| Papers [1-15] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "MATTHEW MARK LUKE JOHN": |
|
|
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, 2006.
An overview of the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
1,326 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the stories behind the disciples Matthew, Mark, Luke and John as portrayed in the gospels. It discusses how Matthew was a tax collector before he became a disciple of Jesus and how he gave up everything, how Mark was discovered by Peter, how Luke was believed to be a physician and an evangelist and finally how many believe that John was Jesus' cousin.
From the Paper
"Many historians agree that Luke wrote his for the Greek audience and that the book was written around 60 AD. Halley observes that much of Greek culture revolved around culture, philosophy, and education, Luke to a philosophic approach to writing his book. According to Halley, Luke's Gospel is a completely "orderly, and classical story" (Halley 485). MacArthur adds that in this Gospel, we can see Luke's petition to the Greeks because Luke "usually preferred Greek terminology over Hebraisms" (MacArthur 289). Moreover, it is important to note that Luke reinforces the "universal scope of the gospel invitation" (289). Bryant backs up this notion adding that Luke's Gospel is called a "Gospel of the nations, full of mercy and hope, assured to the world by the love of a suffering Savior" (Bryant 392)."
| |
|
Mark and Luke, 2007.
A comparative analysis of the gospels of Mark and Luke.
1,917 words (approx. 7.7 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 61.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper compares and contrasts the gospels of Mark and Luke in the area of literal rather than allegorical content, through the development of the similarities and differences of the messages. The main focus of the contrast and comparison is the humanity of the messages. It discusses how in Mark many of the key definitive situations that develop the history of the characters of the Bible, such as Mary, Elisabeth, John the Baptist and even Jesus himself are missing, removing the divine from the story, while in Luke these stories are clear. The story of John the Baptist's conception as well as Jesus' conception and birth are two examples of this difference.
From the Paper
" The first and possibly the most profound difference between the gospels of Mark and Luke can be found within the very first pages of the works. They both tell the story of John the Baptist, but Mark begins his life in the work as he is during the late life of Jesus, while Luke introduces John through an introduction to his fantastic family history, in some ways as fantastic as the conception and history of Jesus himself. In Mark nearly the first passage indicates that John has come upon the scene as a man, whole and with no miraculous history, Mark 1:4 John did baptize in the wilderness, and preach the baptism of repentance for the remission of sins. "
| |
|
Gospels of Mark, Matthew & Luke, 1996.
Compares events in Jesus' life covered by three books of New Testament.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 9 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"This research discusses the gospels of Mark, Matthew and Luke. There are four gospels in the New Testament, but only three are addressed here. The focus is on comparing and contrasting the topics covered in the three gospels.
The four gospels begin at different times in the ministry of Jesus Christ, and at different places. While John, which won't be considered here, begins the story of Jesus as God with eternity, Mark begins the story of the servant of God with John the Baptist and Jesus' baptism (1:1-13). Both Matthew and Luke, scholars at heart, begin with Jesus' lineage, a matter of much more importance to the educated person in those days than it is now (Matt. 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38). Matthew, seeking to show Jesus as the Son of David and fulfillment of prophecy, traces him through Joseph to establish his legal possession of the ..."
| |
|
The Gospels of Matthew and Luke, 2005.
This paper discusses the literary and theological devices used to describe the death of Jesus, according to the Gospels of Matthew and Luke.
2,040 words (approx. 8.2 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 64.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that the description of Jesus as the merciful messiah is especially prevalent in the Gospel of Luke, as he emphasizes the power of forgiveness; whereas, Matthew, whose account is deeply rooted in the Old Testament, highlights the wisdom and justice of Jesus's teachings. The author points out that the question of the sources for the Gospels of Luke and Matthew has been debated often, with most scholars leaning towards the two-source hypothesis. A manuscript of Jesus's axioms and sayings, often referred to as the "Q" source, which would have served as a source for both Luke and Matthew or an earlier version of Mark's gospel. The paper relates that the story of the death of Jesus illustrates Jesus's failure to see that the connection between Jesus's and humanity's relationship with God leads to his persecution and subsequent death; however, in his death, mankind finds salvation and the opportunity to once again discover and enter into a covenant with God.
