| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "MYTH ARYAN INVASION INDIA": |
|
|
The Myth of the Aryan Invasion of India, 2004.
This paper discusses the insidious myth of an Aryan invasion of India, which lately has been widely contested.
1,110 words (approx. 4.4 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 38.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that the post-colonial culture of India, rampant with the demonstration of historical superiority of the British culture, includes the representation of the ancient history of the Indian region as dominated by a fictitious Aryan race that overthrew the Indus Valley people. The author points out that this myth is a clear demonstration of the attempt to bolster the idea of superiority, and therefore, permit the dominance over the Indian population during the colonial occupation. The paper relates that the myth itself can be recounted through ?legitimate? literature of the early and mid 20th century, the Sanhita ("collection") of the "Rig-Veda", a purely lyrical assortment of songs, which the Hindus brought with them from their ancient homes on the banks of the Indus.
From the Paper
"The results of such a rethinking and rewriting of history are, as of yet, unknown; but the cultural identity of the Indian people will clearly be redefined by the new view of the events of the disappearance of the Indus Valley people. One of the most prominent British historians of the colonial and early post colonial period demonstrates the idea that there is little evidence of a real Aryan conquest. ?Of the effects of the Aryan settlements in India itself in the earliest period, we have no real evidence beyond certain scattered allusions in Vedic literature, and some faint local traditions.? "
| |
|
The Bay of Pigs Invasion, 2006.
An overview of the Bay of Pigs invasion and the aftermath of the invasion, particularly with regard to American-Cuban relations.
2,846 words (approx. 11.4 pages), 9 sources, MLA, $ 84.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes and discusses the Bay of Pigs invasion, implemented and designed by President John F. Kennedy, and the impact this failed maneuver had on American foreign policy and on American-Soviet, as well as American-Cuban relations. The paper describes the attempted invasion, the Cuban response to the invasion, the events leading up to the invasion and why it represents one of the worst political disasters in recent U.S. history. The paper further discusses the political repercussions that followed the attempted invasion and its long-lasting impact on American-Cuban relations.
From the Paper
"On the morning of the invasion, it was reported that the exile forces, together with the CIA, had literally destroyed numerous locations, had landed in several provinces within Cuba, had freed thousands of political prisoners and had driven inland, practically dividing the whole country into two separate parts, not to mention placing the Cuban Navy in revolt. In reality, however, none of these claims were true, for the exile forces in the Bay of Pigs encountered immediate difficulties. For example, the location for the first assault was suppose to have been an isolated area, a good place for a surprise attack, yet the forces discovered a militia patrol which destroyed the element of surprise; the beachhead was suppose to be sandy and free of obstacles, yet many reefs were encountered which sank some of the boats. Worst of all, Castro's men were lying in wait just north of the original landing point. Much gunfire then erupted and the exile forces found themselves pinned down; to make matters worse, reports soon came in the Russian tanks were moving closer with every passing minute."
| |
|
The Invasion of Iraq, 2002.
A justification of the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq and an analysis of the French and opposing position.
1,034 words (approx. 4.1 pages), 8 sources, APA, $ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how the U.S. led invasion of Iraq has invited a lot of controversy about the justification, legality and ethics of a ?pre-emptive? strike against a foreign government. It examines how although the U.S. government has justified it on several grounds, most countries in the rest of the world, notably France remain unconvinced. It looks at how the U.S. (and its coalition partners) justify the invasion of Iraq and compare it to the French position. It also analyzes the impact of the invasion on future international affairs.
Outline
U.S. Justification for the Invasion of Iraq
The Opposing (French) View Point
Analysis of the Two Positions
Tactless Diplomacy and Fear of American Power
The Real Agendas?
Impact of the Invasion on Future International Affairs
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Even after the end of the War in Iraq, the controversy about whether the invasion was justified continues unabated both inside and outside the United States. The reasons for the continuing debate are not hard to find. In the days before the war there had been unprecedented demonstrations all over the world by peace activists against the war. During debate at the United Nations, the French government had threatened to use its veto to defeat a resolution that sanctioned an invasion of Iraq. Most other European countries, except the UK, and including Russia had supported the French position. Gerhard Schroder even won the recent German elections on the basis of his opposition to the Iraq war. Perhaps the only countries of significance that supported the war were Britain and Israel, and even in Britain there was significant opposition to the war among the public."
| |
|
Invasion of Privacy, 2008.
An analysis of torts with regards to an invasion of an individual's right to privacy.
