| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "MORAL RESPONSIBILITY": |
|
|
Corporate Moral Responsibility, 2006.
A discussion regarding the moral and social responsibility of a company.
4,772 words (approx. 19.1 pages), 19 sources, MLA, $ 122.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how humans possess the ability to choose between right and wrong, giving us a sense of morality. The paper goes on to discuss how this sense of morality coupled with free will result in human freedom. According to the paper, with this human freedom comes a moral and social responsibility. The paper further discusses how the corporate world has a moral and social responsibility.
Outline:
Introduction
Defining Moral Responsibility
Ethics and Business
Individual Ethics vs. Business Ethics
Examples from the Business World
Stakeholders
Conclusion
From the Paper
"If a corporation can make a goodwill gesture and act in such a manner as to appear to make this an intentional gesture, then even though it is the individuals that make the decision, they are no longer acting as individuals, but are acting as a group (Coffee 1998). Group psychology now comes into play and the role of the individual, as well as the idea of diffusion of responsibility. Each individual within a group loses a part of their autonomy. Their preferences may not always rule and they must sometimes make compromises that may go against their true wishes. The individual no longer acts as a single entity, the play a lesser role in the actions of the group. The group now appears to replace the individual. If this is true, then the corporation can act in an ethical manner, just as an individual does. The corporation can make its own decisions and now acts as if it were an individual."
| |
|
Moral Responsibility in Shakespeare, 1997.
A look at the theme of moral responsibility in William Shakespeare's "Hamlet", "MacBeth" and "King Lear", focusing on the characters of Malcolm, Cordelia and Hamlet.
3,526 words (approx. 14.1 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 99.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper examines the similarities between the three characters Malcolm, Cordelia and Hamlet. It looks at how all are the children of kings and all have been usurped and attempts to determine what moral responsibility each holds towards their kingdoms and how this is manifested in the plays. It discusses the idea of legitimacy and how only the righful heir can truly rule a kingdom and how any subversion of this "rule" leads to chaos and discord. It also goes on to examine the ways in which the responsibilties of the three characters in question differ from each other, asking whether it is possible to arrive at a definitive conclusion of how Shakespeare presents the theme of moral responsibility in his work.
From the Paper
"The whole tragedy of MacBeth seems designed to illustrate that this is the only possible outcome if the natural heir is usurped: we could conclude from this that Malcolm?s moral responsibility, and indeed the responsibility of any such ?natural? heir, is to reassert his own right to the throne in such circumstances. But can this view of moral responsibility be extended to the other two characters in question: Hamlet and Cordelia?"
| |
|
Aristotle and Moral Responsibility, 2008.
This paper provides an analysis of Aristotle's beliefs of moral responsibility.
705 words (approx. 2.8 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 25.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses Aristotle's belief that human beings are morally responsible for their conception of the good life, which was based on his determination that every form of activity people engage in has an ultimate goal that they consider good. The paper explains Aristotle's argument that because there cannot be an endless regression of external motivations, an intrinsic motivation for achieving the highest good must exist. The paper further explains how moral responsibility extends across desires to the conduct those desires produce and to the ends such conduct achieves.
From the Paper
"Aristotle believed that we are morally responsible for our conception of the good life, and based this belief on his determination that every form of activity people engage in has an ultimate goal which they consider good. Furthermore, Aristotle argued that because there cannot be an endless regression of external motivations, there must be an intrinsic motivation for achieving the highest good. This highest good is the goal towards which all human activity is directed."
| |
|
Moral Responsibility.
This paper argues that mentally healthy individuals are definitely morally responsible for their actions but the mentally ill are not responsible.
2,845 words (approx. 11.4 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 84.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that people are morally liable for their actions when they are seen as being morally blameworthy, are obligated to make things right and can be subject to punishment and disapproval if the actions are judged to be within their control. The author points out that the mentally ill are seen as not being morally responsible for their actions because most of the time, they are incapable of understanding what they do and why they do it. The paper relates that a criterion for responsibility is if a person is defend their action with reasons.
