| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "MEDIA BIAS PALESTINE ISRAEL": |
|
|
The Media Bias Towards Palestine and Israel, 2002.
This paper addresses the bias that has long existed in the American news media concerning the treatment of the countries of Palestine and Israel.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 7 sources, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper addresses the bias that has long existed in the American news media concerning the treatment of the countries of Palestine and Israel according to recent events in the Middle East.
| |
|
Media Bias and the Crisis Between Palestine and Israel, 2002.
Examines five different articles on the Middle East Crisis in an effort to demonstrate how media bias influences reporting and news sources.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 5 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The conflict between Palestine and Israel has created an interesting study of the media within the past decade, where the reporting of the conflict demonstrates the presence of favoritism in many respects. Through examining five articles on mass communications referring to Palestine and Israel, this paper demonstrates how the presence of a media bias impacts reporting and news sources.
| |
|
Palestine and Israel: The Final Step Towards Peace, 2001.
This paper examines the final status negotiations between Palestine and Israel under the Oslo peace agreement.
1,620 words (approx. 6.5 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 52.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper debates the book "Compromising Palestine: A Guide to the Final Status Negotiations" by Aharon Klieman and examines the options of both nations, Palestine and Israel. This paper illustrates the major issues of the ongoing conflict and the fundamental problems of territories, religious sites, and refugees.
From the Paper
"Kleiman wrote that partition was a necessary evil while Mearsheimer suggests that in no way will the Palestine people ever agree to a partition on the terms that are being offered. The paradox of partition continues even after 50 years and it becomes a race to see which side will win the race. Is partition necessary as Kleiman suggests or is Mearsheimer correct when he claims that the 50 year old history between the two nations will not allow the concept of partition being accepted. In order to understand the dynamics we must under take a analysis of the history of the two nations. While analyzing the concept of partition Kleiman studied the history of the Palestine - Israel conflict. He realized that fifty years ago the Palestinians, and the Arabs, rejected resolution 181 calling for the establishment of two independent states in Palestine. The resolution also made Jerusalem a city under international administration and marked its borders. While the Arabs rejected the offer, the Jews accepted it. Thirty-three countries, including the then Soviet Union and the United States, voted for the resolution while 13 voted against and 10 abstained."
| |
|
The Conflict Between Palestine and Israel, 2002.
Explores many of the relevant historical and contemporary factors contributing to the present state of conflict between Israel and Palestine.
1,900 words (approx. 7.6 pages), 5 sources, $ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The current situation in the Middle East is one of conflict, but nowhere is the conflict more consolidated than between Palestine and Israel. During the past two years, a state of tension that has existed for centuries has erupted in new violence, and the conflict that has manifest therein is only becoming worse. In the quest to better prevent future damage, it is absolutely necessary both to explore the history that has created the conflict and to examine its current state. This paper explores the numerous factors that have contributed to the present state of the conflict between Palestine and Israel in order to assess the potential future therein.
| |
|
The Conflict Between Palestine and Israel, 2001.
The history and current manifestation of the ongoing aggressions between Israelis and Palestinians.
2,205 words (approx. 8.8 pages), 6 sources, $ 68.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the historical background of the conflict in the Middle East between Palestine and Israel, and notes that while this conflict is promoted in the media as being a relatively ?new? phenomenon that it is actually another stage in an ongoing conflict between these two peoples. Factors that are addressed as contributing to this conflict are those of religion and politics. There is a strong slant towards the Palestinians being unjustly vilified in the media. There is a brief mention of Osama bin Laden and his involvement in the conflict.
From the Paper
"The recent hostilities between the Palestinian and the Israeli people is a negative note in what had seemed to be progress in ending the ongoing conflict between these separate people. Prior to the events of violence that were started once more in the spring of last year, the Palestinian and the Israeli people were apparently working towards a position of peace in the Middle East. However, this was not to be. The existing social tensions between the Palestinian and the Israeli people was too deeply rooted within their histories and cultures to provide a simple solution, which the negotiations that were prevalent at the time were attempting to achieve. "
| |
|
Palestine and Israel, 2001.
The following essay examines the reasons and proposed solutions to the ending of violence in the Israeli - Palestinian conflict in the Middle East.
1,250 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper contends that the ultimate conflict resolution in the Middle East, will only come about when both sides accept the pragmatism of partition. The author claims that as long as Israeli or Palestinian groups continue to claim the whole of the territory, undivided, there will be no end to the violence.