1,680 words (approx. 6.7 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 54.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses an individual's right to privacy and the results of an invasion of that right. It specifically discusses a tort with regards to invasion of privacy. The paper analyzes the two basic elements that occur with invasion of privacy - the fact that the individual's right to privacy is invaded and the resulting damage that occurs as a result.
From the Paper
"The right of privacy in the private sector has taken on a whole new dimension since the times of Justice Brandies with the advent of the internet, email, YouTube and the myriad of personal blogs raise the specter of anyone becoming a world-wide celebrity. If you doubt the power of the internet to create celebrities out of the ordinary person, recall the "numa numa" phenomenon, the portly college lip syncing into his computer became an overnight celebrity via viral video. This was voluntarily placed on the internet, the repercussions of instant involuntary notoriety where unimagined in the late 19th century when the right of privacy was first put forward by Justice Brandies. There are many personal issues that individuals wish to keep private, and the vast amount of case law regarding all four aspects of invasion of privacy needs to be kept in context of the modern era of the internet, AIDS and the 24 hour cable news station."
| |
|
Japan's Invasion of Manchuria, 2004.
An analysis of Japan's invasion of Manchuria in 1931 and America's reaction.
2,147 words (approx. 8.6 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 67.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the Japanese invasion of Manchuria in 1931 in order to defend its national and economic interests in the area. The paper examines the events that led up to the invasion and then explores the incident itself in detail. America's reaction to the invasion is analyzed.
From the Paper
"According to Ronald E. Dolan, when Japan joined fourteen other nations in 1928 in signing the Kellogg-Briand Act which "denounced recourse to war for the solution of international controversies," it was a foregone conclusion that Japan would inevitably invade Manchuria in order to "defend its national and economic interests" in the area. 1 In response to this invasion in 1931, the League of Nations, set up after World War I through President Woodrow Wilson and the Treaty of Versailles, "issued a report condemning Japanese aggression" which prompted Japan to withdraw "from the League, thereby further heightening world tensions." 2 Not surprisingly, America's response to the invasion of Manchuria was typical of the time, for many American citizens and government officials were highly concerned that American interests in the area would lead to all-out war between Japan and the Western powers, not to mention the prevailing attitude among some Americans for an isolationist policy, i.e. complete separation from other nations in the context of disputes and military actions."
| |
|
U.S.-Led Invasion of Iraq, 2002.
An analysis of the reasons for the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, according to the Americans.
1,542 words (approx. 6.2 pages), 8 sources, APA, $ 50.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The U.S.-led invasion of Iraq has invited a lot of controversy about the justification, legality, and ethics of a ?preemptive? strike against a foreign government. Although the U.S. government has justified it on several grounds, most countries in the rest of the world remain unconvinced. In this paper, the writer examines how the U.S. and its coalition partners justify the invasion of Iraq and compares it to the French position. It also discusses the impact of this invasion on future international affairs.
From the Paper
"The main reasons given by the US government (and its main ally, Britain) are that Iraq and its regime under Saddam Hussain possessed weapons of mass destruction; that it has failed to co-operate fully with UN inspectors as called for by UN Security Council resolutions; that the regime has links to terrorist groups including Al-Qaeda, and that Saddam Hussain?s regime posed ?a clear and present danger? to the United States and the rest of the world if left unchallenged. It was implied that the regime was likely to provide weapons of mass destruction (including biological weapons) to terrorist organizations with devastating effect. The US government, therefore, felt justified in leading a ?pre-emptive? strike on Iraq to find and destroy the weapons of mass destruction and to effect ?a regime change.? "
| |
|
The Invasion of Iraq, 2005.
A look at American and French justifications for the invasion of Iraq.
1,325 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The U.S.- led invasion of Iraq has invited a lot of controversy about the justification, legality and ethics of a "pre-emptive" strike against a foreign government. Although the US government has justified it on several grounds, most countries in the rest of the world, notably France remain unconvinced. This paper examines how the U.S. (and its coalition partners) justify the invasion of Iraq and compares it to the French position. It also discusses the impact of this invasion on future international affairs.
From the Paper
"The main reasons given by the US government (and its main ally, Britain) are that Iraq and its regime under Saddam Hussain possessed weapons of mass destruction; that it has failed to co-operate fully with UN inspectors as called for by UN Security Council resolutions; that the regime has links to terrorist groups including Al-Qaeda, and that Saddam Hussain's regime posed "a clear and present danger" to the United States and the rest of the world if left unchallenged. It was implied that the regime was likely to provide weapons of mass destruction (including biological weapons) to terrorist organizations with devastating effect. The US government, therefore, felt justified in leading a "pre-emptive" strike on Iraq to find and destroy the weapons of mass destruction and to effect "a regime change."
| |
|
Tumor Invasion, 2004.