From the Paper
"Whether an action is impulsive or calculating, a person can be held responsible in a positive or a negative way whether the person is mentally ill or mentally healthy. The reason behind ones actions stems from the past, their childhood and the belief system that they were raised on. An example provided by Hospers is that if you are a witness to an automobile accident, an impulsive reaction by you may be to run out and help the people involved. In this case you acted responsibly and unconsciously due to how you may have dealt with similar situations in the past. This principle can be applied to both mentally ill and mentally healthy individuals when considering whether or not they are morally responsible for their actions. It goes without saying that every individual is affected by things that occurred in their past, and specifically their childhood."
| |
|
Moral Standards and Moral Consistency, 2008.
This paper explores the moral standards in the associations of Eberhard Faber, Incorporated.
1,049 words (approx. 4.2 pages), 3 sources, APA, $ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper examines the decision to allow Eberhard Faber to associate with known bribe-givers. The paper is of the opinion that this association seems like an affront to the moral consistency requirement demanded of any credible moral standard. The paper contends that respecting the law in some, but not in all, circumstances makes a mockery of the organization's avowed commitment to legal dictates and therefore is inherently immoral.
From the Paper
"Before going too far, the stakeholders in this situation need to be listed. Obviously, the share-holders of Eberhard Faber are one significant stake-holder; so too is the Board of Directors and, especially, the key principals (Mr. Faber and Mr. Carey) who offer widely divergent views on how to approach this matter. Not to be forgotten, the other company involved is a stake-holder as it could lose a major deal with an American company - a deal it would seem to covet. Lastly, IRS and legal consultants who convinced Mr. Faber that the deal was above-board and breached no US laws are stake-holders with credibility on the line (for a lengthier discussion on all of these parties, please see "Eberhard Faber, Inc.," n.d.). In the end, many people stand to win - or lose."
| |
|
Freedom and Responsibility, 2001.
This paper discusses the conflict between social freedom and moral responsibility in various works of literature.
1,420 words (approx. 5.7 pages), 5 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the human struggle between freedom and moral responsibility as represented in 5 different works of literature over time. The author looks at the inner turmoil within such characters as Shakespeare's "Hamlet", Melville's "Captain Vere", and Toni Morrison's "Pecola". The paper also discusses moral values in the works of Plato and Dante.
From the Paper
"The concept of freedom and responsibility has eluded most writers in time and they try their best to present their own versions of the freedom they conceive and the responsibility they have. Through these concepts the debates of morality and values interrelated to create philosophies that transcend time. Basically most authors suggest that the moral and ethical bases of life are what determine our choices and sense of responsibility and become the vital focus of freedom. Freedom is then a conflict between the sense of responsibility of the social and moral needs."
| |
|
A Question of Responsibility: Freedom and Determinism, 2002.
A look at the function of ethics in the debate between freedom and determinism.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 3 sources, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay will argue that the debate between freedom and determinism is not a moot or abstract philosophical argument but is, rather, a profoundly practical question given that, at its core, it deals with the attribution of moral responsibility for action. As will be seen, although thinkers who reflect on this question often resort to complex thought problems, in the end the debate invariably returns to the issue of whether individuals can be considered morally responsible for their actions.
| |
|
"Ethics" - Aristotle on Personal Responsibility, 1990.
Review of Aristotle's "Ethics" with an emphasis on personal responsibility and moral culpability.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 1 source, $ 23.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"In the Nichomachean Ethics, Aristotle carefully considers the issue of responsibility and finds that the human being is indeed responsible for his or her actions and may be morally culpable even for unintended consequences. This applies both to the private conduct of individuals and to the conduct of legislators acting for the public good. For Aristotle, acting unjustly is tantamount to wishing to act unjustly. The individual is responsible both for his or her moral disposition and also for the manner in which moral questions are decided by him or her. Indeed, this is seen as a natural process so that the individual is born with the ability to differentiate between good and evil. For Aristotle, it does not matter whether the individual is born capable of differentiating good from evil or that this is ingrained by society over time as the individual grows."
| |
|
Alternative Possibilities in Frankfurt, 2008.
A review of the arguments within Henry Frankfurt's essay, "Alternative Possibilities and Moral Responsibility".