From the Paper
?John Mearsheimer in his essay The Impossible Partition, argues that partition as a solution to the Israeli-Palestine conflict has no chance ?because Israel cannot be secure alongside a securely independent Palestine state? and Palestine cannot be expected to accept a sort of limited statehood that would satisfy Israeli security concerns. While in Compromising Palestine, Kliemans? guarded but nevertheless more hopeful belief is that ?Partition Plus? is the only realistic solution because it enables both sides to: achieve distinct political identities, reach moderate security guarantees while it recognizes that absolute security is chimera, and continue to cooperate in some areas.?
| |
|
The Israel-Palestine Conflict, 2004.
An overview of the history of the Israel-Palestine conflict and a potential solution.
1,394 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 46.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how the core of the Israel-Palestine conflict is the State of Israel,created when, in 1947, UN decided to split Palestine into two separate Arab and Jewish states. It discusses how the countries have since not seen peace, how there is constant conflict, and how Palestinians have waged a never-ending war with Israel and vice versa. It analyzes how the countries are now interlinked due to this major conflict, and all efforts of bringing peace to this region have failed. The author proposes a potential two-state solution to the problem similar to the one implemented in India and Pakistan.
From the Paper
"Peace talks which had been going on for several years led to the historic agreements between Israel and the PLO led by Yasser Arafat, in Sept. 1993. The Palestine Liberation Organization agreed to the existence of Israel while Israel recognized PLO as the Palestinians' representative. The two later signed an agreement on September 13 which allowed limited Palestinian self-rule and the West Bank and Gaza. (Heilbrunn, 1995) The country in a bid to achieve more political stability in the region signed an agreement with Jordan in 1994, which brought an end to the 46-years of war and conflict between the two states. On October 26, that year a formal peace treaty was signed."
| |
|
Israel and Palestine, 2007.
This paper describes the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians in a historical context.
1,441 words (approx. 5.8 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper argues that to understand the suggested two-state solution for Israel and the Palestinians, one must first understand the origins of the conflict. An overview of the history is presented from the Palestinian viewpoint. Conditions that the Palestinians side deems necessary for a two-state solution are presented in a list format. The author concludes that the greatest impediment to the two-state solution, however, is trust on both sides.
From the Paper
" In essence the various political events in the region over the past century have created two separate and opposing realities or "narratives". The first is the Israeli narrative of the horror of the Holocaust, coupled with claims to the Holy lands which are seen as being ordained by God to the Jewish people. This has resulted in the occupation of Palestine and the violence, demolition of houses etc. More importantly it leads to what is perceived as the denial of Palestinian autonomy and a reduction of a sense of dignity and the very right to their narrative or political history."
| |
|
Political Change for Israel and Palestine, 2001.
This paper examines the evolution of the Palestinian Liberation Front (PLO).
3,120 words (approx. 12.5 pages), 7 sources, $ 90.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This research paper evaluates the evolution of the PLO and how it has cultivated political change in the Middle East. Subtitles includes: the how and why of the PLO, the PLO, a displaced Palestinian State, PLO leadership and changing ideologies.
From the Paper
"In the historical arena of time, the roots of the Palestine Liberation Organization are shallow. Time has witnessed the birth of Israel bringing political changes that affect the plight of the Palestinians. The evolution of the PLO in the Middle East has also cultivated political change. Many of these changes are currently being addressed in the international community. The Middle East, since World War II, has been a political hot bed of transformation implanted in the cultural and religious ideologies of Jews against Arabs drawn into the political field of Palestinians against Israelis."
| |
|
Media in the Middle East, 2002.
Examines media bias in mass reporting on the crisis between Palestine and Israel.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 9 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In the crisis between Israel and Palestine, two key themes seem to require exploration: Methods or processes and goals. How do the methods of the Israelis and Palestinians and their objectives compare and what does their portrayal in the media reveal about the conflict and more importantly, mass media and communication.
| |
|
The Entry of the People of Israel Into the Land of Israel, 2002.
An analysis of the theories behind the Settlement of the People of Israel.
945 words (approx. 3.8 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 33.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The following paper discusses four different theories for explaining the entry of the people of Israel into the land of Israel, as seen by Callaway: Military incursion, gradual infiltration, peasant uprising and a composite view.