From the Paper
"Jesus as the suffering servant is an overarching theme that is especially characteristic of Matthew's account of the death of Jesus but also found within Luke's gospel. When the Roman soldiers deride Jesus as the "King of the Jews" and give him a mock robe, crown, and in Matthew's gospel a scepter, Jesus suffers just as the real King of the Jews in Psalm 22. The continued mockery by the crowd also fulfills Psalm 22 as it reflects the two charges against Jesus: the threat to destroy the temple and the claim to be the Son of God or Messiah. Even Jesus' last words continue to illustrate the theme of a righteous sufferer, as they are a direct quotation of Psalm 22:1. Furthermore, the rejection of Jesus, who is essentially God's prophet, is done by the entire leadership of Israel, a clear allusion to the prophets of the Old Testament who were similarly persecuted by their own people. Jesus' response to the charges by the Sanhedrin is also remarkably similar to Jeremiah's testimony when he was on trial."l
| |
|
Tthe Gospels of Matthew and Luke, 2002.
An examination of the effect of historical background on an interpretation of the gospels of Matthew and Luke.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 3 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay will argue that understanding the setting of the gospels is of great importance to understanding the Christian message that they are attempting to preserve and spread. This, it may be argued, is due to the fact that the gospels are not purely imaginative literature. Instead, like histories they are engaged with contemporary events and controversies - particularly theological controversies within the early Church - in a very direct way. From this point of view, as the gospels have elements of both the literary and the historical forms of writing, a knowledge of their historical background contributes to our understanding of the texts and their messages.
| |
|
The Synoptic Gospels and the Gospel of John, 2005.
A look at how John's Gospel is different from the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke.
1,172 words (approx. 4.7 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 40.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper shows the differences between the Gospel of John and the three Synoptic Gospels in the Passion Narratives. The paper reviews the writing styles, places, and people of each account.
From the Paper
The Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke are considered the synoptic Gospels, because they follow the same general pattern. John's Gospel, however, is distinguished from the other three in many ways. Though, the most important difference takes place in the events of the Passion Narratives.
| |
|
Different Perspectives of Jesus, 2004.
An examination of how Jesus is depicted in the Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke.
1,358 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper contends that the Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke offer different representations of Jesus that operate together to establish the full character of Jesus. The paper claims that different perspectives of Jesus help us to realize his importance in regards to various topics. For example, Matthew wrote his Gospel with the intention of convincing Jews that Jesus was indeed the Messiah. Mark focuses on Jesus the teacher. Luke shows us a man that was the friend of those who were typically rejected by society. The paper explains that these different portraits blend together to create the magnificence of Jesus.
From the Paper
"Eugene Peterson adds that Matthew begins his Gospel "by setting the local story of Jesus in it world historical context. He makes sure that as we read his account of the birth, life, death, and resurrection of Jesus, we see the connections with everything that has gone before" (Peterson 8). John MacArthur states that Matthew "argues that Christ is the Messiah" (MacArthur Gospel According to Jesus 61) and "describes a series of Jesus' miracles categorically selected to show the range of the Messiah's credentials" (61). Halley points out that "tradition says that Matthew preached in Palestine for some years, and then traveled to other countries; that he wrote his Gospel originally in Hebrew, and some years later, probably about A. D. 60, issued a more complete edition in Greek" (Halley 413). The context of the Gospel helps establish its credibility."
| |
|
The New Testament Gospels, 2000.
An analysis of the similarities and differences between the four synoptic gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke.
2,534 words (approx. 10.1 pages), 2 sources, APA, $ 76.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The following paper analyzes possibilities for why these gospels, that are remarkably and mysteriously alike in a plethora of ways, agree on so many things yet disagree in other ways. The writer examines whether Matthew could have been the source of Mark and Luke's gospels.
From the Paper
"The New Testament is one of the most significant pieces of literature ever written. It is a compilation of the story of and the lessons taught by the most notable religious figure in history: Jesus Christ. Although many use it for guidance in their personal lives and the foundation of their religions, few actually take the time to learn about its origin. When were they written? Who were the writers? What were the sources? Scholars and historians have debated and discussed these questions. The four most acknowledged books in the New Testament are the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. It has often been assumed that these books were written by four men named Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, yet further research has determined that this might not be the case. Of the four Gospels, Matthew, Mark and Luke have the most in common and are therefore are referred to as the ?Synoptic Gospels.? It is unclear why they are so remarkably similar, yet a few hypotheses have been proposed to explain why the three Gospels share so much in common. One of the most fundamental aspects of each of their Gospels is their passion narratives in which curious similarities and differences have been noted."
| |
|
Jesus Compared, 2002.
