| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "MICHELANGELO DAVID": |
|
|
Michelangelo?s "David", 2006.
The history of Michelangelo's "David".
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 51.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper explains how the statue of "David" became the symbol of Florentine liberty, and served as an inspiration to every Florentine. The writer explains that Michelangelo's study of human anatomy is evident in the way he created the body of "David". The paper compares Michelangelo's artistic style to other artists of his day. In conclusion, the writer states that the statue of "David" is such a powerful work of art that it could convert a non-believer into a believer by the force of its beauty.
From the Paper
"The beauty of David encompasses not only the superb physical beauty, the lithely strong body and face of a Greek god, but the inner force of a man imbued with supernatural powers that can only be derived from a Supreme Power. It is the inner force the statue of David exudes that captivated the Florentines and inspired them when they so badly needed inspiration. This inner force has made the statue of David a masterpiece for all civilizations, past, present and future. "If Michelangelo would have only created the outward physical beauty that art historians believe embodies that era, the statue of David would still have merit, but this would not have satisfied Michelangelo, who was in pursuit of perfection, as a means to reach his own Creator. Michelangelo worked with energy and passion on David. The statue of David embodies the energy and passion of Michelangelo and also of the man who once ruled the Jews. Michelangelo once said that art was from heaven. If this is so, the statue of David was divinely inspired and as divinely inspired as the boy king of Israel once was."
| |
|
Michelangelo?s ?David?.
This paper is an essay, which discusses the design elements of Michelangelo?s ?David?.
1,240 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 0 sources, $ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that Michelangelo?s sculpture of David is an excellent example of how an artist can combine the principles of design to create a masterpiece: balance, unity, movement, pattern, emphasis, rhythm, and contrast. The author points out that the visual equilibrium of the sculpture, or its balance, is asymmetrical; the statue is shaped with an ?S? curve, which combines the elements of balance and grace. The paper relates that the element of pattern in David reveals Michelangelo?s genius of human anatomy, for example, the veins in David?s right hand.
From the Paper
"Michelangelo also displays an excellent use of contrast in David. David?s hair is wavy and his skin is smooth. Contrast can also be seen in the wrinkles on David?s face, the veins in his hands, and in the texture of his slingshot. The form of the statue also plays with shadows and light, which gives it a realistic feel. In terms of contrast, Michelangelo?s David is true to human form. In addition, Michelangelo was careful not to add too much contrast to David. This could explain why David is not wearing any clothing or shoes. Too much contrast would certainly diminish the physical beauty of man that Michelangelo wished to emphasize. From this viewpoint, it is easy to understand why Michelangelo utilized a very limited amount of contrast in his sculpture."
| |
|
Michelangelo's David, 1991.
This paper studies the creation of the massive statue Michelangelo's David, including stylistic analysis and a consideration of the artist's personality.
2,475 words (approx. 9.9 pages), 5 sources, $ 87.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"In 1504, Michelangelo completed his massive statue known as the David. This work, which is located in Florence, stands more than fourteen feet high. It is a powerful work, and it was responsible for establishing Michelangelo's fame as an artist. The David shows Michelangelo's knowledge of anatomy, as well as his skill in handling such artistic attributes as balance and proportion. In addition, the marble sculpture conveys an image of the human body which is almost superhuman. In this way, the David encompasses the idea of divinity within the human being. This idea was representative of the values which were developing during the Renaissance period. After centuries of Church domination in human affairs, the Renaissance marked a return to the humanistic values of the ancient world. A study of Michelangelo's life and career reveals that the artist's ... "
| |
|
Michelangelo?s "David", 2004.
Analysis of Michelangelo's famous statue of the biblical hero, "David".
1,030 words (approx. 4.1 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses Michelangelo's sculpture, "David", and how it reflects on the artistic and social values of the Italian Renaissance era. The paper explains the value the Renaissance era placed on sculpture and its fascination for classical antiquity, as well as its emphasis on the glory of the human body.
From the Paper
"The sculpture by the Renaissance Italian artist Michelangelo Buonarroti of the Biblical hero ?David? is so famous that statue?s ubiquitous appearance in parody and in actual texts upon the history and aesthetics of art has rendered the work?s appearance a clich? more an a inspiring work of sculpture. However, rather than simply something that is a pre-extant work for the ages, it is important to remember that the work?s construction is the product of a particular period of history, not something that sprung fully-fledged from the mind of Michelangelo."
| |
|
Michelangelo's David, 2002.
This paper is an in-depth look at the life of the artist, Michelangelo Buonarroti.
1,655 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 8 sources, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the life and times of Michelangelo and the influence his works had on the Renaissance. Particular attention is given to the sculptor "David" that was completed in 1501 and became a symbol of the Italian city of Florence. The other artists of the period are also examined and their works are compared to Michelangelo's in order to give us a thorough understanding of the Renaissance period.