From the Paper
"In the period c. 1200 BCE, we find the shift from Late Bronze II to Iron I. The presence of iron tools allowed farmers (pioneers) to dig cisterns and engage in terrace-style farming. The book of Joshua argues for the total conquest of the land, by a unified force of Israelites. But, in places (Josh. 9, 13.13) it appears that the conquest was not total. The book of Judges suggests that the land was shared with the Canaanites and then the people attempted to conquer it. In this book, the conquest appears to be incomplete. (Judges 1.19-28, etc.). Archaeological evidence suggests that after 1560 BCE Jericho was no longer occupied."
| |
|
Palestine History, 2003.
An exploration of the history of the region known as Canaan, Palestine, and Israel.
2,354 words (approx. 9.4 pages), 14 sources, MLA, $ 72.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper attempts to track the history of the Palestinian people. It begins with early biblical times and progresses through the Middle Ages to modern times. It explores the cultural and social development of this nation and discusses the current political situation in the region today.
From the Paper
"Palestine?s location between Egypt and southwest Asia has made it a center of conflict for thousands of years (Le Gall 1). Palestine is not an ordinary place, with an almost mythological territory saturated with religious ideology and endowed with overwhelming cultural significance, Palestine has been weighed down with historical as well as political meanings for many generations, people, and traditions (Said 1). Palestine?s position between the center of routes linking three continents, made it the meeting place for religious and cultural influences from Egypt, Syria, Mesopotamia, and Asia Minor. This region, also known as the Holy Land, is held sacred among Jews, Christians, and Muslims (Britannica 1). DeHass stated that three world religions sprang from ideas and hopes nurtured on its hills and in its valleys and that within its borders at least three attempts have been made to found universal religions (1)."
| |
|
Jews in Palestine From 1000 BC To 1900 AD, 1992.
An argument that Israel has the historical right to be in Palestine including politics, biblical aspects and social evolution.
2,250 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 8 sources, $ 79.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The "settlement issue" -- the existence of Jewish settlements in the West Bank and Gaza, those parts of "historic Palestine" that came under Israeli control after the 1967 war -has in recent years become one of the most contentious issues facing would-be peacemakers in the Middle East. Many observers see the settlements as the principal obstacle lying in the way of some convenient territorial compromise that would create a Palestinian state or "entity." They have become the emotional center of anti-Israeli rhetoric on the part.of Arabs and their sympathizers. The United States has, at various times, damned the settlements as illegal, or at least as "an obstacle to peace." The government of Israel, on the other hand, claims a right to establish such settlements not only for reasons of short-term security, but on the grounds of a historic right of..."
| |
|
One Palestine, Complete: Jews and Arabs under the British Mandate, 2002.
Review of 'One Palestine, Complete' by Tom Segev.
2,400 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 1 source, $ 89.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This ten-page senior level paper is on the book 'One Palestine, Complete' by Tom Segev who is a columnist for Ha'aretz, Israel's leading newspaper, and author of two now-classic works on the history of Israel, 1949: The First Israelis and The Seventh Million: The Israelis and the Holocaust. One Palestine Complete: Jews and Arabs under the British Mandate, is a panoramic view of life in Palestine during the three strife-torn but decades when Britain ruled and the seeds of today's conflicts were sown.
| |
|
Globalization and Terrorism: The Case of Palestine, 2005.
Discusses the connection with the American presence in the Middle East and the increase in terrorism, using Palestine as an example.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 2 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper very briefly focuses the relationship between hegemonic globalization and terrorism. In particular, this paper emphasizes Palestine as a land colonized by others with the United States roundly supporting its alleged "client state", Israel. Among other things, the paper draws the link between Gulliver in Lilliput and the clumsy colossus, America, in the Middle East.
From the Paper
"Few modern trends are as disturbing as the proliferation of terrorism in recent years. Since 9/11, the world has come to realize that no one is invulnerable from terrorist attack. This brief paper will examine the relationship between globalization and terrorism by examining the particular case of Palestine. As will soon become apparent, while globalization has brought riches to some, it has created anger, resentment and misery for many more. To begin with, globalization can be seen as a colonizing phenomenon, with powerful western nations imperiously lording over more impecunious lands. As Nassar states, "hegemony continues into the twenty-first century under the guise of globalization" (3). His conception of globalization then, is that it is imperialism under another banner. In the particular case of Palestine, anger and resentment arose out of the colonizing of their ancestral land by Zionists (Nasser 41). "
|
|
|