Discusses how Jesus is presented in the Book of Matthew and then shows how this version differs from the Books of Mark and John.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 2 sources, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In various places in the Book of Matthew Jesus is demonstrated as being different from Jesus in the Books of Mark and John. Comparison of the accounts of Jesus in the Book of Matthew is different than the versions of Mark and John. Who is Jesus in Matthew? Why are the versions of the accounts in Matthew different from either John or Mark? How are they different? What makes the difference between these accounts? Throughout the versions of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John they each see Jesus differently. Each of these versions has been written for a different audience. Each writer has a different version due to his or her own personalities. This essay compares Jesus in Matthew compared to Mark and Luke using specific examples in the Scriptures illustrating their version of Jesus.
| |
|
Origins of the New Testament, 1994.
A comparison of the sources and depictions of Jesus and the characters of the authors of the books of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 10 sources, $ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The New Testament has been one of the most revered collections of manuscripts in the hands of mankind for the last seventeen or eighteen centuries. Yet debates continue to rage over the authenticity and interpretation of many of the books and letters which form the corpus of literature which has, since at least the fourth century, been fixed as we know it today--the canon of the New Testament was established for the Eastern church by consensus by no later than 367 C.E. when "Athanasius' Easter Letter from Alexandria listed solely the twenty-seven books of the New Testament," and the Councils of Hippo (393) and Carthage (397) subsequently canonized the same list (Wright, 106).
According to Hurtado, as scholars attempt to construct what they believe to have been the original texts, "the main aim . . . is to establish a Greek text which is as close as possible to the..."
| |
|
The Christology of the Gospel of John, 2006.
Extensive research and application of the biblical text, the Gospel of John.
2,109 words (approx. 8.4 pages), 9 sources, APA, $ 66.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper encompasses the entire Christology of John's gospel and is a comprehensive analysis and interpretation of the many facets entwined within the gospel's structure. This paper's text mainly focuses upon the issues of authorship surrounding John's gospel, as well as providing a insight into the Christological/theological differences evident between John's Gospel and the three synoptic gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke.
Chapters
Context & Authorship
Comparative Elements of the Canonical Gospels and their Christology's
From the Paper
"In order for one to aptly grasp the full spectrum of information that this research based analysis offers, it is crucial for the reader to understand the title of this work; The Christology of the Gospel of John, and what the words Gospel and Christology truly signify. Gospel, as defined by the Oxford English Dictionary, 'The glad tidings (of the kingdom of God)' announced to the world by Jesus Christ. Hence, the body of religious doctrine taught by Christ and His apostles; the Christian revelation, religion or dispensation (OED). Secondly, the word Christology, as defined by the Oxford English Dictionary, is that part of theology which relates to Christ; a doctrine or theory concerning Christ (OED). With these definitions, it is easy to ascertain the fact that this scholarly text will not be a simple summary and commentary of the gospel of John's accounts of Jesus, but will be a comprehensive analysis and interpretation of the many facets entwined within the gospel's structure. As a result of the six page restraint placed upon this dissertation, the text will mainly focus upon the issues of authorship surrounding John's gospel, as well as providing a special focus on the Christological/Theological differences evident between John's Gospel and the three synoptic gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. This text will take into consideration and incorporate details concerning the context (time/place of composition) of John's Gospel, possible sources contributed in the Gospel's construction, and unique literary features that enable the reader's a better understanding of the Gospel's literary style and technique."
| |
|
Christianity, 2001.
A study of the history of Christianity and the four Gospels of Mathew, Mark, Luke and John.
1,120 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 38.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the teachings of Jesus through the four Gospels of Mathew, Mark, Luke, and John. It illustrates how we can draw conclusions of who he was and what was his message through the Bible. The author states that it is apparent how the Christian church has not always followed the teachings of Jesus and has twisted its words around to justify their actions.
