| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "MEDIA POLITICS": |
|
|
Media and Politics in America, 2002.
A look at the influence of the media on politics in America.
2,400 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 5 sources, $ 89.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the negative and positive influences of the media on US political culture. It addresses both current concerns about media accuracy in even reporting and the undeniably militant slant of the mainstream media, as well as the importance of a media system independent of the government, and how important our media's freedoms are to the survival of our democracy.
| |
|
Media And Politics: Strange Bedfellows, 2002.
A brief look at the role media plays in political campaigns.
1,400 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 2 sources, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents a look at the impact media has on political campaigns. Using a published study that researched this impact the writer of this paper seeks to explore the many avenues that the campaign is affected and how powerfully affected it is.
| |
|
Mass Media and Politics, 2004.
A review and analysis of M. Parenti's book about media and politics, "Inventing Reality".
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 1 source, APA, $ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper introduces, discusses and analyzes M. Parenti's book, "Inventing Reality". The paper explains that the book is about the impact of major American corporate print and broadcast organizations on the political process, and the impact of politicians on the media.
From the Paper
In "Inventing Reality", Parenti analyzes the impact that the news media, specifically the major American corporate print and broadcast organizations, have on the political process as well as the impact that political power holders have on media-organization policy and operations. The fundamental theme is that the news media make a project of either distorting or censoring information for the purpose of serving both corporate and entrenched political interests. Why that is significant goes to Parenti's observation that the media cultivate an image of objectivity, comprehensiveness and truth..."
| |
|
The Media and Politics, 2002.
An overview of the media portrayal of government and politics.
1,272 words (approx. 5.1 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 43.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to introduce the topic of the media in politics. Specifically, it discusses why the media pay more attention to national than state and local politics and whether the media fairly portrays the government. It looks at how the media today is a huge conglomerate made up of television news and talk shows, radio news and talk shows, and a vast array of print and online media, which all affect how Americans view and interpret the daily news. As such, the media portray only what is entertaining and will keep the American public interested without changing the channel or turning the page. It shows how it tends to cover more national events, which will hold a wider audience, and tend to portray government and politics in negative and even reactionary terms.
From the Paper
"Media is so pervasive in our society; it can actually change the perception of the people, and swing the balance of power from one political cause to another. As one political media expert noted, "The press, as Walter Lippmann noted, has power partly because it can act as 'the beam of a searchlight that moves restlessly about, bringing one episode and then another out of darkness into vision'" (Seib, 2000, p. 60). For example, at the end of the Gulf War in 1991, the Bush Administration effectively swept the Kurds in Northern Iraq "under the rug," and ignored their situation, which was tenuous with Saddam Hussein's regime. However, after the media continually reported on the Kurd's plight, including live reports from their miserable refugee camps near the Turkish border."
| |
|
Media Owners and the Political Marketplace, 2004.
This paper discusses the economic relationship of media owners to the political marketplace consisting of government, politicians, and citizens.
1,375 words (approx. 5.5 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that the political/governmental complex ensures the press will cast it in a favorable light through interlocking spheres of influence; economically, the press needs the government as it once needed the citizenry. The author points out that high-powered and celebrity journalists are the current go-betweens for the political powers and the market. The paper concludes that if the media owners put public service above profits, and if the political marketplace were not a single-product company, profits might happen both for the owners and for the stakeholders in the political process.
Table of Contents
The Situation Today
Good Old Days
Back to the Future
From the Paper
"By the time of the Civil War, the relationship between the politicians, the press and the populace had begun to change, and again, economics was the crux. Mainstream political interests were motivated to suppress anti-slavery publications. For economic reason, it was important for both Northern Whigs and Northern Democrats to demonstrate to their Southern copartisans that they were not harboring those opposed to slavery. And, since getting elected required appealing to all parts of the nation, as now, it was necessary for politicians to pander to political sensitivities of influential regions out of proportion to numbers of voters found there."
| |
|
Media & Political Parties, 1996.