From the paper:
"Michelangelo embodied many characteristic qualities of the Renaissance. He was an individualistic and a highly competitive genius. Michelangelo was not afraid to show humanity in its natural state - nakedness; even in front of the Pope and the other religious leaders. Michelangelo portrayed life as it is, even with its troubles. He wanted to express his own artistic ideas. When Michelangelo created his sculpture of David he took in consideration the qualities of the Renaissance as well as his own qualities, which had been shaped by his background."
| |
|
A Reading of David Armstrong and David Lewis, 2002.
Comparison and contrast of the points of view of David Armstrong and David Lewis regarding the question of what exactly is the mind.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 2 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay compares and contrasts the points of view of Armstrong and Lewis on the centuries-old debate regarding the question of what exactly is the mind, and the degree to which mental states are identical with brain states.
| |
|
"Prophets In The Dark" ( David Kearns and David Nadler ), 1995.
Reviews this work by Xerox Corporation's CEO on the firm's successful transformation in the 1980s.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 1 source, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Introduction
During the 1980s, much of American business focused on improving its quality process in order to better compete with the Japanese. Great attention was paid to issues such as just in time inventory, total quality management and quality circles, and the American quality expert Deming was both hailed and vilified in the press for having introduced fundamental quality concepts to the Japanese some years before. David Kearns was CEO of Xerox Corporation during the 1982 to 1990 period, a time when the company whose name is synonymous with photocopiers faced intense competition not only from American competitors such as IBM and Kodak, but also from the Japanese. During the 1980s, the company undertook a rigorous quality program designed to transform the way the company did business. At the beginning of the 1990s, the ..."
| |
|
Sculptures of David, 2001.
Compares Donatello's bronze "David" & Michelangelo's marble "David." Functions & styles of statues; iconographic choices made by artists.
2,475 words (approx. 9.9 pages), 12 sources, $ 87.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Donatello's bronze David (c. 1430) and Michelangelo's marble David (1504) are, nominally, treatments of the same subject. Yet -- considering the fact that both drew on the same iconographic tradition, were made within seventy-five years of each other, were created in Florence and credited with political meanings, and were important landmarks in the influence of classical art on the Renaissance -- it would be difficult to imagine two sculptures that were more different. A comparison of these two works will demonstrate how the sculptors made iconographic choices suited to the functions of their statues and how each man took a different approach to the integration of the antique into his style."
| |
|
The Two Davids, 2002.
A comparison of Donatello's "David" and Michelangelo's "David".
1,400 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 7 sources, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper will argue - through a comparison of these two works of art - that the physical aesthetics of both sculptures can only be understood in terms of the cultural contexts that produced them. Their significance and that of their respective visions of male beauty, thus requires those who approach them to do so with reference to the specific talents and genius of the men who created them.
| |
|
Greek - Renaissance Art, 2007.
This paper compares and contrasts the sculpture 'Apoxyomenos' by Lysippos with Michelangelo's 'David'.
880 words (approx. 3.5 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer looks at Greek art through the work of sculptor Lysippos and compares it to the Renaissance art of Michelangelo. The writer discusses that the figure of Apoxyomenos clearly served as inspiration for future human sculptures. In comparison, the writer points out that Michelangelo went many steps further to create figures like David which express truly realistic human appearances and emotions. The writer comments that Lysippos clearly revolutionized Greek art by giving to his works a true third dimension. In contrast to Lysippos' Apoxyomenos, Michelangelo's David, perhaps the most astonishing piece of free-standing sculpture ever produced in Western art, truly represents the human form in all its beauty and proportion.
From the Paper
"One was the new canon of proportions which replaced the Polykletian canon and reflects a change in taste noticeable in all other Greek artforms. For this new canon, Lysippos created a slender, supple and tall figure, realized as if moving in true space in three dimensions. Thus, this figure moves in a kind of freeform arena through the space around it and was designed to be viewed from a number of angles.
Also, the arms of this figure curve forward, an indication that the sculptor was attempting to show the athlete reaching and twisting in actual space. The rather small size of the head is thrown into a stronger perspective by the large hand interposed between it and the viewer."
| |
|
Architecture and Sculpture, 2007.
A comparison of function and construction of Michelangelo's sculpture of "David" and the architecture of Chartres' "Cathedral."
1,061 words (approx. 4.2 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper compares two famous works of art - one sculpture and one of architecture. It examines Michelangelo's sculpture of "David" and the architecture of Chartres' "Cathedral." It compares their structure, materials, function, how they were constructed, the type of structure, their purpose and the length of time it took to construct them. The paper also compares them with regard to proportion and their similarities in characteristics of visual and design elements.
