| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "MOVIE CENSORSHIP": |
|
|
Movie Censorship, 2002.
A discussion of censorship in the movies.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 3 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
A paper on the causes of censorship in the movies.
| |
|
Censorship and Hollywood, 2000.
This paper illustrates the effects of censorship in the film industry as depicted in the documentary film "Hollywood Censored: Movies, Morality and the Production Code."
1,226 words (approx. 4.9 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper focuses on the documentary "Hollywood Censored: Movies, Morality and the Production Code" which illustrates the effects of censorship in the film industry. This paper examines the religious condemnation, societal expectations and financial insecurity that have plagued Hollywood and the film industry since the early 1900s. This paper discusses the profound effect the Catholic church had on Hollywood. The Legion of Decency was created in order to clean up to films that were being shown to society. The hold of the Catholic church in the major cities was massive and as long as Hollywood produced films the religious authorities felt were morally harmful to society, priests and parishioners would continue to ban films. The writer also examines the events that led up to the film industry being granted 1st amendment protection in 1952, in which films were finally viewed as an art form.
From the Paper
"In 1952 movies were granted First Amendment protection and films were finally seen as an art form. This came about after the studios were deemed monopolies and forced to give up their movie palaces. Theaters were now free to show any type of film they pleased and were not held liable to the production code. This allowed directors and producers a freedom they had not seen in many years. Breen's theories and strict regulations became obsolete. The control Hollywood and the courts had given him had been relinquished. As the freedom of the theaters grew, the power of the production code fell and in 1962 the production code was officially done away with and replaced with the ratings systems we now have. One producer in the documentary quotes Robert Graves by saying that "It's impossible for any artist not to be a part of his society even if he is against it" (Hollywood). Simply put, this means that as an artist, producer or director, it would be impossible, whether intended or not, to not mirror the society from which the art was created."
| |
|
Hays Code: Media Censorship, 2004.
A discussion on how the Hays Code is no longer relevant today.
1,930 words (approx. 7.7 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 61.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the Hays Code, established in the 1930s as a guide for movie content, and contends that it cannot work today. It looks at how it is an exaggerated control of movie and television content that equals censorship. It also contends that, even though the television and movie industry should not apply the Hays Code and should not practice censorship, it also must not be an instigator of violent behavior.
From the Paper
"Freedom of expression is a precious right that only some countries enjoy and others are still fighting for and dreaming of. The United States is one of those countries which enjoys freedom of expression, supported by a constitution that protects this right and laws that try to make sure that no government threatens it. However, this freedom of expression is a very big responsibility that the people who are working in the entertainment industry have to appreciate for the sake of both this right and for the sake of society. It is important that the movie and television industry respect the freedom of expression because their words and their beliefs are heard across the world and, in many instance can have a very negative influence on the viewers."
| |
|
Censorship, 2002.
This paper presents a detailed examination of censorship. The writer explores the reasons that the first amendment should not always be followed and how censorship in some cases may be the best course of action.
1,254 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
An opinion paper about how there are times that censorship should be instituted. The writer argues that in most cases the attempt to censor or the act of censorship is something that should be fought at all costs, however there are occasional times when censorship would be beneficial. It explains why the nation should follow the constitutional first amendment in most instances but in light of recent historical events it is time to rethink the 100 percent rule. The use of censorship for the protection of millions is something that needs to be revisited, and embraced.
From the Paper
"On 9-11-2003 the nation watched in terror as the towers came down. Until then the nation?s residents had lived in the secure belief that they were untouchable and that the strength of the United States constitution and all of its amendments were a brick wall surrounding the country from harm(Page pg L15). The rights and protections of the first amendment have been challenged periodically throughout the nation?s history but after the terrorist attacks it has become evident that there needs to be some flexibility when it comes to the issue of censorship with regards to first amendment rights. In a recent survey more than half of those participants who took it believed that the time has come to provide some flexibility in the first amendment and that some forms of censorship are positive actions for the emotional, physical and collateral safety of those who live here. In the 2002 survey, nearly half of those questioned said they believe the First Amendment goes way overboard in guaranteeing rights to Americans? though many politicians spoke out in favor of the amendment(Page pg L15). "
| |
|
Censorship, 2006.
A discussion about censorship and the controversy surrounding it.
2,070 words (approx. 8.3 pages), 5 sources, APA, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the good and bad sides of censorship and points out the need for a balance. The paper focuses on three types of censorship: military censorship, censorship of pornography and violence, and ideological censorship. The paper contains an annotated bibliography.
From the Paper
"The concept of censorship is relatively simple: material that is harmful to people in some way should not be allowed to circulate where they can see, hear or be influenced by it. Material that incites people to commit acts of violence..."
| |
|
Censorship in England, 2002.
Examines censorship of the media in England and the reasons the government feels that censorship is necessary in certain cases.
