmen needed equality more than liberty; he saw the codification of the laws as a means of giving stability to both the French economy and society. The author states that the Code Napoleon is written in clear and concise language and seeks to strike a balance between Roman and customary law by blending the egalitarian principles of the Revolution in regards to individual rights with the conservative views of Roman law regarding property rights. The paper relates that the Declaration de Saint-Owen guaranteed the retention of Napoleon's Code as the law of France; however, (1) of the countries of the Empire, only the Belgian provinces and the Rhineland retained the civil code completely intact, (2) Holland, Italy and Portugal modeled their national codes upon it and (3) Spain, several South American countries, the State of Louisiana and French Canada would all later adopt large portions of the Napoleonic Code into their own codes.
From the Paper
"Prior to the French Revolution, French law was divided chiefly between two systems: Roman law (which had changed little since the Justinian Code (533 AD)) was paramount in the southern two-fifths of France; and Teutonic Customary law in the northern provinces with the dividing line running generally along the river Loire. Some attributes of customary law existed in the south, and traces of Roman law could be found in the Northern provinces. In the north there were over sixty regional variations of the customary law in existence; in addition to the over three hundred local variations which combined the regional law with the unique local customs of the region. "Voltaire was not exaggerating when he said that in France the traveler changed laws as often as he changed horses.""
|
|
|