From the Paper
"As to function, they provoke the same sentiment: awe. The "David" looks down briefly upon the viewer and one's eyes wander to his hands or arm or slingshot and one marvels at the holiness of God. The same may be said of the cathedral. When one stands in the entrance and views the enormity of the vault, the lights and color of the stained glass windows, and how constructed (Spiro 335), one wants to remain in the atmosphere, All the parts work together to bring about a sensation of holiness and awe. The central nave is in the shape of a cross, with the top of the cross at the altar and the two arms stretched out on either side. The cathedral was assembled from millions of stones, which were then laid, or installed on the site where it was needed. The "David" material (a large piece of marble and a slingshot in his hand,) is simply a single piece of marble."
| |
|
Michelangelo and Da Vinci, 2006.
A review of Michelangelo Buonarroti's sculpture, "David" and Leonardo Da Vinci's painting, the "Mona Lisa".
943 words (approx. 3.8 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 33.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses and analyzes the art of Michelangelo Buonarroti and Leonardo da Vinci. Specifically, it focuses on Michelangelo's sculpture "David", and Da Vinci's painting the "Mona Lisa". According to the paper, studying these two masterpieces can give a true understanding of artistic components and great technique.
From the Paper
"It is clear by the time Michelangelo created this work (from 1501 to 1504) he had honed his craft. The piece is extremely well crafted, showing a good understanding of the human form and physique. David is an ideal man, with a pleasing form, just the right amount of musculature, and kind, youthful features. Michelangelo is adept at communicating his ideas through his work, and David is no exception. The figure exudes strength, but youthful insecurity as well, along with grace and natural beauty. As one art critic notes, "The result looks natural, a unified pose rather than an accumulation of observed details. It is, however, an artifact, a simulation of nature" (Hibbard, 1985, p. 56). Michelangelo's work is just as memorable as Da Vinci's is, because both men combine many artistic elements in their works to make them seem real and alive to the viewer. "
| |
|
The Davids, 2002.
A paper which studies and compares the two Davids of the Renaissance period, by sculptors Michelangelo and Donatello.
1,550 words (approx. 6.2 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 50.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper shows how beginning around the early 15th century, the Italian Renaissance (1420-1600) was a culmination of Italy?s ?rebirth? within their culture ? which included artistic focus and style. The writer of the paper examines two of the most influential sculptors of their Renaissance times - Donatello, and Michelangelo. He shows how both sculptors were commissioned to create their interpretation of the Biblical David. While the two share some similarities, both pieces are strikingly different from the medium in which they were sculpted to the artist?s use of realism. The paper discusses the Renaissance period as a background to these works of art.
From the Paper
"Michelangelo?s David also follows the Renaissance style of increased realism, humanism and return to Greco-Roman traditions. His sculpture came during the time period labeled ?High Renaissance?, which was the later period of the Renaissance. Michelangelo was given a thirteen and a half foot block of marble to sculpt David out of, which interestingly had been hacked on by another artist already! In essence, the block was used ? a remnant of sorts. (Bloem) From this enormous block of marble came one of the most famous and breathtaking sculptures of all time. David, unlike Donatello?s interpretation, is seen before the fight with Goliath. His body is poised, ready for the fight. The anatomical detail is superb on this sculpture. As the Renaissance went from the Early period to the High period, the artists paid even more attention to detail in anatomy, which is reflected by Michelangelo?s David."
| |
|
David Copperfield, 2002.
Character analysis of David from the novel "David Copperfield".
1,900 words (approx. 7.6 pages), 4 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is a character analysis of the main traits of David Copperfield. The most important feature of David is that he is Dickens' novelist, and his character is examined in light of that.
| |
|
The Life and Works of Michelangelo, 2002.
The life and work of the Renaissance artist, Michelangelo Buonarroti, and the technique and significance of his works.
1,868 words (approx. 7.5 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 59.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is primarily a biographical report of Michelangelo's almost 90-year-long life from his grim childhood to the early influence of the Medici family to his commission to sculpt the "David" and paint the Sistine Chapel. Also included are photos of his sculptures "Bacchus", "Pieta", "David", "Rondanini Pieta" and his paintings on The Sistine Chapel.
I.Introduction
II.Body
A.Michelangelo?s Early Life
B.Bacchus and Pieta
C.David
D.The Sistine Chapel Ceiling
E.The Tomb of Julius II
F.The Medici Tombs
G.The Last Judgment
H.Michelangelo?s Final Years
III.Conclusion
From the Paper
"One of the greatest artists of all time, a man whose name has become synonymous with the word "masterpiece", is Michelangelo Buonarroti. As an artist he was nearly unmatched; the creator of works of true beauty that express the full extent of the human condition. Yet, in a world where art flourished only with patronage, Michelangelo was caught between the conflicting powers and whims of the Medici family in Florence, and the Papacy in Rome. Unlike many artists of his time, his genius was recognized, but at a seemingly great cost to his personal life."
|
|
|