1,072 words (approx. 4.3 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses Henry Frankfurt's essay, "Alternative Possibilities and Moral Responsibility". It describes his argument regarding free will and moral responsibility and discusses the premise that his argument rests upon. The paper then presents the primary criticism of Frankfurt's essay, as well as the writer's personal view on his essay's arguments.
From the Paper
"Yet, Frankfurt quickly refutes the concept that states the lack of choice absolves the committing individual from moral responsibility by pointing out that regardless of consequences, such a threat in itself relies on the presence of a choice. The fact, when one party threatens another with retribution unless a certain act is committed, the targeted party or individual is given a choice, however difficult, that must be made. The only moral equivalency is in the degree of morality of the individual in question. That is, a person who is absolutely moral would not condign to commit an immoral act regardless of the consequences. Therefore, since every one is considered to have differing degree of moral tolerance, some individuals simply would not compromise their morals and thus their values while others would, according to the degree of their pain aversion, commit the immoral act. But regardless of the circumstance, each individual must make a clear decision in which they are offered the choice to either commit the immoral act or not commit the act."
| |
|
Responsibility, 2007.
This paper discusses vocational and ethical responsibility as portrayed in the movies.
2,213 words (approx. 8.9 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 68.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer discusses ethical responsibilities in the workplace and examines how this subject is portrayed in various films. For this purpose, the writer studies the following movies: "Broadway Danny Rose", "The Conversation", "The Hospital" and "Things Change" . The writer points out that if one does not strive to live according to one's personal sense of morality, then one is likely to be haunted by one's own sense of moral inferiority. The writer concludes that "Broadway Danny Rose" and "Things Change" show that taking on more responsibility than one can handle might be dangerous, but the humor of the first film and the compassion of the second film in comparison with the brutal misery of the lives of the characters of "The Conversation" and "The Hospital," make the risks of Danny and Jerry seem like blessings in comparison.
From the Paper
"The Conversation" as directed by Francis Ford Coppola, depicts a man who might not seem to be a conventionally responsible individual even in his personal life. Harry Caul has no family ties. He lives entirely alone, in a small apartment in a city where he seems to know no one other than the persons he works for as a spy. Yet despite the potentially immoral nature of occupation, that a professional surveillance expert, Harry becomes haunted by a sense of moral responsibility for the consequences of listening to other person's conversations."
"The film begins after Harry has left the East Coast because his wiretapping caused the death of three people. Although Harry was just doing his job, and did not want to hurt these people, these individuals died as an unintended consequence of Harry's actions. Harry cannot even bear to confess the action to a priest, even though his evident loneliness conveyed by the starkness of his dwelling-place and his monotonous routine makes him seem haunted by guilt in the eyes of the viewer."
| |
|
Corporate Social Responsibility, 2007.
An examination of social responsibility of the corporate world.
1,826 words (approx. 7.3 pages), 9 sources, MLA, $ 58.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines corporate social responsibility. The paper explains that this is a term used to describe the way a corporation operates in regard to the community and environment in which it resides and the ethical and moral standards in which it conducts business. The paper looks at how corporate social responsibility is quickly becoming an increasingly important issue as consumers are holding corporations progressively more accountable for their methods of business practices and operations. The paper then discuses how in today's current global economy, corporations can no longer operate on the level of autonomy that was once common, and how this is evident in the increasing decentralization of the traditional corporate hierarchy that is becoming more common in corporations across the nation. In conclusion, the paper shows that companies must evolve with time and generational changes in order to maintain success and long-term profitability.
From the Paper
"Regardless of these positive aspects of Costlos' corporate environment, the net losses posted for the last two quarters denotes a need for fiscal policy and business model change while attempting to maintain its' current level of stakeholder confidence. As the fifth largest retailer in
the United States, Costlo has an inherent responsibility to not only shareholders but to employees', suppliers and the communities in which it operates as well.
"Over the years, the topic of corporate social responsibility has been gaining ground both in popularity and importance. The traditional Friedman or shareholder view of a corporations' only role in social responsibility is to "...use its resources to engage in activities designed to increase its' profits..." (Friedman 1970) in itself may be narrow though it is nonetheless true."
| |
|
Corporate Social Responsibility, 2007.