1,900 words (approx. 7.6 pages), 6 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The topic of censorship is usually applied to less-developed countries, but it is crucial to remember that censorship is found in varying aspects in all countries. This paper addresses England as a country that promotes censorship as both a mechanism for civil defense and a means of ensuring the welfare of their citizens.
| |
|
An Overview of Internet Censorship, 2000.
A look at the law regarding Internet censorship and tools that are used to censor, as well as a debate about the extent of censorship that should be in place.
1,040 words (approx. 4.2 pages), 4 sources, $ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Countries with a history of limiting free expression, such as China and Singapore, are seeking to extend their controls into cyberspace. Meanwhile, countries with more democratic traditions, such as the United States and members of the European Union, are considering policies that seek to control problems like racism and pornography, which could end up restricting speech on the Internet."
| |
|
Changes in Television Censorship, 2006.
An examination of the changes in television censorship.
953 words (approx. 3.8 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 33.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this paper the author examines the changes in television censorship that have occurred over the past 50 years. He looks at how censorship has developed in relation to the development of the television itself. He examines that with the technological advancement of television there have also been technological advances in censorship such as the violence chip, more commonly known as the V-chip. The author describes how the V-chip was developed as an aid for parents to screen out certain programs that have been rated for violent content. The author discusses the laws that have been introduced to help television censorship and how they have been accepted by the general public. In conclusion the author reminds us that censorship is not enough and the viewing time of our impressionable youth also needs to be reduced.
From the Paper
"These changes from television's inception are clearly not positive. Both underage smoking and the burden of dealing with the lessons children learn from violence in the media has been placed on parents; it has not been seen as a responsibility of the masses. However, lessons surrounding both topics are played out every day in the classroom, schoolyard, home, and wider community. Moreover, both issues have become public health issues that affect all of us. As such, it may seem plausible that censorship is indeed the answer. However, the true issue is personal responsibility, since consenting adults should have the right to buy legal products and should also have the right to advertising to determine which brand they should buy. Instead of censorship, it is time to work together to reduce the problems created by smoking and violence for our children."
| |
|
Censorship and the Media, 2006.
Examines how modern censorship affects books, films, plays and television.
2,129 words (approx. 8.5 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 66.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Censorship in media is the management and control of the ideas and information circulated surrounded by a society. This paper examines how, in contemporary times, censorship denotes the assessment of media including periodicals, books, motion pictures, plays, and television as well as radio programs, for the purpose of suppressing or altering parts thought to be distasteful. The paper examines the censorship process on the media.
Paper Outline
Introduction
Censorship of Media
Books/Printed Materials
Films
Music
Corporate Media
Advertising
References
From the Paper
"Corporate media is a term of mockery used by media critics in American political conversation, particularly by progressives and leftists, to entail that the mainstream media is maneuvered by large multinational companies. The critics mention that the major nationwide networks, CBS, NBC, and ABC, and most if not all of the smaller cable channels, are in possession of large corporations: CBS Corporation, General Electric, and Disney correspondingly that they say control and clean out news that does not fit their business schema. They also dispute that the programming on Fox News Channel plainly reflects the traditional perspectives of Rupert Murdoch, who owns and heads FOX parent company News Corp., over and above Roger Ailes, the CEO of FOX News itself."
| |
|
Censorship on the Internet, 2007.
A forceful argument calling for censorship to be eliminated on the Internet.
807 words (approx. 3.2 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 28.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper claims that censorship on the Internet represents one of the greatest threats to the integrity and usefulness of the Internet as a medium for the exchange of information. The paper argues against totalitarian and repressive regimes controlling their citizenry by means of censorship. It further argues against those that wish to foist their own morals on others by limiting the access individuals have to pornographic material. The paper asserts that censorship is a practice that is exacted by the powerful upon the weak to forward some agenda. The paper contends that as a practice, censorship should be eliminated on the Internet or, at the very least, reduced at every opportunity.
From the Paper
"The growing ubiquity of the Internet means that new issues, once confined to the "real" world, have spilled over into cyberspace. Censorship in particular has been a significant concern ever since the Internet grew into a popular medium of communication. Now, unfortunately, censorship is no longer a concern; instead, it is a reality on the Internet and one that seems to be ever-increasing. Censorship on the Internet represents one of the greatest threats to the integrity and usefulness of the Internet as a medium for the exchange of information."
| |
|
Regulation and Censorship in the Film Industry, 2006.
Examines the history of regulation and censorship of the film industry in America and the reasons many in society wanted the industry regulated.
5,107 words (approx. 20.4 pages), 11 sources, MLA, $ 128.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Through an examination of the history of film in America, this paper looks at the censorship and regulation of the film industry and argues that the need for regulation was forced upon the industry (and still is, in a way) for no other reason than that conservative elements of America felt that what the average American could see should be censored. The paper further argues that this regulation was not merely to prevent bawdiness, lewdness, or unsuitable physical actions that stimulated sexual feelings, but also to regulate the politicization of the movies.