History of news media & TV coverage of U.S. politics, debates, campaigns, bias, equal access, advertising.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 6 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The media in the time of the writing of the Constitution was a much smaller and more timid institution. Today, the media has become dominated by the electronic media, and especially by television, which has become powerful in ways not envisioned by the Founding Fathers. Television has become the conduit of choice for political candidates, and this has altered the style of the political debate, leading to the sound-bites and attack ads that have been so criticized in recent years. Television did not set out to shape the political debate and did not intend to cheapen that debate as seems to have occurred. It might be argued that the media lacks power because it does not seem to be in control of the capabilities it wields, but those capabilities are themselves considerable and have had a massive influence on how Americans conduct themselves in elections and between..."
| |
|
Media in the Political World, 2001.
3,670 words (approx. 14.7 pages), 8 sources, $ 101.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This research paper discusses how, why and when TV caught on with the political world, and why people choose the media as an alternative source of information to politics. The author also talks about a few infamous TV ads and debates that set a precedent in American politics and examines the ongoing debate over negative political advertising.
From the Paper
"Since the inception of free media back in the very first days of our country, politicians quickly learned that they would need to learn on how to use the media to their advantage. When major newspaper companies surfaced in every major city, politicians realized that they would have to place advertisements in all of the major newspapers to be a serious candidate in an election. Newspapers were the first dominant source of political advertisements. After newspapers, radio took over as the dominant source, and finally TV. Radio caught on quick, but it was not as effective as TV soon proved to be."
| |
|
The Influence of Mass Media on Political Decisions, 2006.
Examines the role that the mass media has on the general public's decision to vote.
2,197 words (approx. 8.8 pages), 10 sources, MLA, $ 68.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines mass media coverage of election campaigns and, in particular, Presidential election campaigns and looks at the influence the mass media has on voters' decisions. The paper contends that, when it comes to election campaigns, presidential candidates concentrate their mass media efforts on assuring that members of their party get out and vote, on trying to get members of an opposing party to switch to the candidate of the other party and on trying to capture the independent voter.
From the Paper
"We will examine two political decisions in America- the decision to run for office, namely the Presidency, and- connected to that decision, the decision to vote by the general public. In both cases, the mass media- especially television, holds the key. The mass media today contradict the notion that America is a nation of free, and independent thinkers. It is unfortunately true that 250+ million Americans are, for the most part, not only uninterested, but uniformed about the democratic processes that their ancestors fought and died to preserve. Rather than keeping up with current events, especially now in an election year, at best people tune in for 30-second sound bites on the nightly news (whose ratings are slipping year after year). The fault- for the most part- may lie with the media."
| |
|
Politics and the Media, 2004.
This paper provides an analysis of politics and the media.
678 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 23.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article the writer examines the relationship between politics and the media. The writer discusses the influence that the media in the United States has on elections and on politics in general. The writer focuses on how the media helps to construct the publics views on politics.
From the Paper
"Most Americans gets their information about election campaigns through the news media. Consequently the news media play an important part on how Americans form their views of politics. Traditionally the news media and the American people believed that the news reporter's role was to report the news and to offer contextual analysis of the news to help the viewer understand the relative significance of the events, reported Froomkin. An important part of this role included questioning the people who were making the news about ... "
| |
|
Political Humor in Politics, 2002.
The paper looks at the role played by political humor in providing both political information and comic relief.
936 words (approx. 3.7 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 33.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses the different forms of political humor available and the range of media now available, from newspaper cartoons to digital clips sent by e-mail. The paper examines how political humor has become an increasingly influential force in the American political scene, with high profile politicians, such as the President, often becoming the main target of jokes. The paper portrays such humor as a useful tool in keeping citizens lighthearted in tense situations.
From the Paper
"In the United States, political humor has become a very popular entertaining form of entertainment, and is used as a way to make light of political situations and poke fun at the politicians that have been elected and are in the national spotlight. Political humor has been in newspapers and other forms of mass media since the elections of some of the first politicians. However, unlike the comedians of the French Revolution Era, political humorists today will not be beheaded for making jokes about the president."
| |
|
Media Coverage of Third Party Political Candidates, 2002.
This paper discusses the poor showing of third parties in American politics may be because of lack of media coverage and uses the New York gubernatorial race as an example.
2,295 words (approx. 9.2 pages), 3 sources, $ 70.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the question of whether Tom Golisano, running as a third-party candidate for governor of New York in the past mid-term elections, received an appropriate degree of coverage in the region?s newspapers.The author counted the number of newspaper articles per candidate. The author concludes that, because of the relatively limited impact of third-party candidates, the amount of coverage that Golisano received was fair and appropriate.