An overview of tumor invasion and metastasis.
935 words (approx. 3.7 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 33.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how tumor invasion and metastasis of cancer is one of the most deadly processes in the world today. Once the cancer has metastasized to other organs, the chances of successful recovery are greatly reduced. It looks at the importance for a patient with a prior history of cancer to have regular checkups and to understand which cancers commonly metastasize to certain organs, thus increasing the chances of survival of this dangerous killer.
Outline
Introduction
Tumor Invasion
Metastasis
ATX
Metastasis Messages
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Metastasis is controlled in part ?by messages embedded in the organs to which cancer spreads. Elements of the signals stimulating metastasis may come ?not from the tumor cells themselves but from the microenvironment (Couzin, 2003).? Cancer cells are able to identify the location of the new tumor and thrive. Specific cancers have been found to favor specific site, as seen in ?breast cancer which prefers the lungs and bone, and colon cancer which favors the liver (Couzin, 2003).? Stephen Paget, a British surgeon in 1889 developed the ?seed and soil? theory, which ?argues that metastasis depends on matching certain types of ?seeds,? or cancer cells, with ?soils? in which they are likely to grow (Couzin, 2003).? "
| |
|
Invasion and Colonialism in Science Fiction, 2008.
A discussion of invasion and colonialism themes in science fiction.
1,565 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 51.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the theme of invasion in science fiction and how it is, in fact, a colonial topic. The paper also takes a look at related themes such as infestation and infection. It draws upon famous film examples such as "Robocop", "Invasion of the Body Snatchers", and "Alien" to illustrate the symbolic significance of the invader's appearance and what it represents. To conclude, the paper asserts that battles against slick and slimy science-fiction monsters and bad guys reflect the West's battle against outside religious extremists.
From the Paper
"Invasions taking over the mind or body, in an offensively intimate way, are all part of the colonial horror. We are beguiled by a slick oppressor. Memorable science fiction films hone in on this theme of the intruder's allure. A storm trooper is as glossy as a Nazi soldier's boots. There is a brutal anonymity to their sheen, which makes viewers feel dishevelled yet intrigued with what lies beneath. On the other hand, the monster in Alien is covered in slick ooze (Pickover 99). The monster resembles a malignant organ. Ridley Scott's monster is like the lost part of our civilized psyche's missing mojo, and we almost want to stuff it back in, though the monster's only goal is to destroy (Mulhall 47). It is like an AIDS virus: death within temptation. In my opinion, this connection between bodily fascination and death has helped keep the Alien franchise lucrative."
| |
|
The Normandy Invasion, 2006.
A look at the events that led up to the June 6, 1944 invasion by the Allies of the Normandy coast.
2,259 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 5 sources, APA, $ 69.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper details the events prior to the infamous invasion of Normandy which occurred on June 6, 1944, when the allied troops landed in France to begin the liberation of Europe. It describes the actual plans for the invasion, which were under the command of General Dwight David Eisenhower and was codenamed "Operation Overlord." It also details the events that transpired after the troops landed on the five beaches along the Normandy coast, codenamed Utah, Omaha, Gold, Juno and Sword.
From the Paper
"After the fall of France in 1940 and his subsequent defeat in the Battle of Britain, Adolf Hitler had boasted that he would build an impregnable array of defences all along the coast of France. He gave it the pompous name of "The Atlantic Wall". But despite immense efforts the defences were not ready by 1944. The Atlantic wall, though formidable, was hardly impregnable. In many places it was still incomplete, and the German commander in the West, Field Marshal Gerd von Runstedt dismissed it as a figment of Hitler's braggadocio. In November 1943, Field Marshal Erwin Rommel, "The Desert Fox", victor of so many battles in North Africa was sent to France to take charge of the coastal defences."
| |
|
The 2003 Invasion of Iraq, 2005.
Defines and explains the concept of "the shadow" and how it relates to American's 2003 invasion of Iraq.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 23.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the concept of "the shadow" and the 2003 invasion of Iraq. The paper defines the concept of "the shadow" and how it is used as a means for justification. The paper also look at the motives of President George W. Bush and of the American public who supported the invasion.
| |
|
The Mongol Invasion, 2005.