From the Paper
"Following the end of the War, while many film makers now turned to a rather "new" sophistication, there was also a very serious anti-Communist note in some movies. While the real "Red Scare" occurred in the 1950s, in 1919, for example, there was real concern that the newly Communist Russia might actually invade the U.S. "Conservative films such as The New Moon (1919) disparaged communists and communism with scenes of perfidious Bolshevik officers attacking vulnerable young women....In The Penalty...audiences saw 10,00 disgruntled foreign workers, armed with rifles and pistols, waiting to open fire on police and take over the city of San Francisco." (Ross 136). Politicians applauded these films, even though they often misrepresented actual events. This included several truly anti-Semitic films, which, under extreme political pressure, were forced to change character names and some dialogue. "Pressure from the Yiddish press and Governor Al Smith forced the producers of The Volcano to alter its blatantly anti-Semitic plot. The hero's name was changed from Garland to Nathan Levison and the hook-nosed villain was given the line: 'I am not Jew. I am a Bolshevik.!'" (Ross 141)."
| |
|
Censorship of Children's Books, 2008.
This paper discusses the issue of the censorship of books for children, focusing on Susan Patron's book, "The Higher Power of Lucy".
1,938 words (approx. 7.8 pages), 9 sources, MLA, $ 61.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The focus of this paper is to discuss the censorship of a Newberry Medal children's book, "The Highest Power of Lucky," by Susan Patron. More specifically, the writer questions whether the word "scrotum" should cause a Newberry Medal children's book to be banned from libraries. The writer also discusses whether librarians have the right to ban a book because it has a word or phrase that relates to sex. The writer maintains that the censorship of books is wrong, especially when the book is being banned due to one word or phrase.
Outline:
Looking at the Book, "The Highest Power of Lucy"
Why the Author Used the Word
Censoring Children's Books
Censorship Creating Problems with Educational Staff
The Problems with Censorship
From the Paper
"Only at the end of the book does Lucky trust her guardian to ask the meaning of the word. Lucky is similar to many students today who have single parents in their lives. Lucky can also be compared to many latchkey children who fend for themselves while their parents are at work. Many of these children learn words and actions that are not appropriate, but it is a part of their every day life. Reading about Lucky will not reveal words that these children know anyway."
"When deciding to ban a book, the librarian should consider the purpose of the book. Why has the author created this book? What is the main purpose of the book? These questions should be considered before deciding whether the book is inappropriate. The themes of the book center on Lucky becoming a grown-up who needs to learn about language and body parts. If Lucky does not learn the meaning of words from her guardian, then more than likely she will learn about different words from her peers. Children will learn the definitions to different words whether they do it through parents, friends, or peers. Would it be better to learn different words from parents or peers?"
| |
|
Censorship in Music, 2004.
An examination of the history of censorship of American music and its justification.
1,623 words (approx. 6.5 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 52.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the topic of censorship in American music and, specifically, it names some groups or bands that were subject to censorship during their careers and the ways were they censored. It also looks at song lyrics that were "bleeped out" or otherwise edited and warning labels on recordings. It explores how American music has existed since the 19th century and has grown tremendously since the advent of rap, hip-hop, and rock and roll, and how censorship may seem logical because of the escalating number of violent and hateful lyrics in popular music. It also debates whether this kind of censorship makes a mockery of our Constitution, which guarantees our right to free speech and our right to disagree.
From the Paper
"Music censorship is an ongoing trial for musicians and composers in America, partly because music is such an integral part of our lives. As one expert wrote, "Music, patterns of organized sound and silence in time, is important to people, evidenced by the presence of some form of music in virtually every culture. Not every person cares about any one particular piece of music, but almost every person cares about something musical" (Bindas xi). While much attention has been given to the censorship of music in the past decade, in fact, musical censorship has a long history in America."
| |
|
Censorship, 2002.
This paper discusses a definition of censorship appropriate to current American society.
1,400 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 8 sources, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews "Fahrenheit 451" as an obvious extreme of what censorship should not become and personal experiences of the censorship of Christian religious perspectives on a high school campus. The author points out banned books and the censorship of movies, television, and music. The paper relates the usefulness of a definition of "obscenity".
| |
|
Book Censorship, 2005.
This paper argues against book censorship in the public school system.
1,110 words (approx. 4.4 pages), 13 sources, MLA, $ 38.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that freedom of speech, the right to live freely without censorship and freedom of the press, which are all rights protected by the United States Constitution, prevent the censorship of books in the public school system. The author points out that, in the early 1950s, attempts to censor books in the California school system were related to the fear of communism. The paper relates that book censorship interferes with the freedom of the press because potential purchases of books for school libraries and student reading lists actually determine which books are to be printed.
From the Paper
"In Ray Bradbury's "Fahrenheit 451", the author presents an extremely frightening vision of what the world will be like in the future if the nation does not put a halt to any attempt at censorship of books. In this book, the author has fire fighters starting fires for the purpose of burning books. The main characters of the work hide books in the effort to preserve the right to have ideas and thoughts outside of the things that are taught or approved."
|
|
|