From the Paper
"One of the important questions in American politics is why the two parties have so much power, in contrast to many nations in which numerous political parties are represented both in the government and in the national public political debate. One of the major differences between countries with two parties and those with a variety of political parties is, of course, the difference between a parliamentary system of government and our own, which does not encourage power sharing amongst different parties."
| |
|
Political Campaigns, 2002.
The use of mass media in political campaigns.
3,400 words (approx. 13.6 pages), 7 sources, $ 124.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the influence of mass media on the way political campaigns are run.
| |
|
Advertising in Politics, 2005.
Examines the way politics is advertised in the media and how individuals must use their best judgement.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 4 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Advertising in politics has changed very little over hundreds of years in terms of content although it has evolved dramatically in form with the advent of television. The paper shows that common ploys used by political advertisers appeal to the irrational emotional aspect of an individual priming stereotypes and with the advent of television, powerful visual grammar that sends messages more vividly. The paper argues that to counteract these ploys, an individual must become actively involved in critiquing the advertisements and exercise due diligence in selecting political candidates based on facts.
From the Paper
"The most recent elections concluded in November 2004 is a vivid example of advertising in politics. From the alleged revelation of George W. Bush's military records to the Swift Boat veterans' advertisement against presidential candidate John Kerry, it is hard to deny their influence in shaping the overall outcome of the elections. How are these advertisements so effective in rallying or turning away voters and swaying undecided ones? Advertising in politics has taken its familiar form over the course of hundreds of years. It is not surprising that even before the advent of television the same tactics have been used to appeal to the most basal of human prejudices quite effectively. It was not a matter of presenting the absolute truth that was a politician's strength, but rather how he projected himself in contrast to his opponents."
| |
|
Intersections Between Climate Science and Politics, 2008.
A discussion of the global warming debate between science and politics.
2,184 words (approx. 8.7 pages), 10 sources, APA, $ 68.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the basic evidence of scientific consensus on the issue of climate change and reports on the science and facts behind that consensus. The paper explains that it is quite evident, after even a cursory examination of this information, that global warming is a real phenomenon with human beings as the primary causative factor. The paper looks at the politicization of the science of global warming in order to demonstrate how actors within politics and the media, especially in the United States, have consistently manipulated scientific data and language, and deceived the public into believing there is actually a scientific debate regarding global warming. The paper then points out that climate change is no longer being ignored in policy forums and debates, and a significant political shift in the United States is already occurring. In conclusion, the paper shows that today, the reality of global warming is becoming more accepted and the new question is what can be done about it, and this is a promising development for the future of intersections between climate science and politics.
From the Paper
"When it comes to the issue of climate change, the media and science aren't exactly on the best of terms. Climate change, especially in the United States, is a major political issue argued with fervor and passion from both sides of the apparent debate. What is so intriguing about this political furor is the fact that the scientific community has largely come to a resounding consensus that not only is global warming real, but also that it is largely anthropogenic in origin."
| |
|
Sexual Politics in Film, 2007.
An analysis of the theme of sexual politics in the movies "Pulp Fiction" and "Swept Away".
1,354 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how media is particularly dependent on sexual politics as a thematic representation and as a guiding force for human emotion and how this is particularly true with regard to dramatic representations in film. It focuses on two movies, which pay particularly close attention to sexual politics, "Swept Away" (the original 1974 and the newer 2002 versions) and "Pulp Fiction". It looks at how "Swept Away" pays particular interest to social class with an emphasis on sadomasochism and how "Pulp Fiction" deals with the inner workings of the sexual politics in a complicated subculture of sex, drugs and crime.
From the Paper
"The cinematography and setting of Swept Away in both film versions detail the loneliness of man in a world where individuals and whole societies express love and longing through materialism and end courting with violent and absurd expressions of pain and pleasure. The film, is similar in tenor to Nine 1/2 Weeks (1986) another cult classic film dedicated to the idea of sexual politics driving personal relationships and leading to not real love but love that is expressed through dominance and possession as well as objectified bodies. "
|
|
|