An explanation of the impact of the Mongol invasion on Ukraine.
2,250 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 2 sources, $ 89.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains the impact of the Mongol invasion of early 13th centre, end of Kievan Rus, and gradual reinforcement of a separate Ukrainian identity vis-a-vis Russia, Belorus, Baltic states, Poland. It discusses the nature of the Tatar administration and tribute system and the meaning of the Invasion in popular Ukrainian memory.
From the Paper
"The Mongol Invasion and Popular Memory in Ukraine. Introduction For four centuries, Ukraine suffered under Mongol rule. In the first half of the 13th century, Kievan Rus succumbed to an oppressive invader that was culturally dissimilar in an occupation that could never be fully assimilated. In the mid-17th century, the Ukrainian Cossack leader, Hetman Bohdan Khmelnitsky, threw off Mongol rule, towards a different Ukrainian future. Indeed, a substantial portion of this paper refers to the Cossacks' role in the entire region affected by Tatar influence, and their central role in the production of a distinct Ukrainian identity. "
| |
|
Invasion of Normandy, 2003.
This paper analyzes the battle of the Invasion of Normandy in the summer of 1944.
3,266 words (approx. 13.1 pages), 10 sources, APA, $ 93.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This is a paper covering the Invasion of Normandy in the summer of 1944. Includes strategies, commanders, and forces on both sides during the invasion of Normandy. It covers the campaign from the landings on June 6 until the closing of the "Falais Pocket" and the destruction of the German 7th Army, which led to the liberation of Paris on August 25.
From the Paper
"The Invasion of Normandy, in the summer of 1944, opened up a second large front from which the western Allies could launch a direct assault against the Germans in Europe. This invasion the largest amphibious operation of World War Two. Prior to the battle both sides spent years planning their strategies. This battle was one of the most significant battles of the war, and victory for either side would result in devastation for the other."
| |
|
Invasion of Iraq, 2002.
An analysis of the possible American invasion of Iraq, including an overview of the public opinion.
1,319 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents a detailed discussion about the possibility of the United States invading Iraq. The writer argues that an invasion at this time is not necessary or prudent when there are so many bigger threats facing the U.S. The writer discusses why Iraq is not a threat at present and why an invasion would be inappropriate.
From the Paper
"For more than a decade the nation of Iraq has been at odds with the US. Saddam Hussein, who is the leader of Iraq, has alternately allowed then refused weapons inspections throughout the last decade, even though he had agreed to them following the Desert Storm War of 1991. More recently, the President of the United States has focused attention on a possible invasion of Iraq based on the current war against terrorism that the US launched following the WTC attack of 9-11."
| |
|
Invasion of Privacy, 2002.
Based on a survey, this paper shows that governmental invasion of privacy is a major concern among Americans.
3,670 words (approx. 14.7 pages), 0 sources, $ 101.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper seeks to determine how Americans (as opposed to popular culture and the media) feel about governmental invasion of privacy, and to sort responses in terms of gender, political affiliation and age. Done through a survey of 1800 respondents in three age groups (18-34, 35-64, 65+), the answers are tabulated and compared. The results show that younger people are more concerned than older people, women more concerned than men, and Democrats more concerned than Republicans. In all, 75% of Americans are very concerned with the invasion of their privacy. This indicates a serious lack of communication and responsiveness between the government?s behavior and the people?s concerns.
From the Paper
"Before the September 11th terrorist attacks, those among the American people who were concerned about governmental invasion of privacy were relatively soft spoken, and tended towards extremist edges. Certainly, no one was fond of the degree to which the IRS kept an eye on their business, and especially among lower-class and minority factions, there was a deal of foment concerning unwarranted search-and-seizure on suspicion of drug charges and various other matters. However, in general, most Americans didn?t notice the degree to which their lives were supervised. After September 11th, the supervision took a much harder edge. The Patriot Act was passed allowing the government supposedly unprecedented powers to conduct searches, wiretaps, random background checks, and other security procedures against common civilians. (As a matter of historical accuracy, similar wartime measures have been undertaken on occasion in American history, though not within the memory of the current generation) Concern for the privacy of individuals became of much greater concern in the publications of fringe groups, such as ultra-liberal ?Mother Jones? and ultra-conservative ?The World.? However, the concern over individual privacy appears very seldom in mainstream non-fictional media (no one can seriously consider such shows as X-files to represent the general media consensus on government activity)."
|
|
|