From the Paper
"Christianity is by far one of the most powerful religions in present day, and it has millions of followers. Christianity is based on the New Testament, which explains the life of Jesus Christ the savior. Although there is the Bible to explain the teachings of Jesus, there is actually very little known historically about him. By using the four Gospels of Mathew, Mark, Luke, and John, one can draw conclusions of who Jesus was and what he preached. These four Gospels differ in style and content, for different men wrote them all twenty to forty years after the death of Christ. By reading the Gospel of Mathew, one can learn the stories of Jesus? birth in Bethlehem, to his death on the cross. After reading, it is noticeable that there are many differences between this Gospel, and the ?Christianity that grew up in his name.?
| |
|
Mark 2:13-17, 2005.
This paper is an exegesis of Mark 2:13-17.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 0 sources, $ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that Mark is the second Gospel in the New Testament, the shortest of the four Gospels, and the first to be written. The author points out that this book, which was likely composed between AD 65-70, after Peter and Paul died, was probably written in Rome for a Gentile audience. The paper relates that Mark's Gospel is known as the Gospel of Action because it records the eighteen miracles Christ performed, many of which are also described in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke.
From the Paper
"Mark is the second Gospel in the New Testament, the shortest of the four Gospels, and also the first to be written. The book was likely composed between AD 65-70, after Peter and Paul died. It was probably written in Rome for a Gentile audience. Mark's Gospel is known as the "Gospel of Action" because it records the eighteen miracles Christ performed, many of which are also described in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke. I have selected for exegesis one particular passage, Mark 2:13-17. Within Chapter 2 of Mark, there is no delineation of time, so the events would appear to have occurred on the same day that Jesus forgave and healed the paralytic (2:1-12). This event and the event of 2:12-17 take place in Capernaum while large crowds follow Jesus. Jesus calls Levi, the tax collector, to follow him -- and he does. "
| |
|
"The Gospel of Luke", 2001.
A study of the factors that influenced Luke to write his book the way he did.
1,601 words (approx. 6.4 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 52.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how "The Gospel of Luke" has long been acknowledged as one of the most literary and classical books of the Bible. It examines Luke's gospel for its uniqueness, evident not only in its style, but in its theme, purpose, and several related areas, hinging finally on the character of the man who wrote it. It also looks at the controversy over the date of the actual writing of Luke.
Outline
The Writing of Luke
The Occasion and Purpose of the Work
The Themes of Luke
Luke the Author, the Greek and the Believer
From the Paper
"Luke was written meticulously based on several sources, including discussions with the disciples, study of the book of Q, and interviews with Mary and Joanna that he could have done while travelling with Paul (Riley 1). A number of scholars also maintain that the book is based on Mark?s. One thing is certain?historically, Luke?s writing is an accurate one. It should come as no surprise, then, that the most obvious purpose of the book of Luke is, as the author himself states in the beginning, ?to write an orderly account for you?so that you may know the certainty of the things you have been taught.? The ?you? most immediately refers to the official Theophilus who, as a wealthy citizen, could have been Luke?s benefactor. Luke ?wants Theophilus to know that faith in Jesus rests on historical facts that stand up under the most severe scrutiny, founded as they are on firsthand testimony? (Elwell 101)."
| |
|
Matthew's Letter to Paul, 2002.
This paper is a letter of response from Matthew to Paul, written as if Matthew had discovered Paul's letters to the Galatians.
755 words (approx. 3.0 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay is in the form of a letter from the Apostle Matthew to Paul. The letter cogently outlines Matthew's points of disagreement with Paul on issues of doctrine, practice and adherence to the laws according to the Old Testament.
From the Paper
"Dear Paul,
"I have come upon your letter written to the people of Galatia and I am appalled that you take the laws of the Torah so lightly. You claim that you received a revelation from Jesus Christ and are; therefore, an apostle of Jesus. How then could you have misunderstood the reason for his existence here on earth? You have stated, "A man is not justified by observing the law, but by faith in Jesus Christ" and that "by observing the law no one will be justified." You are preaching this to Gentile Christians, telling them they are not required to obey the Law of Moses. You do this because you believe Jesus came to abolish the Jewish laws, while the opposite is true."
|
|
|