This paper examines the moral and ethical obligations faced by companies to make contributions to charitable organizations.
1,496 words (approx. 6.0 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 49.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper explores whether successful corporations have a moral and ethical duty to make charitable contributions. The paper offers three reasons why honoring such obligations is both necessary and even beneficial for the company. The paper brings the argument that corporate social responsibility detracts from the wealth of companies and so shareholders are disadvantaged as a result. The paper explores the ongoing debate and is of the opinion that it is in the long-term interest of both companies, shareholders and stakeholders to honor corporate social responsibility.
From the Paper
"In determining the moral duties and obligations of a successful business establishment, it is important to first define the concept of morality, both as it is understood in society and how it is understood in dictionary terms. Morals for example refer to standards of conduct in terms of society as a whole. These standards relate very much to the social concept of the good/bad dichotomy at any given moment in history. Hence, the concept of good, moral conduct today is the product of centuries of moral human evolution. In addition to social standards, good, moral conduct may also be driven by the demands of the individual's conscience and the individual sense of right or wrong. In short, moral principles are based upon the inner, psychological sense of obligation, right or wrong, and standard of conduct in terms of best benefiting both the individual and the social circle within which the individual lives."
| |
|
Johnson & Johnson: Social Responsibility, 2007.
Examines how the Johnson & Johnson company can be considered a model of corporate social responsibility.
6,050 words (approx. 24.2 pages), 15 sources, MLA, $ 143.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper argues that Johnson & Johnson is a prime example of a company directed by "virtue ethics." As evidenced by the Tylenol crises, J&J executives do not resort to a moral calculus (Utilitarianism) or a deontological (rule-based) method of ethical decision making (Kant). The paper evaluates the company in terms of corporate control devices, stakeholder theory, the CSR pyramid, Kohlberg's theory of moral development and ethical theory.
Outline:
Introduction
Company History
The Tylenol Crisis
The Evaluation
References
From the Paper
"When all was said and done the recall of Tylenol* alone cost Johnson & Johnson over $100 million. Prior to the crisis, Tylenol held a 37% market share, outselling its four nearest competitors combined. Within weeks after the crisis its market share had dropped to 7%. When asked about the future of Tylenol, Madison Avenue guru Jerry Della Femina told a New York Times reporter "I don't think they (J&J) can ever sell another product under that name.""
| |
|
Media Ethics and Responsibility, 2006.
A discussion on the moral and ethical standards that media and their affiliates are expected to uphold.
2,250 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 6 sources, $ 89.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the role and responsibility of the media, specifically addressing bias, adequate media coverage, and the protection of victims from media scrutiny. It also looks at the role of the media consumer in enforcing media responsibility and setting expectations. Entertainment media is also briefly discussed, in terms of the minimal responsibilities is has to the public compared to news media.
From the Paper
"There is no doubt that the media has power and authority in the modern society. People around the globe, at all economic and social levels, consume multiple forms of media daily. For this reason there are expectations from the public that media sources and their affiliates uphold certain standards. This includes ethical, honest, and objective reporting. Different forms of media uphold these standards to varying levels, creating a range of reporting available to consumers. Media for entertainment concerns a much different set of responsibilities than news reporting. Political and business allegiances also affect..."
| |
|
Administrative Responsibility for the 21st Century, 2002.
A study on the process of administering the law in the twenty-first century by comparing the concepts of Joachim Friedrich, Herman Finer and Max Weber.
1,600 words (approx. 6.4 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 52.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper compares the concepts of Joachim Friedrich, Herman Finer and Max Weber on the process of administering the law. The author states a country that is well administrated by quality administrators will have a deep morality instilled in these workers to understand, evaluate and properly execute the laws. It argues that the secret to 21st century administrative responsibility is a true sense of morality that is instituted alongside the very laws of the land.
From the Paper
"However, policies are meaningless without proper administration of those policies. That is why, in the eyes of Joachim Friedrich, Herman Finer and Max Weber, the process of administering the law is actually more crucial than the process of creating it: Implementation is more important than legislation. Indeed, legislation?s primary and initial focus should be to create proper administrative bodies and give them the tools to bring the goals of policy legislation to fruition."
|
|
|
